![]() |
Quote:
Yes investments are better, but what about the people that live off their CD's, they live off the interest that comes from money that's been saved for a long time.They are lucky to get 1.5% on their money. My mother is one of them. She didn't trust wall street with her money, but is now being hurt by low interest rates because she put it in CD's The only real indicator that the economy is getting better is jobs, without more jobs for more people that want to work, the economy forecast is bad |
Quote:
Goldman Sachs is on trial, Obama says he wants their head on a pole. Did you know that they contributed almost a million dollars to his campaign. http://www.opensecrets.org/pres08/co...&cid=n00009638 And Obama want finance reform, I call bullshit |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The leftists want to smear the Tea Party movement by calling them "racists" but it just isn't so.
|
Quote:
The bankers didn't get us in this mess. The politicians on both sides cleared the way for the bankers and now they are sitting their acting like the bankers are the crooks. |
Quote:
|
People are fucking retards! You would think human beings would learn from history but they never do!
|
The spinsters on both sides of the fence will always make it out to be to their advantage in an effort to smear the other side. If you want to see if the economy has improved or not...just look at how real life is. Are people spending more? Are people working more? Are people on welfare more? Are people paying more taxes? Check out your own life...are you at risk of losing your job? Have you lost your job? If you're in any kind of job where the exchange of money is involved, has the trend increased or decreased? If you walk the streets, do you see more or less homeless people? If you're in the market for a house, or looking to sell a house, how's that going? Prices going up or down?
This is such a bullshit one-subject issue that both sides are gonna push around but in reality, the effects of policy have very little effect by themselves. Neither Bush nor Obama are responsible for economic changes, as much as we would like to make them both into scapegoats. The real cause for economic change comes from the select few at the top who control the flow of money. Their actions dictate the economy, not the government's actions. Although the President and Congress can certainly influence the economy, they have no direct control over it. Now, here in PR, things are entirely different. The government CAN and HAS royally raped the economy. Aníbal Acevedo Vilá, the last governor, totally fucked PR by screwing with the tax system...after promising that there would be no service tax instated (the New Progressive Party stated that they WOULD implement it, and the people voted against them for this reason), he went ahead and did it anyways. In the meantime, they decided to do away with the import tax of 6.6%. Prices should have fallen...in fact, many places were advertising that prices would now be 6.6% lower. A total ruse...nothing went down in price, and now there was a new 7% tax stacked on top of the prices people were already paying. Between this and the large number of corruption charges he faced, he was easily defeated by Luis Guillermo Fortuño Burset in 2008. Of course, Fortuño fucked PR further by cutting over 17000 low-level government jobs by lottery. PR needed to reduce its number of government positions, as there was a huge insurgence of "useless" government jobs given to lackey asshats by Sila María Calderón during her reign of terror as governor. But instead of cutting the jobs in high-level positions, where it would have had some kind of effect, they just started cutting low-level positions by lottery, firing teachers, police, etc. at total random. The high-level fat cats in San Juan all still have their jobs untouched and voted themselves yet another raise while thousands of real workers got screwed. The economy here did a nosedive and has yet to recover. |
Quote:
Quote:
I'm sure George Soros and other "lefties" thought those "commie hippies" were freedom fighters and patriots. The only difference, really, is that most of those "lefties" aren't fighting for anarcho-communism or a brand of libertarian-socialism, but rather complete state control. The Tea Party people are more "freedom fighters"... especially if you take out the religious nuts. There are bad apples in the movement.. and the media focuses on them.. know why? Look at this thread - it's got people talking and watching their station(s) more often. I live in the Bible Belt and haven't seen any of these "crazy Tea Baggers".. mostly libertarians who are tired of the bullshit. And to the TS.. Give me any group of 100+ people and I can show you a racist, a gay guy, and maybe even a pedophile. Coincidences are just that... coincidences. :thumbsup Don't believe everything the alarmist media shows you. :winkwink: |
Quote:
The US should have done what Taiwan did. Take the best aspects of what Japan, the UK, Canada, Germany, and France did... combine them, and bam. THEN and ONLY then would we have a good health care system costs-wise. Tort reform may help, but it wouldn't do anything. JUST tort reform won't do shit - and JUST making everyone buy health insurance definitely won't do shit. When a hospital has to pay a 1000% and higher mark-up on a bunch of things, there's an issue. Yet Wal-Mart barely even puts a mark up on their Plasma TV's. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
To answer your question: Maybe, but I doubt it. That'd take every hospital standing together. |
Quote:
|
Lol comeon obviously he is a troll. Many of those are photoshopped.
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123