GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   2010 Economic Predictions (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=970172)

theking 05-26-2010 07:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 17178063)
Many of you in here are smart enough to know that a lot of people in that list are known crackpots, cultists and subversives. People in the business of doom and gloom, who make their bread and butter from scaring the shit out of everyone. Not saying things can't get worse, but I wouldn't listen to half of these loons with a straight face.

Mentally stable people think as you do...but unfortunately there are a lot of people like Mayabong.

BlackCrayon 05-27-2010 04:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mayabong (Post 17177981)
I'm all for a crash actually, it doesn't always have to be looked at in a negative way.

It might not be bad when you live in your parents basement but watch out, they could lose their jobs too. Then what would you do? Rense never posts anything positive...ever.

scubadiver626 05-27-2010 05:13 AM

'we're doomed' - C3P0
'beep chirp' - R2

wig 05-27-2010 06:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mayabong (Post 17177945)
First off why do we have to borrow money from anyone? Why doesn't the government just print its own money interest free? Its very nice of them to give "a majority" of the money back to the treasury. Dammit who are they? I guess kennedy found out when he printed his own money cutting out the FED.

:helpme

There are books out there that will answer your questions if you care to read them in addition to whatever conspiracy material you are reading. :2 cents:

sperbonzo 05-27-2010 06:17 AM

C'mon mayabong!!! Tell us how it's all the fault of the evil Jews!!!



Pretty please???


.
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

TheDoc 05-27-2010 07:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17178100)
You really have no clue about our true history do you? The Federal Reserve was on a 20 year charter (trial) period beginning in 1913. Around the time of it's creation the US owed 1 million in gold of debt. Since it is FACT that the shadowy figures behind the creation of the Fed have backed both sides of wars for their own profit we were drawn into World War I. By the end of that war the US owed $25 million in gold of debt. In 1921 the same scheme behind the Federal Reserve Act occured with the Treasury. The Treasury was handed over to private interests. The Fed opened up the flood gates much like the did in the 2000's in the 20's and pulled the plug in 1929 just like they did in the last crash. In 1933 (end of the 20 year trial) the US was declared bankrupt owing 100 million in gold and has been in bankruptcy receivership since. The Federal Reserve's charter was renewed as they became the new owners with the money they printed off..

Your lesson is close enough to be correct, not perfect but it does prove my point for the people that can't read. As I stated, under our current system of the Fed Reserve we has never had a crash, and it is now why the system can't crash. Either way, the fed reserve is not why we had a depression but it is one of the reasons why were able to get out of it.

L-Pink 05-27-2010 07:23 AM

So basically we should invest in heavy duty firearms and remote property and attempt to be self sufficient.


.

IllTestYourGirls 05-27-2010 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17177733)
Did the great depression happen because of the Fed Reserve? No...

What was created just before and for sure after, is what we have today.

Even Big Ben disagrees with you.

Caligari 05-27-2010 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mayabong (Post 17178030)

:1orglaugh when you have guys like this describing the insanity of the economic crisis it's at least slightly less depressing.

wig 05-27-2010 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 17180129)
Even Big Ben disagrees with you.

If you are talking Bernake, I think you are correct.

I think the main difference between now and then is that the Fed / Govt have more tools at their disposal than they did in the 30's.

Even so, using the Keynesian playbook that has been in play for a whiles now, it is not clear that they will be able to re-inflate.

There are many economists who argue that more fiscal and monetary stimulus is needed still, as well as more flexibility being put in the hands of the Fed / Govt.

In any event, I'm not so sure it will work, but I can't understand the mindset of those who say "let" it all crash. Perhaps a decade or so ago it would have been easier, but no politician is going to commit suicide by helping the excesses get wrung out that way.

I just don't think the people who say let it all crash now really understand what the world would look like. We may find out anyway, unfortunately. :(

onwebcam 05-27-2010 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17179237)
Your lesson is close enough to be correct, not perfect but it does prove my point for the people that can't read. As I stated, under our current system of the Fed Reserve we has never had a crash, and it is now why the system can't crash. Either way, the fed reserve is not why we had a depression but it is one of the reasons why were able to get out of it.

They intentionally caused the Great Depression to get what they wanted and are doing it again.. Never had a crash?


1 Wall Street Crash of 1929
2 October 19, 1987
3 The Dotcom crash
4 The Crash of 2008
5 May 6, 2010 Flash Crash


Just to name a few and all due to the Feds monetary policy

And fresh off the press.

The bankster operative who helped destroy Glass-Steagall is back.

Larry Summers, Obama’s top economic adviser, has told Congress to “grit its teeth” and approve a fresh fiscal boost of $200 billion to keep growth on track, reports the Daily Telegraph. “We are nearly 8m jobs short of normal employment. For millions of Americans the economic emergency grinds on,” he said.

The M3 money supply in the United States is contracting at an accelerating rate that now matches the average decline seen from 1929 to 1933, despite near zero interest rates and the stimulus boondoggle.

“It’s frightening,” professor Tim Congdon from International Monetary Research told the Daily Telegraph. “The plunge in M3 has no precedent since the Great Depression. The dominant reason for this is that regulators across the world are pressing banks to raise capital asset ratios and to shrink their risk assets. This is why the US is not recovering properly,” he said.

No precedent since the Great Depression. Meanwhile, the corporate media has the public obsessing over Lindsay Lohan’s court-ordered ankle bracelet.

The M3 is a measure of the money supply. It began tumbling last summer. The stock of fiat money fell from $14.2 trillion to $13.9 trillion in the three months to April, amounting to an annual rate of contraction of 9.6 percent. The assets of institutional money market funds fell at a 37 percent rate, the sharpest drop ever.

In 2006, the Federal Reserve stopped publishing M3 figures. The Fed said it did this to save money. Nonsense. It did this to stop you from understanding what the big boys are doing with the money supply. It allows them to more effectively cook the books and keep you in the dark. It allows them to portray the largest economic crisis in history as a recovery.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/fiat-mon...ion-level.html

The Feds ONLY purpose is to keep the general population in perpetual debt.. In debt to them.. That's it.

wig 05-27-2010 12:58 PM

I'm not sure about your conclusion, onwebcam but I think what you laid out here (in part) illustrates the deflationary forces that are work.

There were crashes before the Fed was created and there would be crashes after it is dismantled (if that ever occurs, which I doubt).

TheDoc 05-27-2010 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17180355)
They intentionally caused the Great Depression to get what they wanted and are doing it again.. Never had a crash?


1 Wall Street Crash of 1929
2 October 19, 1987
3 The Crash of 2008
4 May 6, 2010 Flash Crash

The facts surrounding the crashes do not support your theories just like crashes before the Fed Reserve don't support your theory.

The big crash, people borrowed money THEN invested the money on inflated stocks. The market had more stocks sold on loan than the entire eco had in money in supply. When you buy inflated stocks with fake borrowed money, chances are it's going to fail, even more so when we didn't have the money to pay out on it.

Heck I think the quality of life greatly improved 'after' the creation of the Fed Reserve, fake or not.



Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17180355)
Just to name a few and all due to the Feds monetary policy

And fresh off the press.

The bankster operative who helped destroy Glass-Steagall is back.

Larry Summers, Obama’s top economic adviser, has told Congress to “grit its teeth” and approve a fresh fiscal boost of $200 billion to keep growth on track, reports the Daily Telegraph. “We are nearly 8m jobs short of normal employment. For millions of Americans the economic emergency grinds on,” he said.

The M3 money supply in the United States is contracting at an accelerating rate that now matches the average decline seen from 1929 to 1933, despite near zero interest rates and the stimulus boondoggle.

“It’s frightening,” professor Tim Congdon from International Monetary Research told the Daily Telegraph. “The plunge in M3 has no precedent since the Great Depression. The dominant reason for this is that regulators across the world are pressing banks to raise capital asset ratios and to shrink their risk assets. This is why the US is not recovering properly,” he said.

No precedent since the Great Depression. Meanwhile, the corporate media has the public obsessing over Lindsay Lohan’s court-ordered ankle bracelet.

The M3 is a measure of the money supply. It began tumbling last summer. The stock of fiat money fell from $14.2 trillion to $13.9 trillion in the three months to April, amounting to an annual rate of contraction of 9.6 percent. The assets of institutional money market funds fell at a 37 percent rate, the sharpest drop ever.

In 2006, the Federal Reserve stopped publishing M3 figures. The Fed said it did this to save money. Nonsense. It did this to stop you from understanding what the big boys are doing with the money supply. It allows them to more effectively cook the books and keep you in the dark. It allows them to portray the largest economic crisis in history as a recovery.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/fiat-mon...ion-level.html

Nothing from prison planet is fresh off the press...

But let's play the game anyway. When a raw material is first found and some products created - at that point they first paid for. That's the "real value" - if you're shoe really cost $10 to make - that's it's "real value."

However because we have a recycling money supply (amount of money makes no difference) "WE the People" increase or decrease the value of the goods based on demand. Money is another good, and we effect it the same way however it's value is based on our ability to keep producing wealth (ie: moving money).

If you inject a huge amount of money into our system, it will simple cycle itself out because we as a society and world economy repurchase the same already paid for raw products, over and over again - much done on debt. It keeps the cycle of money moving, when it stops moving - then you have problems.

Which is why they injected more money into the eco after every major crash. They start the money flow again and the repurchase cycle starts back up and the eco fires over, jobs get created, etc.

I agree a 100 times over with ya it's nasty ass system. However the Fed Reserve and it's ability to allow you to create wealth is far beyond anything we could have ever had 100 years ago. So knocking it rather than working with it, is.... crazy.

wig 05-27-2010 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17180533)
....

I agree a 100 times over with ya it's nasty ass system. However the Fed Reserve and it's ability to allow you to create wealth is far beyond anything we could have ever had 100 years ago. So knocking it rather than working with it, is.... crazy.

:thumbsup:thumbsup

TheDoc 05-27-2010 01:37 PM

Fear my typo skills!

onwebcam 05-27-2010 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17180533)
The facts surrounding the crashes do not support your theories just like crashes before the Fed Reserve don't support your theory.

The big crash, people borrowed money THEN invested the money on inflated stocks. The market had more stocks sold on loan than the entire eco had in money in supply. When you buy inflated stocks with fake borrowed money, chances are it's going to fail, even more so when we didn't have the money to pay out on it.

The Fed created a bubble by flooding the market with money. It happened in the 20's and crash. It happened with the S&L scandle and crash. It happened with the dotcom bubble and crash. It happened with the real estate bubble and crash.. It's happening with the bailout bubble and it's going to crash..


Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17180533)
Heck I think the quality of life greatly improved 'after' the creation of the Fed Reserve, fake or not.



Nothing from prison planet is fresh off the press...

But let's play the game anyway. When a raw material is first found and some products created - at that point they first paid for. That's the "real value" - if you're shoe really cost $10 to make - that's it's "real value."

However because we have a recycling money supply (amount of money makes no difference) "WE the People" increase or decrease the value of the goods based on demand. Money is another good, and we effect it the same way however it's value is based on our ability to keep producing wealth (ie: moving money).


I think "intrinsic value" is the term you're looking for.

I exchange my labor for my needs in exchange for someone else's. Money isn't a "good" it's a mode of exchange. It's "value" is manipulted to serve only a few.. The "few," bankers create nothing of intrinsic value to society and charge us an interest for doing so and make me, my children and their children forever endebted slave to their system.. With the help of Washington..



Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17180533)
If you inject a huge amount of money into our system, it will simple cycle itself out because we as a society and world economy repurchase the same already paid for raw products, over and over again - much done on debt. It keeps the cycle of money moving, when it stops moving - then you have problems.

Which is why they injected more money into the eco after every major crash. They start the money flow again and the repurchase cycle starts back up and the eco fires over, jobs get created, etc.

I agree a 100 times over with ya it's nasty ass system. However the Fed Reserve and it's ability to allow you to create wealth is far beyond anything we could have ever had 100 years ago. So knocking it rather than working with it, is.... crazy.

In both the 1929 crash and the '08 crash the money supply was decreased which caused the crashes.. If there's not enough money to go around then theres not enough money for people to earn a living to pay their bills (mostly interest encrude debt). A crash.. Foreclosures, job losses, etc follow.. Which is what we have now..

Working with a system that only truly benefits a few is.. crazy.. Working with a system that enslaves you, your children, and their children to debt is.. crazy..

TheDoc 05-27-2010 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17181082)
The Fed created a bubble by flooding the market with money. It happened in the 20's and crash. It happened with the S&L scandle and crash. It happened with the dotcom bubble and crash. It happened with the real estate bubble and crash.. It's happening with the bailout bubble and it's going to crash..


I think you're confused on what happened... Because of WW1, the Fed Reserve by 1929 had a record amount of Gold. The reason it crashed was because of a lack of money in supply, due to purchase of totally different and fake Capital - which was corporate stocks.


Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17181082)
I exchange my labor for my needs which creates something of value for me.
The bankers create nothing of intrinsic value to society and charge me an interest for doing so and make me and my children and their children forever endebted slave to their system.. With the help of Washington..

They must create some type of market value or you wouldn't have what you have today. How are you a slave? Because you have to work to better life or should everyone just have the same low level crap life, living off the land?


Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17181082)
In both the 1929 crash and the '08 crash the money supply was decreased which caused the crashes.. If there's not enough money to go around then theres not enough money for people to pay their bills. A crash.. Foreclosures, job losses, etc follow.. Which is what we have now..

Just above you said "The Fed created a bubble by flooding the market with money." now you're saying "In both the 1929 crash and the '08 crash the money supply was decreased which caused the crashes.."

The 2nd statement is kind of correct - However "They" did not decrease the money supply as the stock capital value was never in the supply.

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17181082)
Working with a system that only truly benefits a few is.. crazy.. Working with a system that enslaves you, your children, and their children to debt is.. crazy..

I'm not a slave to the system, I work when and how I choose, purchase what, go on vacations when I want, visit public parks, national parks, drive on great roads, drink clean water and live a very safe life.

If that's slavery, then sign me the fuck up.

theking 05-27-2010 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17181280)
I'm not a slave to the system, I work when and how I choose, purchase what, go on vacations when I want, visit public parks, national parks, drive on great roads, drink clean water and live a very safe life.

If that's slavery, then sign me the fuck up.

I have basically stated the same thing to him. If I am a slave...I have a very generous "Massa'".

onwebcam 05-27-2010 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17181280)
I think you're confused on what happened... Because of WW1, the Fed Reserve by 1929 had a record amount of Gold. The reason it crashed was because of a lack of money in supply, due to purchase of totally different and fake Capital - which was corporate stocks.

The Federal Reserve had too much gold because they were trading their non intrinsic fiat currency for our intrisic gold. Once the country had run up so much debt in fiat currency it went bankrupt and the Fed seized the peoples intrisic value gold to pay for the debt created with their non-intrinsic fiat currency.


Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17181280)
They must create some type of market value or you wouldn't have what you have today. How are you a slave? Because you have to work to better life or should everyone just have the same low level crap life, living off the land?

I don't borrow. I live within my means and I live a comfortable life. If I need something I pay for it with cash on hand or I trade my labor for what I want or need. An example. Two years ago I wanted a movie star smile :) And a dentist needed a new garage. I built his garage and got my movie star smile.. Now even though I live what I consider responsible life I get told that more and more of my income needs to be taken away because others have lived irresponsible lives.. That doesn't work for me.. I especially don't like politicians sitting around all day trying to figure out how they can increase my cost of living to expand their control and wallets.



Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17181280)
I'm not a slave to the system, I work when and how I choose, purchase what, go on vacations when I want, visit public parks, national parks, drive on great roads, drink clean water and live a very safe life.

If that's slavery, then sign me the fuck up.

You pay an ever increasing amount of your earnings to the slavery system yearly. This is interest on the debt created via no risk of their own. If their little scam of a system does blow up in their face they create more debt which you and I can never ever possibly repay and they just come up with new schemes for us to pay the interest so they can get their cut. There isn't even enough money in the system just to service the interest on the debt much less the principle..Therefore your children and their children are born with a price tag on their head. They are behind from birth.

Debt slavery.. Shackled to the debt..


Money As Debt
http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...6453790090544#

onwebcam 05-27-2010 05:14 PM

To expand further on how you are a slave to the system. The legal system. Judges are acting in an administrative capacity. Administering the bankruptcy. Police officers and the statutes they enforce are all a part of the bankruptcy. Essentially revenue officers. All a part of the scheme to service the fiat debt.. They need more revenue they pass more statutes to enforce.. All a part of the slavery system. Your leaders only discuss the tax revenue collected. They don't discuss the second set of books. The CAFR's




CAFR: UC budget fully funded with one-fifth of one percent of state of CA “investments”
May 24, 7:58 AMLA County Nonpartisan Examiner Carl Herman

The UC [University of California] system had a budget deficit for this ending school year of $0.65 billion. The policy response was to deny 2,300 students enrollment, lay-off over 2,000 faculty and staff, furlough teaching days and cut 10% salaries, and raise tuition by 32%. For less than one-fifth of one percent of the investment total of California, UC would have been fully-funded and those reductions eliminated.

This was a point in my previous CAFR article; I’m highlighting it here and invite you to fully understand the data. The meaning of the data is that our economic crisis has been intentionally created by our political “leaders” and propagandized by corporate media. Knowledge of the data empowers citizens to end the crisis, fully investigate the criminals who caused it, and implement the obvious economic solutions that unleash trillions of dollars worth of Americans’ productivity every year for our maximum benefit and enjoyment.

Actually, because complicity in corruption is so deep, the probable best policy response is Truth and Reconciliation to exchange full factual disclosure and return of public assets for no prosecution. What isn’t disclosed within a time window is subject to criminal and civil prosecution. The purpose of this strategy is for those willing to have a “Scrooge conversion” to become powerful partners of humanity for cooperation, justice, dignity and freedom for all. Their information is vital to conclusive and rapid end of American criminal political and economic oligarchs.

California’s political “leadership” of both parties have lied in omission by failing to discuss California’s investments of $367 billion (page 48) as a possible source of funding for the ~$20 billion budget deficit. Ethical politicians would have presented the facts for professional and independent economic cost-benefit analysis to communicate choices to the tax-paying public. But ours have failed in their primary duty to represent the public good, and will soon have to explain the facts.

“Leadership” claims that this money is necessary to leave alone in order to mainly for public employee retirement benefits. Let’s check that story. California’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) shows current member contribution pays for all retiree benefits except for $1.8 billion (also pages 48 and 49). This means that Republican and Democratic “leaders” say they need to extract and hold over $367 billion from the taxpayers in order to pay for a cost of one-half of one percent of OUR money they took from us.

These “leaders” are lying sacks of spin.

continued..
http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-C...CA-investments

mayabong 05-27-2010 09:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 17179089)
C'mon mayabong!!! Tell us how it's all the fault of the evil Jews!!!



Pretty please???


.
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

When it comes to the fed its just about all jews running amuk without congressional oversight so don't even try. :)

onwebcam 05-28-2010 02:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mayabong (Post 17182452)
When it comes to the fed its just about all jews running amuk without congressional oversight so don't even try. :)

Jew hater.. If your lastr name was Nazi... Or Bush.. Or Obama..

iseeyou 05-28-2010 04:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17179237)
Your lesson is close enough to be correct, not perfect but it does prove my point for the people that can't read. As I stated, under our current system of the Fed Reserve we has never had a crash, and it is now why the system can't crash. Either way, the fed reserve is not why we had a depression but it is one of the reasons why were able to get out of it.

*summary of above*

"We" have never "had" a "crash" (since the Fed Reserve Act) because I can define "we" and "had" and "crash" to be anything I want.

Oops. There was a depression long ago (some call it a crash) but this "crash" is not the same as the "crash" in my first sentence. That is why the "crash" statement in my first sentence is still true. In fact, the depression was not really a crash at all. It was merely a "momentary depressed economy".

And anyways, the federal reserve only solves problems and never creates them. They would never "crash" the economy and even if something like that occured, we would of course use a different word instead of "crash". This is the reason why "the system" "cant" "crash". :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

TheDoc 05-28-2010 05:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iseeyou (Post 17183186)
*summary of above*

"We" have never "had" a "crash" (since the Fed Reserve Act) because I can define "we" and "had" and "crash" to be anything I want.

Oops. There was a depression long ago (some call it a crash) but this "crash" is not the same as the "crash" in my first sentence. That is why the "crash" statement in my first sentence is still true. In fact, the depression was not really a crash at all. It was merely a "momentary depressed economy".

And anyways, the federal reserve only solves problems and never creates them. They would never "crash" the economy and even if something like that occured, we would of course use a different word instead of "crash". This is the reason why "the system" "cant" "crash". :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Hey Moron, nobody is saying we didn't have crashes.. The focus was the Fed Reserve didn't create the crashes... at least get your fucking half attempts at being lame correct.

I swear GFY is getting filled with fucking stupid people, every day more and more idiots find this place.

TheDoc 05-28-2010 06:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17181922)
To expand further on how you are a slave to the system. The legal system. Judges are acting in an administrative capacity. Administering the bankruptcy. Police officers and the statutes they enforce are all a part of the bankruptcy. Essentially revenue officers. All a part of the scheme to service the fiat debt.. They need more revenue they pass more statutes to enforce.. All a part of the slavery system. Your leaders only discuss the tax revenue collected. They don't discuss the second set of books. The CAFR's




CAFR: UC budget fully funded with one-fifth of one percent of state of CA “investments”
May 24, 7:58 AMLA County Nonpartisan Examiner Carl Herman

The UC [University of California] system had a budget deficit for this ending school year of $0.65 billion. The policy response was to deny 2,300 students enrollment, lay-off over 2,000 faculty and staff, furlough teaching days and cut 10% salaries, and raise tuition by 32%. For less than one-fifth of one percent of the investment total of California, UC would have been fully-funded and those reductions eliminated.

This was a point in my previous CAFR article; I’m highlighting it here and invite you to fully understand the data. The meaning of the data is that our economic crisis has been intentionally created by our political “leaders” and propagandized by corporate media. Knowledge of the data empowers citizens to end the crisis, fully investigate the criminals who caused it, and implement the obvious economic solutions that unleash trillions of dollars worth of Americans’ productivity every year for our maximum benefit and enjoyment.

Actually, because complicity in corruption is so deep, the probable best policy response is Truth and Reconciliation to exchange full factual disclosure and return of public assets for no prosecution. What isn’t disclosed within a time window is subject to criminal and civil prosecution. The purpose of this strategy is for those willing to have a “Scrooge conversion” to become powerful partners of humanity for cooperation, justice, dignity and freedom for all. Their information is vital to conclusive and rapid end of American criminal political and economic oligarchs.

California’s political “leadership” of both parties have lied in omission by failing to discuss California’s investments of $367 billion (page 48) as a possible source of funding for the ~$20 billion budget deficit. Ethical politicians would have presented the facts for professional and independent economic cost-benefit analysis to communicate choices to the tax-paying public. But ours have failed in their primary duty to represent the public good, and will soon have to explain the facts.

“Leadership” claims that this money is necessary to leave alone in order to mainly for public employee retirement benefits. Let’s check that story. California’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) shows current member contribution pays for all retiree benefits except for $1.8 billion (also pages 48 and 49). This means that Republican and Democratic “leaders” say they need to extract and hold over $367 billion from the taxpayers in order to pay for a cost of one-half of one percent of OUR money they took from us.

These “leaders” are lying sacks of spin.

continued..
http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-C...CA-investments

So basically because we're in bankruptcy and because we have a society, which requires money to operate - we're slaves?

See, what you don't understand is slaves can't do what they want. I can leave, open a company to avoid paying more taxes, actually setup in a way that I pay zero taxes fed or state or personal.... and the list goes on and on - the choice is 100% mine.

Again, if this is slavery - sign me up! For sure being American Slavery - I want to be a the best slave, and not just some 2nd hand world slave.

BlackCrayon 05-28-2010 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17181678)
I don't borrow. I live within my means and I live a comfortable life. If I need something I pay for it with cash on hand or I trade my labor for what I want or need. An example. Two years ago I wanted a movie star smile :) And a dentist needed a new garage. I built his garage and got my movie star smile.. Now even though I live what I consider responsible life I get told that more and more of my income needs to be taken away because others have lived irresponsible lives.. That doesn't work for me.. I especially don't like politicians sitting around all day trying to figure out how they can increase my cost of living to expand their control and wallets.

Unless you are a 'jack of all trades' that kind of system will just never work. What if you need to trade your skill for something but no one needs anything your skill can produce? Shit out of luck i guess.

bbobby86 05-28-2010 06:26 AM

i hope we are no slaves...

TheDoc 05-28-2010 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackCrayon (Post 17183357)
Unless you are a 'jack of all trades' that kind of system will just never work. What if you need to trade your skill for something but no one needs anything your skill can produce? Shit out of luck i guess.

You can just trade a "chicken", like the Nevada chick said..HA! His example was clearly bullshit.

In the time period it would have taken him to build a garage, he could have just worked, made the money and paid the man cash, and got back to work quicker to earn even more money.

onwebcam 05-28-2010 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iseeyou (Post 17183186)
*summary of above*

"We" have never "had" a "crash" (since the Fed Reserve Act) because I can define "we" and "had" and "crash" to be anything I want.

Oops. There was a depression long ago (some call it a crash) but this "crash" is not the same as the "crash" in my first sentence. That is why the "crash" statement in my first sentence is still true. In fact, the depression was not really a crash at all. It was merely a "momentary depressed economy".

And anyways, the federal reserve only solves problems and never creates them. They would never "crash" the economy and even if something like that occured, we would of course use a different word instead of "crash". This is the reason why "the system" "cant" "crash". :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

What are you trying to say? That there's a group of people who use something that looks and sounds like English but has different definitions?


Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17183302)
Hey Moron, nobody is saying we didn't have crashes.. The focus was the Fed Reserve didn't create the crashes... at least get your fucking half attempts at being lame correct.

I swear GFY is getting filled with fucking stupid people, every day more and more idiots find this place.

The did create the crashes.. It's a fact..

onwebcam 05-28-2010 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17183312)
So basically because we're in bankruptcy and because we have a society, which requires money to operate - we're slaves?

No what I'm saying is that what you think are your public servants in reality see you as a stupid uneducated slave. They lie about what is really going on, hide money and spend all day trying to find new ways to get more money from you and I. They pass laws to make it lawful for them to profit from their "statutes" which "control" you while you the slave can't.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17183312)

See, what you don't understand is slaves can't do what they want. I can leave, open a company to avoid paying more taxes, actually setup in a way that I pay zero taxes fed or state or personal.... and the list goes on and on - the choice is 100% mine.

Again, if this is slavery - sign me up! For sure being American Slavery - I want to be a the best slave, and not just some 2nd hand world slave.

What if this same system of "control" was setup around the same time around the World? Were you not aware that this hapened? And those places where it is not are currently being beat into submission to be setup that way? I think they call it "democracy"

Slave
1. One bound in servitude as the property of a person or household.

When the first settlers came to America the majority came here via being bonded slaves.. A wealthy person would put the money up and they would get a bond which you would have to work off. DO YOU HAVE A BIRTH CERTIFICATE? Why don't you go and try the original and get back with me..

mayabong 05-28-2010 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17182891)
Jew hater.. If your lastr name was Nazi... Or Bush.. Or Obama..

The Nazi regime was the total opposite of the bush and obama regime. They were actually fighting the big banks "NWO" grip if you will. Bush and Obama bow down to this.

Funny how people use nazi and bush in the same sentence.

Not really sure what you meant by that sentence.

onwebcam 05-28-2010 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17185379)

Slave
1. One bound in servitude as the property of a person or household.

Person
In general usage, a human being; by statute, however, the term can include firms, labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in Bankruptcy, or receivers.



Quote:

Originally Posted by mayabong (Post 17185422)
The Nazi regime was the total opposite of the bush and obama regime. They were actually fighting the big banks "NWO" grip if you will. Bush and Obama bow down to this.

Funny how people use nazi and bush in the same sentence.

Not really sure what you meant by that sentence.

I was just fucking with you on the "jew" thing..

Hitler was an illegitimate Rothschild.. He was part of the bloodline just like Obama, and Bush.. Hitler believed the same as they do. He just tried to follow the plan too fast..

TheDoc 05-28-2010 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17185266)
The did create the crashes.. It's a fact..

Well, the problem with your facts is they aren't supported by what's actually published as fact and not on a conspiracy website.

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17185379)
No what I'm saying is that what you think are your public servants in reality see you as a stupid uneducated slave. They lie about what is really going on, hide money and spend all day trying to find new ways to get more money from you and I. They pass laws to make it lawful for them to profit from their "statutes" while you the slave can't.

Okay, what if I see them as the stupid uneducated slaves because they think they have power when they have nothing?

I can do the exact same thing they are, go run for office and stupid crap, bend over and take it up the ass for getting that ego power boost... just depends if I want to be a douche to people or not or take it up the ass for money.

It's just a different way to do it, they hold no actual power over me.



Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17185379)
What if this same system of "control" was setup around the same time around the World? Were you not aware that this hapened? And those places where it is not are currently being beat into submission to bep setup that way? I think they call it "democracy"

Slave
1. One bound in servitude as the property of a person or household.

When the first settlers came to America the majority came here via being bonded slaves.. A wealthy person would put the money up and they would get a bond which you would have to work off. DO YOU HAVE A BIRTH CERTIFICATE SLAVE?

2. One who is abjectly subservient to a specified person or influence:

Are you paying taxes to people who sit around all day long telling you how to live?

A slave is actually property of someone else, legal ownership.. sell them, buy others, basically treat them like a house pet that you can control.

I hope you're not saying a birth certificate means you're a slave....

No I do not pay taxes to people. No, people don't tell me how to live, never happened once in my adult life.

However tax wise, I don't mind paying taxes... I understand the community isn't going to pull together to water the plants in the middle of the highway that I like to see when I drive through this shit hole.

onwebcam 05-28-2010 04:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17185682)
Well, the problem with your facts is they aren't supported by what's actually published as fact and not on a conspiracy website.



Okay, what if I see them as the stupid uneducated slaves because they think they have power when they have nothing?

I can do the exact same thing they are, go run for office and stupid crap, bend over and take it up the ass for getting that ego power boost... just depends if I want to be a douche to people or not or take it up the ass for money.

It's just a different way to do it, they hold no actual power over me.


They don't eh? You mean you don't have to follow their statutes? What do you have diplomatic immunity?


Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17185682)
A slave is actually property of someone else, legal ownership.. sell them, buy others, basically treat them like a house pet that you can control.

I hope you're not saying a birth certificate means you're a slave....

Exactly what I'm saying.. The Shephard-Towner maternity act was passed in 1921 because the United States corporation was in debt. They needed a way to borrow more money. They used these bonds to securitize the debt and borrow more against them. And they were traded on the market.. The Act was allowed to expire in 1929 because it was so controversial.. I wonder why? If there is no law that says you have to have a birth certificate then why is it you are required to have one again? Oh yeah you need one to be President.. lmao

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17185682)
No I do not pay taxes to people. No, people don't tell me how to live, never happened once in my adult life.

However tax wise, I don't mind paying taxes... I understand the community isn't going to pull together to water the plants in the middle of the highway that I like to see when I drive through this shit hole.

Your roads are paid for via taxes on gasoline.. Your water, water bill.. Just like your elecctric bill.. Your schools property taxes.. Which BTW you are only a tennant and don;t actually own because a slave can't own anything.. Your state government sales taxes.. This country was built without a federal income tax.. It was only suppose to be temporary to "fund the war" a war which was backed on both sides the very people who control our monetary policy.

$5 submissions 05-28-2010 04:42 PM

Gerald Celente doesn't fuck around. I hope he's wrong though :(

mayabong 05-28-2010 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by $5 submissions (Post 17185799)
Gerald Celente doesn't fuck around. I hope he's wrong though :(

He always says the United States will be like Calcutta... haha

Does Calcutta suck or something?

TheDoc 05-28-2010 05:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17185790)
They don't eh? You mean you don't have to follow their statutes? What do you have diplomatic immunity?

If you're asking if I live under laws, then yes... Just like in any Country, land, location in just about any time in history I would be subject to such rules. However if I don't like the rules, being a free man I can leave and quit paying taxes.


Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17185790)
Exactly what I'm saying.. The Shephard-Towner maternity act was passed in 1921 because the United States corporation was in debt. They needed a way to borrow more money. They used these bonds to securitize the debt and borrow more against them. And they were traded on the market.. The Act was allowed to expire in 1929 because it was so controversial.. I wonder why? If there is no law that says you have to have a birth certificate then why is it you are required to have one again? Oh yeah you need one to be President.. lmao

I guess I would need to see the copy of the contract related to the birth certificate that represents ownership by a government, that I signed. Until then... it's not that.


Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17185790)
Your roads are paid for via taxes on gasoline.. Your water, water bill.. Just like your elecctric bill.. Your schools property taxes.. Which BTW you are only a tennant and don;t actually own because a slave can't own anything.. Your state government sales taxes.. This country was built without a federal income tax.. It was only suppose to be temporary to "fund the war" a war which was backed on both sides the very people who control our monetary policy.

Current roads, yes.. and my registration and part of my insurance for safety stuff too, but not at first. I know our Country has a lot of taxes, all over the place... I'm fine with that. I would love a fair or flat tax, but it isn't going to happen.

It's not the early 1900's anymore... we have a few more things, a few more costs, than we did before. If you want to live in a place with no or very low taxes - being a free man, you can move to any number of 2nd or 3rd world Countries and live it up!

mayabong 05-28-2010 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by onwebcam (Post 17185628)
Person
In general usage, a human being; by statute, however, the term can include firms, labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in Bankruptcy, or receivers.





I was just fucking with you on the "jew" thing..

Hitler was an illegitimate Rothschild.. He was part of the bloodline just like Obama, and Bush.. Hitler believed the same as they do. He just tried to follow the plan too fast..

Most people are raised to believe that hitler was the epitome of evil pretty much like bin laden and I must say I believed it for a while. After doing some reasearch I'm thinking quite the opposite. To say that he was following a plan like the rothchilds (a bit early) couldn't be further from the truth. Most people don't know he was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize (not that that means much these days). He didn't want war, and to be totally honest I havn't seen any proof that the holocaust happened at all. The Jews declared a worldwide boycott on them and basically infiltrated every government surrounding him way before any war ever started (40,000 people in madison square garden even). His only choice was to go on the offense.

If I'm sounding crazy watch benjamin's speech (a jew)


Also david coles auchwitz video (another jew)



and last but not least hitlers declaration of war speech against the USA, which paints a TOTALLY different picture of what we've been told.



You are one of the only open minded people on this site and I would like your input on these subjects without being called names. If you have any information to go against my case i'm open and will not call you any names I promise. Media control is more powerful than an atomic bomb sometimes.
;)

onwebcam 05-28-2010 06:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17185922)
If you're asking if I live under laws, then yes... Just like in any Country, land, location in just about any time in history I would be subject to such rules. However if I don't like the rules, being a free man I can leave and quit paying taxes.




I guess I would need to see the copy of the contract related to the birth certificate that represents ownership by a government, that I signed. Until then... it's not that.

Well that's exactly what I'm asking for in the courts. And I'm obviously being railroaded at every turn.. You are tricked into it via the various "benefits and privileges" in which you signed up for or your parents did for you as you got older. One of those being the Social Security #, Selective Service, "drivers" license, etc but they won't produce the actual contracts hidden behind them.. There's A LOT more to this whole scheme but I'm not going to get into it all right now..


Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17185922)
Current roads, yes.. and my registration and part of my insurance for safety stuff too, but not at first. I know our Country has a lot of taxes, all over the place... I'm fine with that. I would love a fair or flat tax, but it isn't going to happen.

There's no need to ANY income tax.. The only reason there is is because of the Federal Reserve. States and the Federal Government can fund projects by issuing money into the system to those people and for those projects.. Right now the governments issue bonds and the money is "borrowed" from the Federal Reserve..


Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17185922)

It's not the early 1900's anymore... we have a few more things, a few more costs, than we did before. If you want to live in a place with no or very low taxes - being a free man, you can move to any number of 2nd or 3rd world Countries and live it up!

I'm not going to go anywhere..

onwebcam 05-28-2010 06:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17185922)
If you're asking if I live under laws, then yes... Just like in any Country, land, location in just about any time in history I would be subject to such rules. However if I don't like the rules, being a free man I can leave and quit paying taxes.

What they are doing are NOT "laws" it's corporate policy "statutes"..

A law would be broken if you harmed someone physically of financially. If you are going too fast on the road you aren't breaking the law you're breaking corporate policy. If you don't have on your seat belt you aren't breaking the law you're breaking corporate policy..

"Drivers license": You are tricked into privilege that comes with rules attached to it to do something you have every right to do which is travel in or on your own personal conveyance. Confirmed by several Supreme Court decisions.

DRIVER. One employed in conducting a coach, carriage, wagon, or other vehicle, with horses, mules, or other animals.


LICENSE: The permission granted by competent authority to exercise a certain privilege that, without such authorization, would constitute an illegal act, a Trespass or a tort. The certificate or the document itself that confers permission to engage in otherwise proscribed conduct.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc