![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
'we're doomed' - C3P0
'beep chirp' - R2 |
Quote:
There are books out there that will answer your questions if you care to read them in addition to whatever conspiracy material you are reading. :2 cents: |
C'mon mayabong!!! Tell us how it's all the fault of the evil Jews!!!
Pretty please??? . :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
So basically we should invest in heavy duty firearms and remote property and attempt to be self sufficient.
. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think the main difference between now and then is that the Fed / Govt have more tools at their disposal than they did in the 30's. Even so, using the Keynesian playbook that has been in play for a whiles now, it is not clear that they will be able to re-inflate. There are many economists who argue that more fiscal and monetary stimulus is needed still, as well as more flexibility being put in the hands of the Fed / Govt. In any event, I'm not so sure it will work, but I can't understand the mindset of those who say "let" it all crash. Perhaps a decade or so ago it would have been easier, but no politician is going to commit suicide by helping the excesses get wrung out that way. I just don't think the people who say let it all crash now really understand what the world would look like. We may find out anyway, unfortunately. :( |
Quote:
1 Wall Street Crash of 1929 2 October 19, 1987 3 The Dotcom crash 4 The Crash of 2008 5 May 6, 2010 Flash Crash Just to name a few and all due to the Feds monetary policy And fresh off the press. The bankster operative who helped destroy Glass-Steagall is back. Larry Summers, Obama’s top economic adviser, has told Congress to “grit its teeth” and approve a fresh fiscal boost of $200 billion to keep growth on track, reports the Daily Telegraph. “We are nearly 8m jobs short of normal employment. For millions of Americans the economic emergency grinds on,” he said. The M3 money supply in the United States is contracting at an accelerating rate that now matches the average decline seen from 1929 to 1933, despite near zero interest rates and the stimulus boondoggle. “It’s frightening,” professor Tim Congdon from International Monetary Research told the Daily Telegraph. “The plunge in M3 has no precedent since the Great Depression. The dominant reason for this is that regulators across the world are pressing banks to raise capital asset ratios and to shrink their risk assets. This is why the US is not recovering properly,” he said. No precedent since the Great Depression. Meanwhile, the corporate media has the public obsessing over Lindsay Lohan’s court-ordered ankle bracelet. The M3 is a measure of the money supply. It began tumbling last summer. The stock of fiat money fell from $14.2 trillion to $13.9 trillion in the three months to April, amounting to an annual rate of contraction of 9.6 percent. The assets of institutional money market funds fell at a 37 percent rate, the sharpest drop ever. In 2006, the Federal Reserve stopped publishing M3 figures. The Fed said it did this to save money. Nonsense. It did this to stop you from understanding what the big boys are doing with the money supply. It allows them to more effectively cook the books and keep you in the dark. It allows them to portray the largest economic crisis in history as a recovery. http://www.prisonplanet.com/fiat-mon...ion-level.html The Feds ONLY purpose is to keep the general population in perpetual debt.. In debt to them.. That's it. |
I'm not sure about your conclusion, onwebcam but I think what you laid out here (in part) illustrates the deflationary forces that are work.
There were crashes before the Fed was created and there would be crashes after it is dismantled (if that ever occurs, which I doubt). |
Quote:
The big crash, people borrowed money THEN invested the money on inflated stocks. The market had more stocks sold on loan than the entire eco had in money in supply. When you buy inflated stocks with fake borrowed money, chances are it's going to fail, even more so when we didn't have the money to pay out on it. Heck I think the quality of life greatly improved 'after' the creation of the Fed Reserve, fake or not. Quote:
But let's play the game anyway. When a raw material is first found and some products created - at that point they first paid for. That's the "real value" - if you're shoe really cost $10 to make - that's it's "real value." However because we have a recycling money supply (amount of money makes no difference) "WE the People" increase or decrease the value of the goods based on demand. Money is another good, and we effect it the same way however it's value is based on our ability to keep producing wealth (ie: moving money). If you inject a huge amount of money into our system, it will simple cycle itself out because we as a society and world economy repurchase the same already paid for raw products, over and over again - much done on debt. It keeps the cycle of money moving, when it stops moving - then you have problems. Which is why they injected more money into the eco after every major crash. They start the money flow again and the repurchase cycle starts back up and the eco fires over, jobs get created, etc. I agree a 100 times over with ya it's nasty ass system. However the Fed Reserve and it's ability to allow you to create wealth is far beyond anything we could have ever had 100 years ago. So knocking it rather than working with it, is.... crazy. |
Quote:
|
Fear my typo skills!
|
Quote:
Quote:
I think "intrinsic value" is the term you're looking for. I exchange my labor for my needs in exchange for someone else's. Money isn't a "good" it's a mode of exchange. It's "value" is manipulted to serve only a few.. The "few," bankers create nothing of intrinsic value to society and charge us an interest for doing so and make me, my children and their children forever endebted slave to their system.. With the help of Washington.. Quote:
Working with a system that only truly benefits a few is.. crazy.. Working with a system that enslaves you, your children, and their children to debt is.. crazy.. |
Quote:
I think you're confused on what happened... Because of WW1, the Fed Reserve by 1929 had a record amount of Gold. The reason it crashed was because of a lack of money in supply, due to purchase of totally different and fake Capital - which was corporate stocks. Quote:
Quote:
The 2nd statement is kind of correct - However "They" did not decrease the money supply as the stock capital value was never in the supply. Quote:
If that's slavery, then sign me the fuck up. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Debt slavery.. Shackled to the debt.. Money As Debt http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...6453790090544# |
To expand further on how you are a slave to the system. The legal system. Judges are acting in an administrative capacity. Administering the bankruptcy. Police officers and the statutes they enforce are all a part of the bankruptcy. Essentially revenue officers. All a part of the scheme to service the fiat debt.. They need more revenue they pass more statutes to enforce.. All a part of the slavery system. Your leaders only discuss the tax revenue collected. They don't discuss the second set of books. The CAFR's
CAFR: UC budget fully funded with one-fifth of one percent of state of CA “investments” May 24, 7:58 AMLA County Nonpartisan Examiner Carl Herman The UC [University of California] system had a budget deficit for this ending school year of $0.65 billion. The policy response was to deny 2,300 students enrollment, lay-off over 2,000 faculty and staff, furlough teaching days and cut 10% salaries, and raise tuition by 32%. For less than one-fifth of one percent of the investment total of California, UC would have been fully-funded and those reductions eliminated. This was a point in my previous CAFR article; I’m highlighting it here and invite you to fully understand the data. The meaning of the data is that our economic crisis has been intentionally created by our political “leaders” and propagandized by corporate media. Knowledge of the data empowers citizens to end the crisis, fully investigate the criminals who caused it, and implement the obvious economic solutions that unleash trillions of dollars worth of Americans’ productivity every year for our maximum benefit and enjoyment. Actually, because complicity in corruption is so deep, the probable best policy response is Truth and Reconciliation to exchange full factual disclosure and return of public assets for no prosecution. What isn’t disclosed within a time window is subject to criminal and civil prosecution. The purpose of this strategy is for those willing to have a “Scrooge conversion” to become powerful partners of humanity for cooperation, justice, dignity and freedom for all. Their information is vital to conclusive and rapid end of American criminal political and economic oligarchs. California’s political “leadership” of both parties have lied in omission by failing to discuss California’s investments of $367 billion (page 48) as a possible source of funding for the ~$20 billion budget deficit. Ethical politicians would have presented the facts for professional and independent economic cost-benefit analysis to communicate choices to the tax-paying public. But ours have failed in their primary duty to represent the public good, and will soon have to explain the facts. “Leadership” claims that this money is necessary to leave alone in order to mainly for public employee retirement benefits. Let’s check that story. California’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) shows current member contribution pays for all retiree benefits except for $1.8 billion (also pages 48 and 49). This means that Republican and Democratic “leaders” say they need to extract and hold over $367 billion from the taxpayers in order to pay for a cost of one-half of one percent of OUR money they took from us. These “leaders” are lying sacks of spin. continued.. http://www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-C...CA-investments |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
"We" have never "had" a "crash" (since the Fed Reserve Act) because I can define "we" and "had" and "crash" to be anything I want. Oops. There was a depression long ago (some call it a crash) but this "crash" is not the same as the "crash" in my first sentence. That is why the "crash" statement in my first sentence is still true. In fact, the depression was not really a crash at all. It was merely a "momentary depressed economy". And anyways, the federal reserve only solves problems and never creates them. They would never "crash" the economy and even if something like that occured, we would of course use a different word instead of "crash". This is the reason why "the system" "cant" "crash". :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh |
Quote:
I swear GFY is getting filled with fucking stupid people, every day more and more idiots find this place. |
Quote:
See, what you don't understand is slaves can't do what they want. I can leave, open a company to avoid paying more taxes, actually setup in a way that I pay zero taxes fed or state or personal.... and the list goes on and on - the choice is 100% mine. Again, if this is slavery - sign me up! For sure being American Slavery - I want to be a the best slave, and not just some 2nd hand world slave. |
Quote:
|
i hope we are no slaves...
|
Quote:
In the time period it would have taken him to build a garage, he could have just worked, made the money and paid the man cash, and got back to work quicker to earn even more money. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Slave 1. One bound in servitude as the property of a person or household. When the first settlers came to America the majority came here via being bonded slaves.. A wealthy person would put the money up and they would get a bond which you would have to work off. DO YOU HAVE A BIRTH CERTIFICATE? Why don't you go and try the original and get back with me.. |
Quote:
Funny how people use nazi and bush in the same sentence. Not really sure what you meant by that sentence. |
Quote:
In general usage, a human being; by statute, however, the term can include firms, labor organizations, partnerships, associations, corporations, legal representatives, trustees, trustees in Bankruptcy, or receivers. Quote:
Hitler was an illegitimate Rothschild.. He was part of the bloodline just like Obama, and Bush.. Hitler believed the same as they do. He just tried to follow the plan too fast.. |
Quote:
Quote:
I can do the exact same thing they are, go run for office and stupid crap, bend over and take it up the ass for getting that ego power boost... just depends if I want to be a douche to people or not or take it up the ass for money. It's just a different way to do it, they hold no actual power over me. Quote:
I hope you're not saying a birth certificate means you're a slave.... No I do not pay taxes to people. No, people don't tell me how to live, never happened once in my adult life. However tax wise, I don't mind paying taxes... I understand the community isn't going to pull together to water the plants in the middle of the highway that I like to see when I drive through this shit hole. |
Quote:
They don't eh? You mean you don't have to follow their statutes? What do you have diplomatic immunity? Quote:
Quote:
|
Gerald Celente doesn't fuck around. I hope he's wrong though :(
|
Quote:
Does Calcutta suck or something? |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It's not the early 1900's anymore... we have a few more things, a few more costs, than we did before. If you want to live in a place with no or very low taxes - being a free man, you can move to any number of 2nd or 3rd world Countries and live it up! |
Quote:
If I'm sounding crazy watch benjamin's speech (a jew) Also david coles auchwitz video (another jew) and last but not least hitlers declaration of war speech against the USA, which paints a TOTALLY different picture of what we've been told. You are one of the only open minded people on this site and I would like your input on these subjects without being called names. If you have any information to go against my case i'm open and will not call you any names I promise. Media control is more powerful than an atomic bomb sometimes. ;) |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
A law would be broken if you harmed someone physically of financially. If you are going too fast on the road you aren't breaking the law you're breaking corporate policy. If you don't have on your seat belt you aren't breaking the law you're breaking corporate policy.. "Drivers license": You are tricked into privilege that comes with rules attached to it to do something you have every right to do which is travel in or on your own personal conveyance. Confirmed by several Supreme Court decisions. DRIVER. One employed in conducting a coach, carriage, wagon, or other vehicle, with horses, mules, or other animals. LICENSE: The permission granted by competent authority to exercise a certain privilege that, without such authorization, would constitute an illegal act, a Trespass or a tort. The certificate or the document itself that confers permission to engage in otherwise proscribed conduct. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc