GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Another Obama Epic Fail (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=974457)

TheDoc 06-22-2010 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17269401)

Yeah sources are trash... here use this:

http://www.miseryindex.us/URbymonth.asp Oh snap, unemployment has steadied out and is improving.

As for the deficit and debt, as stated... when you correct the dirty books that Bush was running, not putting the war costs on the books, of course the numbers that were already extremly bad and the worst in history, get corrected and actually show how bad the damage is. Today, we're paying for that... suck it up and credit the damage to the proper person.

I hope you're not putting all your 'things are worse' on Obama over unemployment... that would be rather laughable.

The Demon 06-22-2010 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17269420)
Yeah sources are trash... here use this:

http://www.miseryindex.us/URbymonth.asp Oh snap, unemployment has steadied out and is improving.

As for the deficit and debt, as stated... when you correct the dirty books that Bush was running, not putting the war costs on the books, of course the numbers that were already extremly bad and the worst in history, get corrected and actually show how bad the damage is. Today, we're paying for that... suck it up and credit the damage to the proper person.

I hope you're not putting all your 'things are worse' on Obama over unemployment... that would be rather laughable.

The only thing that's laughable as you predictably ignoring 10+ sources, and claiming your only source is the correct one. Please continue amusing us with your denial.

http://www.tradersnarrative.com/wp-c...Jan%202010.png

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/w...yment-2010.png

Oh snap!! What's even funnier is you're using the census jobs that were created as an argument for "unemployment is going down!!" Lol, I'm enjoying this.

TheDoc 06-22-2010 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17269420)

Dang, based on that graphs unemployment numbers, Obama is putting the economic smack down on the mighty Reagan.

The Demon 06-22-2010 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17269450)
Dang, based on that graphs unemployment numbers, Obama is putting the economic smack down on the mighty Reagan.

Are you looking at the same graph we're looking, or are you in the advanced stages of denial? Based on your own single source(lol), Reagan made Obama his bitch.

Also:

http://startthinkingright.wordpress....l-for-america/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-a..._b_341348.html

http://portalseven.com/employment/un...80&toYear=2009

Owned.

"YOUR SOURCES ARE GARBAGE!!!"-TheDoc

TheDoc 06-22-2010 09:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17269448)
The only thing that's laughable as you predictably ignoring 10+ sources, and claiming your only source is the correct one. Please continue amusing us with your denial.

http://www.tradersnarrative.com/wp-c...Jan%202010.png

http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/w...yment-2010.png

Oh snap!! What's even funnier is you're using the census jobs that were created as an argument for "unemployment is going down!!" Lol, I'm enjoying this.

Those are some great opinion blogs...

http://www.bls.gov/ 9.7% in May 2010

The Demon 06-22-2010 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17269460)
Those are some great opinion blogs...

http://www.bls.gov/ 9.7% in May 2010

That's some great government manipulation by the Obama Administration. Silly them, claiming unemployment is going down because they hire 400,000 census workers:) Owned

Vendzilla 06-22-2010 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17269394)
http://static.businessinsider.com/im...510-update.gif

See that big increase in jobs lost on the left, vs. the decrease under Obama's side? That's an improvement...

LMAO, I love when you guys bring up this chart,You're excited about we have stop loosing so many jobs, but does that matter to the 10% of the population that's getting unemployment, or that when Obama revels in the fact that the stimulus created 10k new jobs, never mind that there were 400k new unemployment claims for the same time period? Or that Obama revels in new jobs created in the government, who are paid with the taxes of those that are still employed, I have to wonder what kind of fuzzy math you guys are snorting?

Obama = FAIL on Jobs
Obama = FAIL on everything, he pushed the health care bill that we can't afford and don't want, he doesn't care, he has his agenda
Obama = FAIL on the oil spill, you guys that support Obama were all over GW's shit over Katrina, but that hardly compares to the major fuck up to the world under the Obama Administration
You guys voted in Obama because of the wars GW started, here we are 18 months later
He's going down as the biggest loser as a president
His approval rating has dropped faster than any president, even faster that GW, it's took years for GW's ratings to drop, for Obama it was months

TheDoc 06-22-2010 09:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17269458)
Are you looking at the same graph we're looking, or are you in the advanced stages of denial? Based on your own single source(lol), Reagan made Obama his bitch.

Also:

http://startthinkingright.wordpress....l-for-america/

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-a..._b_341348.html

http://portalseven.com/employment/un...80&toYear=2009

Owned.

"YOUR SOURCES ARE GARBAGE!!!"-TheDoc

Reagan's peak unemployment rate: 10.8%
Obama's peak unemployment rate: 10.1%

If half the time Obama stopped the increase, and so far hasn't had enough time to compare an improvement.

The Demon 06-22-2010 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17269472)
Reagan's peak unemployment rate: 10.8%
Obama's peak unemployment rate: 10.1%

If half the time Obama stopped the increase, and so far hasn't had enough time to compare an improvement.

Reagan's unemployment went down like crazy to around 6%. Obama's is over 10% and growing, while the BLS has desperately tried to change the way unemployment is measured the past 2 years, and extending unemployment benefits to manipulate the charts.:thumbsup

TheDoc 06-22-2010 09:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17269469)
LMAO, I love when you guys bring up this chart,You're excited about we have stop loosing so many jobs, but does that matter to the 10% of the population that's getting unemployment, or that when Obama revels in the fact that the stimulus created 10k new jobs, never mind that there were 400k new unemployment claims for the same time period? Or that Obama revels in new jobs created in the government, who are paid with the taxes of those that are still employed, I have to wonder what kind of fuzzy math you guys are snorting?

Obama = FAIL on Jobs
Obama = FAIL on everything, he pushed the health care bill that we can't afford and don't want, he doesn't care, he has his agenda
Obama = FAIL on the oil spill, you guys that support Obama were all over GW's shit over Katrina, but that hardly compares to the major fuck up to the world under the Obama Administration
You guys voted in Obama because of the wars GW started, here we are 18 months later
He's going down as the biggest loser as a president
His approval rating has dropped faster than any president, even faster that GW, it's took years for GW's ratings to drop, for Obama it was months

The Demon posted the URL, I simply posted the chart... so you might want to correct who brings the chart up.

Obama hasn't had enough time to improve on jobs based on how long it has taken every other president in history.

I love the healthcare bill and know tons of people that do as well.

Of course people dieing and being forgot about and starving and blacks being rounded up after Katrina is far less of a problem than whatever Obama hasn't done with the Oil spill that you think he should have done.

I didn't vote for Obama...

You might want to check the approval rating statistics again: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...pproval_rating

Tom_PM 06-22-2010 09:16 AM

Just checking in on page 3 of a Demon thread to see how it's going.

Yep, the earth must still be turning. Carry on :)

BFT3K 06-22-2010 09:19 AM

It is much easier to complain, than it is to fix the problems.

Tax breaks for the rich did not help anyone but the rich.

Tax breaks for corporations that fuck the middle class did not help.

Less regulation for banks and Wall Street did not help.

Starting two unfunded wars in the middle east was not wise.

Continuing our reliance on fossil fuels, especially oil, does not help.

Allowing politicians to be funded by special interests does not help.

ETC...

Instead of complaining about Obama non-stop, how about offering solutions?

PS - If your solutions are already listed above, please try again.

TheDoc 06-22-2010 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17269484)
Reagan's unemployment went down like crazy to around 6%. Obama's is over 10% and growing, while the BLS has desperately tried to change the way unemployment is measured the past 2 years, and extending unemployment benefits to manipulate the charts.:thumbsup

While Reagan was President the numbers went from steady, to much worse. Basically 3 years of getting worse. It took him a 1 1/2 years to get it back to were it was was, and another 2 years to get it down to 6%.

How about you give Obama that amount of time Reagan required or does he only get 1/8 the the time, for some reason?

The Demon 06-22-2010 09:20 AM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...pproval_rating

This kinda proves our point Doc. Next time try using sources that help your argument. Plus, Obama has been on the lower side of the 40% disapproval for the better part of the past year.:)

Tom_PM 06-22-2010 09:20 AM

Their only problem is Obama.

Case closed, lmao.

The Demon 06-22-2010 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17269499)
While Reagan was President the numbers went from steady, to much worse. Basically 3 years of getting worse. It took him a 1 1/2 years to get it back to were it was was, and another 2 years to get it down to 6%.

How about you give Obama that amount of time Reagan required or does he only get 1/8 the the time, for some reason?

Are you looking at the same graphs we're looking, or are you continuing to make things up? Obama's #s keep going down(up in unemployment) all across the chart, while Reagan's kept going up(down in unemployment). Sorry, we're giving the same criticism to Obama that the few retards on this forum give to Bush. Can't handle it, then quit the double standards.

The Demon 06-22-2010 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 17269503)
Their only problem is Obama.

Case closed, lmao.

And the Democratic party. Your only problem was Bush and the Republican Party. +1 for hypocrisy and double standards:)

dyna mo 06-22-2010 09:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 17269503)
Their only problem is Obama.

Case closed, lmao.

what do you mean? :)

The Demon 06-22-2010 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17269516)
what do you mean? :)

Nothing, he brings to the table the same thing the other liberals on this forum do. No common sense, no argument, just hilarious comments.

BFT3K 06-22-2010 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 17269503)
Their only problem is Obama.

Case closed, lmao.

It is pathetic isn't it?

Obama is trying to help the middle class now that the GOP has placed the US in its worst position of our lifetime, and the Obama haters are so blinded by their own hatred, that rather than work together for a common good, they would rather just bash Obama, so that what? So that the same people that got us here can get back in power?

Sad...

The Demon 06-22-2010 09:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17269522)
It is pathetic isn't it?

Obama is trying to help the middle class now that the GOP has placed the US in its worst position of our lifetime, and the Obama haters are so blinded by their own hatred, that rather than work together for a common good, they would rather just bash Obama, so that what? So that the same people that got us here can get back in power?

Sad...

Definitely sad. The whole "blame the Republicans" rhetoric is hilarious, seeing as how Obama and the Democrats have destroyed this country in 2 years, far more than Bush could have in 8. Gotta love stupid people though, thanks for the amusement BFT3K.:winkwink:

BFT3K 06-22-2010 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17269525)
Definitely sad. The whole "blame the Republicans" rhetoric is hilarious, seeing as how Obama and the Democrats have destroyed this country in 2 years, far more than Bush could have in 8. Gotta love stupid people though, thanks for the amusement BFT3K.:winkwink:

It is hard to imagine a person more ignorant than yourself.

The Demon 06-22-2010 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17269530)
It is hard to imagine a person more ignorant than yourself.

It's definitely NOT had to imagine you being as dumb as they come, even by porn webmaster standards:) :) :)

BFT3K 06-22-2010 09:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17269535)
It's definitely NOT had to imagine you being as dumb as they come, even by porn webmaster standards:) :) :)

Anybody who told you to be yourself simply couldn't have given you worse advice...

The Demon 06-22-2010 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17269539)
Anybody who told you to be yourself simply couldn't have given you worse advice...

Shouldn't you be embarrassed that you're a grown man who possesses a legally retarded IQ?

BFT3K 06-22-2010 09:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17269545)
Shouldn't you be embarrassed that you're a grown man who possesses a legally retarded IQ?

I had a nightmare. I dreamt I was you.

dyna mo 06-22-2010 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17269522)
It is pathetic isn't it?

Obama is trying to help the middle class now that the GOP has placed the US in its worst position of our lifetime, and the Obama haters are so blinded by their own hatred, that rather than work together for a common good, they would rather just bash Obama, so that what? So that the same people that got us here can get back in power?

Sad...

that's really not an accurate portrayal, at least from where i stand.

charlie g 06-22-2010 09:38 AM

Help me, because admittedly I am not too bright? What is an unfunded war? Is there a funded war we have had? I am really confused when it is said Bush and his "unfunded wars". Didn't congress approve funds for Iraq and Afghanistan? Declaration of war and passing spending bills for war funding aren't the same thing?? Really, I am stupid... help me understand why this is different than Viet Nam or Korea... or were those unfunded wars too?

The Demon 06-22-2010 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17269573)
that's really not an accurate portrayal, at least from where i stand.

Lol@liberals having an accurate portrayal of reality.

The Demon 06-22-2010 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charlie g (Post 17269578)
Help me, because admittedly I am not too bright? What is an unfunded war? Is there a funded war we have had? I am really confused when it is said Bush and his "unfunded wars". Didn't congress approve funds for Iraq and Afghanistan? Declaration of war and passing spending bills for war funding aren't the same thing?? Really, I am stupid... help me understand why this is different than Viet Nam or Korea... or were those unfunded wars too?

Charlie, you're proving facts and a logical argument, two things the liberals on this forums can't cope with. Ignore the stupidity, they love to make things up just so they can sleep at night.

BFT3K 06-22-2010 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo (Post 17269573)
that's really not an accurate portrayal, at least from where i stand.

Please enlighten us as to how YOU would be fixing the world's problems, or even just the US problems. I am very curious....

charlie g 06-22-2010 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17269587)
Please enlighten us as to how YOU would be fixing the world's problems, or even just the US problems. I am very curious....

I know this question was directed at dynamo, but I have to ask.... Obama wasnt elected to fix the world's problems. He was elected to get us out of the war and fix the economy. Maybe I misunderstood his platform.... but I thought that was the change promised. I dont see much change... do you?

The Demon 06-22-2010 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charlie g (Post 17269608)
I know this question was directed at dynamo, but I have to ask.... Obama wasnt elected to fix the world's problems. He was elected to get us out of the war and fix the economy. Maybe I misunderstood his platform.... but I thought that was the change promised. I dont see much change... do you?

Unintelligent yet hilarious justification coming.....

dyna mo 06-22-2010 09:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17269587)
Please enlighten us as to how YOU would be fixing the world's problems, or even just the US problems. I am very curious....

gear down, big rig.

as i've mentioned previously in this thread, i'm not the sort to assume i understand the world. my comment was re: your portrayal of people who are disenchanted with obama as being obama haters that can't see reality due to their hatred. that's not the case with many of us.

Vendzilla 06-22-2010 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17269487)
The Demon posted the URL, I simply posted the chart... so you might want to correct who brings the chart up.

Obama hasn't had enough time to improve on jobs based on how long it has taken every other president in history.

I love the healthcare bill and know tons of people that do as well.

Of course people dieing and being forgot about and starving and blacks being rounded up after Katrina is far less of a problem than whatever Obama hasn't done with the Oil spill that you think he should have done.

I didn't vote for Obama...

You might want to check the approval rating statistics again: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...pproval_rating

We need heathcare reform, but you have to admit when Pelosi said we'll know whats in the healthcare bill after it's voted on, well that was kinda scary, now they are after reading everything, that it will not work like Obama said it will, employers have to cut back to afford the changes, it was not voted in bipartisan, it should have been, a good president would have got the two sides to work together on that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17269498)
It is much easier to complain, than it is to fix the problems.

Tax breaks for the rich did not help anyone but the rich.

Tax breaks for corporations that fuck the middle class did not help.

Starting two unfunded wars in the middle east was not wise.

Continuing our reliance on fossil fuels, especially oil, does not help.

Allowing politicians to be funded by special interests does not help.

ETC...

Instead of complaining about Obama non-stop, how about offering solutions?

PS - If your solutions are already listed above, please try again.

We've had this discussion, Obama even said that less people are paying ANY taxes, it's because poor people and most middle income people pay ZERO taxes, so any tax cuts that only benefit the rich, it's just a way for the democratic machine to spin it.

I have offered solutions, get rid of NAFTA, make it a level playing field for American companies to compete with foreign labor. less government means less taxes. More people working in better paying jobs means more people have healthcare. Use a pipe that goes inside the oil leak and inflates seals with hydraulic pressure to seal the fit with no leaks. Pull out of the two wars completely, drill for domestic oil, control it to supply the US first, then sell to other countries to bring down the price of oil world wide, taking away the money from the middle east and bankrupt them like Reagan brought down the USSR with star wars. Then when the economy can handle it, work on green energy, fire up the nuclear reactors and run them like the military runs reactors on a nuclear sub, no worries.


Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDoc (Post 17269499)
While Reagan was President the numbers went from steady, to much worse. Basically 3 years of getting worse. It took him a 1 1/2 years to get it back to were it was was, and another 2 years to get it down to 6%.

How about you give Obama that amount of time Reagan required or does he only get 1/8 the the time, for some reason?

If I saw one thing that would indicate that things might get better, I would agree with you, but doing the math, it doesn't add up. And remember it got worse under a democrat controlled house and senate, so I'm not looking to the democrats to make things better

BFT3K 06-22-2010 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17269630)
I have offered solutions, get rid of NAFTA, make it a level playing field for American companies to compete with foreign labor. less government means less taxes. More people working in better paying jobs means more people have healthcare. Use a pipe that goes inside the oil leak and inflates seals with hydraulic pressure to seal the fit with no leaks. Pull out of the two wars completely, drill for domestic oil, control it to supply the US first, then sell to other countries to bring down the price of oil world wide, taking away the money from the middle east and bankrupt them like Reagan brought down the USSR with star wars. Then when the economy can handle it, work on green energy, fire up the nuclear reactors and run them like the military runs reactors on a nuclear sub, no worries.

And I will respond in the same way I responded last time you were daydreaming on this board...

I would like a magic lamp, complete with a sexy genie who grants wishes.

charlie g 06-22-2010 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17269630)
We need heathcare reform, but you have to admit when Pelosi said we'll know whats in the healthcare bill after it's voted on, well that was kinda scary, now they are after reading everything, that it will not work like Obama said it will, employers have to cut back to afford the changes, it was not voted in bipartisan, it should have been, a good president would have got the two sides to work together on that.



We've had this discussion, Obama even said that less people are paying ANY taxes, it's because poor people and most middle income people pay ZERO taxes, so any tax cuts that only benefit the rich, it's just a way for the democratic machine to spin it.

I have offered solutions, get rid of NAFTA, make it a level playing field for American companies to compete with foreign labor. less government means less taxes. More people working in better paying jobs means more people have healthcare. Use a pipe that goes inside the oil leak and inflates seals with hydraulic pressure to seal the fit with no leaks. Pull out of the two wars completely, drill for domestic oil, control it to supply the US first, then sell to other countries to bring down the price of oil world wide, taking away the money from the middle east and bankrupt them like Reagan brought down the USSR with star wars. Then when the economy can handle it, work on green energy, fire up the nuclear reactors and run them like the military runs reactors on a nuclear sub, no worries.




If I saw one thing that would indicate that things might get better, I would agree with you, but doing the math, it doesn't add up. And remember it got worse under a democrat controlled house and senate, so I'm not looking to the democrats to make things better

Wow, so much good stuff in your post.

NAFTA was a republican fuck you from the get-go. Whoever didn't see this as a shift of the manufacturing base(and an attack on the middle class) was an imbecile.

Healthcare will never be reformed as long as lobbyists are free to throw money around like a drunken shriner at a whorehouse... without tort reform there will always be problems with health care costs and delivery.

The class warfare that the US taxcode inflicts on US society is nothing short of evil. The very wealthy pay little tax while those that work and make the economy click are ridden like beggars on a borrowed horse.

I would actually feel good about Obama if he pulled a JFK on our dependency on oil. JFK made it a national initiative to land a man on the moon. If Obama would set aside 1 trillion dollars to the first company that produced an internal combustion engine(or something equivalent) on a renewable energy source, our dependency on oil would all but cease. But that will never happen as the oil companies spend too much money in Washington.

I could go on and on about what should happen... but until money and politics aren't synonymous, I am just pissing in the wind. Obama sucks more than Bush. At least Obama is intelligent enough to know he's fucking America... Bush I am not so sure he had a clue.

Serial Pervert 06-22-2010 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17267562)

nice pic!

BFT3K 06-22-2010 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charlie g (Post 17269704)
Wow, so much good stuff in your post.

NAFTA was a republican fuck you from the get-go. Whoever didn't see this as a shift of the manufacturing base(and an attack on the middle class) was an imbecile.

Healthcare will never be reformed as long as lobbyists are free to throw money around like a drunken shriner at a whorehouse... without tort reform there will always be problems with health care costs and delivery.

The class warfare that the US taxcode inflicts on US society is nothing short of evil. The very wealthy pay little tax while those that work and make the economy click are ridden like beggars on a borrowed horse.

I would actually feel good about Obama if he pulled a JFK on our dependency on oil. JFK made it a national initiative to land a man on the moon. If Obama would set aside 1 trillion dollars to the first company that produced an internal combustion engine(or something equivalent) on a renewable energy source, our dependency on oil would all but cease. But that will never happen as the oil companies spend too much money in Washington.

I could go on and on about what should happen... but until money and politics aren't synonymous, I am just pissing in the wind. Obama sucks more than Bush. At least Obama is intelligent enough to know he's fucking America... Bush I am not so sure he had a clue.

How do you support healthcare reform and alternate energy, and then bash Obama? WTF?! I was agreeing with most of your post until you drew that bizarre conclusion.

BFT3K 06-22-2010 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Serial Pervert (Post 17269717)
nice pic!

"Well kids, you tried and you failed. What have you learned? Never try. ~ Homer Simpson

Vendzilla 06-22-2010 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17269660)
And I will respond in the same way I responded last time you were daydreaming on this board...

I would like a magic lamp, complete with a sexy genie who grants wishes.

Yet you offer no criticism or debate?

The Demon 06-22-2010 10:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17269733)
Yet you offer no criticism or debate?

Haven't you noticed that BFT3K is a moron? He can't debate logically, nor use facts. His only response will be some kind of retarded insult that draws attention away from the debate. He's incredibly easy to ridicule.

charlie g 06-22-2010 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17269723)
How do you support healthcare reform and alternate energy, and then bash Obama? WTF?! I was agreeing with most of your post until you drew that bizarre conclusion.

Look, I am not on either side. Obama inherited a really shitty lot from Bush. But Obama is not what was advertised. The health reform promised was not what was delivered. He has done nothing to ween us off our dependency on oil. If he were truly the revolutionary that he purported to be he would make alternative fuels a priority in his administration and not pay lip service to the idea. Healthcare can NEVER be reformed as long as trial lawyers have unfettered access to the financial pillars of the healthcare system. This is not rocket science, but you can not get that far into this game unless you play ball with oil and trial lawyers... hell, probably 80% of congress are lawyers.... what does that tell you?

I know many people are invested in the dem-rep struggle. But if you look at things going on for what they are and take off the donkey or elephant cheerleeding outfit, the base solutions aren't that difficult. The guys in washington will always make it seem more complicated than it really is because it is in their best interests to do so.

Amputate Your Head 06-22-2010 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charlie g (Post 17269578)
Help me, because admittedly I am not too bright? What is an unfunded war? Is there a funded war we have had? I am really confused when it is said Bush and his "unfunded wars". Didn't congress approve funds for Iraq and Afghanistan? Declaration of war and passing spending bills for war funding aren't the same thing?? Really, I am stupid... help me understand why this is different than Viet Nam or Korea... or were those unfunded wars too?

Perhaps he meant 'unfounded'. Because both of them are certainly unfounded.

Gouge 06-22-2010 10:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17268521)
A spell checker would not have picked it up, as "your" is also a properly spelled word.

Here's a funny Japanese Jet Pack...



https://youtube.com/watch?v=LHf-ocT9n3E

Microsoft Word has an option to run Grammar checks along with the spelling so yes it would have picked it up and gave me options...you sir loose again.

charlie g 06-22-2010 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 17269817)
Perhaps he meant 'unfounded'. Because both of them are certainly unfounded.

Quite possibly. I thought gw was criticized for fighting in Iraq when he should have been in Afghanistan? Honest question, not trying to stir the pot. I have long ago stopped paying attention to what is happening there. I really do not know what the answer is to that situation. I am jut sad that people continue to be killed and maimed there.

directfiesta 06-22-2010 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17269743)
Haven't you noticed that BFT3K is a moron? He can't debate logically, nor use facts. His only response will be some kind of retarded insult that draws attention away from the debate. He's incredibly easy to ridicule.


:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

Amputate Your Head 06-22-2010 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by charlie g (Post 17269848)
Quite possibly. I thought gw was criticized for fighting in Iraq when he should have been in Afghanistan? Honest question, not trying to stir the pot. I have long ago stopped paying attention to what is happening there. I really do not know what the answer is to that situation. I am jut sad that people continue to be killed and maimed there.

Depends on who you talk to and what you believe. I believe we are in both locations for no other reason than to secure that region until the last drop of oil is pumped out. After that, we will pull out faster than a 16 year old kid scared of parenting. My problem with that lies not in what we are doing, but the way we went about doing it. We can't be upfront and public about invading other countries for oil, so we create "situations" to rally patriotic support of the public to invade under a lie.

Anyone with the ability to reason can easily figure out we are not sacrificing our soldiers and spending billions upon billions to look around the Afghani countryside for one man. That is utterly ridiculous and insulting to anyone over the age of 2. And it's not because we give a shit about the Afghani people and their "plight" with the Taliban. Look how fast we ditch countries that have nothing to offer us: Somalia.

Iraq is no different. We aren't in either location to "win the war". We are there to secure property. Nothing more, nothing less.

Gouge 06-22-2010 11:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gouge (Post 17269820)
Microsoft Word has an option to run Grammar checks along with the spelling so yes it would have picked it up and gave me options...you sir loose again.

I mean Lose :winkwink:

Hornydog4cooter 06-22-2010 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17269743)
He can't debate logically, nor use facts. His only response will be some kind of retarded insult that draws attention away from the debate. .

Yes i much prefer your intelligent insults damn that guy :2 cents:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc