Because it's enjoyable to humiliate incompetent, grown men.

That's what I told your boyfriend the other night, right before he tried to hit me with your purse! :1orglaugh

Why is it a baseless assertion? Your record here speaks clearly enough. You attack the current administration every chance you get. You attack those with opposing views. And now you're suggesting that it's okay for a military General to publicly go against the policies of the Commander In Chief by laying down comments like, because Obama got "butthurt". How exactly am I misinterpreting your position? Your position is very clear. I hardly think that's baseless. In fact, it's got quite a stable base.

This is yet again, a baseless assertion. Try not being like a little child and repeating something so many times, where you believe it to be true.

This isn't baseless, it's just untrue. I'm on this forum maybe 1-2 days a week tops, so that assertion would be retarded. I attack those with opposing views who are stupid and provide no argument, other than attacking the other person.. You pretty much do the exact same thing which makes you a hypocrite who uses double standards.

Tell me, what policies is the General going against? Because as I recall, I never listed any, nor congratulated him for going against Obama's policies. So there we have a strawman and you once again prove your inability to read. Simple enough, class dismissed:)

Okay Demon. You're right. You win. Good luck. :)

Oh RudeDick, you know that kind of thing only happens in your demented little wish dreams. :1orglaugh

Aww what's the matter, you're not going to fight me on your obvious stupidity? Shucks, I was looking for a challenge. Guess I'll have to find it elsewhere.:winkwink::winkwink::winkwink:

Why would you bother debating an ignorant troll?

He is just here so you can hurl insults at someone, without fear of repercussions.

So you detest the Constitution?

What is your solution to this? Only allow people who have been in the military to be President?

Same reason why people bother responding to you, other than to ridicule you.:thumbsup

That's what I just said in my previous post. Please see above. Are you sure you're able to follow along on these English boards?

Yea, I'm totally sure, however you haven't been able to which is why you had to concede. Better luck next time:)

It was Bush's fault. Who knew? :winkwink::1orglaugh:thumbsup

That wasn't even a coherent sentence! Are you even trying?

I can eat a bowl of alphabet soup and puke up more intelligent responses! :1orglaugh

So sad, no wonder you're the laughing stock of GFY. You can't even understand complete, coherent sentences. Guess that's why you're in porn. :thumbsup

Brilliant! - Insult porn on an adult industry board!

Nice one! :thumbsup

That should gain you plenty of supporters here! :1orglaugh

What a fucking dumb ass....

No, just insulting a dumbass for being in porn because he was too stupid for anything else. It's sad enough I have more support than you have in your own career ROFL.

dohhhhh.

btw, been perusing your site/services. if i send over the link to my mainstream product site (when it's ready), can y'all tell me which of your services i could benefit from?

:thumbsup

Oh no, you can't backtrack jackass.

You just said...

"You can't even understand complete, coherent sentences. Guess that's why you're in porn."

That is a DIRECT INSULT to 99% of the people who post here.

YOU ARE AN ASS!

Anyone in adult who takes you seriously after that, should double check their loyalties.

You are clearly an anti-porn person, trolling a porn board.

The cat's out of the bag, fag!

Well, I'm not a mind-reader or possess any magic and don't use ICQ and really don't have discussions about the topics we discuss here with anyone, and I work alone and only have two dogs for company, and so I gain information (here) about a person's thought patterns by engaging in as much dialog as I can before (or if) they descend into insults. Troll or not, the thoughts and processes are in a person's mind when they're typing them out. So it's always good intel. I'm not opposed to different viewpoints, but I reserve the right to disagree with them just like anyone else, and I'm not concerned about being proven wrong, provided someone can do it through proper adult dialog. I'm too old to argue with kids. :)

In Demon's case, it's not easy to get much info out of him because he begins with insults. But if you push hard enough in the right places and can wade through it a bit, eventually you get a little. I guess I'm curious about what he gets out of it, maybe so I can figure out what I used to get out of it when I did the same thing. I don't think I got anything out of it. Was probably just purely a vent. I don't know... whatever.


Bots are annoying though. Total waste of time.

He wont be court-martialed and/or dishonorably discharged, and stop talking about the UCMJ as if you know anything about its provisions or articles.

Oh man, look at the incompetent social outcast go buckwild. I mean I'm not sure if I'm typing to a grown man, or a handicapped 3rd grader.

A waste of time, you mean like making shit up, getting embarrassed, backtracking and conceding with the idea that you're too "old" or I'm a bot? Awwww how adorable, I can tell you have low self esteem because that amount of denial isn't healthy.

Do you even watch or read the news at all? They've only been quoting directly from the specific UCMJ paragraph that he's broken all day. A 3 year old child knows what it says by now. So you can stop talking as if you have any idea what I do or do not know.

Oh man, talk about throwing insults out there and then criticizing others for doing the same. Hypocrisy+1:)

1. I made nothing up.
2. I'm embarrassed of nothing.
3. I didn't backtrack out of anything.
4. It's my life and if I say I'm too old to try having a discussion with a child that prefers insults, then that's what it means.
5. I never said you were a bot.
6. You are making baseless assumptions.

I'm going with a grown man that's an incompetent social outcast and handicapped with the mind of a 3rd grader. But he's still fun to bat around like a ball of yarn when bored.

You're also adept at lying to yourself.

Good point rofl.

Damn, got a family member on his 2nd tour over there with the Aussie forces, and he said the Americans are having a real hard time. I don't see how changing the General who obviously knows what is happening on the ground will help. If the General is speaking the truth then suck it up and deal with it.. if he is telling porkies then sure bring him home and fire him.

If you only want to hear yes sir its all unicorn rides and lollypops then put in some 'yes' man into the position.

A "face-to-face" meeting is essential for good communication.

Interesting.... complete separation from reality, yet crying out.... no.... yearning for help at the same time.

Do you yearn for comfort?

The only ones that come close are 88-89 however no where in the article was he contemptuous, insubordanate or disrespectful towards a superior commissioned officer or critical to the afghanistan policy.

I am very familiar with the UCMJ...and you are right...he won't be but...yes ...technically he could be Court Martialed.

Does it embarrass you to repeat my insults back to me? :winkwink:

here, educate yourself ...

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12313869/


Where were you when generals were calling for more time/tropps ? In a tea pot ?

Have to love people who have never served telling everyone how the UCMJ is interpreted because they read some blog.

Hence this:

I obviously wasn't following politics at that time, dur! This is beyond your comprehension directfiesta, you best stay in the background like a good little child.

Not at all. Do you feel you need to point that out? Did I infringe on one of your insults? I wasn't aware, my deepest apologies Demon. You'd like extra credit for it so you wanted to make sure and get a word in about it? Is that it? Anything else I can help you with today sir? :)

Yes, I haven't put on deodorant lately, can you be a dear and get my axe:)