![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Do the math. Figure out how many men (and women) we have in Iraq and Afghanistan. It sounds like a staggering number. There's currently less than 100k in Iraq. There is 94k in Afighanistan. So figure like 200k troops total. Then figure the US Marines, the smallest branch, has some 400k members. Do the math. If we need to deploy two hundred thousand troops into Iran, we can. Not to mention we already have the infrastructure - Iran is surrounded by GASP Iraq and Afghanistan.... And all of our troops there. Trust me, if we needed to.... We could place millions of troops into another country if given enough time. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
No matter what you think about iran, this war will shoot gas prices sky high in the US
|
Quote:
Of course, this might well be a more compelling reason. As I recall, Shrub didn't take too kindly to Saddam pulling the same stunt back in '03. |
Quote:
:error |
Quote:
|
Everyone loves a good War Thread!
Do you believe we will live through WWIII? |
Quote:
|
There's going to be a war with Iran? when did this happen? why wasn't i informed?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I doubt that a land war is necessary as we have tremendous air power capability as well as Naval power. Air strikes and a Naval blockade of the Gulf would bring Iran to its knees in a reasonably short period of time. When all is said and done Iran's military capabilities compared to ours is insignificant. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I do not believe it will be "like" any other war to date, and I have no idea why we would allow ourselves to be dragged into it. In my opinion, it would be the dumbest war we could ever get involved in. :2 cents: |
Quote:
but i hear what you are saying and agree, if shit hit the fan and we needed to we could increase troop #s etc. but seriously, i can't discount how much these guys weigh history, 2 long protracted wars + 1 is truly against the odds of history. maybe i'm giving too much credit to the top brass but usually those guys are the smartest guys in the room and they look for winnable outcomes/goals. |
Quote:
Iraq and Afganistan did not need to be prolonged...our politicians for whatever their reasons decided to occupy the two countries and do nation building In both countries the military and governments were defeated in a matter of weeks...and victory should have been declared and our forces withdrawn. There would be no need to engage in a land war in Iran...or to occupy the country...or to nation build. With air strikes and a Naval blockade they can be brought to thier knees in short thrift. That is not to say that our politicians...for whatever their reasons...would not once again engage in a prolonged affair. |
After they bomb Iran in November we are looking at WW 3 unfortunately.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
just let me know when i can start tearing up ohio.
|
Quote:
BTW...we defeated the Iraqi military and overthrew the government in 24 days...mission accomplished by our military...but for whatever the reasons the politicians decided to occupy the country and do nation building. |
Quote:
iran and iraq war lasted 10-11 years with a stalemate and you see what we did to iraq in short order... our technology is far superior to any nation out there, but i dont think we would want a quick war.. . |
Quote:
It is an interesting development if true. If true it shows just how serious the Saudis are about stopping Iran from going nuclear...... as allowing Israel to stage an attack form their soil would be unprecedented...... to say the least. :2 cents: |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
can't wait, let's get everyone trained on how to use an automatic weapon ASAP ... mom too !
|
Quote:
|
What do you believe? What is true, what is propaganda?
How can anyone believe ANYTHING anymore? http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/ |
Quote:
also, that was a long time ago and our weaponry has grown leaps and bounds... the US would decimate iran in a war just like we did in iraq... and just like iraq, we will be stuck there playing police force for the next hundred years.. . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You have to understand two things about the American military. 1) ALL rules of engagement, policies and movement are determined by their civilian leaders. The military is only as good as the politicians allow them to be. Right now their hands are tied and unable to complete the task at hand. This has NOTHING to do with the ability of these brave men and women soldiers. 2) The US military is capable of handling any job. They are brave, well trained, willing and able. Any short comings come from politicians, not those in uniform. You must understand the system. You can not point fingers at soldiers who's job is to OBEY ORDERS. However if you give them an order or a task, they will complete it with success so long as their hands are not tied, as they are now. |
Quote:
Quote:
how do you plan on killing guys who bunker in some of the most treacherous land on the planet? make a giant bulldozer and run over mountains? you can drop 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000x bombs and it wont make a dent in the landscape of these mountains. |
Quote:
what if the job is not meant to be completed? how do you have a successful task that is not meant to be finished in the first place? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
military should have power over itself. we all know how great military dictatorship turns out. :1orglaugh |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:31 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc