GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Fact or fiction? The myths and realities of illegal immigration (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=976453)

Serial Pervert 07-05-2010 11:27 AM

yeah, but most part of those jobs, americans would not accept doing, physical stuffs, etc

Brujah 07-05-2010 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17309586)
lets see, things like they don't speak english, don't have a drivers license for the US, have 15 people in a yugo.

:1orglaugh This was a great thread. When are you bringing that politics forum online Vendzilla? I'll help you bait and troll for comments or replies.

cherrylula 07-05-2010 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 17309326)
You shut your dirty liberal hippie mouth. President Reagan gave amnesty to illegals.

um, I'm far from a liberal hippy. But if you want to name call go ahead, it only makes you look ignorant!

you should move to North Hollywood, CA. But make sure you speak spanish as the coupons you get in the mail won't be in english. :1orglaugh

Vendzilla 07-05-2010 11:30 AM

the bad thing about this law that Arizona put into effect is that now every illegal alien will be calling for court time, free food and jail while the trial is held to see if they were racially profiled, filling up the courts and causing more costs. All because the the FUCKING IDIOT in office won't back this, FUCK HIM

cherrylula 07-05-2010 11:32 AM

Fact is laws will be enacted, opinions of people who aren't concerned are useless. Only good for views on a message board.

Brujah 07-05-2010 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cherrylula (Post 17309598)
you should move to North Hollywood, CA. But make sure you speak spanish as the coupons you get in the mail won't be in english. :1orglaugh

Bueno! Tengo hambre.

Yanks_Todd 07-05-2010 11:40 AM

I think unless you have lived in a border state you don't fully grasp the deepness of this issue. This ISN'T about Jose taking the job I wanted my son to have at PF Changs. This is about a serious criminal element that is crossing the border and causing damage. That criminal element is from Mexico (a country not a race). Obviously a vast majority of that nationality are of a specific race so that opens the door for the race card to be played endlessly and creatively.

I have travel all over the world and on many occasions been asked to show my ID. When it happened in Thailand I would bet I stood out because I was white. Was I offended? Not a bit. I am not Thai and I was visiting their country, I have no problem if you want to know if I am there legally.

I think the law is OK, I feel nervous about how the AZ police (MANY of which are horrendous, white trash, ignorant and power hungry) will enforce it.

But we need to bring this issue to the surface. Phoenix has skyrocketed to the top of violent crime charts and kidnapping and it simply is not an influx of Australians causing it.

cherrylula 07-05-2010 11:45 AM

I have a friend who is an LAPD. He's told me all sorts of stories about when they break up coyote houses, and all the human trafficking the Mexicans do. Really terrible stuff. Houses filled to standing room only with dirty, sick people. I could go on with lots of stories from people I know right in the mix. It's not just family guys at home depot.

Brujah 07-05-2010 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cherrylula (Post 17309658)
I have a friend who is an LAPD. He's told me all sorts of stories about when they break up coyote houses, and all the human trafficking the Mexicans do. Really terrible stuff. Houses filled to standing room only with dirty, sick people. I could go on with lots of stories from people I know right in the mix. It's not just family guys at home depot.

They're still already illegal, and already doing illegal things. This is like arguing against the right to bear arms because criminals use guns to perform illegal acts. It was already against the law in the first place, so punishing innocent gun owners isn't necessarily the right answer.

theking 07-05-2010 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17309568)
I guess you forgot about the end of the cold war, taking down the Berlin wall, unemployment from 10% down to what, 4? Iran backing down. But you of course just want to look at the negative.
I was in between the fleet and the coast of Iran when he took office on a nuclear submarine, so don't come at me about borrowing some money, it's a loosing debate with me. I will also remind you that my daughter is on the USS Ronald Reagan. Do you think they're going to build a USS Obamanation?
And it's not going to compare to the ASSHOLE in office that's borrowing like a 18 year old with his first credit card and wondering WTF when he gets his first statement, in this case, 2010 elections

I am not forgetting anything about President Reagan's administration...and just as with every President...there are pros and cons depending upon one's individual perception. What ever his pros are percieved to be...there is not any denying the fact that the less than one trillion dollar national debt...which had taken two hundred years to reach that level...was quadrupled in his eight year term of office. What ever his accomplishments are percieved to be it was accomplished on the back of borrowing from foreign countries and putting the nation deeply in debt and every President since has followed in his foot steps of borrow and spend.

I personally do not view his administration as having left the country in great shape. The last time the country was in great shape was during the '50's...up to early or maybe mid 60's...and since then it has been all downhill...to our current situation.

Yanks_Todd 07-05-2010 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cherrylula (Post 17309658)
I have a friend who is an LAPD. He's told me all sorts of stories about when they break up coyote houses, and all the human trafficking the Mexicans do. Really terrible stuff. Houses filled to standing room only with dirty, sick people. I could go on with lots of stories from people I know right in the mix. It's not just family guys at home depot.

Good post, I think that is point that many people don't get. I live in Seattle and saw a protest against the AZ law. The protesters were all focused on the simplistic notion that AZ was just trying to kick out good hard working people that are taking "good" American jobs.

(BTW, I lived in Phoenix for 8 years and San Diego for 5)

JustDaveXxx 07-05-2010 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 17309379)
I have family and friends in Arizona. Proud hispanic Americans.

OHHH so it comes out. Because you are Hispanic, these laws upsets you? That would explain why you are getting all Jesse Jackson in this thread. You need to think logically and quit getting all EMO in this thread.

I am Latin, my grandfather was the 1st Hispanic in the US to own a radio station in Texas. I got through college with 2 degrees and through law school with the help of hispanic scholarships. Im not talking $500, im talking over $40K+ for being a latin student. Being Latin got me an education that i may not been able to get otherwise.


So, i do know where you are coming from. It kinda sux to think of your family members being fucked with by the police because they are brown skinned. But things need to change. Sacrifices need to be made.


States are going broke. There are some serious drains on our state economies because of all of the people that are here illegally. Kicking people out that dont belong here is a good start.


Do you think that good Arab+Muslim people like getting singled out in the airport? Fuck no, but surfaces need to be made there too. The airport is one place where Blacks and Mexicans will never be singled out for being a suspected terrorist.


Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan (Post 17309422)


now this thread is about ILLEGAL IMIGRATION, not everything ILLEGAL. if you cannot stick to that topic it shows you have no idea what you are talking about.


So true.




Funny story: I was at Kino Flo in Burbank Ca. picking up a a few lights from repair 2 weeks ago. I have know all of the warehouse workers and different managers for about 8 years. I speak spanish to them and drop them all off porn DVDs. As a result i get my lights fixed fast and usually for free. Even when out of warranty. Great group of guys.


So the subject of the AZ immigration law came up and everyone thought it was fucked up and racist. So i asked them how much do you guys make an hour? $18+? My question was this "How would you feel if your White bosses called you up to the office and told you guys, you need to get your pay cut to $9 an hour because we have all of these new applicants that will do your job for $9 an hour and they are willing to start today if you say no"

I told them to keep in mind, you move boxes and anybody can be trained to do that.


All 6 of them said thats fucked up! Then i told them that Kino Flo can easily go down the street to the Home Depot parking lot and start a bidding war for your job positions. Kino Flo will easily be able to cut their warehouse budget in half, in one day.

So then i said fuck it!, lets git rid of the AZ law and give all of the illegals amnesty starting next month. We will pick a day 30 days from now and make everyone in this country legal.

How many more are gonna head over to our country when we make that amnesty announcement i asked? To further that, how many more are gonna keep coming, knowing that we give out amnesty every 10 years? Now with all of these guys with their new work permits granted by our new Amnesty laws and now looking for a job, how safe is your job now???


After i left all of these guys were pretty concerned with what i said and definitely had a different view of immigration and all of the laws pertaining to it.

Vendzilla 07-05-2010 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 17309674)
I am not forgetting anything about President Reagan's administration...and just as with every President...there are pros and cons depending upon one's individual perception. What ever his pros are percieved to be...there is not any denying the fact that the less than one trillion dollar national debt...which had taken two hundred years to reach that level...was quadrupled in his eight year term of office. What ever his accomplishments are percieved to be it was accomplished on the back of borrowing from foreign countries and putting the nation deeply in debt and every President since has followed in his foot steps of borrow and spend.

I personally do not view his administration as having left the country in great shape. The last time the country was in great shape was during the '50's...up to early or maybe mid 60's...and since then it has been all downhill...to our current situation.

In the 50's?
You mean back when they taught kids to duck and cover? Are you kidding me?

theking 07-05-2010 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17309704)
In the 50's?
You mean back when they taught kids to duck and cover? Are you kidding me?

No I am not kidding you...and what does "duck and cover" have to do with our economy going down hill...since the early to mid '60's. During the '50's and early to mid '60's one average working person in the family could live the American dream...new home...new car...latest applicances...vaction's etc. etc. Those days are gone and will never return.

DBS.US 07-05-2010 12:23 PM

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Yanks_Todd 07-05-2010 12:46 PM

The real solution is air-tight borders and numerous work depots in Mexico funded by Mexico from which the supply and demand of labor of both countries can be met while cutting the criminal element out of the loop.

This also benefits Mexico as most of the guns used in the current rash of drug violence are good ol American weapons.

DBS.US 07-05-2010 12:58 PM

Just start by giving fines to companies that hire workers without ID.

Vendzilla 07-05-2010 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 17309727)
No I am not kidding you...and what does "duck and cover" have to do with our economy going down hill...since the early to mid '60's. During the '50's and early to mid '60's one average working person in the family could live the American dream...new home...new car...latest applicances...vaction's etc. etc. Those days are gone and will never return.

Duck and Cover come from the cold war we were in, I lived thru that and served during that, during the Reagan administration, it went bye bye.
The world was on the brink of going "poof!"
Maybe you should read a little about Cuba?

GotGauge 07-05-2010 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17309863)
Duck and Cover come from the cold war we were in, I lived thru that and served during that, during the Reagan administration, it went bye bye.
The world was on the brink of going "poof!"
Maybe you should read a little about Cuba?

Vendzilla can you ICQ me?
22264474

tony286 07-05-2010 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 17309434)
Are you forgetting that President Reagan started the ball rolling to borowing money from foreign countries as he was the first President to do this and that he quadrupled the National Debt during his eight years in office...how can anyone call that leaving the country in great shape?

Also the largest tax increase in peacetime and lets not forget the meese commission.

uno 07-05-2010 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan (Post 17309521)
so you do. you have a personal vendetta in this issue it is now clear.

lol, nvm.

theking 07-05-2010 01:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17309863)
Duck and Cover come from the cold war we were in, I lived thru that and served during that, during the Reagan administration, it went bye bye.
The world was on the brink of going "poof!"
Maybe you should read a little about Cuba?

I know what "duck and cover" is...I too lived thru those years...and no...the world was not anymore in danger of going "poof" than it is now. During the "Cuban Missile Crisis" the world was not in danger of going "poof"...MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) existed and niether the U.S. or the Soviets were dumb enough to launch nukes at one another. In my opinion the world is actually a more dangerous place now than it was during the "Cold War". None of this has anything to do with the points that I was making. BTW...President Reagan did not end the "Cold War"...it was the accumulated policy of every administration...since and including President Truman's administration against the Soviet's that brought an end to the "Cold War"...combined with the internal collaspe of the Soviet system.

almoe 07-05-2010 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brentbacardi (Post 17307944)
"The Social Security Administration has estimated about three-quarters of illegal workers have taxes for Social Security and Medicare taken out of their paychecks — programs in which they cannot legally participate unless they become legal residents."

Whoever wrote that is a DUMB ASS

Just how the fuck does the SSA collect this money? You need a Social Security Number/Card to have FICA and Medicare taxes collected. If you have a SSN you're not illegal. --- Fucktards

Quote:

Originally Posted by Oracle Porn (Post 17309473)
Living in the states for 3 years (LEGALLY) I saw a lot more LAZY ASS useless American white trash rather then lazy immigrants, usually immigrants want to succeed in life, that's why they move out of their home country.

I do not disagree with what you said ... but if these folks would just stay home and use that ambition to fix their own fucking country both sides would be better off.

Almoe

theking 07-05-2010 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by almoe (Post 17310075)
Whoever wrote that is a DUMB ASS

Just how the fuck does the SSA collect this money? You need a Social Security Number/Card to have FICA and Medicare taxes collected. If you have a SSN you're not illegal. --- Fucktards

Almoe

The answer is very simple...using someone's SSA number...stolen SSA number.

Brujah 07-05-2010 02:26 PM

http://images.cheezburger.com/comple...4022251801.gif

brassmonkey 07-05-2010 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 17310117)

gordo gracioso

PenisFace 07-05-2010 02:53 PM

Quote:

I fail to understand why we allow anyone from any other country to come into the US and work legally. Until the day when unemployment in the US is 0%, no one who isn't a US citizen should be allowed to work.
For someone who argues so fervently, you need to read up on legal immigration to the United States. Simply put, it is not an easy process, and you don't get to live and work in the United States if your only hope of employment is unskilled or partially skilled work. For a Canadian to be granted access to live and work in the United States, they must have an appropriate education (usually requiring a bachelors degree) in a specific field. Usually, these fields are science, medical, and a few others.

Basically, you must be able to work in a field that requires lots of qualifications. What does this mean? It means that there aren't enough Americans who are educated enough to fill these jobs, which means it's time to bring in people who are. I couldn't move the united states to be a municipal worker, or a truck driver, or an auto mechanic. Because there are plenty of Americans who do that and who are qualified to do so. I could, however, move to the Unitd States to be a pharmacist, a landscape architect, or an English teacher. Because people with those skills are lacking in the US. In order to work a job/career in the United States, I must:

1) Have education (bachelors degree, usually) in a specific field.

2) There can not be any Americans with the same education credentials who are also trying to get the same job. If there are, they get it, I don't.

3) The employer must submit documentation stating that you are working for them. If the company goes under, or you get laid off, or fired, you can not simply get another job to make ends meet. You have to work in the same field, and have the new company submit new documentation indicating that you now work for them.

4) If the industry collapses, or jobs are not available, you go back to your own country. Like I said above, I can't leave my job as a landscape architect or english teacher to work at a grocery store.

Living and working in the US means that you have skills that Americans don't have, or there is a shortage of people who have those skills. That's it. That is the only way you can legally work in the united states, at least if you are an every-man. There are different rules and regs, but they only apply to the top 1% of the population, wealth wise.

You can be granted permanent residence in the United States if you invest in, or create a company that employs 10 americans for (I believe) a minimum of 2 years. If, after 2 years, you still have 10 americans employed, you are granted residence status. If the company folds after a year, you're out of luck, thanks for trying.

Cliffs: The only reason people who aren't american work and live in the united states, is because there are not enough Americans with the skills to fill the jobs. You don't live and work there if you're going to be a cashier at a grocery store.


ME? I'm working on my bachelors, and I plan on relocating the united states within 5 years. The field im studying has nearly no prospects in the United States. Most people in the field, are from somewhere else.

Vendzilla 07-05-2010 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GotGauge (Post 17309903)
Vendzilla can you ICQ me?
22264474

I'm heading out the door, give ya a jingle when I get back
Quote:

Originally Posted by tony299 (Post 17309916)
Also the largest tax increase in peacetime and lets not forget the meese commission.

Peacetime, guess you didn't know about the cold war, I recieved a medal because it was war time when I was in the Navy during his p[residency, I guess you're wrong
Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 17309949)
I know what "duck and cover" is...I too lived thru those years...and no...the world was not anymore in danger of going "poof" than it is now. During the "Cuban Missile Crisis" the world was not in danger of going "poof"...MAD (Mutual Assured Destruction) existed and niether the U.S. or the Soviets were dumb enough to launch nukes at one another. In my opinion the world is actually a more dangerous place now than it was during the "Cold War". None of this has anything to do with the points that I was making. BTW...President Reagan did not end the "Cold War"...it was the accumulated policy of every administration...since and including President Truman's administration against the Soviet's that brought an end to the "Cold War"...combined with the internal collaspe of the Soviet system.

You are sooo full of shit

By the early 1980s, the USSR had built up a military arsenal and army surpassing that of the United States. Previously, the U.S. had relied on the qualitative superiority of its weapons to essentially frighten the Soviets, but the gap had been narrowed.After President Reagan's military buildup, the Soviet Union did not further dramatically build up its military;the enormous military expenses, in combination with collectivized agriculture and inefficient planned manufacturing, were a heavy burden for the Soviet economy. At the same time, the Reagan Administration persuaded Saudi Arabia to increase oil production, which resulted in a drop of oil prices in 1985 to one-third of the previous level; oil was the main source of Soviet export revenues.These factors gradually brought the Soviet economy to a stagnant state during Gorbachev's tenure.

Ronald Reagan recognized the change in the direction of the Soviet leadership with Mikhail Gorbachev, and shifted to diplomacy, with a view to encourage the Soviet leader to pursue substantial arms agreements. Reagan's personal mission was to achieve "a world free of nuclear weapons," which he regarded as "totally irrational, totally inhumane, good for nothing but killing, possibly destructive of life on earth and civilization." He was able to start discussions on nuclear disarmament with General Secretary Gorbachev. Gorbachev and Reagan held four summit conferences between 1985 and 1988: the first in Geneva, Switzerland, the second in Reykjavík, Iceland, the third in Washington, D.C., and the fourth in Moscow. Reagan believed that if he could persuade the Soviets to allow for more democracy and free speech, this would lead to reform and the end of Communism.

Speaking at the Berlin Wall on June 12, 1987, Reagan challenged Gorbachev to go further, saying:

? "General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization, come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" ?


Reagan and Gorbachev sign the INF Treaty at the White House in 1987Prior to Gorbachev visiting Washington, D.C., for the third summit in 1987, the Soviet leader announced his intention to pursue significant arms agreements. The timing of the announcement led Western diplomats to contend that Gorbachev was offering major concessions to the U.S. on the levels of conventional forces, nuclear weapons, and policy in Eastern Europe. He and Reagan signed the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty at the White House, which eliminated an entire class of nuclear weapons. The two leaders laid the framework for the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or START I; Reagan insisted that the name of the treaty be changed from Strategic Arms Limitation Talks to Strategic Arms Reduction Talks.

When Reagan visited Moscow for the fourth summit in 1988, he was viewed as a celebrity by Russians. A journalist asked the president if he still considered the Soviet Union the evil empire. "No", he replied, "I was talking about another time, another era." At Gorbachev's request, Reagan gave a speech on free markets at the Moscow State University. In his autobiography, An American Life, Reagan expressed his optimism about the new direction that they charted, his warm feelings for Gorbachev.The Berlin Wall was torn down beginning in 1989 and two years later the Soviet Union collapsed.

theking 07-05-2010 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17310302)
I'm heading out the door, give ya a jingle when I get back

Peacetime, guess you didn't know about the cold war, I recieved a medal because it was war time when I was in the Navy during his p[residency, I guess you're wrong


You are sooo full of shit

By the early 1980s, the USSR had built up a military arsenal and army surpassing that of the United States. Previously, the U.S. had relied on the qualitative superiority of its weapons to essentially frighten the Soviets, but the gap had been narrowed.After President Reagan's military buildup, the Soviet Union did not further dramatically build up its military;the enormous military expenses, in combination with collectivized agriculture and inefficient planned manufacturing, were a heavy burden for the Soviet economy. At the same time, the Reagan Administration persuaded Saudi Arabia to increase oil production, which resulted in a drop of oil prices in 1985 to one-third of the previous level; oil was the main source of Soviet export revenues.These factors gradually brought the Soviet economy to a stagnant state during Gorbachev's tenure.

Ronald Reagan recognized the change in the direction of the Soviet leadership with Mikhail Gorbachev, and shifted to diplomacy, with a view to encourage the Soviet leader to pursue substantial arms agreements. Reagan's personal mission was to achieve "a world free of nuclear weapons," which he regarded as "totally irrational, totally inhumane, good for nothing but killing, possibly destructive of life on earth and civilization." He was able to start discussions on nuclear disarmament with General Secretary Gorbachev. Gorbachev and Reagan held four summit conferences between 1985 and 1988: the first in Geneva, Switzerland, the second in Reykjavík, Iceland, the third in Washington, D.C., and the fourth in Moscow. Reagan believed that if he could persuade the Soviets to allow for more democracy and free speech, this would lead to reform and the end of Communism.

Speaking at the Berlin Wall on June 12, 1987, Reagan challenged Gorbachev to go further, saying:

“ "General Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace, if you seek prosperity for the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, if you seek liberalization, come here to this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" ”


Reagan and Gorbachev sign the INF Treaty at the White House in 1987Prior to Gorbachev visiting Washington, D.C., for the third summit in 1987, the Soviet leader announced his intention to pursue significant arms agreements. The timing of the announcement led Western diplomats to contend that Gorbachev was offering major concessions to the U.S. on the levels of conventional forces, nuclear weapons, and policy in Eastern Europe. He and Reagan signed the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty at the White House, which eliminated an entire class of nuclear weapons. The two leaders laid the framework for the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, or START I; Reagan insisted that the name of the treaty be changed from Strategic Arms Limitation Talks to Strategic Arms Reduction Talks.

When Reagan visited Moscow for the fourth summit in 1988, he was viewed as a celebrity by Russians. A journalist asked the president if he still considered the Soviet Union the evil empire. "No", he replied, "I was talking about another time, another era." At Gorbachev's request, Reagan gave a speech on free markets at the Moscow State University. In his autobiography, An American Life, Reagan expressed his optimism about the new direction that they charted, his warm feelings for Gorbachev.The Berlin Wall was torn down beginning in 1989 and two years later the Soviet Union collapsed.

In case you are not aware of it...in the later years of the "Cold War"...the U.S. intentionally kept its forces weaker than the Soviet's...specifically in Europe...to let the Soviet's know that we would be forced to use our nukes and institute MAD if they made any major moves on Europe...to deter them from any major moves on Europe.

Nothing in your copy and paste post...indicates that anything I posted...makes me full of shit...but your insult does give me cause to tell you...you are now dismissed.

JustDaveXxx 07-05-2010 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PenisFace (Post 17310204)
For someone who argues so fervently, you need to read up on legal immigration to the United States. Simply put, it is not an easy process, and you don't get to live and work in the United States if your only hope of employment is unskilled or partially skilled work. For a Canadian to be granted access to live and work in the United States, they must have an appropriate education (usually requiring a bachelors degree) in a specific field. Usually, these fields are science, medical, and a few others.

Basically, you must be able to work in a field that requires lots of qualifications. What does this mean? It means that there aren't enough Americans who are educated enough to fill these jobs, which means it's time to bring in people who are. I couldn't move the united states to be a municipal worker, or a truck driver, or an auto mechanic. Because there are plenty of Americans who do that and who are qualified to do so. I could, however, move to the Unitd States to be a pharmacist, a landscape architect, or an English teacher. Because people with those skills are lacking in the US. In order to work a job/career in the United States, I must:

1) Have education (bachelors degree, usually) in a specific field.

2) There can not be any Americans with the same education credentials who are also trying to get the same job. If there are, they get it, I don't.

3) The employer must submit documentation stating that you are working for them. If the company goes under, or you get laid off, or fired, you can not simply get another job to make ends meet. You have to work in the same field, and have the new company submit new documentation indicating that you now work for them.

4) If the industry collapses, or jobs are not available, you go back to your own country. Like I said above, I can't leave my job as a landscape architect or english teacher to work at a grocery store.

Living and working in the US means that you have skills that Americans don't have, or there is a shortage of people who have those skills. That's it. That is the only way you can legally work in the united states, at least if you are an every-man. There are different rules and regs, but they only apply to the top 1% of the population, wealth wise.

You can be granted permanent residence in the United States if you invest in, or create a company that employs 10 americans for (I believe) a minimum of 2 years. If, after 2 years, you still have 10 americans employed, you are granted residence status. If the company folds after a year, you're out of luck, thanks for trying.

Cliffs: The only reason people who aren't american work and live in the united states, is because there are not enough Americans with the skills to fill the jobs. You don't live and work there if you're going to be a cashier at a grocery store.


ME? I'm working on my bachelors, and I plan on relocating the united states within 5 years. The field im studying has nearly no prospects in the United States. Most people in the field, are from somewhere else.

You are pretty dead on.


My best friend of 20 years came to this country from England and over stayed his welcome. He had a social security card with his name on it and also had "not valid for work" stomped on it. He needed that to get his Drivers license.

This guy tried and tried to get his Green card. Denied, denied over and over. With what he did, our country had tons what he did thats why he was getting denied.


This guy did construction, drywalling+plastering and before that, he served soft served yogurt because there was no work. This guy had the very best work ethic out of anyone i have ever met. I used to call him the "white Mexican".

Long story short, He saved his money, he paid taxes, some how got a tax return, bought 5 different properties, flipped them and cashed out when they were prime and made a shitload. Hired a attorney after 911,(was that much more difficult to get into this country after 911) to set up his paper work to come into the United states as a $500K investor.


The tricky part was leaving the country back to England to not show that he ever over stayed his welcome. So he left through Mexico back to his port of entry which was England.

When he came back to the US, customs saw according to their records that he never left the US. But since he went back to England he had a new passport with no stamps and had all of his paper work in order stating he was a serious investor with money already in US banks. The US customs saw that oversight as their mistake and they welcomed him with open arms.


Was it right? Nope. Did he make it right? Yup.


At the end of the day, this guy has over 1 million liquid in the bank, and owns 2 apartment buildings and pays a butt load in US taxes. This is what our country wants. It is kind of lame that it is that difficult to get into this country.


I do know that it can be very difficult to get into this country, but the rules are the rules.:2 cents:

MetaMan 07-05-2010 04:05 PM

You can also be sponsored by a citizen if you are close family/relatives and they do make exceptions if you do not have a degree.

PenisFace 07-05-2010 04:07 PM

Quote:

I do know that it can be very difficult to get into this country, but the rules are the rules.
The problem with the rules being so strict, is that it prevents 99% of the people who want in, from coming in. The sad part is that most of those people are still going to try to get in, regardless of how they go about it. It's a shame mexico is such a mess. If they weren't so perpetually fucked, I can imagine the US would halve the amount of illegal immigrants over night.

So who's fault is this? Is Mexico to blame for their deplorable living conditions, poverty and crime, a place where most people have no chance to be anything but poor? Is the US to blame, making themselves out to be a bastion of liberty, freedom and success? Or does the blame sit somewhere inbetween?

Mexico: Poverty, crime, lack of education, no hope. Attached to the United States.

USA: Freedom, liberty, success, happiness, impossible to enter legally for 99.5% of Mexicans. Attached to Mexico.

And there in lies the problem :( I 100% believe that illegal imigration, at least from Mexico into the United States, is unstoppable. You may catch and deport more with tougher laws and better law enforcement, but they'll be back.

Can you blame them?

Vendzilla 07-05-2010 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theking (Post 17310356)
In case you are not aware of it...in the later years of the "Cold War"...the U.S. intentionally kept its forces weaker than the Soviet's...specifically in Europe...to let the Soviet's know that we would be forced to use our nukes and institute MAD if they made any major moves on Europe...to deter them from any major moves on Europe.

Nothing in your copy and paste post...indicates that anything I posted...makes me full of shit...but your insult does give me cause to tell you...you are now dismissed.

Again, I was part of that force, so you're trying to convince someone that was there that it didn't happen.

It was the later years of the cold war that the major build up of weapons and technology that the USSR couldn't keep up with, they had more, we had better

In the later years is when Reagan was in office, so now you're saying he did bring down the USSR?

Or are you giving credit to the peanut farmer?

Rochard 07-05-2010 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JustDaveXxx (Post 17310389)
You are pretty dead on.

My best friend of 20 years came to this country from England and over stayed his welcome. He had a social security card with his name on it and also had "not valid for work" stomped on it. He needed that to get his Drivers license.

This guy tried and tried to get his Green card. Denied, denied over and over. With what he did, our country had tons what he did thats why he was getting denied.


This guy did construction, drywalling+plastering and before that, he served soft served yogurt because there was no work. This guy had the very best work ethic out of anyone i have ever met. I used to call him the "white Mexican".

Long story short, He saved his money, he paid taxes, some how got a tax return, bought 5 different properties, flipped them and cashed out when they were prime and made a shitload. Hired a attorney after 911,(was that much more difficult to get into this country after 911) to set up his paper work to come into the United states as a $500K investor.


The tricky part was leaving the country back to England to not show that he ever over stayed his welcome. So he left through Mexico back to his port of entry which was England.

When he came back to the US, customs saw according to their records that he never left the US. But since he went back to England he had a new passport with no stamps and had all of his paper work in order stating he was a serious investor with money already in US banks. The US customs saw that oversight as their mistake and they welcomed him with open arms.


Was it right? Nope. Did he make it right? Yup.


At the end of the day, this guy has over 1 million liquid in the bank, and owns 2 apartment buildings and pays a butt load in US taxes. This is what our country wants. It is kind of lame that it is that difficult to get into this country.


I do know that it can be very difficult to get into this country, but the rules are the rules.:2 cents:

Your friend went about it wrong. He came to the US and overstayed his vacation instead of getting the proper paperwork. Basically, he came to the US hoping he would get permission to stay which is the wrong way about it.

Then to top it off, he decided to lie about how long he had been in the country, left through Mexico, returned to the UK, and then back to the US? Yeah, that's exactly what we want in the US. Someone who came to the US with the intention of breaking it's laws with the "hope" that he would granted permission to stay, and then when he got called on it he exited the country through Mexico to avoid US customs.

Your friend is a criminal intent on breaking our laws. No wonder why he can't get in.

Rochard 07-05-2010 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PenisFace (Post 17310204)
For someone who argues so fervently, you need to read up on legal immigration to the United States. Simply put, it is not an easy process, and you don't get to live and work in the United States if your only hope of employment is unskilled or partially skilled work. For a Canadian to be granted access to live and work in the United States, they must have an appropriate education (usually requiring a bachelors degree) in a specific field. Usually, these fields are science, medical, and a few others.

Basically, you must be able to work in a field that requires lots of qualifications. What does this mean? It means that there aren't enough Americans who are educated enough to fill these jobs, which means it's time to bring in people who are. I couldn't move the united states to be a municipal worker, or a truck driver, or an auto mechanic. Because there are plenty of Americans who do that and who are qualified to do so. I could, however, move to the Unitd States to be a pharmacist, a landscape architect, or an English teacher. Because people with those skills are lacking in the US. In order to work a job/career in the United States, I must:

That's a crock of bull. At Playboy / ICS we had a number of Canadians who did not have a college education who switched jobs at will without issues. They quit their job, get hired on at a new company, resubmit their paperwork, and bam.

My neighbors across the street are another one. They are from Afghanistan. They barely speak a lick of English, but from what they told me they went through a four week "business course" and then while they were still in Afghanistan they got a loan to move their entire family to the US and open up a business - They now run a 7-11.

Years ago I worked for an Iranian family. Same exact crap. They took a business course on running a dry cleaner, got a huge loan, moved the entire family from Iran into a million dollar house. They came here under some goverment program that encouraged them to take a business course and then loaned them the money to come and open up a business.

I'm not saying it's easy to move to the US and become a citizen. There has to be some requirements. We can't just let anyone in. But once you come in illegally, you should never be allowed back in again.

JustDaveXxx 07-05-2010 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 17310552)
Your friend went about it wrong. He came to the US and overstayed his vacation instead of getting the proper paperwork. Basically, he came to the US hoping he would get permission to stay which is the wrong way about it.

Then to top it off, he decided to lie about how long he had been in the country, left through Mexico, returned to the UK, and then back to the US? Yeah, that's exactly what we want in the US. Someone who came to the US with the intention of breaking it's laws with the "hope" that he would granted permission to stay, and then when he got called on it he exited the country through Mexico to avoid US customs.

Your friend is a criminal intent on breaking our laws. No wonder why he can't get in.

I agree with you partly. But his intention when he came was not to stay but to have a log vacation. He met a girl and fell in love and decided to stay.(sounds gay, i know)lol

Was he right? Not in my opinion.


Im not saying he was right, im just telling you what happened.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 17310552)
Your friend is a criminal intent on breaking our laws. No wonder why he can't get in.

He is not a criminal according to your rules and laws. As a 500k investor with a business plan to hire US workers, the US will and did allow him in. Got his Visa then got his green card.


Like i said earlier, this person is seriously loaded, employs over 20 American employees and has all of his citizenship papers in order. He didn't even have to take a test.lol

JaneB 07-05-2010 06:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brentbacardi (Post 17307944)
From the article "The Social Security Administration has estimated about three-quarters of illegal workers have taxes for Social Security and Medicare taken out of their paychecks ? programs in which they cannot legally participate unless they become legal residents."

And how do they have these taken out when someone hands them a hundred bucks cash for doing lawn work?

Doesn't make sense.



They use legal citizens social security numbers to get hired for jobs. So yeah some may pay into the system, but they are using stolen ss numbers. They also cause headaches for a lot of people by using their ss number.

PenisFace 07-05-2010 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 17310578)
That's a crock of bull. At Playboy / ICS we had a number of Canadians who did not have a college education who switched jobs at will without issues. They quit their job, get hired on at a new company, resubmit their paperwork, and bam.

My neighbors across the street are another one. They are from Afghanistan. They barely speak a lick of English, but from what they told me they went through a four week "business course" and then while they were still in Afghanistan they got a loan to move their entire family to the US and open up a business - They now run a 7-11.

Years ago I worked for an Iranian family. Same exact crap. They took a business course on running a dry cleaner, got a huge loan, moved the entire family from Iran into a million dollar house. They came here under some goverment program that encouraged them to take a business course and then loaned them the money to come and open up a business.

I'm not saying it's easy to move to the US and become a citizen. There has to be some requirements. We can't just let anyone in. But once you come in illegally, you should never be allowed back in again.

This is exactly what I was talking about. If you are going to invest in the American economy by opening a business, and paying taxes to the American government, they will let you in. Didn't you see the part where I pointed out that if you open a business/invest in a business, you are allowed in?

Selective reading doesn't help anyone.

Major (Tom) 07-05-2010 07:05 PM

is it safe to assume that anyone in favor of this is a mexican or at one time an anchor baby? how could anyone be in favor of illegals taking over shit.
round em up, send them back. end of discussion
duke


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:21 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123