why doesnt HELMET or whatever his name is add a .kid and block everything else. Sort of like a big public pool where they fence off a part for children. So the .kid tld would be as far as they would be able to navigate. Then the parents, with a simple setting could enable the other tld's when they surf. But this is too practical and there is no money in it that's why this entire thing is a sham and HELMET with little stamp of approval (like it counts anyways these days, he's so '96) is supporting .xxx
ds

I think it was Danni Ashe who originally suggested that .kid was the way to go years ago. But yeah, there is no money in that even though it would TRULY BE THE WAY TO GO in protecting children. Imagine putting your kid in front of a computer and leaving him alone to have fun KNOWING that the only sites he can access once you've set everything up, are sites with a .kid domain. You'd have nothing to worry about.

Personally I say we come up with some kind of codeword that we shout at lawley everytime we see him so as to let him and everyone within earshot know our displeasure and that we as an industry DO NOT SUPPORT .XXX.

Hell... take it one step further and protest his presence there. Schedule a sit in, bring a bull horn and protest against lawley, .xxx and his supporters. Wouldn't that make for a nice photo / video opp. and live on in Fubar infamy?

Not to mention it'll send our message to him LOUD AND CLEAR.

Too many people quietly sucking his dick both publicly and privately to get a couple of bucks.

Kinda like that brazzers thread going right now . . .

That is a very good idea! If we were attending, I would have no problem filming it and putting it on youtube ....:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

And people should include Helmy and his side kick Joann to the list of people to boycott and protest against......:2 cents:

I am sure they already have things in place to remove anyone that is disorderly......they seem to be good at censorship!

I have been spending ad money with Xbiz for many years now. Starting next month, I'm pulling it and urging other advertisers I personally know to do the same.

There is but one way to deal with a company like xbiz and that is to cut all funds to them.

Transparency oooops how does that foot taste in your mouth?
 

Well i visit GFY not that often, but what is funny about this thread is who started it, it would seem that someone has put there foot in there mouth.

I was very big into the .xxx opposition a few years back..did some digging and found out some great dirt...

Here is what i suggest that these people who say they are not involved with .XXX do:

1. Transparency
2. Honesty

Follow the money people it never lies, this case you have some cleaver corp set up's but not to hard to pierce through. I guess in my opinion you can decide who really cares about you, and who is looking out for you right?

Some down right shady back room deals that went down years ago... :Oh crap

Agreed.... and I'm wondering if some of them are still going on?

I'd like to think that anyone who secretly backed .XXX would pay for it by losing the support of those of us who are against .XXX and see it for the threat that it is... but I'm not yet convinced that justice always prevails like that.

Still, opposition to the .XXX TLD is one of only a couple of topics that really does seem to have the ability to unite large groups of us. And yup Mike, I'll always remember how hard you fought against .XXX -- you definitely get it.

To be honest with you... if .XXX did get passed for some reason, your idea here is without a doubt the best response our industry could make. Push for as many GENERIC tld's as possible for porn, and who would been a sponsored TLD then like .XXX? It would seriously mess with the .XXX agenda. :thumbsup

I still think just stopping .XXX is the best way to go though.

I think Quentin beat you to it in a thread I started a few weeks back with his .GiveQMoney ideal. :winkwink:

The thread was about the fact that ICM is trying to define the "sponsoring community" as only the people who support them, and not the adult community. :321GFY

Yeah I wonder how Disney.PORN or Vatican.GAY or Republican.BLOWJOB would work out. :1orglaugh

Just give me lots of $$$s, and I will block people from using them(maybe, as some conditions may apply) :2 cents:

[QUOTE=Tickler;17358199]
Yeah I wonder how Disney.PORN or Vatican.GAY or Republican.BLOWJOB would work out. :1orglaugh

/QUOTE]

OMG... you owe me a new monitor LOL!

Can sheeple say "defensive registrations" at $60/year or one time fee for $250.

Take how many companies/brands/products/organization, and multiply by all those naughty porn TLDs that they don't want to be associated with. :2 cents:

And just for fun we throw in a whole bunch of non-porn bad words. :1orglaugh

A huge multi-billion dollar business that only extorts money from people. :321GFY

I agree.....like I mentioned earlier, I am finished with the ASACP and the people who run it, they know who they are and all of them can kiss my fucking ass.....

Oh, and lawley, well....he can suck snot out of a donkeys ass for all I care :321GFY:321GFY

Good on you for pulling your ads. I do not know how far X-Biz is involved with the .XXX, but giving that fat worthless fuck lawley a platform to spew his nonferrous shit from is low as they come, not to mention them being a group of hypocrites.......

I am still waiting for my account at Xbiz to be approved (it's been like at least a week). However, they are having no problems sending me their newsletters.

After this TLD Lawely's next one: .Christ or .+++.
Maybe even .jesus

Well for those attending you can ask your questions at the Dot-XXX: A Broad-based Perspective from Industy Leaders panel at the AVN Show on the 8th.

Who is on that panel?

I know 1 sponsor who is contributing to ASACP
When I informed this sponsor about the fact he has a ex convicted rapper of a minor as affiliate, they told me they dont mind, he should have a second chance :)
I emailed this affiliate his other ASACP sponsors as well, inc a screen shot of the court records and prove of my statement.

They all dont care

Why would anyone mind a rapper? I prefer punk music but rap isn't *that* bad. :winkwink:

What's being implied is that the xxx TLD will one day be forced on the industry where every single adult website/blog will have to get one. Well at least in the United States. If that day ever comes, what will your statement be when asked how it feels knowing you helped destroy your own industry?

Stuart Lawley is a complete porn outsider but was still allowed on XBiz.net. I thought there were strict rules as to who gets in and who doesn't.

This is the same industry that still welcomed Larry Schwarz even after everything he is allegedly accused of doing to his own children.

I wish I knew... the list doesn't appear to be on the website.

Quoted for truth.

I asked one long time insider if I applied to XBiz.net, if XBiz would let me in. He said probably not. Well I never applied because I don't feel my safety should be jeopardized by letting the world know my real name and personal information just so I can join a porn forum.

Whom would you personally like to see on that panel?

First off, Helmy and ASACP do not care, it's all about the money....time for others to boycott the ASACP due to what I call nonferrous acts AND a good start would be to pull all the bogus labels they have convinced others to place on their website?s for their so called cause.
What is their cause? Is it to protect children from porn or to stuff their pockets with money based on a bogus campaign like lawley is proposing? It sure looks like money is the key to all of this


It seems X-Biz does have "selected rules" as to who they deem part of the industry....after all, they allow lawley "which is NOT part of the industry? to spew his horse shit and window dressing on their board, then on the other hand they won't allow Mike South on the board to say his piece about .XXX and he is part of the industry. I would say they are hypocrites and love to sensor......nothing more.

Funny how that idiot Helmy can come here to call someone out that is banned from this board, and at the same time they won't approve him so he can voice his opinion on the X-Biz board.

I think it is Helmy, his friends and some of his Family?

So who is on the board, Helmy????

I got invites by Helmy and someone else to join that board when this thread started but have no interest in discussing anything with idiots like helmy, lawley, Joan Irvine or the ASACP cronies.

Go figure....:2 cents:

What I want to know is what Lawley offered Christian groups such as the American Family Association.

Have you ever read their charter?
http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/stld-apps-19mar04/xxx.htm

Lawley is going to "save" us.

This will do the complete opposite in helping kids. It won't protect them at all but will help kids find porn better! You're going to point an arrow and tell these kids "hey there it is". Then these kids will bypass the filters the parents set up or just go over a friend's house to watch porn.

You all saw piracy coming years in advance and did nothing to stop it. Now look at the mess you allowed to happen! Now you all see the future catastrophe xxx will create and many are jumping on board in SUPPORT of it. And people have the nerve to say I'm anti-porn! The people who are supporting xxx are anti-porn!! I'm only against the abuse and mistreatment porn stars go through everyday by the people who run this industry. Anyone who supports xxx are approving of the dismantling of the industry you claim to support. Watch what will happen if a Republican gets into office and he'll make it a law that you all need to buy xxx which will put you all into a corner ready to be banned & blocked by states and countries.

And so who else:
http://forum.icann.org/lists/stld-rfp-xxx/msg00056.html

My plane flies out on the 8th so i'm HOPING that this panel is early enough in the day so I can attend it and ask all the questions that aren't being answered in this thread.

This article brings up the point about Congress getting involved
http://news.com.com/2010-1026-517661...tag=nefd_acpro

So, who should be on the "pro" side of the panel, and who should be on the "cons" side of the panel? Sorry I am a little bit slow. Has anyone figured it out yet?

I thought I saw someplace (maybe in Diane Duke's posting in another thread?) that Hustler is AGAINST.xxx . VCA was bought out by Hustler years ago, so VCA probably is now against .xxx.

Maybe ICANN needs a PRESENT updated list of which past supporters actually STILL support .xxx ????????

We common folks might also like to see a present list of so-called supporters

The internet is forever

Nice!
ds

You would think this information should be accessible for public viewing public, wouldn't you?

I think there is a confusion above between the panel of the show in Miami and the board of Asacp :)

I dont want to cannibalize this thread, I just posted details of the seminar here:
http://www.gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/979751-hey-avn-whos-dot-xxx-broad-based-perspective-industy-leaders-panel.html

They are public about asking for contributions...