GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Manwin Official Statement re acquisition of Brazzers (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=978327)

Klen 07-20-2010 03:04 PM

Is this thread turned into epic backfire?

will76 07-20-2010 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17349733)
Quick question... how many here that are bitching about stolen content have actually paid for a trademark or actually copyright their content?


How would that matter? If someone copyrighted their content, does that mean the tube sites wont steal it then?

Loch 07-20-2010 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17349733)
Quick question... how many here that are bitching about stolen content have actually paid for a trademark or actually copyright their content?

On North American producers my guess would be less then 5 that post on GFY.

Under US & Canadian law all European producers are automatically considered to be under the Copyright law/Protected.

Loch 07-20-2010 03:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 17349921)
How would that matter? If someone copyrighted their content, does that mean the tube sites wont steal it then?

No but if they have a copyright they actually stand to make some serious cash if suing, much like Pink Visual is doing.

To copyright your content costs almost nothing, most people are just too lazy to even look into it.

wargames 07-20-2010 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 17349917)
Is this thread turned into epic backfire?

Nope 25 of the latest 30 videos on PH are sponsored vids looks like PH is cleaning up :thumbsup

GonZo 07-20-2010 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KlenTelaris (Post 17349917)
Is this thread turned into epic backfire?

No that would be this thread... http://www.gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/978028-mike-south-step-inside.html

timoxxl2 07-20-2010 03:17 PM

we should recommend this thread as an introduction to the adult industry

DaLord 07-20-2010 03:59 PM

Never thought I should hear the 'likewhoa' word again without going off like a bomb.

will76 07-20-2010 04:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17349733)
I love hearing how working with Brazzers must mean we are desperate and willing to do anything for traffic. That just makes me happy because it is the kind of assumptive diagnosis that leads people to guide their efforts based on what they think other people are doing rather than clear analysis of what actually works for them.

Yes that is my personal opinion. You (and all of the other companies) working with them are more concerned about making sales, no matter who you do business with and how that business conducts itself today and did so in the past. As long as you can make a buck from it. Hey I have no problem with that. Some people are only concerned about making a buck no matter what the cost or the thieves they partner with. If that is you then more power to you, just be up front and honest about it. Don't try to pretend you have good business ethics and are doing business on the up and up when you are working with tube sites that are or were stealing everyone else's content and profiting off of it.

Far-L 07-20-2010 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qbert (Post 17349912)
If making money matters to you more than the fact that stolen full length clips are responsible for driving the traffic that is makling you that money, then you'll do whatever you have to in order to justify it to yourself in your own mind.

It may not be technically illegal, but it's ethically deplorable. It's dirty money. Spin it however you want, but it still boils down to making money from the use of stolen content.

Sleep well. :321GFY

lol, you are the one spinning everything and just for the convenience of trying to insult us. I don't consider that to be unethical, unless of course your goal is to discredit us through unsubstantiated and false assertions, but I do think you are being a dick.

However, you are right about one thing... it is not, under current US laws "illegal", and while you may deplore the fact that people post the content and consider it unethical, under the circumstances I only find it to be unethical if the tube site doesn't take down anything that we notice them about when necessary. What makes our views about the "ethics" of the situation different in so far as you can claim to be "right" while I am somehow "wrong"? Clearly, if it is not illegal, then how is it unethical if we take advantage of the traffic our clips generate? Because you don't like them? You don't like the big bad tubes? Cry me a river. Maybe when you get off your pedestal of reactionary arrogant accusatory insulting posturing and lose the holier than thou aura you will see the situation more clearly.

My position is based on facts. I don't know for a fact who puts up our clips without authorization. I consider it unethical to blame someone, based so far on circumstantial and not factual evidence, which also happens to be the standard for the US legal system. For us it is a fact that if our clips went up without persmission then they were taken down promptly with notice. That might make the situation a pain in the ass but it is not necessarily unethical. If we figured out how to turn that negative into a positive then that doesn't make us unethical either; business-wise, that simply makes us pragmatic.

I suggest you crack open the books again to learn what "ethics" really are. If it makes you feel better then you can tell me a great big "i told you so" if Pink Visuals prevails. I already said before though that my hunch is that will only result in a settlement that will be in Pink Visuals interests and not yours, mine, or anyone elses. Is that unethical? No, that is what we call business as usual.

JFK 07-20-2010 04:19 PM

Four Fitty acquisitions :thumbsup

will76 07-20-2010 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wargames (Post 17349945)
Nope 25 of the latest 30 videos on PH are sponsored vids looks like PH is cleaning up :thumbsup


LMAO so only 15% on the first page are potentially stolen.... whooa looks good enough to me, where do i sign up to do business with them. :upsidedow

What ever it takes for you to justify doing business with someone.

Never mind the fact they really don't have to have stolen content on their sites any more. None of it was ever user generated anyway. It was all from content producers or from membership sites all of which are tripping over each other to put the past in the past and blow Nathan to try to get traffic from him. Why would PH bother with user submitted shit, it is easier for them to work with the owners of the content, now that the owners are begging to be on the site vs trying to get their content removed.

Funny how things change over time.

Big bad website steals your content, costs you sales and fucks you. Everyone hates them. Sales get tough (partly because of big bad website) and owners go from trying to get content removed to begging to have it listed as long as their is a link back. I know each of those owners justified this in their own heads but the ones that were getting their content stolen from them and now are doing business with PH, deep down inside how does it feel? How does it feel now to have to blow the company that was fucking you, all because you need the sales now to stay alive? It must suck, but hey do what you got to do and say what you got to say to make yourself feel better about it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loch (Post 17349937)
No but if they have a copyright they actually stand to make some serious cash if suing, much like Pink Visual is doing.

To copyright your content costs almost nothing, most people are just too lazy to even look into it.

I guess we will see how that turns out, if they win and if they can actually collect on it. I would guess some tube sites operate in countries where it doesn't matter if you sue them, you will never collect.

If pink visual wins then I think everyone would be stupid not to copyright their content, until then I think it is yet to be seen if it matters or not.

will76 07-20-2010 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timoxxl2 (Post 17349958)
we should recommend this thread as an introduction to the adult industry


this thread can be summed up like all of those stupid GFY situations where:

Person steals and gets out'ed. Evidence is staked against person and he can not try to deny it. Person makes a post saying " I messed up, I am sorry" GFY retards chime in saying " Wow that is so big of you to own to your mistake, you are top notch". :upsidedow Like the person had any other choice, and instead of holding them accountable you idiots reward them for saying sorry.

This thread seems like it is along the same lines but just different situation. In this case, people are talking about how top notch Brazzers are now because they want $omething out of it. And in this case Brazzers isn't apologizing just throwing out millions of dollars and lots of traffic.

Far-L 07-20-2010 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 17350091)
Yes that is my personal opinion. You (and all of the other companies) working with them are more concerned about making sales, no matter who you do business with and how that business conducts itself today and did so in the past. As long as you can make a buck from it. Hey I have no problem with that. Some people are only concerned about making a buck no matter what the cost or the thieves they partner with. If that is you then more power to you, just be up front and honest about it. Don't try to pretend you have good business ethics and are doing business on the up and up when you are working with tube sites that are or were stealing everyone else's content and profiting off of it.

Tell you what. Show me the proof of them "stealing" content and I will be happy to agree with you. In the absence of such proof, you are simply entitled to your opinion like everyone else. In my opinion, you don't really know what ethics are in the first place, and in the second place, your assumptions about who we do or do not do business with are just wrong and sometimes even deflammatory.

There are plenty of people that we do not do business with because we have issues with their manner of doing business, their ethics, and past experiences with them or even the companies that associate with them. We are happily not "bros", and our stringency about whom we work with has been a major factor in our slow growth. I am supposed to take your baseless accusations that are unproven over my own experience, the advice of our attorneys, and the reality of current market conditions? No thanks. I am fine with you thinking you are somehow morally superior and that we are somehow desperate and grasping at anything to save our pitiful morally bankrupt biz.

will76 07-20-2010 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17350119)

My position is based on facts. I don't know for a fact who puts up our clips without authorization. I consider it unethical to blame someone, based so far on circumstantial and not factual evidence, which also happens to be the standard for the US legal system. For us it is a fact that if our clips went up without persmission then they were taken down promptly with notice. That might make the situation a pain in the ass but it is not necessarily unethical. If we figured out how to turn that negative into a positive then that doesn't make us unethical either; business-wise, that simply makes us pragmatic. .

keep telling yourself what ever you want to make yourself feel better.

If I close my eyes then I don't know for a fact what is right in front of me because I can't see it.

You have to be an idiot to realize that all of these big sites like pornhub, youporn etc... didn't start off with stolen content. They popped up one day with thousands of videos on them, from day one. How did those videos get there? user submitted content? what from the first surfer who hit there site, found 0 videos on it and then went and joined a bunch of membership sites, stole all of their content and then uploaded it to the tube site. WOW, those tube sites sure were lucky to have the first surfer to find their site go and "user submit" all of the content on it.

Everyone knows that these tube sites went and uploaded the majority of the content, if not all of it themselves. Just keep covering your eyes with your hands and pretend that you don't see. " i don't know for a fact who puts up our content " :1orglaugh didn't someone say that their user submission shit was suspended but yet stolen content kept popping up. Unbelievable the extent some of you will go to justify this shit in your head so you can still try to make yourself appear to be a stand up guy... too funny. I think the only one buying your bullshit is you. everyone else not sucking off brazzers sees it for what it really is. Like i said though, hey if it is what it is that is fine too, just dont try pretend it is something else.

Far-L 07-20-2010 05:17 PM

Nice try to introduce metaphysics into the debate but I suggest you go back and read Plato, Aristotle, and Socrates - you will certainly want to ruminate on the allegory of the cave some more.

I am not in this debate to win a popularity contest - which you so often seem to be doing when you champion whatever cause of the week you think will make you look important and purposeful. I am just speaking from a different point of view, and an experience that is not consistent with what others are claiming. The fact that I know it is unpopular but I am still willing to present my experience and suffer the consequences regardless speaks to my character, regardless what you think or assume or accuse without merit or proof.

Qbert 07-20-2010 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17350119)
I don't consider that to be unethical

Your own words say far more than anything else I could add. Case closed. :disgust

bdjerk 07-20-2010 06:10 PM

this is good for another 5 pages at least.

Far-L 07-20-2010 08:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Qbert (Post 17350287)
Your own words say far more than anything else I could add. Case closed. :disgust

You still don't even have a clue what I am saying so don't even pretend like you can offer anything to this debate. You don't have to use me as your excuse for your failures either.

I would like my fries extra crispy please.

And if you spit in them that would be highly unethical...:1orglaugh:321GFY

topnotch, standup guy 07-20-2010 10:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17350156)
Tell you what. Show me the proof of them "stealing" content and I will be happy to agree with you.

Are you fucking serious?

Do you need proof that wood comes from trees too? Or that fish live in water?

This is sad really.

I can remember when you used to come off as being pretty knowledgeable.

And now?

Now you're just another tube boy.

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 07-20-2010 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 17348326)
As much as I appreciate your kind offer Nathan/Fabian, I do not wish to in any way appear to be perceived as being bought off with an expenses-paid trip to the AVN show. I assure you that I can easily afford to travel there on my own funds, if I so wish to.

How about instead, you respond here forthrightly, and 100% honestly, in public, to some questions which I and others have posed, such as:

1) Who are your partners/investors in Manwin?

2) What is your plan (besides hiding behind the ridiculous provisions of the DMCA safe harbor provisions, which hopefully will be changed soon) for ensuring that your Manwin company, and known/suspected associates/entities/properties (such as Brazzers, JuggCash, KeezMovies, PornHub, Xtube, ExtremeTube, Tube8, MovieBox, Sex In Your City, etc), quit screwing over the rest of the industry by seemingly engaging in allowing obvious non-copyright holders/employees to post long scenes (or any scenes for that matter) of videos which they have no copyright to on any of your sites?

3) What role, if any, do Stephane Manos (Man) or hahahahahahaha (oops, forgot, for some reason O-u-i-s-s-a-m, without hyphens, appears as hahahahahahaha on GFY) Youseff (Sef) play in Manwin's current operations?

4) Does Virage Media Limited still exist? If not, when did it cease to exist, and why? Are the former Virage Media Ltd properties now part of Manwin?

5) When did Manwin come into existence, and who are the partners/investors?

6) When did Manwin acquire Mansef? In March or July, or whatever date?

7) Is Bob Rice still a part of your Manwin operation? If not, when did he leave?

8) What business relationship/association(s) have you, or any companies associated with you, (such as Virage Media or HQtube and Xtube) had with Envisionext/Stan Fiskin?

9) What business relationship, if any, do you have with Jain Shaileshkumar (aka Sam Jain) or Bjorn Daniel Sundin (aka Daniel)? Some people here seem to think there is a money connection somehow.

10) Would you consider contributing some of Manwin's profits to an industry-wide anti-copyright/anti-piracy effort?

I have other straightforward questions, but I will save them for now. If you can straightforwardly answer the questions above, I will refrain from posing any additional questions, since I do not wish to cause you or your family any personal embarrassment, nor possible legal issues.

I assure you that I am not attempting in any way to destroy you or your reputation, as you maudlinly claim (I suspect, in some way to gain sympathy/pity).

I'm simply asking questions which I perceive that you have repeatedly ducked, dodged, and otherwise parried from.

None of the information I have posted is personal (even if you or anyone else chooses to take it personally).

Most, if not all, of the info I have posted about, came from easily accessible public sources on the internet, such as LinkedIn, and Google searches of your name, your nicks, and your various company names, plus names of people associated (or said to possibly be associated) with you.

I assure you that I have not hacked into anything that is private or otherwise secure information. That is outside of my nature/proclivity, and skill-set.

If you wish to be perceived as a respectable member of the adult industry (and I know many already do respect you for some of your past achievements - some of which I respect as well), by answering forthrightly, the simple questions which I have posed here, and prove yourself to sincerely and aggressively stand against content/copyright piracy (not just for your own content, but for the entire industry), then you may be surprised to find a strong ally in me.

Respectfully yours,

ADG

http://30daysout.files.wordpress.com...g_crickets.jpg

It should be around 8am in Deutschland now. Rise and shine Mr. Manwin Managing Partner (is every partner at Manwin as "silent" as you are? Pardon the pun).

You are not doing much of a job representing your company when you go on a forum and ask people to trust you, but then refuse to respond to simple questions posed to you.

You indicated the obvious, that given their legal problems and perceptions within the adult industry, Mansef/Manwin needs to make changes and improve it's image within the industry, and change it's practices (one of which was lying).

I'm giving you an opportunity right here to do that...

Your forthright answers to the ten questions posed above would be greatly appreciated...

ADG

Socks 07-20-2010 11:32 PM

The thing that doesn't make sense to me about this whole scenario is this:

Whatever the price for Brazzers was, it was a lot. People have said $140m, dunno where that came from, and Nathn has disputed that number if I remember right.

Nobody spends that much money by themselves, it's just too much risk. So like banks, they use risk management. They would pool a team of people together to create a fund for such a thing.

Then again, I don't really care who owns it, or how many partners there are, etc. But that strikes me as odd. Who gambles with that much money, without at least spreading the risk around?

DateDoc 07-20-2010 11:32 PM

Maybe you guys are having some affect. Tube8 only has two new movies in the last 20 hours!

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 07-20-2010 11:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DateDoc (Post 17350875)
Maybe you guys are having some affect. Tube8 only has two new movies in the last 20 hours!

Day off for the employees? :winkwink:

ADG

crazytrini85 07-21-2010 12:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17350156)
Tell you what. Show me the proof of them "stealing" content and I will be happy to agree with you. In the absence of such proof, you are simply entitled to your opinion like everyone else. In my opinion, you don't really know what ethics are in the first place, and in the second place, your assumptions about who we do or do not do business with are just wrong and sometimes even deflammatory.

There are plenty of people that we do not do business with because we have issues with their manner of doing business, their ethics, and past experiences with them or even the companies that associate with them. We are happily not "bros", and our stringency about whom we work with has been a major factor in our slow growth. I am supposed to take your baseless accusations that are unproven over my own experience, the advice of our attorneys, and the reality of current market conditions? No thanks. I am fine with you thinking you are somehow morally superior and that we are somehow desperate and grasping at anything to save our pitiful morally bankrupt biz.

I can't figure you out.

On one hand you will put up a fight against another force threatening the industry, and are known for being an honest company, then on the other hand turn a blind eye to one of the biggest thieves in the business and try to find a way to do business with them.

I doubt it, but are sales at Home Grown that bad?

Brazzers has been stealing for so long people have stopped digging for proof, but at one time there was a lot of it out there. Since Nathan took over I don't think anyone has looked because this is all old news.

will76 07-21-2010 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17350156)
Tell you what. Show me the proof of them "stealing" content and I will be happy to agree with you. In the absence of such proof, you are simply entitled to your opinion like everyone else. In my opinion, you don't really know what ethics are in the first place, and in the second place, your assumptions about who we do or do not do business with are just wrong and sometimes even deflammatory.

What are you talking about? My assumptions about who you do business with? You said you do business with Pornhub, I am commenting on that. What have I said defamatory about you?

I already gave you proof of stealing. If you can't use common sense to see how those videos got on those tube sites, that those tube sites profit off of stolen content, then ask me this one simple question how did all of the stolen content get there in the first place from day 1? users just showed up and started filling up an empty site.... build it and the porn users will come :1orglaugh

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17350156)
There are plenty of people that we do not do business with because we have issues with their manner of doing business, their ethics, and past experiences with them or even the companies that associate with them. We are happily not "bros", and our stringency about whom we work with has been a major factor in our slow growth. I am supposed to take your baseless accusations that are unproven over my own experience, the advice of our attorneys, and the reality of current market conditions? No thanks. I am fine with you thinking you are somehow morally superior and that we are somehow desperate and grasping at anything to save our pitiful morally bankrupt biz.

Can you name some people you don't do business with, some of these "plenty people" just curious how many of them you could actually stand to gain from. Or if your decision to not do business with them is based more off of if you can profit from them or not.



Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17350257)
I am not in this debate to win a popularity contest - which you so often seem to be doing when you champion whatever cause of the week you think will make you look important and purposeful. I am just speaking from a different point of view, and an experience that is not consistent with what others are claiming. The fact that I know it is unpopular but I am still willing to present my experience and suffer the consequences regardless speaks to my character, regardless what you think or assume or accuse without merit or proof.

lol cause of the week. In 7 years of posting on GFY I've "campaigned" 2 issues... stolen traffic and sales from spyware and sites profiting off of stolen content. That = "cause of the week", you exaggerate much?

The fact that you know it is unpopular and post about you doing business with sites that profit off of stolen content isn't anything short of you just trying to justify it in your own head. Funny I always took you to be Mr. On the right side of the issue, but hell when it comes to a top 100 site that is sending you traffic and sales I can see why you are going out of your way to try to justify to yourself, more so than anyone here that you are still doing the right thing... but in order for you to be doing the right thing than you have to convince everyone that porn hub is not bad... good luck with that one!

Quote:

Originally Posted by crazytrini85 (Post 17350931)
I can't figure you out.

On one hand you will put up a fight against another force threatening the industry, and are known for being an honest company, then on the other hand turn a blind eye to one of the biggest thieves in the business and try to find a way to do business with them..

It is rather simple. They had nothing to gain from Acacia, why not fight them. Acacia was shaking everyone down. It was either give in and pay them, ignore them and get sued and have a weak case for avoiding it, or fight them.

On the other hand, porn hub has tons of traffic and sales to send them. So why would he fight them and lose that traffic and sales.

Makes perfect sense to me.

Brujah 07-21-2010 01:08 AM

Someone should save all these pages. I predict this thread disappears before end of month.

ladida 07-21-2010 02:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 17350934)
It is rather simple. They had nothing to gain from Acacia, why not fight them. Acacia was shaking everyone down. It was either give in and pay them, ignore them and get sued and have a weak case for avoiding it, or fight them.

On the other hand, porn hub has tons of traffic and sales to send them. So why would he fight them and lose that traffic and sales.

Makes perfect sense to me.

Exactly. Plus, they can ride the "we are a honest company" slogan all day long based on that.

bdjerk 07-21-2010 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brujah (Post 17351021)
Someone should save all these pages. I predict this thread disappears before end of month.

all they'd really have to do is buy advertising or a skin and POOF it would all go away, along with any other threads started. :2 cents:

Far-L 07-21-2010 10:47 AM

Good morning haters.

Here is the rundown...

First, we could've sold you guys out and made out like bandits on the Acacia deal. If you don't believe me, then talk to some of those that did settle with them and ask what terms they were offered.

Next, I cannot talk specifically about our CE case but suffice to say many people thought we were kicking a gift horse in the mouth when we went into arbitration with them. I am not going to name names for the others we won't do biz with but most of them are well known, highly respected, buyers of drinks at shows. I don't need to add to the drama by indulging your curiousity for our blacklist.

Seriously, the moment PV or anyone else brings a case and proves that they have stolen content then I will apologize to everyone, but in the meantime, my dealings with the company are not consistent with what others claim. Why should I believe anyone else's hearsay over my own experience? Seriously? Do you expect me to run a business based on what other people are saying and doing? I don't know you. I don't trust you. I am not about to jump on the "We hate tubes" bandwagon just because you did or did not.

You are welcome to disapprove, and to think we are desperate. On that point we can discuss it again in a year or so and see who is still in business.

will76 07-21-2010 11:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17352167)

Seriously, the moment PV or anyone else brings a case and proves that they have stolen content then I will apologize to everyone, but in the meantime, my dealings with the company are not consistent with what others claim. .


/end of thread. You are the only person that doesn't think they have stolen content on porn hub, that there was never stolen content on porn hub, and that porn hub only exists because it made (makes) tons of money from stolen content - other people's hard work.

Far-L 07-21-2010 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 17352210)
/end of thread. You are the only person that doesn't think they have stolen content on porn hub, that there was never stolen content on porn hub, and that porn hub only exists because it made (makes) tons of money from stolen content - other people's hard work.

We have found plenty of our content on there that was not placed by us. We ask to have it taken down or replaced with our authorized copy. They comply. Promptly. End of problem. And end of story.

Ad-Min 07-21-2010 11:45 AM

Just a stupid question but what "if" they really have sold Mansef.
How quick would you turn down the whole stolen content?
I mean,they have a million vids on their tubes,millions of users which submit new movies every minute.
How quick would you be able to take down all the stolen content (with original description and alternative description)??
I am just wondering,i have not read the whole thread but "if" they have bought it you should give them time.
If i would buy such a network i wouldnīt be able to do it and of course i wouldnīt take down the sites to make sure everything is fine,this does not make sense.
But hey,itīs not my business.

SteveLightspeed 07-21-2010 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17352311)
We have found plenty of our content on there that was not placed by us. We ask to have it taken down or replaced with our authorized copy. They comply. Promptly. End of problem. And end of story.

Far-L, can I steal your car and trash it, as long as I promptly give it back to you when you find me? With all due respect, I don't see how anyone can do biz like that. Theft is theft. Even if I only steal other people's cars, would that make a difference?

Steve Lightspeed

Far-L 07-21-2010 12:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SteveLightspeed (Post 17352373)
Far-L, can I steal your car and trash it, as long as I promptly give it back to you when you find me? With all due respect, I don't see how anyone can do biz like that. Theft is theft. Even if I only steal other people's cars, would that make a difference?

Steve Lightspeed

The difference here though Steve, to use your analogy, if you stole my car, which is a Model H, a Homegrown Cruiser with turbo power content and painted with our logos, and you drive it around until I get it back, you just did some solid advertising for us. I don't consider the content to be "trashed and crashed" because it went on the tube freeway. On the contrary, the more exposure, while it may have caused a dent or two, provided us with critical feedback to improve our design, generated tons of branding that elevated our organics, and created opportunities to find more distributors.

We tackled this problem from the beginning with carrot and stick. Work with us and get the carrot. Don't work with us and get the stick. People have been stealing our content since before most people here were even old enough to use a computer. We have been up against this problem since day one; now, instead of spending all our money on attorneys to fight it to a phyrric finish, we chose to try and work with people first. Most people I see just complaining, railing, and otherwise getting nowhere. We turned a negative into a positive, an enemy into an ally, and learned how to work with the situation. That doesn't make us evil. You of all people should get this.

Far-L 07-21-2010 12:58 PM

Wow... so looks like Microsoft is a bigger thief than Brazzers!

Just go to Bing, search videos, and put in a term like "porn". Who uploaded all that freaking content without permission?

Somebody have Bill Gates contact info?

:winkwink:

ProG 07-21-2010 01:10 PM

Fabian were you involved with PornGraph? Just curious...

ProG 07-21-2010 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17352603)
Wow... so looks like Microsoft is a bigger thief than Brazzers!

Actions speak louder than words and who you associate yourself with says a lot about you :2 cents:

Half man, Half Amazing 07-21-2010 01:47 PM

Far-L:

How is it possible that the day that ExtremeTube.com opened there were already thousands of vids on there? Thousands of copyrighted un-licensed vids just magically appeared before the site was even open to the public?

You should have read my Connecting the Dots article where I showed that the VERY FIRST member to be signed up to PornHub had uploaded a few 100 videos and made comments on other people's profile representing himself as an admin for the site. That not good enough proof to you? After I pointed out all these shady things, Brazzers...errr Pornhub quickly went and changed their tube site. All the while they were denying they owned these sites...if they were so legit then why were they trying to deceive people?

Ok, how about this...Brazzers running a tube site WITHIN their members area of Brazzers.com so you as a copyright holder would have no idea your content was being stolen unless you yourself became a member of Brazzers. This also gave them a nice way of adding value to their memberships..."why sign up for Homegrown...by being a member of Brazzers you can upload all the Homegrown content you want just keep it on the downlow"

You're doing business with the biggest copyright infringers our industry has ever known. You're judged by the company you keep. Go ahead and make your money with them, just know that they're making 10 times that by using your stolen content. Content with the table scraps? Your choice.

Far-L 07-21-2010 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ProG (Post 17352703)
Actions speak louder than words and who you associate yourself with says a lot about you :2 cents:

What a great generalization that says everything and nothing at the same time. Hey, try these on for size... when you ain't got nothing, you got nothing to lose... and time waits for no one and no one waits for time... you look like I'm tripping...

The strangest part of this is no matter how much I discuss this issue as a business consideration worth debate and try to keep it professional, folks like you and others simply want to insult me in such oblique ways.

The sad part is that if that is all you are going to do to address the problem is insult me then there is probably a good reason why the tube revolution has hurt your business so much. :2 cents:


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:23 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc