GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Manwin Official Statement re acquisition of Brazzers (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=978327)

Half man, Half Amazing 07-21-2010 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17352790)
The sad part is that if that is all you are going to do to address the problem is insult me then there is probably a good reason why the copyright infringement revolution has hurt your business so much. :2 cents:

Fixed for ya!

ProG 07-21-2010 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17352790)
The sad part is that if that is all you are going to do to address the problem is insult me then there is probably a good reason why the tube revolution has hurt your business so much. :2 cents:

What are you doing to address the problem? If you can't beat them join them?

Far-L 07-21-2010 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Half man, Half Amazing (Post 17352806)
Fixed for ya!

lol, thanks for putting words I didn't say into my mouth. Still, you make a good point - I agree there is a fundamental and elemental revolution going on regarding Intellectual Property, copyrights, patents, etc.

I don't pretend to know how everything will shake out. I just know we are going to do our best to protect our content and survive in the current marketplace.

Half man, Half Amazing 07-21-2010 02:31 PM

So Far-L, would you do business with The Pirate Bay? After all, there's no proof anyone working there uploaded a single torrent file. And they aren't required to comply with DMCA laws since it's a US law.

So by the rationale you've laid out to us, there should be nothing stopping you from seeing any problem with the ethics of The Pirate Bay.

Here's the thing man, you're entitled to do business with whomever you want. We can criticize you for it, but at the end of the day it's your decision to make as a business owner. Where I think you really insulted the intelligence of a lot of people is when you started down the path of "show me evidence" that Brazzers has ever done anything wrong. You're taking pages out of the Jules Denial Jordan playbook there.

Stick to your guns on your decision to do business with them, but don't come in here defending Brazzers like they're squeaky clean.

Far-L 07-21-2010 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Half man, Half Amazing (Post 17352925)
So Far-L, would you do business with The Pirate Bay? After all, there's no proof anyone working there uploaded a single torrent file. And they aren't required to comply with DMCA laws since it's a US law.

So by the rationale you've laid out to us, there should be nothing stopping you from seeing any problem with the ethics of The Pirate Bay.

Here's the thing man, you're entitled to do business with whomever you want. We can criticize you for it, but at the end of the day it's your decision to make as a business owner. Where I think you really insulted the intelligence of a lot of people is when you started down the path of "show me evidence" that Brazzers has ever done anything wrong. You're taking pages out of the Jules Denial Jordan playbook there.

Stick to your guns on your decision to do business with them, but don't come in here defending Brazzers like they're squeaky clean.

Seriously, first let me thank you for actually raising debatable points rather than just attacking me personally. The difference in Pirate Bay is they would not take content down and that is why they got into the hassles they got into, worldwide, regardless of US copyright laws, so that answer is provided based on the reality of how they conducted biz. Sure, we could post our clips there with some branding but that was all we could do to address them using our content without permission. Therefore they are a different problem and not the same beast of a problem as the tubes.

To say that I am denying what you and others say about Brazzers is inaccurate also. I am not going to determine their guilt based on what is essentially hearsay arguments and circumstantial evidence that runs counter to our own experience. I am suspicious of them but I am suspicious of you, Steve, and everyone else here and I don't trust anyone in this biz for the most part. However, for us, they are innocent until PROVEN guilty and not the other way around. I hope you get my point.

To sum it up... I don't defend their innocence or prove their guilt. I just found that we could address any problems we had with our content going up easily and professionally and in the way that market conditions dictated. Same with Youporn and other tubes that would take down our stuff with appropriate notices.

I am not familiar enough with the start of Brazzers to comment on what they did in the beginning, but knowing the history of this industry, the idea that people used content without permission is not a surprise. An inconvenience yes, but par for the course - albeit unfortunately.

Anyway, I feel like I am in the midst of the same deluge Shap went through on this score a couple years back.

Far-L 07-21-2010 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ProG (Post 17352878)
What are you doing to address the problem? If you can't beat them join them?

Tell me how much you pay month to month on legal to address IP issues? If it is more than we do then I will bow to your efforts and give praise. But if we spend more then you should just bend over and kiss my ass... :1orglaugh

erooup 07-21-2010 03:28 PM

Nathan/Fabian

Are you gonna comment on what ADG posted? This point particularly:

Quote:

With regards to Envisionext, Nathan/Fabian tried to deny anything more than a fraternal relationship with the Envisionext President/CEO, Stan Fiskin (Envisionext did some design work for Virage Media).

Yet in an X-Biz article about the new Virage VP for Mergers and Acquisitions, Bob Rice (who has not been mentioned much, if at all, in this thread), it is stated that Virage acquired Envisionext (anyone know what Bob Rice is up to these days?):

Virage Media specializes in strategic investments and recently acquired XTube.com and IWantU.com. The company owns New Jersey-based Envisionext Inc., a web design and solutions firm with offices in Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, and other U.S. and European cities.

Or did your iPhone stop working?

erooup 07-21-2010 03:35 PM

Who said "don't answer the question you were asked, but they question you wish they have asked"?

McNamara mentioned it in "The Fog of War", but I forgot the original source.

will76 07-21-2010 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17353029)
Tell me how much you pay month to month on legal to address IP issues? If it is more than we do then I will bow to your efforts and give praise. But if we spend more then you should just bend over and kiss my ass... :1orglaugh

seriously, fuck you and your "i am better than everyone" attitude because you spend this or that. Bottom line is everyone knows what you are doing here and no on agrees with you.

Your argument that " well they take down the stolen content when we ask " is just fucking lame.

They know there is stolen content on their site. They do NOTHING to stop it (key word being STOP it). They could put safe guards in place to prevent it from happening. If someone produced a homemade clip it would be easy for them to prove they owned it. For the studious and companies like yourself it would be easy for you to prove to them you own the content.

However those sites don't give a fuck, they dont care to control what content ends up on their site and they could give a fuck if there is stolen content or not. Them taking down a video when you ask is a laugh. Wow so IF you find your stolen content on their site they will take it down. Then the next day it is back up again. Then you have to find it again and ask again, then they take it down again. Oh look a couple days later it is back again, etc... its a fucking joke, being played on you. You are the monkey they are making jump through the hoop. And makes it even worst is that you convinced yourself that what they are doing is OK, because you don't do business with bad guys so you trying to convince us and everyone else that Porn Hub is a good site to do business with :1orglaugh

Look at the responses here, it isn't like I am off in left field. Everyone disagrees with you even other program owners like yourself. Stop making excuses for them. What you are doing is like sucking their dick with the lights off and because you can't see its a guy you are trying to tell everyone you are not gay.

BTW, you have avoided the question of " how did all of the content get their in the first place if the site owner didn't go steal it". Asked about 3 or 4 times, you avoided it every time.

Far-L 07-21-2010 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by erooup (Post 17353123)
Who said "don't answer the question you were asked, but they question you wish they have asked"?

McNamara mentioned it in "The Fog of War", but I forgot the original source.

Sounds like something Kissinger would've said...

erooup 07-21-2010 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17353308)
Sounds like something Kissinger would've said...

Kissinger would lie

Far-L 07-21-2010 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 17353306)
seriously, fuck you and your "i am better than everyone" attitude because you spend this or that. Bottom line is everyone knows what you are doing here and no on agrees with you.

Your argument that " well they take down the stolen content when we ask " is just fucking lame.

They know there is stolen content on their site. They do NOTHING to stop it (key word being STOP it). They could put safe guards in place to prevent it from happening. If someone produced a homemade clip it would be easy for them to prove they owned it. For the studious and companies like yourself it would be easy for you to prove to them you own the content.

However those sites don't give a fuck, they dont care to control what content ends up on their site and they could give a fuck if there is stolen content or not. Them taking down a video when you ask is a laugh. Wow so IF you find your stolen content on their site they will take it down. Then the next day it is back up again. Then you have to find it again and ask again, then they take it down again. Oh look a couple days later it is back again, etc... its a fucking joke, being played on you. You are the monkey they are making jump through the hoop. And makes it even worst is that you convinced yourself that what they are doing is OK, because you don't do business with bad guys so you trying to convince us and everyone else that Porn Hub is a good site to do business with :1orglaugh

Look at the responses here, it isn't like I am off in left field. Everyone disagrees with you even other program owners like yourself. Stop making excuses for them. What you are doing is like sucking their dick with the lights off and because you can't see its a guy you are trying to tell everyone you are not gay.

BTW, you have avoided the question of " how did all of the content get their in the first place if the site owner didn't go steal it". Asked about 3 or 4 times, you avoided it every time.

Cut me a break. The only reason you feel threatened by me saying to prove you put your money where your mouth is because you actually haven't done anything other than bitch about stuff and you haven't actually done much to really do anything about this at all other than preach to the choir.

I have already answered your question - I said I don't know and I don't believe your version of events based on hearsay and I showed you the Bing example to give one potential example of how to start with content.

Now, calm down and try to remain professional. Just because I disagree with you is no need to get so piqued. If you stick to the topic maybe people will actually learn something - whether you or I are right or wrong. Reduce it to name calling and swearing and all you do is reduce this to idiotic childishness. :2 cents:

Loch 07-21-2010 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 17353306)
seriously, fuck you and your "i am better than everyone" attitude because you spend this or that. Bottom line is everyone knows what you are doing here and no on agrees with you.

Actually maybe 10-15 people have posted against Farrels business decission.
Have a look at who that is....Then have a look at "who is not posting against it".

PS: i do believe the post you were just referring to was a joke as im sure he is sick of answering people that have no real questions.
or the same questions

Profits of Doom 07-21-2010 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Half man, Half Amazing (Post 17352764)
Far-L:

How is it possible that the day that ExtremeTube.com opened there were already thousands of vids on there? Thousands of copyrighted un-licensed vids just magically appeared before the site was even open to the public?

You should have read my Connecting the Dots article where I showed that the VERY FIRST member to be signed up to PornHub had uploaded a few 100 videos and made comments on other people's profile representing himself as an admin for the site. That not good enough proof to you? After I pointed out all these shady things, Brazzers...errr Pornhub quickly went and changed their tube site. All the while they were denying they owned these sites...if they were so legit then why were they trying to deceive people?

Ok, how about this...Brazzers running a tube site WITHIN their members area of Brazzers.com so you as a copyright holder would have no idea your content was being stolen unless you yourself became a member of Brazzers. This also gave them a nice way of adding value to their memberships..."why sign up for Homegrown...by being a member of Brazzers you can upload all the Homegrown content you want just keep it on the downlow"

You're doing business with the biggest copyright infringers our industry has ever known. You're judged by the company you keep. Go ahead and make your money with them, just know that they're making 10 times that by using your stolen content. Content with the table scraps? Your choice.

I remember the thread where ExtremeTube.com was outed on here. At the time they were still under construction and they had no traffic whatsoever, but they had pages and pages of uploaded, stolen content. Personally I couldn't give a shit who someone does business with, but get the fuck out of here with the "it hasn't been proven they steal the content and upload it themselves" bullshit. It has been proven, and it was proven right on this very forum.

I had a tube site with a shitload more traffic than ExtremeTube.com had when it was revealed on here, and when I opened up user submissions the vast majority of videos uploaded were the heavily watermarked "spam videos" that are prevalent on xvideos.com. So Brazzers can't tell when a video from a popular website is uploaded, but by their own admission on here they reject videos that are watermarked with anything if you don't have a partner account? Really? Get the fuck out of here...

Tickler 07-21-2010 08:42 PM

Leaving the porn tubes aside for the moment.

Quote:

Quote:

"In a July 19, 2005 e-mail to YouTube co-founders Chad Hurley and Jawed Karim, YouTube co-founder Steve Chen wrote: 'jawed, please stop putting stolen videos on the site. We?re going to have a tough time defending the fact that we?re not liable for the copyrighted material on the site because we didn?t put it up when one of the co-founders is blatantly stealing content from other sites and trying to get everyone to see it.'"
Quote:

"Chen twice wrote that 80 percent of user traffic depended on pirated videos. He opposed removing infringing videos on the ground that 'if you remove the potential copyright infringements... site traffic and virality will drop to maybe 20 percent of what it is.' Karim proposed they 'just remove the obviously copyright infringing stuff.' But Chen again insisted that even if they removed only such obviously infringing clips, site traffic would drop at least 80 percent. ('if [we] remove all that content[,] we go from 100,000 views a day down to about 20,000 views or maybe even lower')."
Quote:

"In response to YouTube co-founder Chad Hurley?s August 9, 2005 e-mail, YouTube co-founder Steve Chen stated: 'but we should just keep that stuff on the site. I really don?t see what will happen. what? someone from cnn sees it? he happens to be someone with power? he happens to want to take it down right away. he get in touch with cnn legal. 2 weeks later, we get a cease & desist letter. we take the video down.'"
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/n...om-filings.ars
Does make one wonder about the porn tubes though. :2 cents:

will76 07-21-2010 08:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17353354)
Cut me a break. The only reason you feel threatened by me saying to prove you put your money where your mouth is because you actually haven't done anything other than bitch about stuff and you haven't actually done much to really do anything about this at all other than preach to the choir.

I have already answered your question - I said I don't know and I don't believe your version of events based on hearsay and I showed you the Bing example to give one potential example of how to start with content.

Now, calm down and try to remain professional. Just because I disagree with you is no need to get so piqued. If you stick to the topic maybe people will actually learn something - whether you or I are right or wrong. Reduce it to name calling and swearing and all you do is reduce this to idiotic childishness. :2 cents:

I'll take the appearance of being a hot head over your "better than everyone" else attitude any day.

You say I haven't done anything. Well doing nothing is better than doing business with the people who are the problem, which is what you are doing.

I'm always calm :1orglaugh i know my typing comes across as someone who is screaming at the screen and banging on the keyboard, but i'm probably one of the coolest non emotional people you would meet.

bdjerk 07-21-2010 10:29 PM

what a fuckin trainwreck

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 07-21-2010 11:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 17348326)
As much as I appreciate your kind offer Nathan/Fabian, I do not wish to in any way appear to be perceived as being bought off with an expenses-paid trip to the AVN show. I assure you that I can easily afford to travel there on my own funds, if I so wish to.

How about instead, you respond here forthrightly, and 100% honestly, in public, to some questions which I and others have posed, such as:

1) Who are your partners/investors in Manwin?

2) What is your plan (besides hiding behind the ridiculous provisions of the DMCA safe harbor provisions, which hopefully will be changed soon) for ensuring that your Manwin company, and known/suspected associates/entities/properties (such as Brazzers, JuggCash, KeezMovies, PornHub, Xtube, ExtremeTube, Tube8, MovieBox, Sex In Your City, etc), quit screwing over the rest of the industry by seemingly engaging in allowing obvious non-copyright holders/employees to post long scenes (or any scenes for that matter) of videos which they have no copyright to on any of your sites?

3) What role, if any, do Stephane Manos (Man) or hahahahahahaha (oops, forgot, for some reason O-u-i-s-s-a-m, without hyphens, appears as hahahahahahaha on GFY) Youseff (Sef) play in Manwin's current operations?

4) Does Virage Media Limited still exist? If not, when did it cease to exist, and why? Are the former Virage Media Ltd properties now part of Manwin?

5) When did Manwin come into existence, and who are the partners/investors?

6) When did Manwin acquire Mansef? In March or July, or whatever date?

7) Is Bob Rice still a part of your Manwin operation? If not, when did he leave?

8) What business relationship/association(s) have you, or any companies associated with you, (such as Virage Media or HQtube and Xtube) had with Envisionext/Stan Fiskin?

9) What business relationship, if any, do you have with Jain Shaileshkumar (aka Sam Jain) or Bjorn Daniel Sundin (aka Daniel)? Some people here seem to think there is a money connection somehow.

10) Would you consider contributing some of Manwin's profits to an industry-wide anti-copyright/anti-piracy effort?

I have other straightforward questions, but I will save them for now. If you can straightforwardly answer the questions above, I will refrain from posing any additional questions, since I do not wish to cause you or your family any personal embarrassment, nor possible legal issues.

I assure you that I am not attempting in any way to destroy you or your reputation, as you maudlinly claim (I suspect, in some way to gain sympathy/pity).

I'm simply asking questions which I perceive that you have repeatedly ducked, dodged, and otherwise parried from.

None of the information I have posted is personal (even if you or anyone else chooses to take it personally).

Most, if not all, of the info I have posted about, came from easily accessible public sources on the internet, such as LinkedIn, and Google searches of your name, your nicks, and your various company names, plus names of people associated (or said to possibly be associated) with you.

I assure you that I have not hacked into anything that is private or otherwise secure information. That is outside of my nature/proclivity, and skill-set.

If you wish to be perceived as a respectable member of the adult industry (and I know many already do respect you for some of your past achievements - some of which I respect as well), by answering forthrightly, the simple questions which I have posed here, and prove yourself to sincerely and aggressively stand against content/copyright piracy (not just for your own content, but for the entire industry), then you may be surprised to find a strong ally in me.

Respectfully yours,

ADG

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 17350857)
http://30daysout.files.wordpress.com...g_crickets.jpg

It should be around 8am in Deutschland now. Rise and shine Mr. Manwin Managing Partner (is every partner at Manwin as "silent" as you are? Pardon the pun).

You are not doing much of a job representing your company when you go on a forum and ask people to trust you, but then refuse to respond to simple questions posed to you.

You indicated the obvious, that given their legal problems and perceptions within the adult industry, Mansef/Manwin needs to make changes and improve it's image within the industry, and change it's practices (one of which was lying).

I'm giving you an opportunity right here to do that...

Your forthright answers to the ten questions posed above would be greatly appreciated...

ADG

It's been over 24 hours since my last post in this thread, and Nathan / Fabian Thylmann has cowardly continued to duck my questions posted above.

His silence speaks volumes.

I guess he is too busy licking boots (and trying to cover his tracks):

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5IOsliFxM3...BootLicker.jpg

Too bad for Nathan / Fabian Thylmann, and his Manwin shadow biz, that he and his company/co-conspirators (the subjects of a US Federal and Civil Lawsuit for copyright violations), are already in the targets of the US DOJ/Canadian authorities/Interpol, that it's unlikely he will be able to worm his way out of this one, regardless of how much he bootlicks... :1orglaugh

http://fladoodles.files.wordpress.co...ck_ticking.jpg

ADG

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 07-22-2010 03:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ProG (Post 17352636)
Fabian were you involved with PornGraph? Just curious...

What is/was PornGraph, and what could it possibly have to do with Nathan / Fabian Thylmann?

ADG

will76 07-22-2010 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 17354274)
What is/was PornGraph, and what could it possibly have to do with Nathan / Fabian Thylmann?

ADG

Fabian started with Nats right? Then I think the next question was, what was John's involvement with Porngraph? I don't remember the details posted here but there was a lot of accusations and speculation with porngraph and john.

I can't talk about John though, if I do he will run to the mods to try to get me banned.

Do your digging young jedi, you might find some good dirt on both of them. :2 cents:

Here is a good start for you http://www.gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/275929-porngraph-installs-trojans.html

woj 07-22-2010 08:09 AM

500 official statements :)

bdjerk 07-22-2010 08:31 AM

almost worth the trip to florida to watch the festivities.

magicmike 07-22-2010 09:32 AM

So is the reason laws on copyright / dmca takedown still exist because politicians enjoy their youtube and free porn as well?

Nothing is going to change until the law changes. So many jobs, and so much money is at stake that something will hopefully happen soon.

fris 07-22-2010 09:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17352523)
The difference here though Steve, to use your analogy, if you stole my car, which is a Model H, a Homegrown Cruiser with turbo power content and painted with our logos, and you drive it around until I get it back, you just did some solid advertising for us. I don't consider the content to be "trashed and crashed" because it went on the tube freeway. On the contrary, the more exposure, while it may have caused a dent or two, provided us with critical feedback to improve our design, generated tons of branding that elevated our organics, and created opportunities to find more distributors.

We tackled this problem from the beginning with carrot and stick. Work with us and get the carrot. Don't work with us and get the stick. People have been stealing our content since before most people here were even old enough to use a computer. We have been up against this problem since day one; now, instead of spending all our money on attorneys to fight it to a phyrric finish, we chose to try and work with people first. Most people I see just complaining, railing, and otherwise getting nowhere. We turned a negative into a positive, an enemy into an ally, and learned how to work with the situation. That doesn't make us evil. You of all people should get this.

doesnt change the fact it was stolen, even if it made you money, its called theft, so by your thoughts its ok if you steal something as long as you give it back when you find out.

So we can steal millions of dollars until we find it missing.

:1orglaugh

bdjerk 07-22-2010 09:56 AM

Far-L needs more acid.

DWB 07-22-2010 10:22 AM

It's amazing what we as an industry have grown accustomed to.

Fuck me, steal from me, do whatever you want to do, and then I will let is all slide because I will send you a notice and then you will remove it for a few weeks. Then do it all over again. And it's all good. lol

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 07-22-2010 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by will76 (Post 17354791)
Fabian started with Nats right? Then I think the next question was, what was John's involvement with Porngraph? I don't remember the details posted here but there was a lot of accusations and speculation with porngraph and john.

I can't talk about John though, if I do he will run to the mods to try to get me banned.

Do your digging young jedi, you might find some good dirt on both of them. :2 cents:

Here is a good start for you http://www.gfy.com/fucking-around-and-business-discussion/275929-porngraph-installs-trojans.html

Interesting read - thanks for the link.

If I read correctly, I was surprised that John Albright never posted in that epic thread to defend himself or explain his position.

Fugitive Sam Jain et al are also known for their spyware exploits, and some here have suggested might possibly be in bed with Fabian Thylmann / Manwin now, who has suddenly also become quite reticent.

Not saying there is a connection, just noting a trend.

ADG

JFK 07-22-2010 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bdjerk (Post 17354913)
almost worth the trip to florida to watch the festivities.

you really think, anything is going to happen ? ;)

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 07-22-2010 11:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFK (Post 17355376)
you really think, anything is going to happen ? ;)

Nathan /Fabian is going to be there, right?

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5IOsliFxM3...BootLicker.jpg

I predict much BROmance, and that many drinks will be purchased...

ADG

JFK 07-22-2010 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 17355390)
Nathan /Fabian is going to be there, right?

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_5IOsliFxM3...BootLicker.jpg

I predict much BROmance, and that many drinks will be purchased...

ADG

'ADG The MAGNIFICENT' Predicts the future, hurry Hurry get your fortune told !!! only :2 cents: Cash.... NO CREDIT !:Graucho

will76 07-22-2010 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsianDivaGirlsWebDude (Post 17355320)
Interesting read - thanks for the link.

If I read correctly, I was surprised that John Albright never posted in that epic thread to defend himself or explain his position.


I thought this was John replying, maybe an old nick? http://www.gfy.com/4027114-post34.html

My memory is bad but didn't Quickbuck (hooper wiseman) buy it from John? The interesting thing was (according to the post I linked to above) when people noticed the virus was the same time the site claimed to have been sold but John's info was still on the domain. I think it turned into a finger pointing match between the buyer and seller to who was doing the virus shit. Maybe some digging can shed more light on it.

ProG 07-22-2010 01:05 PM

I am a firm believer that what is in the beginning will be in the end. If you enter this industry as a scumbag you will leave this industry as a scumbag. No matter what you do in between. (You know who you are)

bdjerk 07-22-2010 02:17 PM

great point ProG

topnotch, standup guy 07-22-2010 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Far-L (Post 17353006)
Anyway, I feel like I am in the midst of the same deluge Shap went through on this score a couple years back.

Yeah, I wonder why that is?

http://www.missiontolearn.com/wp-con...2/well-duh.jpg

Far-L 07-22-2010 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by topnotch, standup guy (Post 17356108)

Well, look at you, cornering on wittiness! Mum must be proud.

You don't think it is a little pathetic that you didn't learn from Shap at the time and are still dwelling on this issue like it was brand new crisis to the industry?:(

AsianDivaGirlsWebDude 07-22-2010 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fris (Post 17355113)
doesnt change the fact it was stolen, even if it made you money, its called theft, so by your thoughts its ok if you steal something as long as you give it back when you find out.

So we can steal millions of dollars until we find it missing.

http://pix.motivatedphotos.com/2008/...950-Piracy.jpg

ADG

TeenCat 07-22-2010 04:26 PM

http://cms-haiti.com/images/logos/marwin-doors.jpg

Far-L 07-22-2010 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fris (Post 17355113)
doesnt change the fact it was stolen, even if it made you money, its called theft, so by your thoughts its ok if you steal something as long as you give it back when you find out.

So we can steal millions of dollars until we find it missing.

:1orglaugh

Nice try but in the end sophistry will get you no where.

Where did I say it was ok to steal anything? In fact, I have clearly stated that we don't want our stuff used without permission and we work hard to constantly address the issue. Are you too simple to understand this? Do I need to have it translated to a more suitable language?

What is your stake in this anyway? Are you just mad that I don't feel an all encompassing need to help everyone else get their content taken off of places where they have not authorized it to be used? That is their job. Not mine. Sorry. Get over it.

The sad thing is we spent money on attorneys to see what we could do about the problem. (unlike the whiners like most folks here that just want to yelp and not actually do anything) We found that taking the course of action we took would be best - and that means making the best of a bad situation. Anyone that has seen a law suit all the way through knows that it is expensive and even with overwhelming evidence the outcome is uncertain. We took the path of trying to fix the problem and work with the issues. You don't like it? Show me something better.

Far-L 07-22-2010 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bdjerk (Post 17355130)
Far-L needs more acid.

Actually, what I really need is for you to not be such a dick.

But in lieu of that ever happening, I will accept the L to try and provide escape from such abtuse inanity and petty vulgarities. :disgust

ProG 07-22-2010 06:53 PM

You should back away for your own safety Far-L. Your head is getting so big it might explode.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc