![]() |
Quote:
It would be great if you kept the non-sense out of the thread though, but I sadly know that will never happen so I will try to just ignore it... |
Quote:
No, I have actually not lied. I have nothing to do with envisionext.com. I am good friends with Stan, yes, never denied that... Have known him for ages too... But no, we do not own envisionext.com ... Your information is a few years old.. things change. |
Quote:
|
I think I can see where this headed and if I am right it is actually very smart.
I understand that many of you guys posting feel personally aggrieved and financially robbed by previous actions of the sites concerned but reality is that sounding off on a forum doesn't help anything. I don't imagine it will stop "Nathan" sleeping at night and I don't imagine he will put his hands up and say "sorry we did you wrong here is a check for $1 million as an apology". If I was a previously violated content producer (which I am not), I would not only be concentrating my time on better protecting my content (as Robbie clearly has) but I would also be reading the content of the posts here and thinking how I could in future get money from these people, which is why most of us are actually in business (those of us that actually are). |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Hans Gruber: Mr. Mystery Guest? Are you still there? John McClane: Yeah, I'm still here. Unless you wanna open the front door for me. Hans Gruber: Uh, no, I'm afraid not. But, you have me at a loss. You know my name but who are you? Just another American who saw too many movies as a child? Another orphan of a bankrupt culture who thinks he's John Wayne? Rambo? Marshal Dillon? John McClane: Was always kinda partial to Roy Rogers actually. I really like those sequined shirts. Hans Gruber: Do you really think you have a chance against us, Mr. Cowboy? John McClane: Yippee-ki-yay, motherfucker. |
Amazing to see the BRO gang in full effect once again. At the end of the day people simply DO NOT care. That's what's hurting this industry.
|
Quote:
Still reticent about Virage, who owned more than just Xtube. How many DMCA takedown requests did Xtube process last year? Many large tube sites purchase content. That is irrelevant to the point I was making. Hell, I have licensed lots of 3rd party content myself as bonus material to the people who join my sites for my exclusive content. I just don't use anyone else's copyrighted content without permission or a license, period. ADG |
Don't listen to the guys telling you everything will be ok, and that this is a great move and you should all come aboard the good ship. Let them PROVE it to you first. Let them answer all of your valid questions and if they can't be honest with you, then there's your answer.
|
Quote:
O'rly?!? I guess it's not lying when you say that you have nothing to do with Envisionext, and that you are simply good friends with Stan. The only thing is, you neglected to mention that according to LinkedIn, Stan Fiskin was simultaneously CEO of Envisionext and COO for Virage. I can understand why you don't want to discuss Virage, but why can't you tell us who your current "partners" are in Manwin, if you are so proud of this fine upstanding company? Let me guess - LinkedIn has it in for you: Stan on LinkedIn Keep spinning... :1orglaugh I'll ask again, since you say you don't lie, who are the other partners in Manwin? ADG |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Surprisingly enough people can work for two companies at the same time without the two companies being owned by eachother. Also, as I have said, in case you missed it "things change"... Anyway, to get to your question you seem to be so interested in... even though I have no obligation towards you whatsoever, and since honestly you are not going to believe me anyway... but who cares... if by "Partners" you mean shareholders, which is the only thing I can imagine, then there are no other noteworthy partners (noteworthy in terms of owning more than 1 or 2 %) But now, obviously, you are going to call me some name again, or say I am obviously lying or whatnot... So considering that, if you think I am lying, come and prove it or STFU. I think there is some GFY rule... hmm... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Requesting cliff notes on this tread.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Tell me again why Brazzers is getting sued by Pink Visual? Oh that's right, BECAUSE YOU ARE FUCKING THIEVES! The shoe fits, bro. :2 cents: Now that I know you were involved in Virage and the owner of Envisionext was COO for Virage, I have to question that other company you started, what was the name of it again... you know, the one with the "mysterious" huge data leak and all the CC data compromised? I'm bad with names. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I recommend everyone to read that link. :warning :warning With this clear evidence it just shows how pathetic some studio owners are. Crying about their own licenses, but see no problem in selling their content to the tubes who stole from everyone. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Awesome logic... Regarding the mysterious other company, until you actually say which you mean, I can not comment... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
wow, this is a fucked up thread. but i guess thats adult business as usual. wild shit in here, will be interesting to watch it all move forward, in whatever direction that is.
interesting changes for you, from coder of nats(the N in nats) to "partner" in brazzers. is PA still doing well? always converted well with my german traffic. |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc