no wonder it went through ... I blame Obama Hussein bin laden and his socialist demonic followers

So are you against infertile heterosexuals or those past menopause from marrying?

Confused about negative burden of proof yet again? And I think you should stop using the word rational, seeing as how you have no concept of rationality. Please continue humoring us.


Edit: Since I have to dumb yet another down for you, let me demonstrate. Now if I was to use your logic and the incompetence of Tom, I would say "You're an idiot, prove me wrong!!" That also translates to "Prove that you're NOT an idiot". Comprende, champ?

It wasn't that long ago that there were laws (in the United States) that stated people of different races were not allowed to marry. 16 states had those laws up to 1967.

Virginia was one of them. In 1959 a white man and a black woman (who had been married in the District of Columbia) were arrested as they slept in their home and were convicted of a felony, getting one year in prison with the sentence suspended for 25 years so long as the couple left the State. The presiding judge stated this at the trial;

"Almighty God created the races white, black, yellow, malay and red, and he placed them on separate continents. And but for the interference with his arrangement there would be no cause for such marriages. The fact that he separated the races shows that he did not intend for the races to mix."

The couple moved to D.C. and filed a motion that eventually reached the Supreme Court and in 1967 Loving vs Virginia stated that race-based legal restrictions on marriage was unconstitutional, in a 9-0 vote.

Not that long ago, less than a lifetime in fact, and people were not being granted, what the Supreme Court decided, was their constitutional rights. I hope this case ends the same as Loving...cause the world could use as much Loving as it can get nowadays!

I shall. And I shall continue asking you rhetorical questions that you can't answer in any way other than by put downs.

And I shall continue destroying your pseudo logic while you dodge rebuttals and resort to off topic discussions.:winkwink:

Then we're on the same page here. But I'm going bowling now. Later D.

I was born straight and turned gay by my surroundings.

indeed. we could even go further and help provide fostering and adoption services for these families for all the children not caught up in the 'sanctity of marriage'

:1orglaugh if they were all of those none of it is illegal.

hahahaha

Personally I dont give a fuck who marries whom. My personal preference is not the issue, but I would probably vote like most of those in California did. I do not think homosexuals MUST have this "pseudo right" they dont really care in my opinion. The reason they want this law struck down is so they can "feel" less discriminated against.
Everyone faces discrimination of one sort or another, every single social group, it simply is inevitable but just more apparent when you are in a minority social group.

Shut up fudge packer.

Cambaby and Demon. Thanks for making my ignore list grow. Your in perfect company.

No problem. I realized your intelligence level when you told someone to "preach somewhere else", because you didn't agree with him, while ignoring everyone else who was preaching who agreed with you. Great job dumbass.:thumbsup:thumbsup

I am glad I am on "your" ignore list, considering I am the only one between the two of us that knows the proper usage of that word.

You've made plenty of typos too. Should we point them out?
Location: CR

Czech Republic? Or "crazy republican"?
If it's crazy republican then your posts make sense. If it's Czech, then why the fuck do you care about California gays?

According to Amputate, if it doesn't affect you, you shouldn't care. What a simplistic and ignorant view on life. Btw, still pretending that you're going to leave the house?

People in other countries shouldn't care.

I am leaving the house. Going bowling. Wife is fixing her hair so I'm entertaining you some more. That's what you asked for isn't it D?

Homosexual federal judge overturns the will of the majority of Californian voters and thats not violation of their rights? Hello.. Lets start with 101.

i like packed fudge it's on sale at walgreens. :)

Splain me what "rights" the judge "violated" of those poor majority voters. I want to know exactly which rights were trampled.

:) let him be gay

Perhaps you would reply to my earlier post
http://gofuckyourself.com/showpost.p...7&postcount=99

will of the majority of voters is free money

is it a violation of their rights not to start the printing presses?

Perhaps YOU would reply to my earlier post...
http://gofuckyourself.com/showpost.p...7&postcount=99

homemade is waaaaaaaaaaaaay better. :pimp

If you read the thread you will see that I do concede there is a precedent with Jim Crow laws, but I would argue that those laws were ill conceived and poorly written in the first place. Also you are under the assumption that homosexuals must be born gay just as blacks are born with darkly pigmented skin and based on that you draw the comparison? Really you cannot compare the two issues unless you base it on the fact that homosexuals are born gay, and frankly you cannot prove that and the burden of proof if you use that argument is on you.

this is going to get heated fast. :2 cents: "conflict of interest" :2 cents:

Thought experiment:

Take a sample of 100 abstinent men, they live and die choosing to never have sex with anyone. How many of them are gay?

this isnt about how gays became gay. it's about the citizens of cali saying we are not bending because you want it that way. :2 cents:

What difference does it matter if gays are born or made? The issue is rights and equal treatment under laws.

forcing straight porn to wear condom is a pretty important ruling the homo's are pushing, probably going to do one hell of a lot more to affect you life than a couple of cocksuckers getting married :2 cents:

If you can't see the massive difference between a guy marrying a guy, and a guy having 10 wives, or a woman wanting to marry her dog... Well I just don't know.

:1orglaugh

http://mimg.ugo.com/200809/24420/cut...on_288x288.jpg oh snap!

two snaps up and a tweeist

are there any actual homos in this thread weighing in or just homophobes/homo sympathizing master debaters?

I'm Blaine Edwards... And I'm Antionne Merriweather... And welcome to "Men on Prop 8"! :)

I am an actual card carrying "Friend of Dorothy" ;)