GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   California gets scarier (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=984346)

tony286 08-29-2010 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17449365)
I'm sure they can track you by your cell phone

That was my thought.

GAMEFINEST 08-29-2010 06:48 PM

scary shit is the jobless rates here.

MetaMan 08-29-2010 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NaughtyRob (Post 17449363)
Although it is indeed scary I don't care if they know where I am I am not doing anything wrong.

Who gets to decide who is really right or wrong? Who are the people who control that power? Who will be the people to control that power in 10 years?

Who watches over this power? Who will watch over it in 10 years?

Whoever watches over this power who do they answer too? Who will be able to use it next?

Never let unneeded laws advanced just because you are "innocent". Innocent people have never been found guilty have they?

96ukssob 08-29-2010 06:55 PM

oh no's! the gov't is going to know where I'm driving to!!! :1orglaugh:1orglaugh

they don't need to do this, they can already figure this out by looking at credit/debit card transaction statements, as well when you pay tolls on roads, airline tickets, etc.

What are you so worried about them finding out? If your that concerned, then your doing something shaddy :2 cents:

cam_girls 08-29-2010 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MetaMan (Post 17451078)
Never let unneeded laws advanced just because you are "innocent". Innocent people have never been found guilty have they?


This is why Big Brother are so scary. Obama doesn't have a clue what they get up to, and what technology they use.

YOU ARE GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT

Have no doubt. Your state lawyer, judge, the police prosecutor and the even the court reporter are all work mates. They work in the same courtroom every day for 10 years. YOU are the new guy. You think the judge will side with YOU or the policeman?

Think of it this way. Should you lock away people who might be dangerous but you have no evidence, or let them free? THEY LOCK YOU UP ON SUSPICION. All it takes is someone to lay charges and the police do the rest.

I'm not saying it's wrong, if you're 90% sure someone is a mass murderer it's probably best to lock them away, but don't live in ignorance that being innocent is your keep safe.

And corporal punishment is in wide use.

aubreythree 08-29-2010 07:23 PM

yup, that might be reasonable

Brujah 08-29-2010 07:35 PM

This isn't a technology piece. Do you understand that sentence? Technology has existed for a long time that makes it POSSIBLE for you to be watched and followed.

This is a legal, government, and privacy piece. Just because they CAN do it, doesn't mean they've had the right to do it before, without a warrant.

Some of you people are just so stupid, it's no wonder we're in this shape. You worry more about whether some homosexual is going to be allowed to get married, more than the eroding of your rights. Sad.

d-null 08-29-2010 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bossku69 (Post 17451083)

What are you so worried about them finding out? If your that concerned, then your doing something shaddy :2 cents:

the thing you people that love to give away rights always forget, is the definition of "shady" tends to change through the years and governments love to become repressive to an individual's right to enjoy life as they see it without infringing on anyone else (I expect this concept to probably be over your head though) :2 cents:

cambaby 08-30-2010 02:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bossku69 (Post 17451083)
What are you so worried about them finding out? If your that concerned, then your doing something shaddy :2 cents:

You must work for Google! That is exactly their stance on privacy.

Tell you what, why dont you let me install cameras in your home, I mean if you arent doing anything shady you shouldnt have a problem with it. Otherwise I think we could arrest you for refusing since you obviously are doing something illegal.

Amputate Your Head 08-30-2010 07:50 AM

you have no reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway.
and owning a car is not a "right".

Brujah 08-30-2010 07:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 17451961)
you have no reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway.
and owning a car is not a "right".

At least not with states in the Ninth Circuit court :1orglaugh

It was unanimously against it in the 4th Circuit court, DC area.

cambaby 08-30-2010 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 17451961)
you have no reasonable expectation of privacy in your driveway. and owning a car is not a "right".

You are deranged, you gotta be trolling. :1orglaugh

Amputate Your Head 08-30-2010 08:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cambaby (Post 17451993)
You are deranged, you gotta be trolling. :1orglaugh

which part are you confused on crybaby? Do you think you have a "right" to own a vehicle? or do you think your driveway is private?

damnage 08-30-2010 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 17452008)
which part are you confused on crybaby? Do you think you have a "right" to own a vehicle? or do you think your driveway is private?

My land is my land. The old phrase about an Englishman's home being his castle is my opinion on the matter.

I am realist and can see how surveillance might be needed, however I wish for it to be done in a legitimate way in a set rule of procedures and with justification for use of such invasions.

This sort of advancement leads a country down only one road.

Amputate Your Head 08-30-2010 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by damnage (Post 17452030)
My land is my land. The old phrase about an Englishman's home being his castle is my opinion on the matter.

then why don't you keep your valuables in your car while it sits in the driveway unlocked?

dyna mo 08-30-2010 08:15 AM

if it helps with l.a. traffic, i'm all for it.

ottopottomouse 08-30-2010 08:20 AM

http://gpsjammers.net/gmt14-all-civi...al-jammer.html

Rochard 08-30-2010 08:59 AM

Normally I could care less. I have no fear of my privacy being invaded; I have nothing to hide. They can track me through my cell phone, and if not, they can gladly put a gps tracking device in my car. Whatever.

But sneaking up onto someone's property in the middle of the night, putting a tracking device on a car, and without a warrant? Whoa. Something's not right with that.

Amputate Your Head 08-30-2010 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 17452236)
Normally I could care less. I have no fear of my privacy being invaded; I have nothing to hide. They can track me through my cell phone, and if not, they can gladly put a gps tracking device in my car. Whatever.

But sneaking up onto someone's property in the middle of the night, putting a tracking device on a car, and without a warrant? Whoa. Something's not right with that.

I've had cops crawl all over my property, front, back, sides, the works.... with no warrant whatsoever. They don't generally give a damn.

JP-pornshooter 08-30-2010 11:05 AM

the fed or the CA state government is mostly useless..
they have such serious budget problems they need to battle, not a bunch of paranoid homos...


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123