![]() |
So the pornographers don't like thieves and agree with the Ten Commandments?
Oh! the hypocrisy when you meet THEE JUDGE that hates pornography. "The lust of the eyes and the lust of the flesh is not of God but of the world. Those who are friends with the world are enemies of God" - James & John |
Steve has already publicly admitted in another thread that the site rips that you are tracking to harvest IPs to send out demands for payment ended up on the torrents by his own hand, in so much as he sent them to review sites freely and one of them seeded them to the torrents.
It would have been less work, although less profitable to have tagged those site rips extremely easily before sending them out so that you could have found out and sued the person responsible for seeding it in the first place. Logic has no place where money is to be made. |
Quote:
http://www.gofuckyourself.com/showpo...4&postcount=78 I think you should stop drunk posting man. :2 cents: |
Quote:
Sorry, I misunderstood. And at 9:30am, I'm not drunk posting! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
or you successfully blackmailed someone into giving you money because they didn't want their porn surfing habits exposed. There is a huge difference between the two. you suit as documented is going to set a very dangerous precedent when you actually face a real copyright lawyer. |
Quote:
hear nothing, see nothing do nothing. Just move along and watch from the side. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
so how did it go lightmeth ? did they win the case ? NO THEY DIDNT THEY FAILED as usual.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
if he really wanted to do the deal, he would have agreed to my condition that the deal would go forward as i originally agreed (he handles 100% of the day to day operations) if i posted the screen shot. he refused to agree,after he tried to turn the deal into a standard affiliate relationship (i handle all the day to day operations of everything ) |
I think this woman wishes she had never downloaded pirated content.
http://www.news.com.au/technology/si...-1225948322250 How did she find the money to fight it for so long? |
http://www.news.com.au/technology/si...-1225948322250
"Single mum ordered to pay $1.5m for illegally downloading 24 songs" "She was ordered to pay $62,500 for each of the 24 songs, a total of $1.5 million" how anyone can think that's an appropriate punishment is beyond me so when you're rich you can get away with murder, but when you're not you can be slapped with a $62.500 fine for downloading a song, utter insanity and you wonder why some people snap to put this in perspective: this will totally destroy her life, now if she had robbed a shop or even held up a shop, she would be out in maximum a few years and be able to continue her life let alone all those bank CEO's that destroyed 100 of thousands if not millions of people's lifes over the last few years they get no punishment |
Quote:
Best part is, everyone that saw that thread - including crazytrini85, knows without question that you're full of complete shit. Then again, every time you post, people know it's complete bullshit. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
you went from agreeing to handling all the day to day operations of the site to expecting me to handle the day to day operations, of the tracker, of all the torrent submissions, of all the tube submission etc. |
Quote:
I've worked with him, nothing but a straight up dude. :2 cents: Why are YOU the only person he's lied to? |
Quote:
I don't want to get back into the fight, clearly it is over and the deal is never going to happen, but just show some proof that you sent the email and maybe you will regain 1 tiny shred of credibility. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:40 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc