GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   GFY Republicans: How do you feel about your people taking down craigslist? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=985343)

Slutboat 09-04-2010 11:24 AM

FACT: A republican AG is responsible for the witch hunt against craigslist:

http://abcnews.go.com/TheLaw/story?id=7507090&page=1

this was started in may of last year by Republicans. Of couse they found some Dems to go along by pushing the emotional fear button of "Child Trafficking"

You porn biz guys still going to defend the Republican Party when they outlaw all porn production under the guise of "it promotes illegal activity"?

Naughty-Pages 09-04-2010 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyDanza (Post 17468194)
you film porn you need to prove everyone on camera is over 18.... that simple....

I get that.. but to "Backdate" the documentation requirements for stuff that was legally shot years before the new regulations were made, thereby making what was legal now illegal??.. It is clear what the intention was there.

DateDoc 09-04-2010 11:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cambaby (Post 17468088)
HAHAH DateDoc I like the one link on that page you did visit :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:error

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

GatorB 09-04-2010 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pussyluver (Post 17467160)
Chill out a bit would ya?

Not all Republicans are members of the Tea Party movement..
Not all Tea party members are cock suckers
Not all conservatives or Republicans are religious extremists
Not all conservatives are Republicans.

Not all Nazis hated jews. So they weren't all bad right?

dyna mo 09-04-2010 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17468349)
Not all Nazis hated jews. So they weren't all bad right?

that's correct. :thumbsup

DirtyDanza 09-04-2010 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naughty-Pages (Post 17468329)
I get that.. but to "Backdate" the documentation requirements for stuff that was legally shot years before the new regulations were made, thereby making what was legal now illegal??.. It is clear what the intention was there.



adapt and overcome...


coccaine was once legal to.. so was LSD... you saying crack heads shuold still be allowed to run around smoke crack and rob people cause it was once legal?


you really don't have an argument dood... I you can try to pin it how it is.. but fact is.. everyone got together and said no kids on film.. how do we stop that.. oh I know make everyone on a film show an ID.. therefore weather it was filmed in roman times or modern times if you want to have viewers of content you have to follow modern laws of which item is to be viewed...


im sure there are some paintings somewhere in an archive that the "modern world" considers aceient blah blah.. but those are few far and between....

you telling me that it should be ok to sell and view "iffy" content where the model may or may not be 18 because the laws of the times when that film was shot?

dood they did not just make the law cause people looked underage... were talking about a very mob influenced era where 16-17-18 were used all the time... just cause it took us a while to adapt a good law does not make what happened right...

fuck dood it was once legal to have slaves you saying I should go round up a bunch of blacks and hold them hostage make them do hard labor and shoot anyone who tries to take my slaves just cause it was once legal?


see where im going with this?

Amputate Your Head 09-04-2010 12:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyDanza (Post 17468506)
adapt and overcome...


coccaine was once legal to.. so was LSD... you saying crack heads shuold still be allowed to run around smoke crack and rob people cause it was once legal?


you really don't have an argument dood... I you can try to pin it how it is.. but fact is.. everyone got together and said no kids on film.. how do we stop that.. oh I know make everyone on a film show an ID.. therefore weather it was filmed in roman times or modern times if you want to have viewers of content you have to follow modern laws of which item is to be viewed...


im sure there are some paintings somewhere in an archive that the "modern world" considers aceient blah blah.. but those are few far and between....

you telling me that it should be ok to sell and view "iffy" content where the model may or may not be 18 because the laws of the times when that film was shot?

dood they did not just make the law cause people looked underage... were talking about a very mob influenced era where 16-17-18 were used all the time... just cause it took us a while to adapt a good law does not make what happened right...

fuck dood it was once legal to have slaves you saying I should go round up a bunch of blacks and hold them hostage make them do hard labor and shoot anyone who tries to take my slaves just cause it was once legal?


see where im going with this?

lol @ comparing substances and slavery to photographs.

fact: everything is legal.... until it's not.

DirtyDanza 09-04-2010 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 17468512)
lol @ comparing substances and slavery to photographs.

fact: everything is legal.... until it's not.



im just comparing what was once legal to what is now not... in the eyes of the courts a law is a law ... it's not case by case....


and I agree with you everything is legal until it's not.... kind of what I was saying only I like analogies :)

NemesisEnforcer 09-04-2010 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17468349)
Not all Nazis hated jews. So they weren't all bad right?

It's too early to invoke Godwin's Law. :upsidedow

NaughtyVisions 09-04-2010 12:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 17468512)
lol @ comparing substances and slavery to photographs.

fact: everything is legal.... until it's not.

Dood :thumbsup

NaughtyVisions 09-04-2010 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyDanza (Post 17468194)
the new regs are not bad at all dood... all they say are prove she's over 18.... it's very simple..... weather she is 90 with wrinkles or just turned 18 with no grass on the infield the bottom line is they all need to prove they are over 18 if you can't then it shuold be just as good as child porn... that simple.....


listen I Think it's stupid that a gilf would need to prove she's over 18 but... it is what it is.. and if thats why I gotta do to protect children thats what we gotta do... you can't make laws on these things on a case by case basis..... it has to be across the board...

it's simple...



you film porn you need to prove everyone on camera is over 18.... that simple...


I am willing to bet 90% of the people that film content do not do 2257 the way it's supposed to be done.....


ill ask a simple question ... how many "files" do you keep for each girl...


lets see how many producers are actually up on the laws.....


it's very simple.....

Dood, do you really believe the 2257 regs are as simple as "all they say is prove she's over 18?" Dood, if it was that simple, would every content producer be advised to consult attorneys to look over their 2257 docs and how they are kept? Dood, if it was that simple, do you think companies like 2257Safe would exist?

Dood...just Dood....

Slutboat 09-04-2010 01:07 PM

dood you are arguing with a guy who says if someone killed the President they would be "An American Hero". Nuff said

Naughty-Pages 09-04-2010 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyDanza (Post 17468506)
adapt and overcome...


coccaine was once legal to.. so was LSD... you saying crack heads shuold still be allowed to run around smoke crack and rob people cause it was once legal?


you really don't have an argument dood... I you can try to pin it how it is.. but fact is.. everyone got together and said no kids on film.. how do we stop that.. oh I know make everyone on a film show an ID.. therefore weather it was filmed in roman times or modern times if you want to have viewers of content you have to follow modern laws of which item is to be viewed...


im sure there are some paintings somewhere in an archive that the "modern world" considers aceient blah blah.. but those are few far and between....

you telling me that it should be ok to sell and view "iffy" content where the model may or may not be 18 because the laws of the times when that film was shot?

dood they did not just make the law cause people looked underage... were talking about a very mob influenced era where 16-17-18 were used all the time... just cause it took us a while to adapt a good law does not make what happened right...

fuck dood it was once legal to have slaves you saying I should go round up a bunch of blacks and hold them hostage make them do hard labor and shoot anyone who tries to take my slaves just cause it was once legal?


see where im going with this?

none of that makes sense.. this is about legal porn.

if it was legal for an 80 year old adult to pose nude before, and it still is now, yet they said the old documentation you have for it is no longer valid so you must toss it out and pay to shoot new content. The fact that I have government ID and a signed release from for something that was shot prior to the new laws being backdated somehow must mean her wrinkled ass might not be 80 years old now?

let's put this into the crazy perspective that it was.. it is the same as them setting up new laws concerning Deeds to Homes because of prostitution houses being used in human trafficking (a big issue that is probably more widespread not only in the US, but worldwide). And because of this you now no longer own your house under the new regulations.. You now have to abandon your old home and you will have to buy a new house and get the proper documentation. (I mean where does it stop?) Now if you are upset you lost your home, does that make you a supporter of human trafficking??? WTF dude?

If they wanted to put up more stringent laws, it should not have been back dated to include content already legally produce under the law.

NaughtyVisions 09-04-2010 03:49 PM

http://images.icanhascheezburger.com...0943791066.jpg

Vendzilla 09-04-2010 06:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slutboat (Post 17468020)
Huh? Typical far right loony mischaracterization of a logical argument. No I don't dislike them or you, see I don't dislike people I haven't met based on their ideas, skin color, sexual preference, religion or anything else. I don't hate anyone unless they give me a damn good reason to. The Tea Party, of which you so vehemetly defend on GFY, stands for the exact opposite of these values that are the core foundation and principals America was built on.

where does it say they stand for the opposite of the core values that America was built on?

messiah1 09-04-2010 06:38 PM

Fun Fact:
In reality the Democrats of today would be considered economically hardcore republicans 30 years ago.

poncabare 09-04-2010 07:17 PM

liberals are just as hypocrital... you preach tolerance and understanding, but only if it is in agreement with your ideas

Slutboat 09-04-2010 07:55 PM

naw dude no tolerance for the shit that is destroying this country, I'm sick of it and I'm pissed

Naughty-Pages 09-04-2010 08:12 PM

I should add.. I guess the next step is to force us all to go to a .xxx tld


(I can't believe anyone in the adult industry would have wanted an xxx.tld and if they did.. this is probably just a small preview for them of what is to come..)

tony286 09-04-2010 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 17468015)
You should really get better sources of information than whatever propaganda outlet you are listening to. I would suggest trying something like going to one of your local Tea party gatherings and finding out what they are actually talking about.

There is NOTHING about the tea party movement that has anything AT ALL to do with censorship. They are far too libertarian for that. Are there people in that movement that are pro-censorship? I'm sure that there are.... There are wackos from EVERY party or group. However if you actually take the initiative to find out for yourself what is going on at Tea Party rallies you will find that all they are talking about is big government, high taxes, too much government power, overspending, etc.... (They are often just as mad at the republicans as the democrats). Nothing to do with porn.


I don't really hold out hope that you will use your own initiative to find out facts for yourself.... you will probably just take whatever someone else spoon feeds you in order to form your views and opinions.... but I can at least try to make a suggestions to you.

It's up to you bud.



.:2 cents:

Your kidding yourself really, wanting to overturn roe vs wade that's not libertarian or not making gay marriage legal. These people wrap themselves in the constitution when it suits their agenda. Trust me sister sarah becomes president porn will be dead in the gun sights, they love shit like this it looks good and it doesnt upset their corporate masters.

tony286 09-04-2010 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by poncabare (Post 17469302)
liberals are just as hypocrital... you preach tolerance and understanding, but only if it is in agreement with your ideas

You mean like get the government out of my healthcare but not if you are a woman who wants an abortion or terri schiavo?

howardzinn 09-04-2010 08:31 PM

Well most of the tea baggers are either too fat to fuck, too old to fuck or too ugly to fuck. Besides who wants to fuck a crazy ass old xenophobic racist white person with the IQ of a pumpkin.

OneHungLo 09-04-2010 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DirtyDanza (Post 17468113)
so let me get this straight your against protecting children?

2257 is put into effect to protect children ...


your bitching about 2257 is basically saying you want to film children? and people call me a sick fuck

So you're saying all that 2257 business was all about protecting children? Oh please..

Dcat 09-04-2010 09:21 PM

Damn people ...the Democrats and Republicans are nothing but the flip side of the same coin. They both serve the EXACT SAME agenda. Let's at least be sophisticated enough to see past that or nothing will ever change. Who cares "which camp" the politician that just sold you out is in, it doesn't matter. The train is still going to the SAME PLACE!

Threads like this drive me crazy.

</end rant>

..ejecting now

DirtyDanza 09-04-2010 09:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naughty-Pages (Post 17468894)
none of that makes sense.. this is about legal porn.

if it was legal for an 80 year old adult to pose nude before, and it still is now, yet they said the old documentation you have for it is no longer valid so you must toss it out and pay to shoot new content. The fact that I have government ID and a signed release from for something that was shot prior to the new laws being backdated somehow must mean her wrinkled ass might not be 80 years old now?

let's put this into the crazy perspective that it was.. it is the same as them setting up new laws concerning Deeds to Homes because of prostitution houses being used in human trafficking (a big issue that is probably more widespread not only in the US, but worldwide). And because of this you now no longer own your house under the new regulations.. You now have to abandon your old home and you will have to buy a new house and get the proper documentation. (I mean where does it stop?) Now if you are upset you lost your home, does that make you a supporter of human trafficking??? WTF dude?

If they wanted to put up more stringent laws, it should not have been back dated to include content already legally produce under the law.



then you have to do that.... it is what it is... really nothing to bitch about....

consider it a recall of sorts....

SatansCandy 09-04-2010 10:01 PM

"As a dog returns to his vomit so does a fool to his folly" - King David

I am sure the whores will find another site to post their listings on. They are slaves to sin and will continue to sin without Christ and true repentance.

"The harlot's pathways lead straight to hell" - Proverbs 7

Slutboat 09-04-2010 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SatansCandy (Post 17469543)
"As a dog returns to his vomit so does a fool to his folly" - King David

I am sure the whores will find another site to post their listings on. They are slaves to sin and will continue to sin without Christ and true repentance.

"The harlot's pathways lead straight to hell" - Proverbs 7


this guy for real? that would be awesome

sorry for the newb question but a real preacher troll would be a whole lotta fun

sperbonzo 09-05-2010 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tony299 (Post 17469426)
Your kidding yourself really, wanting to overturn roe vs wade that's not libertarian or not making gay marriage legal. These people wrap themselves in the constitution when it suits their agenda. Trust me sister sarah becomes president porn will be dead in the gun sights, they love shit like this it looks good and it doesnt upset their corporate masters.

Go to a tea party rally Tony.... you won't see anything about abortion or gay marriage mentioned there....

I know you won't believe me, but you should try going and seeing for yourself, instead of taking the word of some article on the internet.


.:2 cents:

directfiesta 09-05-2010 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 17471045)
Go to a tea party rally Tony.... you won't see anything about abortion or gay marriage mentioned there....

I know you won't believe me, but you should try going and seeing for yourself, instead of taking the word of some article on the internet.


.:2 cents:

You are right .. if you stop before the 17th second ... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh


tony286 09-05-2010 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 17471045)
Go to a tea party rally Tony.... you won't see anything about abortion or gay marriage mentioned there....

I know you won't believe me, but you should try going and seeing for yourself, instead of taking the word of some article on the internet.


.:2 cents:

oh really http://www.ttprw.org/ its a teaparty site they must be lying or really liberals lol

tony286 09-05-2010 04:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 17471065)
You are right .. if you stop before the 17th second ... :1orglaugh:1orglaugh


That's fucking scary it really is.

marketsmart 09-05-2010 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sperbonzo (Post 17471045)
Go to a tea party rally Tony.... you won't see anything about abortion or gay marriage mentioned there....

I know you won't believe me, but you should try going and seeing for yourself, instead of taking the word of some article on the internet.


.:2 cents:

you are full of shit...

i went to one of these tea parties and it was all a bunch of fags dressed in leather that kept pushing me down and trying to stick their balls in my mouth...

i will not be going to one of those parties again...

no wonder the democrats hate these guys so much...



.

NaughtyVisions 09-05-2010 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by marketsmart (Post 17471378)
you are full of shit...

i went to one of these tea parties and it was all a bunch of fags dressed in leather that kept pushing me down and trying to stick their balls in my mouth...

i will not be going to one of those parties again...

no wonder the democrats hate these guys so much...



.

They even turned your misfortune into an ad for one of their next "dance" parties. That's you in the middle in jeans, right? I feel so sorry for you and what you've been through. :2 cents:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_W8k2uAvVVu...Document48.jpg

marketsmart 09-05-2010 05:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NaughtyVisions (Post 17471399)
They even turned your misfortune into an ad for one of their next "dance" parties. That's you in the middle in jeans, right? I feel so sorry for you and what you've been through. :2 cents:

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_W8k2uAvVVu...Document48.jpg

yes, thats the tea party i attended.. the guy on the left was named gary...





.

The Demon 09-05-2010 06:43 PM

I can't help but think slutboat is a 12 year old kid with a 1st grade comprehension of liberals, conservatives, Democrats, and Republicans. Say what you will about the different breeds on this forum but you've taken stupidity to a whole new level.

Agent 488 09-05-2010 06:50 PM

why go to a tea party when you can go to wal mart. same thing.

Slutboat 09-05-2010 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17471552)
I can't help but think slutboat is a 12 year old kid with a 1st grade comprehension of liberals, conservatives, Democrats, and Republicans. Say what you will about the different breeds on this forum but you've taken stupidity to a whole new level.

thank you so much Demon my man, you make me feel young again.

stay tuned for a nice rant in your honor and in the meantime enjoy the taste of my greasy nads in your vile little mouth.

directfiesta 09-05-2010 07:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Agent 488 (Post 17471561)
why go to a tea party when you can go to wal mart. same thing.

http://blog.oregonlive.com/politics_...ay.272.cdb.jpg

NaughtyVisions 09-05-2010 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by directfiesta (Post 17471583)

I think he's a member of the Tea Baggers, not the Tea Party. :2 cents:

NYRangers 09-05-2010 10:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Slutboat (Post 17467124)
that's right you are guilty you hypocritical FUCKS. You make your money in porn but you tea bagger cocksuckers are actively trying to vote in righty extremests who will do everything in thier power to shut the porn biz down. Craigslist is just the first step, way to go assholes.

Can I chime in just for the sake of chiming in and not being affiliated to any party? Because if I can, I would love to chip in and say you are an absolute one sided ignorant tool.

If I can't, then anyone who reads the rest of this sentence and the next realizes that this hypocrite has sucked me in to responding to his absurdity.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc