GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   If the ICM's .xxx is approved, it will hurt you alot more than what's happening now with ePassporte! (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=988351)

RAM 09-21-2010 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by closer (Post 17524089)
Like with every new rule, there will be many ways to circumvent it so I'm not worried at all

Yes I agree however it would be nice not to have too :thumbsup

Zyber 09-21-2010 02:56 PM

Guys, we should also ask our surfers to vote for us.

The question is if they will vote the right thing. It is hard for a horny dude to say NO to XXX.

Quentin 09-21-2010 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FetishWeb (Post 17524096)
I'm not seeing how any international court would be able to exercise any binding authority over ICANN or the department of commerce.

You do see how a U.S. court could exercise such authority, though, I trust?

Hopefully you can further see how a company located in the U.S. might have standing to challenge in civil court a law that requires that company to spend a significant amount of money to alter their operations by way of a forced migration to a different TLD?

Presumably you also understand that U.S. courts are frequently the venue for international dispute resolution when the dispute arises from enforcement of U.S. law?

Do you really believe that .XXX use could be made mandatory without facing any court scrutiny?

I get the sense that we agree more than we disagree here, honestly.... unless you are of the opinion that .XXX could be made mandatory without that requirement being subject to legal challenge? If so.... well, then I disagree, and I'm happy to simply leave it at that.

mikesinner 09-21-2010 03:41 PM

voted no.

Alprazolam 09-21-2010 03:43 PM

all domains are controlled by the state of virginia. its a fact. go check.

Naughty-Pages 09-21-2010 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by minicivan (Post 17523481)
No one has explained yet how federal government in the USA can mandate that all websites of some type can go under the direct control of a private company. With this stupid thinking, why not worry that tomorrow, all private business will need license from Walmart to operate?

Technically, in the USA all private business "should" have a business certificate, but it's not from Walmart.. it's from your local government.

And the US government has no problem telling adult businesses where they can and cannot locate their establishment.. They have been doing that forever.

an .xxx tld makes having those current laws that apply to where adult businesses can be located a very easy transition to apply to the internet.

Someone else was talking about .org domains and forcing those to be for charity only, that is like apples and oranges.. there are not large groups of radical people to be a motivational factor like there are groups against porn.

anyone who does not believe .xxx tld is one step towards censorship and potentially forcing porn sites to a redlight district (.xxx) is simply naive.
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrsmut (Post 17523174)
if everybody is sending the exact same text they could consider it as the same person sending the messages with different emails

I agree...

I made mine a little different so it would stand out..

When I see all of those "Please approve the .XXX Registry Agreement" you can tell they were all form letter shit from icmregistry.com/forms And I guarantee 99% of those submissions are complete bullshit made by people not even in the adult industry..

What is the average time for the verification email that you guys have been getting? (I know there was a lag the last few times this crap came up...) I sent my opposition to this like 40 min ago and still no confirmation link...

Socks 09-21-2010 04:37 PM

Remember when Tipper Gore wanted to censor every song made in the USA?

People do crazy things, and they use laws as the basis to launch their craziness.

Less tools in their arsenal, the better.

NewbieNudes 09-21-2010 04:42 PM

Just sent my mail. Please let this fucking issue DIE.

A good point I used...

"...snip..... It (.xxx) is like extortion, because to protect our brands we'll have to buy the .XXX of our .COM names, even though we are opposed to supporting this bad idea. /snip "

Send in those emails peeps!

NewbieNudes 09-21-2010 04:43 PM

Oh and don't forget when you send the email to look out for and reply to the "confirm email" email they send back to you.

KillerK 09-21-2010 04:44 PM

You guys need to send in your support for .XXX...

I wrote a bot and have been using proxys to send thousands of letters of support.

Fuck all of you that support Xbiz but don't support .XXX

F-U-Jimmy 09-21-2010 05:07 PM

So how long after you confirm your e-mail does it take to post on the site. I had to send mine twice as i didnt get a reply e-mail the first time. the second attempt resulted in an e-mail reply, to which i confirmed but still no sign of my e-mail on the site and its been 30 minutes ? Strange stuff :helpme

Naughty-Pages 09-21-2010 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by F-U-Jimmy (Post 17524455)
So how long after you confirm your e-mail does it take to post on the site. I had to send mine twice as i didnt get a reply e-mail the first time. the second attempt resulted in an e-mail reply, to which i confirmed but still no sign of my e-mail on the site and its been 30 minutes ? Strange stuff :helpme

ya, i asked that same question earlier..

mine took about 60-90 minutes or so..

davecummings 09-21-2010 08:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sextoyking (Post 17523269)
Dave,

I saw the 24+ votes in favor - looks fishy - dunno.

You sir have done alot to bring attention to this matter.

Mabey post another with your bio, service to our country, etc, etc.

also, would be nice if all the boards, gfy, ynot, etc, etc could mail there members a template email and make it easy and quick for them to post there objections to this..

Thanks Col.

Todd

Thanks. I posted extensives threads at three other boards, in hopes of getting their attention before it was too late.

My bio/background is quite comprehensively covered by past NY Times and other reporters at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Cummings

I appreciate the nice things you posted:-).

Now, everybody reading this who hasn't posted yet, do it by tommorow's deadline or be prepared to wish you had---got it? OK!!!!!

Thanks,

davecummings 09-21-2010 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naughty-Pages (Post 17524241)
Technically, in the USA all private business "should" have a business certificate, but it's not from Walmart.. it's from your local government.

And the US government has no problem telling adult businesses where they can and cannot locate their establishment.. They have been doing that forever.

an .xxx tld makes having those current laws that apply to where adult businesses can be located a very easy transition to apply to the internet.

Someone else was talking about .org domains and forcing those to be for charity only, that is like apples and oranges.. there are not large groups of radical people to be a motivational factor like there are groups against porn.

anyone who does not believe .xxx tld is one step towards censorship and potentially forcing porn sites to a redlight district (.xxx) is simply naive.
I agree...

I made mine a little different so it would stand out..

When I see all of those "Please approve the .XXX Registry Agreement" you can tell they were all form letter shit from icmregistry.com/forms And I guarantee 99% of those submissions are complete bullshit made by people not even in the adult industry..

What is the average time for the verification email that you guys have been getting? (I know there was a lag the last few times this crap came up...) I sent my opposition to this like 40 min ago and still no confirmation link...

It took almost an hour last weekend when I submitted my below comment:

------------------------------------------

"I am a REAL stakeholder, with over 10 years in the Sponsored Community! IMO, ICANN needs to determine if ICM and all of the people it's motivated to express support for .xxx are, in fact, REAL stakeholders. IMO, ICANN needs to make certain that ICANN decides who meets stakeholder and sponsored community status, and not be swayed by any ICM subjective preferences/definitions/etc of it.

In my REAL stakeholder opinion, ICANN should permanently and totally deny the ICM .xxx proposal. It seems to me that relatively few Adult Internet people are in favor of it, while conversely, relatively MANY of the REAL stakeholders support ICANN denial of the ICM proposed .xxx contract.

I understand that ICANN might possibly be feeling somewhat swayed due to concern of an ICM lawsuit if .xxx isn't approved for ICM. IMO, ICANN might indeed be involved in a multitude of lawsuits if .xxx ISN'T denied, and those legal actions could be near-term, continuing, and long-term (e.g., if/when government "ghetto-ization" requires REAL STAKEHOLDERS to close sites with .com and other presently recognized tlds, and instead use the ICM .xxx tld; or, when continuing registry and other "issues/problems" come up, etc---this could go on for years and years).

I worry that unless ICANN totally and permanently "kills" .xxx THIS time, ICANN will become so overburdened in resolving matters related to .xxx that ICANN might become unable to properly accomplish its other primary priorities and responsibilities.

I understand that the Free Speech Coalition (FSC) has brought many IMPORTANT issues to ICANN in the last few weeks. IMO, ICANN needs to listen to FSC and resolve all the matters AND requests that FSC has surfaced to ICANN. Like many other REAL stakeholders in the Sponsored Community, FSC is the overall voice for me. ICM does not speak for me (or MANY others of the REAL stakeholders!).

Dave C."

Domain Diva 09-21-2010 08:46 PM

Email sent.

Keep up the good work Dave..

HighEnergy 09-21-2010 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mpahlca (Post 17523448)
next they would legislate .org being only charities right or .co only being columbian based websites?

I hope so, that was the idea to begin with.

HighEnergy 09-21-2010 10:47 PM

XXX

If there is money to be made .xxx will proceed, if not this time then the next.

When it does happen (it will happen), legal has nothing to do with it. The Registry's, Registrars, Hosts and ISP's as declared within their TOS have final say.

Any one of the above can stop you dead in your tracks at any time. I would guess the ISPs will/would catch the brunt of it.

The pecking order is Registry > Registrar > Hosting provider > ISP

If the Feds/FCC sent a message saying, "Hey Comcast, if you conduct business within the United States communication infrastructure any adult web site you transmit and distribute MUST use an .xxx TLD." End of story. That would NOT be censorship but rather a simple regulation.

ICANN rules don't mean squat to the people who control final digital distribution. So sure, vote any way you want to about .xxx. Countries will make the final decision in the end. I used the US as an example but it's a global situation.

If you want to stay in business then you should embrace .xxx to show 'good faith' compliance as a responsible internet entity. OR, go ahead and build a wall around yourself with a "can't touch me" attitude. Drive yet another nail in the coffin of adult entertainment. Give the powers that be even more cannon fodder to yank the rug from under the minuscule adult industry.

'Nuff said ...

~

McSpike 09-22-2010 01:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quentin (Post 17524065)
I didn't mean that it would be difficult in a technical sense. I meant it would be difficult to coordinate an internationally-binding legal requirement to host adult content on the .XXX TLD.

I understand the "ICANN is dependent on the U.S. government" theory of how .XXX could become mandatory, internationally. I just think it would be significantly more complicated than Congress passing a law, then calling up ICANN and demanding that ICANN assist in enforcing that law. ICANN might be dependent on the U.S. government, but it does not follow that ICANN is an indentured servant to the U.S. government.

This matter would quickly end up in court, and the courts (both domestic and international) most assuredly exercise power independent of the U.S. Congress. If they did not, COPA would be the law of the land, and the .XXX question would be largely moot for American website operators.

Regardless, I'm against .XXX, either way. Even if it were clearly impossible for it to become mandatory under any circumstances, I'd still be against .XXX for the reasons I stated in my comments to ICANN, ranging from the first comments I submitted to the most recent ones.

Amen to what he said.

Zyber 09-22-2010 02:26 AM

Bump. We need more webmasters to vote NO to .xxx

Nikki_Licks 09-22-2010 05:44 AM

Bac to the top!
Fuck .XXX and the ASACP :321GFY

Redrob 09-22-2010 06:41 AM

Morning Bump

Pandemos 09-22-2010 06:56 AM

Emailed! :D

Spudstr 09-22-2010 07:15 AM

If the US goverment says adult must goto .xxx then every commercial business MUST use .com every tv station must use .tv every network/isp must use .net.

I don't see this happening they can't make one industry do it and not the other. Its called discrimination and will be over turned.

Zyber 09-22-2010 07:35 AM

Only few hours left to give public comments to ICANN. Write them now! No time to waste!

[email protected]

Remember to click the verification link which will be sent to your email address.

Redrob 09-22-2010 08:34 AM

Lunch Bump

Naughty-Pages 09-22-2010 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Spudstr (Post 17525817)
If the US goverment says adult must goto .xxx then every commercial business MUST use .com every tv station must use .tv every network/isp must use .net.

I don't see this happening they can't make one industry do it and not the other. Its called discrimination and will be over turned.

BUT THEY ALREADY DO IT RIGHT NOW IN REAL LIFE!

In the real world they have zoning laws, laws that say what part of town is allowed to conduct business, laws that say what part of town a factory can be in, laws that say what is farm land, laws that say what is residential land, laws that say where adult business are permitted, etc..

Funny thing is, they tend to sometimes allow permission for some things like building a business or a residence on farm land, but NEVER allow an exception for adult businesses.

In this case, lets simplify things here: think of residences as .nets, retail outlets as .com's, farm land as .org's, and adult as .xxx and by current laws, you can probably build a house on a .org but most likely cannot put an adult business on one. If we are going by laws on the books in the USA concerning THE REAL WORLD, then it is possible that they could apply these rules to the Internet, because making .xxx takes us one step closer.

No one classifies the current zoning laws as "discrimination", in fact it could be an extremely strong precedence in a court case to move adult sites to .xxx. And what congressman is going to publicly oppose it??? Which guy up for election is gonna stand up and stop it?? They are not censoring it, they are just making the internet safer for children, you wouldn't want to hurt children would you? (That will be the argument that the extremists make, and no government official is going to stand up and argue against those extremists).

Now sure, you could say that the USA cannot make the entire world follow this.. but the problem is that world will follow... Credit card companies, merchant accounts, etc that are based in the USA would not process for adult sites that are not using .xxx, Webhosts based in the USA would not host adult sites that are not using .xxx, Domain registrars based in the USA would not allow adult sites that are not using .xxx.. and so on.. Because of those few reasons it would effectively kill off the majority of non .xxx adult sites. Sure there would be some foreign sites that have a foreign registrar and foreign webhost, but they probably would not be able to process credit cards, therefore they would only promote sponsor programs.. however the next step would be for the USA to say that Affiliate programs cannot allow sites with a non xxx tld to promote them.

If you do not think that is possible.. look at what happened to Gambling... Gambling is permitted all over the USA in specific areas, however they completely wiped it out on the Internet for the USA, if you owned a gambling site your host shut it down, google stopped your ads, etc.. Not saying they could ever eliminate adult sites, just saying that if that impact could be done with Gambling, it's not a far stretch to imagine that they could have some type of impact on Adult.

if you do not think that it .xxx brings us one step closer the disaster I describe above, then you simply have not looked at the big picture..

davecummings 09-22-2010 09:05 AM

Time to post (I wonder if those in our Industry who don't post against .xxx are secretly associated with icm????? If so, ?????????????????????????????)

Unlimited 09-22-2010 09:10 AM

bump bump

topnotch, standup guy 09-22-2010 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Naughty-Pages (Post 17526179)
BUT THEY ALREADY DO IT RIGHT NOW IN REAL LIFE!

In the real world they have zoning laws, laws that say what part of town is allowed to conduct business, laws that say what part of town a factory can be in, laws that say what is farm land, laws that say what is residential land, laws that say where adult business are permitted, etc..

Funny thing is, they tend to sometimes allow permission for some things like building a business or a residence on farm land, but NEVER allow an exception for adult businesses.

In this case, lets simplify things here: think of residences as .nets, retail outlets as .com's, farm land as .org's, and adult as .xxx and by current laws, you can probably build a house on a .org but most likely cannot put an adult business on one. If we are going by laws on the books in the USA concerning THE REAL WORLD, then it is possible that they could apply these rules to the Internet, because making .xxx takes us one step closer.

No one classifies the current zoning laws as "discrimination", in fact it could be an extremely strong precedence in a court case to move adult sites to .xxx. And what congressman is going to publicly oppose it??? Which guy up for election is gonna stand up and stop it?? They are not censoring it, they are just making the internet safer for children, you wouldn't want to hurt children would you? (That will be the argument that the extremists make, and no government official is going to stand up and argue against those extremists).

Now sure, you could say that the USA cannot make the entire world follow this.. but the problem is that world will follow... Credit card companies, merchant accounts, etc that are based in the USA would not process for adult sites that are not using .xxx, Webhosts based in the USA would not host adult sites that are not using .xxx, Domain registrars based in the USA would not allow adult sites that are not using .xxx.. and so on.. Because of those few reasons it would effectively kill off the majority of non .xxx adult sites. Sure there would be some foreign sites that have a foreign registrar and foreign webhost, but they probably would not be able to process credit cards, therefore they would only promote sponsor programs.. however the next step would be for the USA to say that Affiliate programs cannot allow sites with a non xxx tld to promote them.

If you do not think that is possible.. look at what happened to Gambling... Gambling is permitted all over the USA in specific areas, however they completely wiped it out on the Internet for the USA, if you owned a gambling site your host shut it down, google stopped your ads, etc.. Not saying they could ever eliminate adult sites, just saying that if that impact could be done with Gambling, it's not a far stretch to imagine that they could have some type of impact on Adult.

if you do not think that it .xxx brings us one step closer the disaster I describe above, then you simply have not looked at the big picture..


And to add insult to injury...

If xxx happens not only will legitimate adult sites be consigned to an online ghetto, but...

Illegal tube sites will most likely be unaffected just as they're currently exempt from 2257 regulations.

And asshats like Fabian and Shap will be laughing all the way to the bank.

.

xxxal 09-22-2010 09:37 AM

job done, +1

F-U-Jimmy 09-22-2010 10:25 AM

Bump to the top

Redrob 09-22-2010 11:37 AM

Down to the wire.

papill0n 09-22-2010 01:16 PM

emails sent regularly

davecummings 09-22-2010 01:52 PM

Don't shoot yourself in the foot by idly sitting by and watching .xxx happen all because we didn't voice our opposition--please post a "no to .xxx" now!

Alprazolam 09-22-2010 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HighEnergy (Post 17525064)
XXX

If there is money to be made .xxx will proceed, if not this time then the next.

When it does happen (it will happen), legal has nothing to do with it. The Registry's, Registrars, Hosts and ISP's as declared within their TOS have final say.

Any one of the above can stop you dead in your tracks at any time. I would guess the ISPs will/would catch the brunt of it.

The pecking order is Registry > Registrar > Hosting provider > ISP

If the Feds/FCC sent a message saying, "Hey Comcast, if you conduct business within the United States communication infrastructure any adult web site you transmit and distribute MUST use an .xxx TLD." End of story. That would NOT be censorship but rather a simple regulation.

ICANN rules don't mean squat to the people who control final digital distribution. So sure, vote any way you want to about .xxx. Countries will make the final decision in the end. I used the US as an example but it's a global situation.

If you want to stay in business then you should embrace .xxx to show 'good faith' compliance as a responsible internet entity. OR, go ahead and build a wall around yourself with a "can't touch me" attitude. Drive yet another nail in the coffin of adult entertainment. Give the powers that be even more cannon fodder to yank the rug from under the minuscule adult industry.

'Nuff said ...

~

Haha! Go fuck your mother.

Jarmusch 09-22-2010 02:08 PM

Email sent.

Quote:

Originally Posted by vano (Post 17523265)
Do not forget to confirm your message

How long does it take to receive it?

avm79 09-22-2010 02:26 PM

one more sent

Cyber Fucker 09-22-2010 03:43 PM

Fuck fucking .XXX

Redrob 09-22-2010 04:10 PM

Evening bump

Nikki_Licks 09-22-2010 05:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davecummings (Post 17527402)
Don't shoot yourself in the foot by idly sitting by and watching .xxx happen all because we didn't voice our opposition--please post a "no to .xxx" now!

Couldn't have said it better :2 cents:

F-U-Jimmy 09-22-2010 06:35 PM

Up to the top again

Nikki_Licks 09-23-2010 06:19 AM

Back to the top, last day for comments..... time to get them in :thumbsup

Redrob 09-23-2010 07:11 AM

Last day to get your comments in....

davecummings 09-23-2010 09:16 AM

Less than 3-hours to go. Those who posted against .xxx are golden. Those who didn't ....:-(.

u-Bob 09-24-2010 02:43 PM

thnx! to everyone who's sent an email!

amateurcanada 06-01-2011 02:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TampaToker (Post 17523334)
So NichePartners.com supports .xxx? http://forum.icann.org/lists/xxx-rev.../msg00197.html

Hi there - an interesting post to the forum here - our company has taken no stance in the decision to approve an .xxx domain - all our domains function profitably without such drastic change. Any censorship or monopolies in the adult industry will hurt is for many years to come. While i've just recently taken notice to this - i'll be sure to have this removed as no such email was ever sent by us, ever. Thanks.

seeric 06-01-2011 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amateurcanada (Post 18186844)
Hi there - an interesting post to the forum here - our company has taken no stance in the decision to approve an .xxx domain - all our domains function profitably without such drastic change. Any censorship or monopolies in the adult industry will hurt is for many years to come. While i've just recently taken notice to this - i'll be sure to have this removed as no such email was ever sent by us, ever. Thanks.

Exact copy from ICANN's site:

Please approve the .XXX Registry Agreement

To: xxx-revised-icm-agreement@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Please approve the .XXX Registry Agreement
From: Robert <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 03:55:50 -0600
Dear ICANN,

I urge you to execute the Registry Agreement with ICM Registry as soon as
possible and so let the registration of .XXX names begin.



Robert
NichePartners.com



The irony of the situation is the X'd out domain name by ICANN's site matches the exact number of alphanumerics in NichePartners.com.

If i were you, I'd find out who inside my company used my email address to email support of something so important to the industry. Maybe ICM hacked your mail server? LOL.

merina0803 06-01-2011 02:41 PM

http://www.gaycollegesexpartiesblog....ck-orgy-02.jpg

amateurcanada 06-01-2011 04:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by seeric (Post 18186867)
Exact copy from ICANN's site:

Please approve the .XXX Registry Agreement

To: xxx-revised-icm-agreement@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Please approve the .XXX Registry Agreement
From: Robert <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2010 03:55:50 -0600
Dear ICANN,

I urge you to execute the Registry Agreement with ICM Registry as soon as
possible and so let the registration of .XXX names begin.



Robert
NichePartners.com



The irony of the situation is the X'd out domain name by ICANN's site matches the exact number of alphanumerics in NichePartners.com.

If i were you, I'd find out who inside my company used my email address to email support of something so important to the industry. Maybe ICM hacked your mail server? LOL.

Hahaha, thats where things dont work - we don't even have [email protected] LOL. This is old news either way - i've emailed them for an explanation - if you change the numeric value of the message I sent - you will see HUNDREDS of blanket emails from other individuals. Its a joke on hundreds/thousands of people. Many are in this forum :P

Juicy D. Links 06-01-2011 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by merina0803 (Post 18186893)

:helpme:helpme:helpme:helpme


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc