![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
This election is not for a new president, it's to take away the power he had. He's a shitty leader, he had the power to do ANYTHING, but the democrats were about as useless as an Epass card when it came to working together. It seems that everyone thats for the democrats right now are making excuses, man up bitches, the economy is fucked, right leaning or left leaning news can't cover that up, people are pissed. Or are you actually going to blame Fox news for the economy and unemployment? Can't blame Bush, after spending a trillion dollars, Obama owns this shit Hell a couple people running for office turned down the president for backing. Is there anyone running for office using the healthcare law, don't think so Is there anyone running for office on how they made jobs, yeah right |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Well it's a shame if the senate doesn't go republican too.
It means the republicans will have a built in excuse when all their policies, or lack of policies, have their inevitable effects. We americans deserve all this, and it is inevitable that we will pay the price for the choices we have made and our general passivity in the face of a transforming planet. The dem pols, by betraying the progressives who have the only intelligent answers to the current economic dead end, deserve to be punished. We progressives can look forward to the results of republican rule. It should be a great show. We can see how the republicans create jobs and fix the economy. |
The cock smokers from both parties are out of control. Our corrupt system needs a complete overhaul. Political scum destroyed this country in less than 250 years. Amazing.
|
Quote:
http://madmikesamerica.com/wp-conten...BeckGotGun.jpg |
Quote:
|
funny america is in a death spiral and this is the shit you fight about.
|
Quote:
Some FACTS 50% actually like "Obamacare" Of the 50% that don't, 50% of those hate it because it DOESN'T GO FAR ENOUGH. These people don't want LESS "Obamacare" they want MORE. Of the 25% that actually hate "Obamacare" because they think it's "government healthcare" HALF actually LIKE it when the individual pieces are explained and they aren't told they are part of "Obamacare". So when you break it down only about 1/8 actually hate Obamacare. And most of them really hate the mandatory inusrance part which will most likely be revisited, but shouldn't. Seriously Obamacare is NOT getting repealed. Now that sick kids can get insurance the GOP is REALLY going to take that away? Want to lose an election in 2012. I'd like to run against the guy who voted to take away sick kids insurance. REAL fucking smart. Or how about young peolpe 18-25 that are now paying LESS for insurance because they can stay on their parents plan instead of having to get their own plan? Yes INCREASE their insurance costs. That'll get them to vote for you. |
Quote:
Useles Iraq war cost what 2 trillion. Medicare prescription drug benfit plan passed by GOP controlled Congress and signed by Bush is going to cost nearly a trillion dolalrs over it's first dozen years. God knows how much after that. These are the DEMOCRATS fault? |
Quote:
give anyone the power to steal money and they will.. the system is fucked |
Quote:
Before Reagan took office the total debt was 3 trillion after he left it was 7 trillion. That's a 133% increase durring his term. By comparison under Clinton during his 8 years the debt only increased by 2 trillion or 26% If you adjust for inflation that 4 trillion Reagan ran up equals about 8 trillion today. No way Obama increases the debt by 133% which would be 16 trillion or even the 8 trillion inflation adjusted debt Reagan ran up. |
Quote:
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...ealth_care_law Quote:
Quote:
|
You need to ignore GatorB. This is middle aged idiot with little to no education.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
What I was asking, was where does the "liberal media" tag come from? Every time a conservative has an issue with a news story, they immediately claim "liberal bias", which seemed odd to me since, again, the number 1 (by far) watched news channel is quite conservative. Take our friend Christine O'Donnell... "Republican Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell's campaign threatened a radio station with a lawsuit if it posted video of an interview with the tea party favorite on the Internet. "This is another example of the liberal media shamelessly attacking Christine O'Donnell to boost their ratings," Moran said in the statement, even though Jensen, the host of the show in question, is a well-known conservative." |
Quote:
While some news stations report mainly news of interest for people of certain political preferences (MSNBC, DailyKos, HuffingtonPost, The Nation), there is only ONE outfit that regularly reports lies and misinformation as fact. And it isn't a liberal organization. I understand though that it's hard for some minds to understand this distinction, so you probably don't understand my point. But that's okay, just assume I'm an idiot and go about your day feeling good about your ignorance. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I still hope they run her against Obama in 2012 though... |
Quote:
Since companies can just set up shop almost anywhere in the world now, I'm not sure if those old Sci-Fi movies where giant corporations ruled instead of government hasn't come to pass in at least some initial capacity. |
Quote:
Who do you think controls and directs the Tea Party? |
Quote:
From what I see, the big corporations are trying to USE the Tea Party movement to put a fresh face on the Republican party whose image was so devastated by Bush. After all that happened, the fact that they've managed to accomplish this is just two years is amazing. I always knew a whole lot of people were stupid with short memories, but two years? Amazing. That said, I think the religious right is ALSO trying to control the Tea Party, and their interests aren't 100% the same as the corporate Republicans. They are concerned about the social issues more than the "corporate freedom" issues. I think you saw the two factions at work when Rove attacked O'Donnell on Fox. These corporate Republicans know they're playing with fire with these religious fanatics, but they also know they can't win without their mass ignorance because not many poor or working class people outside the religious right's influence are dumb enough to vote against their own interests. So when you're rich and want to push an agenda that favors you and your friends at the expense of 95% of the country, but you need 51% of the vote... how do you do that? Through ignorant religious fanatics worried about gay marriage and other "culture" issues that you really don't care about. So you give them the culture issues, and they give you power to run your companies in whatever crooked way you want. |
Quote:
|
It's always funny to see someone who's point of view regarding the two main parties resembles that of a naive 9 year old.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
And you think this is ok? Time for a change And yeah you can give credit for the debt work during Clinton, but remember, house and senate controlled by the GOP during most of the good times |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
BTW, just ignore the demon - he is as "Fox-News-Brainwashed" as a person could ever be, followed maybe by Vendzilla, but at least Vendzilla displays a bit of a sense of humor on occasion. :2 cents: |
I think Palin is entirely too selfish to give up Money for Service. Remember, she's the half-term quitting governor of alaska. Can you imagine the "presidenting is too hard" quitting speech? good god.
Did you know that in alaska, her approval numbers are lower than Obamas? Wow. I'm sure she cares.. not at all. But if a royalty check is late? I'm CERTAIN she cares, a LOT. But it's just my opinion of course.:2 cents: |
Quote:
Quote:
And if her numbers are lower than Barry's, then why do some dem's running for office don't want Barry's help? |
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123