GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Republicans Will Control the House 2010 according to InTrade (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=994646)

The Demon 10-27-2010 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Connor (Post 17646920)
Conservatives seem to think any newspaper that reports facts and real news is "liberal bias" ... why? Because when you're raping the country, stealing from working class people, and basically engaging in all kinds of crooked corporate shit, the "facts" aren't helpful to your side, and when they're reported... well, tends to go bad for you. The solution? Somehow get a huge chunk of the population to believe that almost every media channel is just "liberal bias" and the only channel that consistently reports lies and misinformation is the only true, balanced media channel. Amazing how well that has worked for them.

You've just described everything the Democrats have been doing, and how the democrats label fox news as "bullshit". And you have the balls to include your blatant hypocrisy in this post. You're an idiot.

Vendzilla 10-27-2010 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 17646877)
Well this is great news! I can't imagine why anyone would want to be president right now. There is no quick fix to this. Put the Republicans back in so we can bash them again.

Sarah Palin? Oh, I hope so. That would be the funniest election ever!

Jeb Bush? After the mess his bro left us in? Be serious.

Or we could run that bitch Pelosi, wait, under her the deficit has gone up 5 trillion dollars?
This election is not for a new president, it's to take away the power he had. He's a shitty leader, he had the power to do ANYTHING, but the democrats were about as useless as an Epass card when it came to working together.

It seems that everyone thats for the democrats right now are making excuses, man up bitches, the economy is fucked, right leaning or left leaning news can't cover that up, people are pissed. Or are you actually going to blame Fox news for the economy and unemployment?
Can't blame Bush, after spending a trillion dollars, Obama owns this shit
Hell a couple people running for office turned down the president for backing.

Is there anyone running for office using the healthcare law, don't think so
Is there anyone running for office on how they made jobs, yeah right

kane 10-27-2010 06:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17646995)
but the democrats were about as useless as an Epass card.

This might just be my favorite sentence of 2010. Made me laugh hard.

IllTestYourGirls 10-27-2010 06:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17646995)
Is there anyone running for office using the healthcare law, don't think so
Is there anyone running for office on how they made jobs, yeah right

In fact they are RUNNING away from everything they have done and not done. There is a dem running for Senate here that voted with Obama 97% of the time and is running ads saying "I am a fiscal conservative". It is rather comical. :1orglaugh

Bill8 10-27-2010 07:37 PM

Well it's a shame if the senate doesn't go republican too.

It means the republicans will have a built in excuse when all their policies, or lack of policies, have their inevitable effects.

We americans deserve all this, and it is inevitable that we will pay the price for the choices we have made and our general passivity in the face of a transforming planet.

The dem pols, by betraying the progressives who have the only intelligent answers to the current economic dead end, deserve to be punished.

We progressives can look forward to the results of republican rule.

It should be a great show. We can see how the republicans create jobs and fix the economy.

LiveDose 10-27-2010 08:06 PM

The cock smokers from both parties are out of control. Our corrupt system needs a complete overhaul. Political scum destroyed this country in less than 250 years. Amazing.

2MuchMark 10-27-2010 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by timlover (Post 17645505)
whats a republican?

Here you go:

http://madmikesamerica.com/wp-conten...BeckGotGun.jpg

ThunderBalls 10-27-2010 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cwd (Post 17646073)
yeah, I am excited for Rand Paul, Sharron Angle, Christine O'Donnel and Joe Miller to take power!

Congratulations, you just won the nutjob of GFY award.

Agent 488 10-27-2010 10:43 PM

funny america is in a death spiral and this is the shit you fight about.

GatorB 10-27-2010 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by IllTestYourGirls (Post 17645516)
It is a clear mandate to repeal Obamacare.

No it's not. And if so people are stupid.

Some FACTS

50% actually like "Obamacare"

Of the 50% that don't, 50% of those hate it because it DOESN'T GO FAR ENOUGH. These people don't want LESS "Obamacare" they want MORE.

Of the 25% that actually hate "Obamacare" because they think it's "government healthcare" HALF actually LIKE it when the individual pieces are explained and they aren't told they are part of "Obamacare".

So when you break it down only about 1/8 actually hate Obamacare. And most of them really hate the mandatory inusrance part which will most likely be revisited, but shouldn't.

Seriously Obamacare is NOT getting repealed. Now that sick kids can get insurance the GOP is REALLY going to take that away? Want to lose an election in 2012. I'd like to run against the guy who voted to take away sick kids insurance. REAL fucking smart. Or how about young peolpe 18-25 that are now paying LESS for insurance because they can stay on their parents plan instead of having to get their own plan? Yes INCREASE their insurance costs. That'll get them to vote for you.

GatorB 10-27-2010 11:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17646995)
Or we could run that bitch Pelosi, wait, under her the deficit has gone up 5 trillion dollars?

Ok first of all In Bush first 6 years the GOP controled congres ran up debts and Bush signed off on them. In the last 2 years sure the Dems controleld COngress and Bush SIGNED those budgets. But no that bet that was run up is ALL Polosi's fault? Sorry Bush did have the power to veto those last 2 budgets if he thought they were causing too much debt. He did not do that.

Useles Iraq war cost what 2 trillion. Medicare prescription drug benfit plan passed by GOP controlled Congress and signed by Bush is going to cost nearly a trillion dolalrs over it's first dozen years. God knows how much after that. These are the DEMOCRATS fault?

RogerV 10-28-2010 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LiveDose (Post 17647212)
The cock smokers from both parties are out of control. Our corrupt system needs a complete overhaul. Political scum destroyed this country in less than 250 years. Amazing.

This is the truth i lost my faith in the reps. now the dems. Both sides are out to fattin their pockets and dont care about the people.

give anyone the power to steal money and they will.. the system is fucked

GatorB 10-28-2010 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17646995)
Or we could run that bitch Pelosi, wait, under her the deficit has gone up 5 trillion dollars?

FACT of the 13.7 trilion dollar debt Reagan, Bush 1 and Bush 2 are responsible for half of it.

Before Reagan took office the total debt was 3 trillion after he left it was 7 trillion. That's a 133% increase durring his term. By comparison under Clinton during his 8 years the debt only increased by 2 trillion or 26% If you adjust for inflation that 4 trillion Reagan ran up equals about 8 trillion today. No way Obama increases the debt by 133% which would be 16 trillion or even the 8 trillion inflation adjusted debt Reagan ran up.

IllTestYourGirls 10-28-2010 04:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17647507)
rant with no real facts and lots of wishful thinking

Apparently you did not read my posts on the first page where I show a poll done this October that completely destroys your "facts"

http://www.rasmussenreports.com/publ...ealth_care_law

Quote:

A majority of voters continue to favor repeal of the new national health care law, and the number who sees this outcome as likely has reached a new high.

The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey shows that 53% of Likely U.S. voters favor repeal of the health care law, including 43% who Strongly Favor repeal. Forty-two percent (42%) oppose repeal of the bill, with 32% who are Strongly Opposed.
Quote:

Overall, 37% say the health care plan passed by Congress in March will be good for the country, the lowest level of confidence found this month. Fifty-three percent (53%) say the law will be bad for the country.

The Demon 10-28-2010 06:15 AM

You need to ignore GatorB. This is middle aged idiot with little to no education.

directfiesta 10-28-2010 06:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RogerV (Post 17647516)
give anyone the power to steal money and they will.. the system is fucked

In perspective, this is a funny quote .... ( not politically related , but more in respect to your friend ... )

cwd 10-28-2010 06:39 AM

Quote:

I'm curious where this "liberal media" tag came from. I thought the number one rated news channel was FoxNews and the largest newspaper in the US was the Wall Street Journal? They don't seem so "liberal".
Quote:

So ratings=the media is run by the Republicans? Name me another source that is NOT liberal based that gets credit?
As you can see, I never claimed the media is run by Republicans. In fact, the media to me is run by corporations; News Corp, CBS, GE, Disney, Time Warner, Viacom.

What I was asking, was where does the "liberal media" tag come from? Every time a conservative has an issue with a news story, they immediately claim "liberal bias", which seemed odd to me since, again, the number 1 (by far) watched news channel is quite conservative.

Take our friend Christine O'Donnell...

"Republican Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell's campaign threatened a radio station with a lawsuit if it posted video of an interview with the tea party favorite on the Internet.

"This is another example of the liberal media shamelessly attacking Christine O'Donnell to boost their ratings," Moran said in the statement, even though Jensen, the host of the show in question, is a well-known conservative."

Connor 10-28-2010 07:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17646981)
You've just described everything the Democrats have been doing, and how the democrats label fox news as "bullshit". And you have the balls to include your blatant hypocrisy in this post. You're an idiot.

It's funny, you just can't see how ignorant saying that makes you sound.

While some news stations report mainly news of interest for people of certain political preferences (MSNBC, DailyKos, HuffingtonPost, The Nation), there is only ONE outfit that regularly reports lies and misinformation as fact. And it isn't a liberal organization. I understand though that it's hard for some minds to understand this distinction, so you probably don't understand my point. But that's okay, just assume I'm an idiot and go about your day feeling good about your ignorance.

MaDalton 10-28-2010 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maxi (Post 17645742)
Meet your new president..


if she becomes president it's "goodbye world"

BFT3K 10-28-2010 08:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MaDalton (Post 17648313)
if she becomes president it's "goodbye world"

She will never be president, don't worry.

I still hope they run her against Obama in 2012 though...

Connor 10-28-2010 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17648425)
She will never be president, don't worry.

I still hope they run her against Obama in 2012 though...

And sadly while we're all forced to fight a "culture war" with the same old religious right... ahem, I mean the Tea Party, huge corporations are increasing their international focus and shipping jobs to countries with desperate, cheap labor that they can exploit easier.

Since companies can just set up shop almost anywhere in the world now, I'm not sure if those old Sci-Fi movies where giant corporations ruled instead of government hasn't come to pass in at least some initial capacity.

BFT3K 10-28-2010 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Connor (Post 17648458)
And sadly while we're all forced to fight a "culture war" with the same old religious right... ahem, I mean the Tea Party, huge corporations are increasing their international focus and shipping jobs to countries with desperate, cheap labor that they can exploit easier.

You say that like somehow there is a divide between the Tea Party and huge corporations.

Who do you think controls and directs the Tea Party?

Connor 10-28-2010 09:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17648473)
You say that like somehow there is a divide between the Tea Party and huge corporations.

Who do you think controls and directs the Tea Party?

Well, I think there IS a divide... but I do understand your point.

From what I see, the big corporations are trying to USE the Tea Party movement to put a fresh face on the Republican party whose image was so devastated by Bush. After all that happened, the fact that they've managed to accomplish this is just two years is amazing. I always knew a whole lot of people were stupid with short memories, but two years? Amazing.

That said, I think the religious right is ALSO trying to control the Tea Party, and their interests aren't 100% the same as the corporate Republicans. They are concerned about the social issues more than the "corporate freedom" issues.

I think you saw the two factions at work when Rove attacked O'Donnell on Fox. These corporate Republicans know they're playing with fire with these religious fanatics, but they also know they can't win without their mass ignorance because not many poor or working class people outside the religious right's influence are dumb enough to vote against their own interests. So when you're rich and want to push an agenda that favors you and your friends at the expense of 95% of the country, but you need 51% of the vote... how do you do that? Through ignorant religious fanatics worried about gay marriage and other "culture" issues that you really don't care about. So you give them the culture issues, and they give you power to run your companies in whatever crooked way you want.

The Demon 10-28-2010 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Connor (Post 17648270)
It's funny, you just can't see how ignorant saying that makes you sound.

While some news stations report mainly news of interest for people of certain political preferences (MSNBC, DailyKos, HuffingtonPost, The Nation), there is only ONE outfit that regularly reports lies and misinformation as fact. And it isn't a liberal organization. I understand though that it's hard for some minds to understand this distinction, so you probably don't understand my point. But that's okay, just assume I'm an idiot and go about your day feeling good about your ignorance.

I can assume you're an idiot and ignorant because when I ask you to prove your assertion that FoxNews "regularly" reports lies, as opposed to outfits like MSNBC and the ones you've mentioned, you wouldn't be able to back this up. And if you can't back up your assertions, you're an idiot. See the logic?

The Demon 10-28-2010 09:58 AM

It's always funny to see someone who's point of view regarding the two main parties resembles that of a naive 9 year old.

Connor 10-28-2010 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Demon (Post 17648649)
I can assume you're an idiot and ignorant because when I ask you to prove your assertion that FoxNews "regularly" reports lies, as opposed to outfits like MSNBC and the ones you've mentioned, you wouldn't be able to back this up. And if you can't back up your assertions, you're an idiot. See the logic?

Dear anonymous GFY troll, when you grow balls, then maybe I'll consider giving you the "proof." Until then, enjoy your ignorance.

Vendzilla 10-28-2010 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 17647353)

He's not a republican, he's a libertarian

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17647511)
Ok first of all In Bush first 6 years the GOP controled congres ran up debts and Bush signed off on them. In the last 2 years sure the Dems controleld COngress and Bush SIGNED those budgets. But no that bet that was run up is ALL Polosi's fault? Sorry Bush did have the power to veto those last 2 budgets if he thought they were causing too much debt. He did not do that.

Useles Iraq war cost what 2 trillion. Medicare prescription drug benfit plan passed by GOP controlled Congress and signed by Bush is going to cost nearly a trillion dolalrs over it's first dozen years. God knows how much after that. These are the DEMOCRATS fault?

Bush and Obama are not on the ticket next week, the house and the senate are, they are to blame for this shit, off all the 545 people in charge, Bush was one of them, Obama was one of them

Quote:

Originally Posted by GatorB (Post 17647535)
FACT of the 13.7 trilion dollar debt Reagan, Bush 1 and Bush 2 are responsible for half of it.

Before Reagan took office the total debt was 3 trillion after he left it was 7 trillion. That's a 133% increase durring his term. By comparison under Clinton during his 8 years the debt only increased by 2 trillion or 26% If you adjust for inflation that 4 trillion Reagan ran up equals about 8 trillion today. No way Obama increases the debt by 133% which would be 16 trillion or even the 8 trillion inflation adjusted debt Reagan ran up.

OK, so Reagan, 8 years, Bush 1 and 2, 12 years ran up half of 13.7 trillion dollars according to you, so thats 6.85 trillion dollars in 20 years, Obama did what in 2 years?
And you think this is ok? Time for a change
And yeah you can give credit for the debt work during Clinton, but remember, house and senate controlled by the GOP during most of the good times

Bryan G 10-28-2010 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Maxi (Post 17645742)
Meet your new president..


How can anyone defend this retard??

The Demon 10-28-2010 10:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Connor (Post 17648670)
Dear anonymous GFY troll, when you grow balls, then maybe I'll consider giving you the "proof." Until then, enjoy your ignorance.

Dear stupid human being, when you call someone ignorant and then admit to providing zero proof for your hilarious arguments, you're just making your stupidity transparent.:1orglaugh

BFT3K 10-28-2010 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Connor (Post 17648543)
Well, I think there IS a divide... but I do understand your point.

From what I see, the big corporations are trying to USE the Tea Party movement to put a fresh face on the Republican party whose image was so devastated by Bush. After all that happened, the fact that they've managed to accomplish this is just two years is amazing. I always knew a whole lot of people were stupid with short memories, but two years? Amazing.

That said, I think the religious right is ALSO trying to control the Tea Party, and their interests aren't 100% the same as the corporate Republicans. They are concerned about the social issues more than the "corporate freedom" issues.

I think you saw the two factions at work when Rove attacked O'Donnell on Fox. These corporate Republicans know they're playing with fire with these religious fanatics, but they also know they can't win without their mass ignorance because not many poor or working class people outside the religious right's influence are dumb enough to vote against their own interests. So when you're rich and want to push an agenda that favors you and your friends at the expense of 95% of the country, but you need 51% of the vote... how do you do that? Through ignorant religious fanatics worried about gay marriage and other "culture" issues that you really don't care about. So you give them the culture issues, and they give you power to run your companies in whatever crooked way you want.

I agree 100% with you, and if I wasn't in the middle of 5 jobs right now I would add a lot more to what you have written here.

BTW, just ignore the demon - he is as "Fox-News-Brainwashed" as a person could ever be, followed maybe by Vendzilla, but at least Vendzilla displays a bit of a sense of humor on occasion. :2 cents:

Tom_PM 10-28-2010 10:28 AM

I think Palin is entirely too selfish to give up Money for Service. Remember, she's the half-term quitting governor of alaska. Can you imagine the "presidenting is too hard" quitting speech? good god.

Did you know that in alaska, her approval numbers are lower than Obamas? Wow. I'm sure she cares.. not at all. But if a royalty check is late? I'm CERTAIN she cares, a LOT.

But it's just my opinion of course.:2 cents:

Vendzilla 10-28-2010 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K (Post 17648722)
I agree 100% with you, and if I wasn't in the middle of 5 jobs right now I would add a lot more to what you have written here.

BTW, just ignore the demon - he is as "Fox-News-Brainwashed" as a person could ever be, followed maybe by Vendzilla, but at least Vendzilla displays a bit of a sense of humor on occasion. :2 cents:

Why not, the present administration is so funny, useless, but funny

Quote:

Originally Posted by PR_Tom (Post 17648748)
I think Palin is entirely too selfish to give up Money for Service. Remember, she's the half-term quitting governor of alaska. Can you imagine the "presidenting is too hard" quitting speech? good god.

Did you know that in alaska, her approval numbers are lower than Obamas? Wow. I'm sure she cares.. not at all. But if a royalty check is late? I'm CERTAIN she cares, a LOT.

But it's just my opinion of course.:2 cents:

OK, just to let you know, Bristol Palin on Dance with the stars keeps showing up at the bottom, but the text in votes are saving her, she's getting so much that Joy Bayhart from the View is pissed!

And if her numbers are lower than Barry's, then why do some dem's running for office don't want Barry's help?


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123