Originally Posted by DateDoc (Post 17682037)

Republicans do not care. If they did you'd see a bunch of threads started about how biased the media is. Instead there are just a lot of threads from Dems attacking Fox News. No matter how bad Fox News is, it isn't going anywhere. No matter what Rush Limbaugh says, he is here until he chooses to retire. While Dems watch Republican shows (boosting their ratings and ad revenue), very few Republicans watch the Democrats' shows.

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17683233)

Hey dip shit, what stance did I lose? I asked for links and you are TOO FUCKING STUPID to find any, you would have done better to put this link up http://google.com

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis (Post 17682486)

No problem though with FOX's parent company, News Corp donating $1 million to republican candidates, FOX News commentators doing fundraisers every weekend for republican candidates, openly endorsing candidates on the air, and the fact that Hannity, Oreilly, Beck, and the rest of them have contributed 10 times the money Olbermann has to republicans. Thats the difference between a political station and a news station, one is ok to do these things, the other gets punished when they do.

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis (Post 17683538)

Really? A link to the actual source (Federal Elections Committee - Campaign Funds) is the same as google in your mind? And you're calling me stupid? Its a marvel of nature that you have been able to survive this long without walking in front of a bus.

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17683617)

I wanted a link to prove this, we were talking about Olbermann, and you were complaining about Hannity, Beck and O'reilly




Where do you do that shit head?
You linked to a PDF file
the Washington post where the Newscorp gave 1million dollars to the Republican Governors Association
And yet another to a blog about Dick Morris
Not one of these things said anything about the news anchors at Fox news.

Your insipid ramblings about your inadequacies to comprehend the nature of this discussion and many others, I have discerned you have a lack of understanding even the basics of debate and that when giving evidence of your post, you lack the inherent evidence to prove what you wrote. Then argued that is true when still there is no evidence to prove so.

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17683617)

I wanted a link to prove this, we were talking about Olbermann, and you were complaining about Hannity, Beck and O'reilly




Where do you do that shit head?
You linked to a PDF file
the Washington post where the Newscorp gave 1million dollars to the Republican Governors Association
And yet another to a blog about Dick Morris
Not one of these things said anything about the news anchors at Fox news.

Originally Posted by SuckOnThis (Post 17683685)

Ok, I see you obviously have some kind of learning disability and/or serious mental health issues so I will try once again and this time please try to pay attention. Feel free to reread this post if you don't understand all at once.




Click on the PDF file at http://query.nictusa.com/pdf/427/109...pdf#navpanes=0

this is directly from the Federal Elections Committee and it shows campaign funds for a person running for election, you follow so far? Scroll down to the 10th page and you will see Hannity donated $5000, got it now?

Originally Posted by SallyRand (Post 17683628)

What you said.

I however do object to any restrictions placed on anyone for any reason which limit their ability to participate in the political system. It's like. "You work here so you cannot donate to the political candidate of your choice!"

It's just wrong.

Originally Posted by Vendzilla (Post 17683782)

Newscasters, or ones claiming to be should give the appearance of being neutral. Different for commentators, most are pretty easy to see where they stand.
I think a news company should have rights over their employee's about how they are perceived in the public and anytime a person of popularity makes three donations to any one political party, it will become public. Is it right for the newscaster? no, but his perception as a newscaster will have less value. Keith was a commentator, so I see no reason for all this