GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   why megaupload got shutdown. (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1054267)

SmokeyTheBear 01-20-2012 11:43 AM

why megaupload got shutdown.
 
If you read the indictment you will notice the emails between company exec's are what the whole thing stems from.

On or about April 10, 2006, VAN DER KOLK sent an e-mail toORTMANN asking ?Do we have a server available to continue downloading of the Youtube?s vids? ? Kim just mentioned again that this has really priority.?

They purposely denied dmca's.

"It was further part of the Conspiracy that members of the Conspiracy deliberatelymisrepresented to copyright holders that they had removed copyright infringing content fromtheir servers, while, in fact, they only removed certain links to the content file, which could stillbe illegally downloaded through numerous redundant links. Redundant links were sometimescreated by members of the Conspiracy"

Directly stole and uploaded videos

"In approximately April 2006, members of the Mega Conspiracy copiedvideos directly from Youtube.com to make them available on Megavideo.com"

paid uploaders they were fully aware were in violation

On or about February 21, 2007, VAN DER KOLK sent an e-mail toORTMANN entitled ?2 reward payment files.? Attached to the e-mail was a file containingMegaupload.com users? e-mail addresses and reward payments for that time period, whichranged from $100 to $500. For one user that was paid $300, VAN DER KOLK wrote, ?30849files, mainly Mp3z, some copyrighted but most of them have a very small number of downloadsper file.? For other users, all of which were selected for reward payments of $100 by the MegaConspiracy, he wrote the following: ?Our old famous number one on MU, still some illegal files


33but I think he deserves a payment?; ?Loads of PDF files (looks like scanned magazines)?; ?lookslike vietnamese DVD rips?; ?This user was paid last time has mainly split RAR files, however more than 50% deleted through abuse reports.?



they will have a hard time fighting this one

Fletch XXX 01-20-2012 11:44 AM

People will pay anyone to do anything lol

nikki99 01-20-2012 11:46 AM

because with million dollars u can still look fat like a pig

Mutt 01-20-2012 11:46 AM

here's the brains of the operation

http://www.radiolive.co.nz/Portals/0...dotcom-spa.jpg

http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowll...comYouTube.jpg

BIGTYMER 01-20-2012 11:47 AM

I wonder what goodies the Feds will find on their servers.

faxxaff 01-20-2012 11:50 AM

Main reason was money laundry. File sharing is just a minor cosmetic retouch to this affair that makes it look better in public.

alias 01-20-2012 11:52 AM

Dun goofed.

BIGTYMER 01-20-2012 11:59 AM

Good article: http://torrentfreak.com/megaupload-w...uction-120120/

DWB 01-20-2012 12:02 PM

I'm sure there is quite a bit of loose mails out there from a lot of tube sites who have been having people upload for them and paying them for it.

I'm sure we'd all be surprised as to what the feds already have access to.

SmokeyTheBear 01-20-2012 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by faxxaff (Post 18700853)
Main reason was money laundry. File sharing is just a minor cosmetic retouch to this affair that makes it look better in public.

if they didn't violate the dmca it wouldn't have been money laundering . The money laundering will prob give the the biggest penalties but without the dmca its just business transactions.

faxxaff 01-20-2012 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 18700877)
if they didn't violate the dmca it wouldn't have been money laundering . The money laundering will prob give the the biggest penalties but without the dmca its just business transactions.

still, illegal business transactions .... that's the point.

Like they got Al Capone .... not with real shit, but with mail fraud.

Fletch XXX 01-20-2012 12:09 PM

" Another, allegedly sent in December 2006 by Kim Dotcom to another staff member, carried a link to a music file hosted on a MegaUpload server entitled “05-50_cent_feat._mobb_deep-nah-c4.mp3”."

please keep in mind how many times mp3s have been shared on gfy....

this is their ammo??? LOLOLOLOLOLz

faxxaff 01-20-2012 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DWB (Post 18700870)
I'm sure there is quite a bit of loose mails out there from a lot of tube sites who have been having people upload for them and paying them for it.

Hope they kill all the GF sites for that same reason. I am certain FBI has access to their gmail accounts ;-P

V_RocKs 01-20-2012 12:11 PM

If I didn't have ties to the community... Oh the money I would make.

Seriously... If my parents had died when I was young and I didn't have siblings I think I'd create a service knowing I can never travel to certain countries.

faxxaff 01-20-2012 12:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIGTYMER (Post 18700866)

can you send me your email contact. Wanted to ask a question about your hosting ...

SmokeyTheBear 01-20-2012 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fletch XXX (Post 18700889)
" Another, allegedly sent in December 2006 by Kim Dotcom to another staff member, carried a link to a music file hosted on a MegaUpload server entitled ?05-50_cent_feat._mobb_deep-nah-c4.mp3?."

please keep in mind how many times mp3s have been shared on gfy....

this is their ammo??? LOLOLOLOLOLz

how many times have the gfy OWNERS posted copyright mp3's on gfy ?

never..

BIGTYMER 01-20-2012 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by faxxaff (Post 18700899)
can you send me your email contact. Wanted to ask a question about your hosting ...

I just host with them but their email is [email protected]. :)

pornguy 01-20-2012 12:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 18700837)
If you read the indictment you will notice the emails between company exec's are what the whole thing stems from.

On or about April 10, 2006, VAN DER KOLK sent an e-mail toORTMANN asking ?Do we have a server available to continue downloading of the Youtube?s vids? ? Kim just mentioned again that this has really priority.?

They purposely denied dmca's.

"It was further part of the Conspiracy that members of the Conspiracy deliberatelymisrepresented to copyright holders that they had removed copyright infringing content fromtheir servers, while, in fact, they only removed certain links to the content file, which could stillbe illegally downloaded through numerous redundant links. Redundant links were sometimescreated by members of the Conspiracy"

Directly stole and uploaded videos

"In approximately April 2006, members of the Mega Conspiracy copiedvideos directly from Youtube.com to make them available on Megavideo.com"

paid uploaders they were fully aware were in violation

On or about February 21, 2007, VAN DER KOLK sent an e-mail toORTMANN entitled ?2 reward payment files.? Attached to the e-mail was a file containingMegaupload.com users? e-mail addresses and reward payments for that time period, whichranged from $100 to $500. For one user that was paid $300, VAN DER KOLK wrote, ?30849files, mainly Mp3z, some copyrighted but most of them have a very small number of downloadsper file.? For other users, all of which were selected for reward payments of $100 by the MegaConspiracy, he wrote the following: ?Our old famous number one on MU, still some illegal files


33but I think he deserves a payment?; ?Loads of PDF files (looks like scanned magazines)?; ?lookslike vietnamese DVD rips?; ?This user was paid last time has mainly split RAR files, however more than 50% deleted through abuse reports.?



they will have a hard time fighting this one


Someone posted the owner made like 45 million last year alone of this site.

It would be that hard of a fight.

Unless they can get their hands on his funds.

SykkBoy 01-20-2012 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 18700837)
If you read the indictment you will notice the emails between company exec's are what the whole thing stems from.

On or about April 10, 2006, VAN DER KOLK sent an e-mail toORTMANN asking ?Do we have a server available to continue downloading of the Youtube?s vids? ? Kim just mentioned again that this has really priority.?

They purposely denied dmca's.

"It was further part of the Conspiracy that members of the Conspiracy deliberatelymisrepresented to copyright holders that they had removed copyright infringing content fromtheir servers, while, in fact, they only removed certain links to the content file, which could stillbe illegally downloaded through numerous redundant links. Redundant links were sometimescreated by members of the Conspiracy"

Directly stole and uploaded videos

"In approximately April 2006, members of the Mega Conspiracy copiedvideos directly from Youtube.com to make them available on Megavideo.com"

paid uploaders they were fully aware were in violation

On or about February 21, 2007, VAN DER KOLK sent an e-mail toORTMANN entitled ?2 reward payment files.? Attached to the e-mail was a file containingMegaupload.com users? e-mail addresses and reward payments for that time period, whichranged from $100 to $500. For one user that was paid $300, VAN DER KOLK wrote, ?30849files, mainly Mp3z, some copyrighted but most of them have a very small number of downloadsper file.? For other users, all of which were selected for reward payments of $100 by the MegaConspiracy, he wrote the following: ?Our old famous number one on MU, still some illegal files


33but I think he deserves a payment?; ?Loads of PDF files (looks like scanned magazines)?; ?lookslike vietnamese DVD rips?; ?This user was paid last time has mainly split RAR files, however more than 50% deleted through abuse reports.?



they will have a hard time fighting this one

email trails....these guys are pretty fucked.

doesn't anyone use a cone of silence anymore?

SmokeyTheBear 01-20-2012 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy (Post 18700950)
Someone posted the owner made like 45 million last year alone of this site.

It would be that hard of a fight.

Unless they can get their hands on his funds.

here is just a bit of what they seized ( notice over 50 bank accounts seized )



$175,000,000 in United States dollars;2.

Bank of New Zealand, Account No. XX-XXXX-XXXX200-04, in thename of Cleaver Richards Trust Account for Megastuff Limited;3.

Kiwibank, Account No. XX-XXXX-XXXX922-00, in the name of Megastuff Limited Nominee Account No. 1;4.

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited in Auckland, NewZealand, Account No. XXXXXXXXXXXX2088, in the name of BRAMVAN DER KOLK;5.

Citibank, Account No. XXXXXX3053, in the name of Megacard, Inc.;6.

Citibank, Account No. XXXXXX3066, in the name of Megasite, Inc.;7.

Stadtsparkasse München, Account No. XXXX4734, in the name of FINN BATATO;8.

Commerzbank, Account No. XXXXXXXX4800, in the name of SVEN ECHTERNACH;9.

Deutsche Bank AG, Account No. XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX6600, in thename of MATHIAS ORTMANN;10.

Computershare Investor Services Limited, Holder No. XXXX4385, in thename of KIM DOTCOM (New Zealand Government Bonds);11.

Development Bank of Singapore, Account No. XXXXXX0320, in thename of MEGAUPLOAD LTD.;12.

Development Bank of Singapore - Vickers Securities, Account No.XX1901, in the name of MEGAUPLOAD LTD.;13.

Development Bank of Singapore-Vickers Securities, Account No.XXX089-4, in the name of Megamedia Ltd.;14.

Hang Seng Bank Ltd., Account No. XXXXXX78-833, in the name of Megamedia Ltd.;15.

Hang Seng Bank, Account No. XXXXXXXX8001, in the name of Megamedia Ltd.;16.

Hang Seng Bank, Account No. XXX-XXXX48-382, in the name of Megamedia Ltd.

Development Bank of Singapore, Account No. XXXXX5252, in the nameof Megamusic Limited;18.

Development Bank of Singapore, Account No. XXXXX0060, in the nameof MEGAUPLOAD LTD.;19.

Hang Seng Bank, Account No. XXX-XXXX75-883, in the name of MEGAUPLOAD LTD.;20.

Westpac Bank, Account No. XX-XXXX-XXXX847-02, in the name of Simpson Grierson Trust Account, holder KIM DOTCOM.21.

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, Account Nos.XXX-XXXXX6-220/XXXX6-201/XXXXX6-838, in the name of MEGAUPLOAD LTD.;22.

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, Account No.XXXXXXXX5833, in the name of FINN BATATO;23.

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, Account No.XXX-XXXXX5-833, in the name of an individual with the initials BVL;24.

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, Account No.XXXXXXXX8833, in the name of ANDRUS NOMM;25.

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, Account No.XXXXXXXX3833, in the name of BRAM VAN DER KOLK;26.

Hang Seng Bank Ltd., Account No. XXX-XXXX52-888, in the name of KIM TIM JIM VESTOR;27.

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, AccountNo. XXXXXXXX7833, in the name of SVEN ECHTERNACH;28.

Development Bank of Singapore, Account No. XXXXXX6160, in thename of VESTOR LIMITED;29.

Citibank (Hong Kong) Limited, Account No. XXXX8921, in the name of KIM TIM JIM VESTOR;30.

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, AccountNo. XXXXXXXX4833, in the name of MATHIAS ORTMANN;31.

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, Account No.XXXXXXXX6888, in the name of an individual with the initials JPLL;32.

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, AccountNo. XXXXXXXX9833, in the name of JULIUS BENCKO;33.

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, AccountNo. XXXXXXXX2838, in the name of RNK Media Company;34.

Development Bank of Singapore Hong Kong, Account No.XXXXXX6930, in the name of A Limited;

6835.

Development Bank of Singapore, Account No. XXXXX1690, in the nameof A Limited;36.

Citibank (Hong Kong) Limited, Account No. XXXX6237, in the name of KIM TIM JIM VESTOR;37.

Development Bank of Singapore, Account No. XXXXXX9970, in thename of KIM DOTCOM/KIM VESTOR;38.

Citibank (Hong Kong) Limited, Account No. XXXX8942, in the name of KIM TIM JIM VESTOR;39.

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, AccountNo. XXX-XXXX16-888, in the name of KIM TIM JIM VESTOR;40.

Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Limited (ICBC),Account No. XXXXXXXX8434, in the name of MATHIAS ORTMANN;41.

Development Bank of Singapore, Account No. XXXXXX4440, in thename of Megapay Ltd.;42.

Development Bank of Singapore, Account No. XXX-XXX-XXXXXX8760, in the name of Megastuff Ltd.;43.

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited, AccountNo. XXXXXXXX6838, in the name of MEGAUPLOAD LTD.;44.

Development Bank of Singapore, Account No. XXX-XXX-XXXXXX8870, in the name of N-1 Limited;45.

Development Bank of Singapore, Account No. XXX-XXX-XXXXXX1980, in the name of N-1 Limited;46.

Citibank (Hong Kong) Limited, Account No. XXXXX 0741, in the nameof KIM TIM JIM VESTOR;47.

Citibank (Hong Kong) Limited, Account No. XXXXX0768, in the nameof KIM TIM JIM VESTOR;48.

Citibank (Hong Kong) Limited, Account No. XXXXX1055, in the nameof KIM TIM JIM VESTOR;49.

Citibank (Hong Kong) Limited, Account No. XXXXX9938, in the nameof KIM TIM JIM VESTOR;50.

Citibank (Hong Kong) Limited, Account No. XXXXX8948, in the nameof KIM TIM JIM VESTOR;51.

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, Account No.XXXXXXXX0833, in the name of an individual with the initials LRV;52.

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation, Account No. XXX-XXXXX04-888, in the name of an individual with the initials WT;

6953.

Bank of the Philippine Islands, Account No. XXXXXX0069, in the nameof Megateam Limited;54.

Bank of the Philippine Islands, Account No. XXXXXX0264, in the nameof Megateam Limited;55.

Bank of the Philippine Islands, Account No. XXXXXX3627, in the nameof KIM SCHMITZ;56.

Bank of the Philippine Islands, Account No. XXXXXX7676, in the nameof KIM SCHMITZ;57.

Rabobank Nederland, Account No. NLXXXXXXXXXXXX7300, in thename of Bramos BV;58.

Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Australia, AccountNo. XXXXXXXX0087, in the name of MATHIAS ORTMANN;59.

Ceskoslovenska Obchodna Banka Slovakia, Account No.XXXXXXXX9833, in the name of JULIUS BENCKO;60.

Paypal Inc., account [email protected];61.

Paypal Inc., account belonging to KIM DOTCOM([email protected]);62.

Paypal Inc., accounts belonging to SVEN ECHTERNACH([email protected], [email protected], [email protected]);63.

Paypal Inc., account belonging to BRAM VAN DER KOLK([email protected]);64.

Moneybookers Limited, account belonging [email protected];

65.

Moneybookers Limited, account belonging [email protected];

Captain Kawaii 01-20-2012 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by faxxaff (Post 18700853)
Main reason was money laundry. File sharing is just a minor cosmetic retouch to this affair that makes it look better in public.

BINGO...After reading the arstech articles its seriously about money laundering and racketeering. FEDS go after money. It finances them...Anyone with similar operations should be turning their diapers to poo.

SmokeyTheBear 01-20-2012 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Captain Kawaii (Post 18700970)
BINGO...After reading the arstech articles its seriously about money laundering and racketeering.

money laundering and racketeering are just called business , unless you are doing something else illegal. thus the dmca is what fucked them.

if they hadn't uploaded videos themselves, ignored dmca complaints and repeat infringers they wouldn't have any case of money laundering or racketeering.



or i should say , if they hadn't admitted all of the above in emails lol

the big porn tubes and filelockers are likely purging all email accounts as we speak :)

pornguy 01-20-2012 12:58 PM

Fuck thats awesome.

Got links on where this info is coming from.. I want to start adding them to my DMCA's

:)

SmokeyTheBear 01-20-2012 01:06 PM

heres the full indictment http://www.scribd.com/doc/78786408/Mega-Indictment

pornguy 01-20-2012 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 18701016)

Nice. Going to add that to the DMCA's I am sending out today. hahahahahha..

SZNY 01-20-2012 02:44 PM

Seems like Lease Web is going to loose a big client, megaupload had there 600+ servers racked

Jakez 01-20-2012 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear (Post 18700904)
how many times have the gfy OWNERS posted copyright mp3's on gfy ?

never..

I'm sure one of them has posted a song from youtube once or twice.

SmokeyTheBear 01-20-2012 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jakez (Post 18701215)
I'm sure one of them has posted a song from youtube once or twice.

thats not what MU is in trouble for , they are in trouble for ripping/posting and hosting the stolen content.

none of the gfy owners have EVER posted and hosted stolen music on gfy..

You must see a difference in
posting a video from youtube that purports to be legal
and
hosting a video you know is stolen because you stole it..

VIXEN ESCORTS 01-20-2012 07:39 PM

https://youtube.com/watch?v=sMZwZiU0kKs

uno 01-20-2012 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by faxxaff (Post 18700888)
still, illegal business transactions .... that's the point.

Like they got Al Capone .... not with real shit, but with mail fraud.

:cough:taxes:cough:

uno 01-20-2012 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pornguy (Post 18701157)
Nice. Going to add that to the DMCA's I am sending out today. hahahahahha..

:1orglaugh That's not a bad idea.

pornmasta 01-20-2012 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nikki99 (Post 18700845)
because with million dollars u can still look fat like a pig

yes indeed :2 cents:

jscott 01-20-2012 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by faxxaff (Post 18700890)
Hope they kill all the GF sites for that same reason. I am certain FBI has access to their gmail accounts ;-P

I still dont understand why do you think the gf sites with real amateur / gf submissions are the same as sites that are stealing production companies copyright materials? can you explain please?

Jakez 01-20-2012 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jscott (Post 18701742)
I still dont understand why do you think the gf sites with real amateur / gf submissions are the same as sites that are stealing production companies copyright materials? can you explain please?

Because most GF sites contain copyrighted and/or unlicensed material. You have to know this already..

BareBacked 01-20-2012 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SykkBoy (Post 18700957)
email trails....these guys are pretty fucked.

doesn't anyone use a cone of silence anymore?

LOL ok 99

EukerVoorn 01-20-2012 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by faxxaff (Post 18700853)
Main reason was money laundry. File sharing is just a minor cosmetic retouch to this affair that makes it look better in public.

I don't get this, if you can make millions a year by running a file locker then why would you bother laundring money?

PenisFace 01-20-2012 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EukerVoorn (Post 18701837)
I don't get this, if you can make millions a year by running a file locker then why would you bother laundring money?

A mix of greed and stupidity.

AllAboutCams 01-20-2012 10:27 PM

what about hoodtube.com there is loads of videos on there from youtube

SmokeyTheBear 01-20-2012 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by EukerVoorn (Post 18701837)
I don't get this, if you can make millions a year by running a file locker then why would you bother laundring money?

when you stick a check in the bank , it is called depositing a check..

if you sold some crack , got paid with a check and deposit in your bank , it's called money laundering

money laundering is simply a byproduct of a criminal act involving money

SmokeyTheBear 01-20-2012 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xxxupdate (Post 18701850)
what about hoodtube.com there is loads of videos on there from youtube

i think the clincher is megaupload went about directly transferring youtube videos to MU. Not only that but they detailed it in emails.

I'm sure most pawnshops have alot of stolen goods, its much different if the pawnshop is actually breaking into your house to steal the goods.

youtube has loads of videos that are stolen/copyright themselves , but they aren't actively stealing them .


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc