![]() |
I just watched this political documentary on PBS
|
Watching it now, long and in depth. Every American should watch it.
|
Thank you for showing that. Fascinating and revealing.
On one hand you have a man with a dream to improve things , naive, inexperienced and unable to bring people together. Unable to get things done and it seems unable to compromise. On the other hand you have a man with strange deep religious beliefs, whose experienced in taking companies and turning them around and making them worth a lot more. By passing the stripped off assets onto others. Neither in my opinion should be the leader of the free world. Four more years of not doing anything. Or a man who who can't sack people, without having to deal with the consequences. Neither of them have real experience in making things work or getting companies back on their feet, building something worth buying and employing people. While producing a profit for everyone. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Johnny's a bad influence on me. :1orglaugh |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I usually hate everything I see you post, But have to give it to you on this one. Nice find :thumbsup |
PBS *ALWAYS* runs great Frontline episodes and has lots of other amazing documentary and scientific shows like Nature and Nova. Even one of the Koch brothers agree's.. or his company does because they fund that stuff.
PBS is not a waste of money. Don't let chumps like Romney or Boehner make you think removing paltry public funding of PBS will in any noticable way reduce deficits. It's nonsensical chatter that wont save a dime and will remove great quality informative programming from people who can't afford to pay for 800 channels. |
Quote:
Obama focusing on using Big Bird against Romney is a joke and confirms he shouldn't be in office. |
Yeah. It's a red herring. Cut one toilet seat off an air craft carrier instead, it'll save more. People like me used to be able to say "people aren't that stupid", but voters ARE that stupid these days.
(to not realise how little money goes to PBS versus REAL budget HOGS like the pentagon who are given MORE MONEY than they asked for. Talk about that.) |
By the way, it was Romney who brought up PBS, not Obama. Is responding to an actual comment out of bounds for Romney supporters? God we're doomed.
|
Quote:
95% of his tax cuts will result in more unemployment. Ed do you accept cuts will effect your income or buying power? |
Quote:
maybe doing something about it yourself other than pointing fingers will be more satisfying for you. |
Sesame Workshop and its subsidiaries had total assets of $289 million. About $29 million was held in cash and "cash equivalents," mainly money-market mutual funds. Another $121 million on the balance sheet was held in "investments." According to the accompanying notes, these investments included stakes in hedge funds and private-equity funds
.....No wonder Big bird needs our tax payer dollars!! .:2 cents::1orglaugh . |
TLC used to be like PBS. Now it airs Honey Boo Boo.
|
Quote:
As I said before, If Obama wins, I hope GE and other companies like it leave the USA. |
Quote:
Can you tell us what you think is the best way forward then. I have said my opinion. That is for Western Governments and tax payers to invest in the future technologies. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Giving out money is much different than Taking less taxes. Remember all these companies Pay taxes on every employee they have. |
Quote:
|
Why are voters so stupid? Centralized public education. :thumbsup
|
Quote:
The Military is needed, It brings many American jobs, technology and security to this country. It seems to Obama that talk shows are more important than the safety of America. Taxing these business in the USA will only push them and other job creators out. Then the middle class will truly be screwed, and everyone voting for Obama will get what they deserve. |
Quote:
Interfering overseas usually results in giving country leaders, who even though dictators or despots play the game the Americans want, a lot of money. And usually ends in their reign continuing. Will he cut this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_foreign_aid not by the way he's talking. Look at some of the countries in that list. http://listosaur.com/politics/top-10...reign-aid.html In fiscal year 2010, the U.S. government allocated the following amounts for aid: Total economic and military assistance: $52.7 billion Total military assistance: $15.0 billion Total economic assistance: $37.7 billion of which, USAID assistance: $14.1 billion. |
Quote:
How would it cut jobs in Welfare? If anything they should be adding jobs to investigate the people to make sure they need assistance or to help people earn their living. Cutting taxes will create jobs, adding more income being taxed. It's actually pretty simple to see how this works. How would cutting foreign aid make us lose American jobs? |
Quote:
.:2 cents::1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh . |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Too many countries have bloated their economies on borrowed money. Even if it's initially spent by Government, what it's spent on goes into the economy. Taxes never covered the borrowed money, that flowed around those countries, and now the debt mountain is becoming the problem. Cutting taxes means cutting spending (jobs), which means less money in those countries or borrowing more. Or just printing it until a loaf of bread costs $20. Now if you know how to cat taxes, without cutting jobs or borrowing more. Go to the White House, they have a proper job for you. If cutting taxes created jobs, there would be very little unemployment. You're thinking is good for the 1960s. Get with the program, it's 2012. Quote:
If they do, I would be the first to say cut the funding. |
Paul how did you get that gfy award? Your trolling attempts are horrible.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Prove where PBS makes a profit and I will join you in shouting the funding should be cut. I agree that Government have covered the gaping hole of losing production and export sales with public spending and borrowing. I agree it has to be slowed down. What we disagree on is giving money back in tax cuts. Because it will mean more imports. Your spending will be on goods that are imported, so the spending will. Shop > Wholesaler or Warehouse > Docks > Third World. Government spending is. Worker/Community > Shop > Wholesaler or Warehouse > Docks > Third World. Here's somewhere they could cut a huge amount of spending. Farm Subsidies. Instead of you getting cheap subsidised food, you pay the full price. It might cut obesity rates, won't result in lost jobs and will cut Government spending. :thumbsup Will you pay extra for your food to cut Government spending? |
Quote:
http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-gra...ion-bucks-year |
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Nonprofit is not a business model, it is a tax status. |
http://www.quora.com/What-portion-of...ral-government
Cutting that funding will make a huge dent in the borrowing. :1orglaugh What else has Romney said he will cut? Go grab more straws BD, this one is proving how little you know. |
Baddog, you seem to think that anyone who doesn't support the republican agendas is a democrat.
2cents |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123