Romney flip/flops AGAIN - abortion this time
 

This greasy fucker's views get flipped more than a crack house mattress.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/1...n_1952780.html

"Mitt Romney said Tuesday he has no plans to push for legislation limiting abortion, a softer stance from a candidate who has said he would "get rid of" funding for Planned Parenthood and appoint Supreme Court who would overturn Roe v. Wade."

The human windsock. The fucking guy HAS NO beliefs - other than that he's entitled to the White House.

He's revolting. The quintessential political scoundrel. :throwup

Obama 2012.

http://images.sodahead.com/polls/002...n1_xlarge.jpeg

This guy is a moron

Only Obama tools feel this way. He has already said that he is running for President, not Paul Ryan. Additionally, his stance for quite a while is that there are legit reasons for abortions. He is not flip flopping, you freaks are just concerned because it is a tough race and you are concerned that your one term choice may really be one term.

Yea sure, Romney hasn't flip flopped more than a fish out of water. :1orglaugh

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :xmas-smil22

Dude, he IS flip/flopping. You didn't read the article.

Freaks? You support a party that would tell an incest victim that she has to give birth to her own brother or sister! The fucking freak is YOU! :321GFY

Obama 2012.

http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...WaMgE1x3nb1mWA

Romney has consistently stated he does not support that language. Nice try.

A politician flip-flopped? No fucking way...

What does it really matter? Obama, Romney, [insert other name here]

They're all full of shit.

I'm convinced that the man doesn't even know what words are coming out of his mouth when he opens it.

In an article I read about Romney I think they did a very good job of summing him up. He is a businessman who is has used his ability to assimilate into a particular role to attain great success. When Bain was buying and gutting companies he was able to present himself as a person who was interested in that company and their products. He showed himself to be knowledgeable and passionate about the company and what they do. This helped him win over the management so he could buy and gut the company. Many very successful businessmen in many different businesses regularly do the exact same thing.

Now Romney wants to be president so he is playing the role of someone who wants to be president. I think, if elected, he will actually govern more like the guy who was governor and less like a hardcore right winger. That is likely what is in his heart and his flip flops are him slipping out of character. It might be easy to fake interest in a company for a few months while you do the courting and buying, it is different to hold character for a couple of years as you run for president.

In the end it won't really matter. I was reading today about how the new congress will be more divided than ever before because most of the moderates have been voted out and both sides have voted in people who are much more extreme one way or the other so the odds of them finding a middle ground on things will be very low.

every election i see the same stupid shit on gfy. "he flipflops!" "he is wrong!" etc etc. And when one of the two puppets is "elected" the fucking up of the world continues as the same people of the Federal Reserve keep running the show no matter what.

I agree GrantMercury is a moron :thumbsup

--and that's my problem with the Republican party. Their values are fucked up. If I watch FOx News for 5 minutes, I can't believe the shit I'm hearing.

Obama only needs to run ads like that. Nothing more.

America loses either way, but at least that flip flopping jack ass won't be in there. How he has even made it this far boggles the mind. Personally, I think he is a republican sacrifice. Let Obama win so next time around the people will BEG for a Republican.... Jeb Bush perhaps.

Same thing with other stations, It is a shame that there is no reliable news source...

Don't let pesky facts get in the way of baddog's relentless sucking up of the propaganda man.

Romney blows with the prevailing political wind. It's kind of like breaking news that the sun rose today. No tools required.

You're backing the wrong candidate old man, Romney is planning in swiping your medicare!!

https://youtube.com/watch?v=W_pgfWK3sxw

It may seem that way but I don't believe it is the case. For example, if Al Gore had one the election when he was running, things might be very different.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

True Mitt

Some of you guys are pretty funny; especially those of you whose opinion does not matter.

I don't know if you are wealthy or not. Lets say wealthy means at least $5M in liquid assets. I'm going to guess by your 90k posts that you don't fall into this category, no offense. I'm also going to guess you are not super religious or a gun nut either. Therefore, you are a fool to vote republican. :2 cents:

How much bait could a troll bait bait if a troll bait could bait troll.

Only a foolish American would vote for Obama again. I doubt he has gained one vote that he didn't get the first time around.

For the record, I have no intent of voting for Romney; that does not mean I can not point out idiocy, stupidity and/or nonsense. The Obama nuts only see me appear to defend Romney or slam Obama. The Romney nuts only see me appear to defend Obama or slam Romney. I am equal opportunity. If you say/post something dumb, I am probably going to call you on it. :)

Romney's social views don't really matter. If he's elected all he'll be focused on is helping the rich get richer through more tax cuts, more subsidies, more friendly laws, etc.

He is a business man running for purely selfish reasons and don't care if people get abortions or anything else so long as his financial goals are met.

He will work against the interests of about 99.99% of this board but that won't stop idiots for voting for him.

While he's busy cutting $100 million a year in funding for PBS he'll be increasing oil subsidies, defense budget, cutting funding to anyone trying to develop alternative energy sources, breaking down labor laws that protect the worker, getting more loopholes into the tax code, etc.

When did you decide that? You've previously stated here that Romney has your vote.

Flip flopping? :winkwink:

I don't see why Democrats are all shook up.

Romney was always a moderate. He went hard right in his rhetoric during the last few months to win the Republican nomination because that's what you have to do.

Now he's back to his original stance on things.

And it sounds to me like it's the same social stance as Democrats.

Which just goes to show that people are hung up on their favorite "Side" instead of paying attention to ISSUES.
So now some Democrats are angry because Romney AGREES with them?

What a fucked up world. Seems to me that if a candidate were agreeing with your "side" on social issues, and was better at economics...that you'd be voting for him instead of screaming about "flip flops". He didn't flip flop now. He flip flopped during the Republican nomination campaign.

He's back to his original stance now. So quit bitching and go vote for him. Otherwise you're just voting for Obama because you're a "Democrat".

Or you could grow a set, and vote for someone who is for REAL freedom: Gary Johnson

Why do people call Tax relief tax cuts?

What drives me nuts is when the use the language" We have to PAY for tax cuts"
WTF????

So the govt. is taking MY money. But when they don't take it...they somehow have to "pay" for not taking MY money?

Only in the thieving world of career politicians does that actually make sense. :(

Baddog, you said



We are showing you proof that you are making a mistake about Mitt. Why not prove us wrong, or admit that you're wrong, instead of just dismiss all of us as "opinions of people who do not matter"? I know this is a class Mitt move, but come on. We're all just having a discussion here. You shouldn't dismiss anyone if you don't agree with them. Prove your point, man.

You're right. I had to go back and see how I worded that, but since my vote does not matter here (Obama gets it) I decided https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1083171

:thumbsup

Funny you say this.

Democrats blame Bush for the economy, and are very fast to place all blame on him.

If you bring up that the housing market crashing was because of a bill that president Clinton signed, They get MAD and refuse to discuss it further.

Obama came in with a large debt. He claimed to cut it in half by the time he ran for re-election but he Failed, Not only did he Fail, he doubled it.

It's a NON issue. It's like saying water is wet. Nobody is shook up who pays any attention whatsoever. How else to say it?

Actually, anyone intelligent doesn't play blaming games.
They assign cause to effect.
If it was Bush, it was Bush. If it was Obama, it was Obama. Nobody has to pretend there is a political motivation behind it unless they themselves need there to be one.

no kidding, it's like that one joke: "how can you tell when a politician is lying?"


"His lips are moving."