Russian meteor conspiracy theory
 

How come no one is up in arms about this obvious cover up?

Were does anyone see a meteor? Looks like a missile strike to me.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...rite-0d778.jpg

1) No one saw it coming?
This meteor was so big and did so much damage yet no one saw it coming?

2) No crater?
Where is the crater? How come we haven't seen pictures of a crater yet? Underwater? Great, the Russians have sonar and radar. I want to see images.

3) No damage?
This meteor hit with the force of twenty times the nuke dropped on Hiroshima. This nuke flattened an entire city. Other than some windows, I haven't seen any damage. Not a single building was flattened?

4) No one died?
Twenty times the force of a nuclear bomb, yet we don't have thousands dead. Wouldn't thousands of people have died just by the shock waves alone?

5) North Korean missile cover up?
We've all seen the videos of the meteor hitting, oddly enough mostly from dashboards. Sure didn't look like a meteor to me. Wouldn't a meteor be breaking up in chunks and we would see dozens if not hundreds of pieces breaking up. These videos don't look like a meteor, they look just like a missile strike. American meteor expert Jose Canseco seems to agree with me.

6) Military Strike?
Why is Znak newspaper reporting from military sources that the Russian air defense unit at the Urzhumka military base "shot something down".

7) What happened in Cuba?
Was this meteor in Russia - which oddly enough was filmed by dozens of people with dashcams - really nothing more than a cover up for a military strike in Cuba?

8) Exploded in air?
Reports from the Russian government say this exploded 100 feet in the air ABOVE the city. That sounds exactly like what a nuclear bomb would do. Meteors don't explode in mid air for no reason unless they hit something.

9) Lack of radiation reports
Oddly enough, a meteor hits a Russian town, yet no one seems to have thought to pull out geiger counters to see if any radiation was involved. This sounds suspicious to me. Or maybe they have used geiger counters but are keeping that information secret. Why isn't the Russian government being more straight forward with this?

10) Lots O video tape
9/11 happened in a major city with millions of people and only one camera got the first plane hitting the tower. Yet here in the middle of no place in the Ural Mountains in Russian, they had dozens of camera shooting the sky for no reason. Doesn't anyone find this odd?

11) Secret Russian military operations
Why hasn't anyone commented about recent Russian military movements. Military units have been put on alert and other forces moved, yet no one in the Russian government has commented on these.

I want answers.

This is a joke right?

Here's Hiroshima after being hit by a nuclear bomb...

http://inapcache.boston.com/universa..._05/h31_01.jpg

This is the impact site of the Russian meteor... .

http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/...ticleLarge.jpg

You mean to tell me that this metor was twenty time the size of the nuke that hit Hiroshima, yet the only photo we have is a lake with small hole in the ice?

Wouldn't that entire lake be disintegrated?

Obviously they have video camera in Russia - lots of them - but not one image of a building that fell down? Not one?

Someone must've hacked Rochard his account.

it blew up 20 miles above ground. Not sure how to comment on most of those. The questions could have been wrote better to make it work for the nutters

I am pretty sure they said the force created by the meteor / whatever entering the atmosphere and then exploding was equivalent to 20 Hiroshima's.

The image of the hole in the ice = probably a tiny piece of the rock that hit after it exploded way up in the air.

okay, that was daft but by the time i got to number 8 i was laughing, meteors are always exploding in the air, even the famous tunguska meteor did.

Bullshit. This is not twenty miles in the sky.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...rite-0d778.jpg

Twenty miles up in the sky is nearly in space. The guy who jumped was 23 miles. That picture is not twenty miles up in the sky.

I'm not even gonna comment on all those retarded questions. Any 12 year old could find the answers for them without ending up with some insane conspiracy.

I still think he is joking.

So then this was really cover up of a US missile test off the cost of Cuba?

Conflicting stories - did it explode twenty miles in the air (in outer space), 100 feet above the ground, or did it crash into a lake?

We are talking 10 to 20 tons of material here - that's all it did was punch a small hole in a lake?

Is someone else using your account or did you turn into a retarded conspiracy theorist overnight?

I told you guys that Building #7 was hit by a meteor!

.

This hole is way too small to be caused by 10 to 20 tons of meteor....

http://dickatlee.com/issues/911/asc/...gon-hole-l.jpg

If you connect the dots this story should read: America tests missile defense system, shoots meteor for target practice. Meteor breaks into several meteorites and causes damage in several different countries......ssshhhhhhhhh, America is never wrong.

This is twenty times bigger than the nuke that hit Japan?

http://cdn.theatlanticwire.com/img/u...4940/large.jpg

I've seen hail in Phoenix do more damage.

Yup, account hacked.
Funny.
Not for him though :1orglaugh

So we saw one meteor months ago, yet no one noticed the other one that nearly hit us?

How come people at NASA aren't getting fired over this?

Or maybe NASA was in on it all and they wanted to see if the US could shoot down a meteor or a missile.

But then what happened in Cuba? Did the US attempt to hit the meteor and it failed to reach the atmosphere?

I'm just saying there are a lot of unanswered questions here.

Wish you were right about that, however I do not think he is.

Do some research about the atmosphere and the forces it places on any object entering the atmosphere. A rock entering out atmosphere at 20k/s - easily believable that it would explode far far far above the earth's surface.

As for the picture you think represents an object being closer than 20miles. Look up curvature of the earth / horizon etc - that object could be 100+k away.

Why wouldn't you answer these questions? Are you afraid of the truth?

This is a massive cover up.

Don't hurt yourself.

I was at the mall shoe shopping with my girlfriend and trying not get turned on when this hot chick was helping my g/f put these thigh high boots on... So I distracted myself with this idea. I fully believe it.

This will be huge in a week.

Lol , like the Russian government is going to give straight answers and Rochard , comparing a nuclear bomb to a meteor??!

NASA - who claims they didn't see the meteor - says it was much bigger than a nuclear bomb...

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/worl...icle-1.1265952

for real? how close is the sun when it sets yet it is touching the ground LOL

The sheep will believe whatever their government tells them

have you ever heard of pythagoras?

NASA misses tons of stuff. Amateur astronomers pick up a lot of NASA's slack.

I don't think it was a cover up.

There are 9721 Near-Earth Objects known as of Feb 16th. 862 of them are asteroids that are 1 kilometer wide or larger, and 1379 of them are classified as Potentally Hazardous Asteroids. It is estimated that this makes up less than 10% of all of the near-earth objects in our solar system.


There is no crater because the asteroid blew up 25 miles above ground, and did so while it was flying more or less horizontally at thousands of miles an hour.


Most of the damage caused by a Nuclear bomb is caused by the waveform it creates. A numb that explodes when it hits the ground causes less damage than one exploding overhead. To maximize the waveform a bomb has to be exploded at just the right height. The Hiroshima bomb did much more damage with a much lower yield.

No because the shock was (a) very high up, (b) went in all directions, (c) was spread out thanks to the very fast lateral movement of the Asteroid.

Fun idea, but unlikely. The NK's are having trouble with their missiles, and even if they were successful, it would have been detected by governments around the world.

Yes but if you look closely at some of the video this is exactly what you see. You may not see it on some cameras because the light caused by the heat of the breakup blind most cameras.

It looks like a meteor because it moves lateral to the ground, not falling or falling straight down at least. The sonic bomb it creates is much louder and with much higher pressure. A missile would have hit the ground to explode. And besides all kinds of radioactive markers would be made it detectable all over the world had it been a nuke.

Who knows, but again unlikely. There's no reason to attack Russia.

Who can say? But trying to get real questions answered will never be done with distracting questions like Cavuto might ask.

Meteors DO explode in mid air. They are moving so fast, that the friction from the earth's atmosphere cause them to explode. The meteor in Tunguska, Russia, also exploded in mid air. It caused lots of damage and left no crater. (Though on a PBS show the other day, they say they may have found the crater in a nearby lake)

Or, there is no radiation to report. It's no secret, there's just nothing to report. And in case you think they would cover it up, this would be wrong. First there's no reason to cover it up, and besides of there was radiation, it would already be detectable in neighbouring countries.

9/11 was 12 years ago when relatively few people had video cameras, let alone smartphones. Today everyone and their kids has a smartphone with built-in video cameras.

Sorry my friend, no answers for that one.


;)

It's pretty obvious that this meteor is being measured using the Lizard Scale.

Johnny? You back?

The sun is stationary. This was not. This was moving across the sky until it hit the ground.

Big deal. They found some rocks. Maybe NASA gave them to the Russians to display. That is, if NASA went to the moon!

And they didn't see it shortly before it hit the earth why?

The video footage I've seen seems to indicate it went all the way down to the ground. Video tape doesn't lie.

Right. So how come this meteor that was twenty or thirty times a nuke that hit Japan didn't do any damage?

Exactly. Maybe they were trying to hit the US - and missed. Maybe their second try landed off the coast of Florida. Why isn't our government looking into this?

So now you are saying some of the video footage is faked? Not good? Not shot under the right conditions?

Doesn't look like a meteor at all to me. Looks like a missile.

This looks like a missile that hit the ground and exploded.

So now we have rocks exploding thirty miles in the atmosphere because of friction? There isn't much friction thirty miles up. In fact, there isn't any air at that point.

How do we know what happened in Tunguska in the early 1900s? The only thing we know is the damage it did. At least that meteor seems to have knocked down a few trees. But did we have any working knowledge of what happens thirty miles in our atmosphere in the early 1900s? No, we didn't. We also didn't have any recording devices, or any tracking devices. No one has any idea how high it was when it "hit".

You are just making stuff up at this point.

There is no radiation to report - or they aren't reporting how much radiation is there?

Wouldn't there be radiation - this so called meteor just passed through the radiation belt while no one was seeing it on it's way to earth.

My father had a video camera twenty years prior to 9/11. I had one ten years prior to 9/11.

Do you honestly meant to tell me that in a city of eight million people and five million tourists that morning, not one person had a video camera trained on one of the two biggest tourist attractions in the big apple that morning, but yet we have dozens of Russians running around with dashcams in Siberia?

Well thank god we invest billions into NASA each year. I mean, it's not like this is important or anything like that.