Porno Dan! What is this Absurd BS???
 

Sorry they're targeting you man, seems really unfair:

http://www.xbiz.com/news/160739

And, of COURSE it was "an anonymous letter"...
fuck that shit!

Well that fucking sucks :mad:

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-U1Jwb7hLvd...ds-baby+02.jpg

How many scenes has Porno Dan produced without an HIV/STD incident?

At least Dan should have plenty of people supporting him and decent legal representation.

:stoned

ADG

Too bad for Dan :disgust

What if you are a catholic pornstar and its against your relgion to use a condom????

When people can't compete they resort to "other" measures....this industry is not littered with "stand up guys"

Lol 99% would fuck with your business if they could gain anything from it :2 cents:

Ps not only this business though

Actually, a very valid point! :)

Sad, but almost certainly true... :2 cents:

If its anything about the case law that just passed in the Eu, it states your personal rights don't trump the general public rights. in other words if it endangers others while doing your job then you don't exactly have "freedom of speech" to express your religion.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/7560...-necklace.html

http://alladultnetwork.tv/main/wp-co...01/Immoral.jpg

No mention of whether X-Biz even made an effort to get a comment from Porno Dan, et al, over at Immoral Productions. I would expect that good journalism dictates that a reporter would at least ask for their perspective/reaction, in order to provide some balance to the article, and less of a Press Release for AHF (I presume Dan and Co., know about the complaint at this point, and as Dan is fairly outspoken, I would expect that he may have something to say about this).

:stoned

ADG

Somehow, I suspect the response would be that doing porn in the first place is prohibited by Catholicism, as well. ;-)

Something must be wrong I don't see anywhere in the story where it said they tried reaching him/them for comment. Reporting at it's finest.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh
:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh :1orglaugh

id give my left nut to see this argument made..

not at all.. it's breeding, and it's encouraging more breeding

:thumbsup:thumbsup

I love this,

"Business activities occurring at Immoral Productions pose a substantial risk of bodily harm and lifelong disability,"

Makes it sound like it is a Chinese factory with 10yr olds running heavy equipment and have a chance to loose a hand.

:thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup
That whole thing is such fucking bullshit, anyway.

It wouldn't be the first time Catholics caused deaths.

I suggested to Dan that he should get the hell out of California.

He worked the majority of his career based out of Maryland with zero problems.

But he always gives me the standard "California is the only state where it's legal to film porn" argument. Maybe he'll rethink that now. Dan's a good guy and this whole thing in Cali is insane.

Maybe now he'll move to Vegas too.

Bump for this shit!

Dan, weren't you the first one to get the actual health permit? You were trying to do the right thing and the went after you first... weird!

really? :disgust:disgust:disgust

So fucking lame this entire thing.

I bet its someone that didn't get chosen or a hater that couldn't get it up during one of this shows..

Unless the AIDS Healthcare Foundation produces the name of the "anonymous" letter writer, I'd tell'em to go fuck themselves (using a condom, of course).

Doesn't someone still have the right to face their accuser in a court of law?

absolutely, right next to 'we won't torture the shit outta you'

Just a question.. but they stated the content originated from ImmoralLive.com Is it possible he "forgot" to put on a condom during his past shows?

Well, the good news is that the county doesn't even have to respond to the AHF's complaint in any way, so the identity of the accuser may never become relevant at all (legally speaking, at least).

I think that's a fairly likely outcome here, really; the county might just read the AHF's complaint, send something back that in effect says "Thanks. Duly noted; we will take this under advisement" and then the next time we hear about it will come when the AHF holds another press conference to bitch about the county doing nothing in response to their complaint.

Has the county even promulgated the final rules for compliance with Measure B, btw? Does anybody know?

That's what I was wondering - how much influence/authority the AHF has to do something based on an anonymous letter (if one even existed in the first place). So they're basically an advocacy group I'm assuming?

trust me there are many ways to profit from the press and make this work for him. nothing makes sales like your content and you giving your 2 cents on the 6 o clock news. keep spinning

Yep, they're the advocacy group that circulated the petitions that started all of this in the first place, and that has spent millions of dollars on its campaign to establish mandatory condom use in porn as the law of the land. They're now trying to push the measure statewide across California, and have pledged to do the same across the country.

They've also filed to intervene in Vivid's lawsuit challenging Measure B (or the "Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act" as it is now known), an application that Vivid's legal team is challenging.

The AHF definitely has some pull in L.A./California, and pretty deep pockets as well.

Fucking bastards

Catholics are allowed to use condoms.
But yeah, some fake dude could use this excuse, I mean it works in certain countries... You can do whatever you like as long your religion "requires" that. And political correct pussies comply.

So are you shooting illegally in Nevada?

How do you mean? Why would he?
Lets say you spot someone drunk driving, you anonymously tip the police, police catches him in the act and then you should "face that driver in a court of law"?
Not really, you would be merely somebody who gave a tip..

So now its up to if they will find the evidence or not.

This is shit if he used condom. If he did not use condoms then he broke the law hence making it not shit.

Unless you know 100% that he used condoms you can not claim "shit" for sure. :2 cents:

As for catching him first - somebody has to be first. Sometimes better guys get caught before worse guys.

Thats what I was thinking.. So.. Did Dan or his cast forget to put a condom on their jimmy?
And dont you fuckers fill the thread with shit, unless you have been watching all his live videos and can vouch for him.

Nope. Shooting porn is not "illegal".
It's only "legal" in California and one other state. But it's not "illegal" in any state. No law AGAINST it.

In other news...breathing air is not "legal" in any state. But it's not "illegal" either. Just like porn.

It would be funny if California and that other state made breathing air legal then as well :)

And why does Dan says its only legal in California if there is one more state where it is legal as well? :2 cents: