Who here thinks Jahar is innocent?
 

I do

Still not a single shred of evidence. I think his brother may have had something to do with it but not him

Fuckus offus

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Lickus anus

Gluteus Maximus

You do realize there are photos of the two brothers together, a few minutes before the bombs went off, that show they no longer have backpacks with them; right?

maybe they just set them down for a rest :1orglaugh

Picture? Link?

http://imagemacros.files.wordpress.c...ues_retard.jpg

http://1800retard.com

Holy fuck, since I actually have a life I am only remotely paying attention and know that.

How dense are you to be obsessing over this and not know this fact?

Dumber than I thought.

There's still absolutely ZERO evidence they did this

Glenn beck thinks it's an inside job as well
 

http://www.freepatriot.org/2013/04/2...is-inside-job/

Glen Beck has claimed that he has proof the federal government has covered up the Boston bombing as being carried out by Chechnya terrorists. He says that the bombing was actually carried out by Saudi nationals and that he has the evidence to prove it. He gives Obama until Monday to admit it or his show will reveal the evidence. Is this just to get extra attention or does he have something more? Glenn Beck has always done a great job at laying out facts in his arguments, but we will see. We do however know that on Monday an anonymous source said that the raids would happen on Friday and obviously that already came true. There is a lot of suspicious things surrounding the Boston bombings, but is it just conspiracy theories at work again?

And if that doesn't prove they are guilty. I don't know what does.

Regardless of the bombings, those two robbed a 7-11, killed a campus cop and hijacked a car and had explosives.

At least I don't have to look at that sad cock avatar with your bs posts, anymore.. :Oh crap

You're right. Since you seem to know so much, it may have been you.

Angry they are getting your credit?

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

They never robbed a 7-11 and we don't know about the other things

Yea, this should be very interesting

I don't think they robbed a 7-11

How about an eyewitness account? Nah you still wouldn't accept that as any kind of proof, would you?

http://www.news.com.au/world-news/bo...-1226625202011

.

Yeah, they covered that yesterday:

http://www.wtsp.com/news/topstories/...d-not-rob-7-11

.

glenn beck lol..

So a guy who was drugged up, just blown up and couldn't talk or see picked out the suspects?? :helpme

My bad, but they stole a car at the 7-11. It would have been robbed if it were a company car..

No, he wrote the original 8 words in the immediate aftermath.

The rest of the info, description and such came out later while he was still in intensive care. The stories on it have been out since sometime yesterday. If you were informed as you think you are you would know that.

But that doesn't fit your chosen narrative so you will discount it somehow. There is no proof that you will ever accept, so why keep asking for it?

Edited in: All of that was apparent in the original post I made by the way, if you read it. The bombing happened Monday. The pictures were released Friday. The article I quoted stated that within hours [after he ided the pictures] the FBI released the pictures. So it would be obvious to anyone with any level of reading comprehension (especially someone like you with your MIT 4.0 GPA) that the identification from the pictures occurred on Friday.

.

I think JohnnyClips is so worried about proving these guys innocent because they shared very similar views.

Could he be next? Should we be worried? Is he the type of person the tip line was setup for? Fits the profile. Extremist views. Socially isolated. Mildly retarded.

And that is the thing about all the conspiracy theorists.

It is quite sad. There are photos of the guys coming with bags and leaving without. There are photos of them within 5 feet of the 8 year old that was killed. They get into a fight with the cops, killing one.

It's not them though.

Yeah, my proof is from what I saw/heard. You posted a thread the other night when the chase was happening. I clicked into a link you had in there and then another link to a live feed from a Boston station. This was probably 12:30-1am Central. Thanks for that btw, the national news, over the air, did not cover any of that here. They just stayed on normal programming because noone knew it was the guys who had done the bombing yet. I ended up watching the local Boston feed through out. They did a good job, seemed to get closer than anyone else. ABC later was using the same feed I was watching.

At that point there was a chase going on. There was no talk about it being the Bombers. There was some speculation that it was whoever had killed the MIT cop but even that was stated in very couched terms. What they knew they had was someone that was openly shooting and throwing explosives.

It was not until they had had the big shoot out, some time after 2 in the morning my time, that they said it was the bombers. By that point one of them was dead so they knew who they were dealing with.

So, to think that they are probably innocent is to totally suspend belief. We would have to believe that they were running, with firearms and explosives in possession merely because their pictures had been shown or something like that.

-Or-

We had to believe that the person who got killed was not actually killed in the shoot out and the kid was planted in the boat (or was never in the boat).

I do not think our government is above reproach. I do think that just because I am paranoid does not mean that they are not out to get me. BUT, there are some things that are not conspiracies and that are not engineered.

.

What blows my mind is that when the MIT cop got shot, no one immediately presumed it was them. They announced that just as we were getting ready to walk the dogs. goodgirl asked, "do you think it is them?" I said, "no doubt." The next day the media acted like it had not dawned on anyone.

Then, how the neighbor walked up to the boat and lifted the tarp; while the cops took an hour to arrest him is kind of funny.

One thing I do wonder is if they ever meant to kill and not just maim. I know that sane people assume a bomb will kill, but I wonder with these guys.

They encountered a few people that were not law enforcement and they all lived when the easiest thing for the bombers to do would be to off them.

Wondering if they had some remorse after the fact. Especially considering the WBC tweet by the younger one.

So that's the only proof?

(p.s. there are no photos showing them with no bags)

STFU and let the adults talk.

http://media-cache-ec1.pinterest.com...705416_600.jpg
http://media-cache-ec1.pinterest.com...705416_600.jpg
http://media-cache-ec1.pinterest.com...705416_600.jpg
http://media-cache-ec1.pinterest.com...705416_600.jpg
http://media-cache-ec1.pinterest.com...705416_600.jpg
http://media-cache-ec1.pinterest.com...705416_600.jpg
http://media-cache-ec1.pinterest.com...705416_600.jpg

Was that necessary? I would have thought the PBBC was above that sort of shit.

.

:1orglaugh:1orglaugh:2 cents::2 cents::thumbsup:thumbsup

hell it's his thread, you're the one stalking like a bitch in heat...start your own goddamn thread you fool

I am sure maiming was the biggest intent, just because of the type of bomb; they cause a lot of injuries for a significant distance. I don't think they had the balls to off someone up close and personal; the younger one did not want to die, the older brother probably did not care. I hear he said he had no friends here; sounds like a personal problem.

I am sure the younger one was scared shitless and had been in that boat for a long while.

Yes, there are.