GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   The GOP 2016 presidential "hopefuls" (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1145653)

crockett 07-17-2014 08:13 PM

The GOP 2016 presidential "hopefuls"
 
This is what the Republican party has to offer... I dunno if I should laugh or cry at the sad state of affairs.

Chris Christie

Rand Paul

Ted Cruz

Rick Perry

Mike Huckabee

Rick Santorum

Bobby Jindal

Those are the 7 hopefuls that plan to show up in Iowa...

No shows will be...


Jeb Bush

Scott Walker

Paul Ryan

Marco Rubio


The GOP spent the last 6 years telling us how horrible Obama was, and this is all they have to show for themselves? A couple nut jobs and governors with more skeletons in their closest than Nixon..

The sad part is the best of the bunch is probably Jeb Bush.. I can't wait to see which one of these turds you righties decide to try and polish. :1orglaugh

Amputate Your Head 07-17-2014 08:17 PM

No, the sad part is clinging to the belief that you can fix the clusterfuck we are in by voting in an entirely rigged system, with players paid off by the largest corporations in the world.

crockett 07-17-2014 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 20162360)
No, the sad part is clinging to the belief that you can fix the clusterfuck we are in by voting in an entirely rigged system, with players paid off by the largest corporations in the world.

I'm pretty sure not a single one of the guys in that list are fixing anything. Every single one of the Governors has fucked shit up in their own states and the nut jobs don't stand a chance because they just pander to their extremely narrow bases.

2MuchMark 07-17-2014 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20162355)
This is what the Republican party has to offer... I dunno if I should laugh or cry at the sad state of affairs.

Chris Christie

Rand Paul

Ted Cruz

Rick Perry

Mike Huckabee

Rick Santorum

Bobby Jindal

Those are the 7 hopefuls that plan to show up in Iowa...

No shows will be...


Jeb Bush

Scott Walker

Paul Ryan

Marco Rubio


The GOP spent the last 6 years telling us how horrible Obama was, and this is all they have to show for themselves? A couple nut jobs and governors with more skeletons in their closest than Nixon..

The sad part is the best of the bunch is probably Jeb Bush.. I can't wait to see which one of these turds you righties decide to try and polish. :1orglaugh

I for one will be looking forward to falling off my chair laughing at one idiot after another make fools of themselves on national TV.

Hillary 2016: Easy.

Robbie 07-17-2014 09:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 20162360)
No, the sad part is clinging to the belief that you can fix the clusterfuck we are in by voting in an entirely rigged system, with players paid off by the largest corporations in the world.

QFT. Everything else is just a political "horse race" to amuse and distract people without enough intelligence to see that they are being led like sheep.

mikesouth 07-17-2014 09:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 20162360)
No, the sad part is clinging to the belief that you can fix the clusterfuck we are in by voting in an entirely rigged system, with players paid off by the largest corporations in the world.

QFT :thumbsup:thumbsup:thumbsup

bronco67 07-17-2014 09:38 PM

The only one I can side with on some issues is Rand Paul, but he's as kooky as the rest of them and will definitely have many, many gaffes during the election cycle. He can't help but put his foot in his mouth.

kane 07-17-2014 09:43 PM

I don't think it matters who wins the next presidential election. The blueprint has been drawn over the last 5-6 years on exactly how to bring the government to a grinding halt so I think we will see more of the same that we have seen in recent years.

Robbie 07-17-2014 09:49 PM

For a govt. that has been at a "grinding halt"...it still managed to change the entire "health care" system and turn it into a giant gift to insurance companies. And it also managed to find time to kill thousands of more people around the world with bombing and drone strikes.

I'd love to see the federal govt. actually come to a "grinding halt" sometimes. But it just keeps getting bigger and more powerful every day.

But they've got the majority of people believing that "nothing is getting done".

Newsflash: The govt. isn't supposed to be "doing" stuff constantly the way it does these days and spending money that it doesn't have and running the debt to 17 trillion dollars.

That's the way I see it anyway.
For an entity that has been brought to a "grinding halt", it still managed to spend more money than at any time in history. :(

EDIT: I left out the massive spying that our govt. is doing on it's own citizens. "Grinding halt"? I wish.

Axeman 07-17-2014 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20162401)
For a govt. that has been at a "grinding halt"...it still managed to change the entire "health care" system and turn it into a giant gift to insurance companies. And it also managed to find time to kill thousands of more people around the world with bombing and drone strikes.

I'd love to see the federal govt. actually come to a "grinding halt" sometimes. But it just keeps getting bigger and more powerful every day.

But they've got the majority of people believing that "nothing is getting done".

Newsflash: The govt. isn't supposed to be "doing" stuff constantly the way it does these days and spending money that it doesn't have and running the debt to 17 trillion dollars.

That's the way I see it anyway. For an entity that has been brought to a "grinding halt", it still managed to spend more money than at any time in history. :(

I agree. The vast majority of the things the Federal gov't does, shouldn't be remotely dealt with at that level. Almost all of it should be done at the local and State levels. Federal should be minimal, and do very little. IMO anyways.

Rochard 07-17-2014 10:00 PM

I can honestly say I do not know most of them. I might know who they are and what state they are from, but that's it. Chris Christie is the only one I know of but I'm not sure if he cold pull it off.

I believe that the Republicans would have been beat no matter who ran against them; All the Democrat needed was a "warm body without drama" which is exactly what they got. The entire country was pissed about the economy, and while we can't really put blame on the Republican party there was a Republican in the White House when it all went down. McCain wasn't it - he is an "old white dude with lots of money", and Romney wasn't the solution but just "more of the problem" - a white guy who uses other people's money to buy stuff and profit off of while he ran it into the ground which is exactly what the banks were doing...

Other than Hilary I have no idea who the Democratic party will be putting up. It sure will be fun to watch.

2MuchMark 07-17-2014 10:44 PM

I used to think that Chris Christie would be the best bet to be the next republican president. He seemed like a tough no nonsense guy and smart one too, but the whole bridge-gate scandal will put those brakes on if he ends up being convicted.

That punk Ted Cruz can't run as he's not a natural-born American... unless he somehow changes the law. I kind of hope he does. PLEASE America, don't vote for that idiot Canadian! :)

arock10 07-18-2014 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amputate Your Head (Post 20162360)
No, the sad part is clinging to the belief that you can fix the clusterfuck we are in by voting in an entirely rigged system, with players paid off by the largest corporations in the world.

So what do you suggest?

Wizzo 07-18-2014 08:11 AM

Rand Paul has more common sense then anyone on either side of the aisle, because he's not a true republican but a libertarian and so sadly we will be stuck with the status quo.

Wizzo 07-18-2014 08:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Axeman (Post 20162402)
I agree. The vast majority of the things the Federal gov't does, shouldn't be remotely dealt with at that level. Almost all of it should be done at the local and State levels. Federal should be minimal, and do very little. IMO anyways.

Rand Paul agrees with you. :winkwink:

dyna mo 07-18-2014 08:40 AM

OTR: repubs win the wh in 2016.

It's a lock, peeps.

MrBottomTooth 07-18-2014 08:43 AM

The sad thing is if Jeb Bush ran he would probably do the best out of them all.

2MuchMark 07-18-2014 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 20162776)
The sad thing is if Jeb Bush ran he would probably do the best out of them all.

I keep forgetting about him... but yes he might be able to win the nomination and probably give Hillary a run for her money. I think though that no one, not even republicans, are ready for another Bush in the white house.

I was thinking - it must be damn impossible to be a republican now. You have to lean so far to the right to get the tea-party vote, but that far to the right is "crazy" even for republicans. I don't think republicans can win without the tea party vote.

Oh well.

*snicker*

geeknik 07-18-2014 08:49 AM

Repbulicans are Democrats are Republicans are Democrats.

Once you realize that you'll be a better person.

SmutHammer 07-18-2014 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrBottomTooth (Post 20162776)
The sad thing is if Jeb Bush ran he would probably do the best out of them all.

I agree, it's to bad the media and people on Obama's nuts blame everything on Bush and trashed his name.

The only thing I know about Rand Paul is a statement he made "Porn?, Not In My State!"

I still believe Romney would have been the best thing for our Country, It's to bad Media killed his chances, That and the birth control stuff etc.

Choopa_Pardo 07-18-2014 09:10 AM

Face it we are living in an oligarchy. Democracy is an illusion.

arock10 07-18-2014 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Choopa_Pardo (Post 20162825)
Face it we are living in an oligarchy. Democracy is an illusion.

That's what happens when everyone wants freedom at any price

mineistaken 07-18-2014 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20162786)
I keep forgetting about him... but yes he might be able to win the nomination and probably give Hillary a run for her money. I think though that no one, not even republicans, are ready for another Bush in the white house.

I was thinking - it must be damn impossible to be a republican now. You have to lean so far to the right to get the tea-party vote, but that far to the right is "crazy" even for republicans. I don't think republicans can win without the tea party vote.

Oh well.

*snicker*

So tea party would vote for democrat candidate?

Robbie 07-18-2014 01:12 PM

When did the "Tea Party" become the religious nut side of the Republican Party? Did I miss something?

It thought T.E.A. stood for "Taxed Enough Already" and is all about smaller govt. and less taxes.

Maybe some religious nuts have infiltrated it...but the TEA Party has nothing to do with being "far right". I suppose that is how they are labeled by the media?

If you want a smaller govt., less taxes, and more personal freedom...you are "extreme right" these days? Hell, that used to be hippy-level LEFT back in the 1960's and 1970's before the new fake liberals took over and convinced everyone to bow down to the Federal govt. instead of protesting AGAINST it (like REAL libs did back in the day).

Barry-xlovecam 07-18-2014 03:50 PM

They are "hopeful" that witch Hillary will be the Democrat nominee. If she is, the Republicans can run Bozo for the win.

crockett 07-18-2014 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bronco67 (Post 20162395)
The only one I can side with on some issues is Rand Paul, but he's as kooky as the rest of them and will definitely have many, many gaffes during the election cycle. He can't help but put his foot in his mouth.

Rand Paul is just like his dad.. He talks for a few mins and sounds ok, but any longer and the fruit loops just spill everywhere..

Actually what is scary is the Jeb Bush is the most sane out of the bunch. I never really had any problems with him as the FL governor, but I'd be damned if I wanted another Bush in the WH.. LoL

crockett 07-18-2014 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20162401)
For a govt. that has been at a "grinding halt"...it still managed to change the entire "health care" system and turn it into a giant gift to insurance companies. And it also managed to find time to kill thousands of more people around the world with bombing and drone strikes.

I'd love to see the federal govt. actually come to a "grinding halt" sometimes. But it just keeps getting bigger and more powerful every day.

But they've got the majority of people believing that "nothing is getting done".

Newsflash: The govt. isn't supposed to be "doing" stuff constantly the way it does these days and spending money that it doesn't have and running the debt to 17 trillion dollars.

That's the way I see it anyway.
For an entity that has been brought to a "grinding halt", it still managed to spend more money than at any time in history. :(

EDIT: I left out the massive spying that our govt. is doing on it's own citizens. "Grinding halt"? I wish.

To be fair the health care system was put in place during the first two years. That's when Obama was able to get things done. After Republicans won the house everything then came to a grinding halt.

crockett 07-18-2014 04:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard (Post 20162410)
I can honestly say I do not know most of them. I might know who they are and what state they are from, but that's it. Chris Christie is the only one I know of but I'm not sure if he cold pull it off.

I believe that the Republicans would have been beat no matter who ran against them; All the Democrat needed was a "warm body without drama" which is exactly what they got. The entire country was pissed about the economy, and while we can't really put blame on the Republican party there was a Republican in the White House when it all went down. McCain wasn't it - he is an "old white dude with lots of money", and Romney wasn't the solution but just "more of the problem" - a white guy who uses other people's money to buy stuff and profit off of while he ran it into the ground which is exactly what the banks were doing...

Other than Hilary I have no idea who the Democratic party will be putting up. It sure will be fun to watch.

I always wished Senator Bill Nelson would run. He's from my home town and my parents went to school with him, he's one of the few politicians that actually does a good job. You never see him mixed up in shady shit.

Robbie 07-18-2014 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20163268)
I always wished Senator Bill Nelson would run. He's from my home town and my parents went to school with him, he's one of the few politicians that actually does a good job. You never see him mixed up in shady shit.

This is the same things that polls show across the U.S.

Congress has super LOW ratings. But when you ask people about THEIR Rep. or Senator...they give them high rankings. :(
Funny how that works with human nature.


They all need to go.

MaDalton 07-18-2014 04:23 PM

no sane candidate will make it through the primaries...

crockett 07-18-2014 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20163276)
This is the same things that polls show across the U.S.

Congress has super LOW ratings. But when you ask people about THEIR Rep. or Senator...they give them high rankings. :(
Funny how that works with human nature.


They all need to go.

Na it's really not. Yes there is a personal connection of being a local senator, but he really has done a good job. He's not one of these guys trying to make headlines. He just does his job.

Robbie 07-18-2014 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20163282)
Na it's really not. Yes there is a personal connection of being a local senator, but he really has done a good job. He's not one of these guys trying to make headlines. He just does his job.

Crockett Science. :)

crockett 07-18-2014 05:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20163316)
Crockett Science. :)

Can't argue with the truth. Bill Nelson has been a congressman since 1979 and before that he was in the state house of reps. Meanwhile John McCain has been in office since only 1983.. However you don't see Nelson running his mouth of TV self promoting himself like McCain does in fact most probably don't know who he is..

That's because he is one of the few that actually does his job rather than focuses on trying to make a big spectacle of himself.

MK Ultra 07-18-2014 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20163276)
This is the same things that polls show across the U.S.

Congress has super LOW ratings. But when you ask people about THEIR Rep. or Senator...they give them high rankings. :(
Funny how that works with human nature.


They all need to go.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20163276)
They all need to go.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20163276)
They all need to go.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20163276)
They all need to go.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20163276)
They all need to go.

http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41KWE1JAt8L.jpg

:2 cents:

Robbie 07-18-2014 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20163330)
Can't argue with the truth. Bill Nelson has been a congressman since 1979 and before that he was in the state house of reps.

In other words...a lifetime/career bureaucrat.

You are proving my point. This guy has been involved in govt. for 40 years. He is one of the people who put us in the situation we are in . And yet...since he's YOUR guy, he's cool. It's the politicians from other people's districts that suck.

This is what I'm talking about.
What you're saying isn't uncommon Crockett. Matter of fact it's human nature. And every politician knows this shit inside and out.

It's how they spend their whole lives living off of the taxpayer teat instead of getting real jobs and living in the real world.

2MuchMark 07-18-2014 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20163092)
When did the "Tea Party" become the religious nut side of the Republican Party? Did I miss something?

It thought T.E.A. stood for "Taxed Enough Already" and is all about smaller govt. and less taxes.

Maybe some religious nuts have infiltrated it...but the TEA Party has nothing to do with being "far right". I suppose that is how they are labeled by the media?

If you want a smaller govt., less taxes, and more personal freedom...you are "extreme right" these days? Hell, that used to be hippy-level LEFT back in the 1960's and 1970's before the new fake liberals took over and convinced everyone to bow down to the Federal govt. instead of protesting AGAINST it (like REAL libs did back in the day).

Let's see.

I would describe Ronald Reagan as a Republican.
Chris Christie as Republic too.
Rick Perry as Right-leaning republican.
Ted Cruz, Michelle Bachman and Sarah Palin as Farrrrr right wing.

Would you agree?

Robbie 07-18-2014 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ********** (Post 20163494)
Let's see.

I would describe Ronald Reagan as a Republican.
Chris Christie as Republic too.
Rick Perry as Right-leaning republican.
Ted Cruz, Michelle Bachman and Sarah Palin as Farrrrr right wing.

Would you agree?

I would describe Bachman and Palin as religious nutcases who came out and "supported" the tea party hoping to get votes from them.

Cruz is probably closer to what the Tea Party is about I would think.

Out of Reagan, Christie, and Perry....Perry is not a Republican in the traditional sense. He's another one of the guys who "prays" for answers :(

The Republican party that was in existence for over a century (the real one) is the party of Lincoln. The party that was for fiscal responsibility. The party that was for less govt.

In other words...it doesn't exist anymore.

So to try and say this bureaucrat or that bureaucrat is a "real" Republican or a "far right" or "extreme" is pretty much pointless.
They are ALL nothing but lifetime/career bureaucrat's who will be ANYTHING to get your vote.

If the people in a certain area decided to start giving blood sacrifices to "God" again...they'd jump on board if they thought it would get them elected. :(

crockett 07-19-2014 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robbie (Post 20163456)
In other words...a lifetime/career bureaucrat.

You are proving my point. This guy has been involved in govt. for 40 years. He is one of the people who put us in the situation we are in . And yet...since he's YOUR guy, he's cool. It's the politicians from other people's districts that suck.

This is what I'm talking about.
What you're saying isn't uncommon Crockett. Matter of fact it's human nature. And every politician knows this shit inside and out.

It's how they spend their whole lives living off of the taxpayer teat instead of getting real jobs and living in the real world.

I suppose we should just randomly elect aircraft pilots to fly airliners from now on. I mean hey who needs experienced people when any John Doe can do the job just fine..

Robbie 07-19-2014 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20163824)
I suppose we should just randomly elect aircraft pilots to fly airliners from now on. I mean hey who needs experienced people when any John Doe can do the job just fine..

A pilot has to be trained to fly an aircraft. It's a SKILL.

Representing the voters of the area where you live and giving them a voice in the govt. is something that we ALL can and should do. Not just a small group of lawyers who have never done anything else in their lives. You don't need training to be able to cast a vote on behalf of your constituents.

Why on Earth do you think that Bill Nelson or John McCain have some special magical abilities when it comes to representing their state in Congress?

Your analogy is pure "crockett science". Do you REALLY think Ted Cruz or Nancy Pelosi are somehow smarter than you are and that you couldn't do their jobs?

They are nothing but career/lifetime bureaucrats with very little "real world" experience. They live and work in Washington D.C. and get paid by the tax payer.

I'm not impressed. Nor should you be.

Magnetron 07-19-2014 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crockett (Post 20162355)
No shows will be...


Jeb Bush

Scott Walker

Paul Ryan

Marco Rubio

Walker is definitely out.

His re-election ads are backfiring to the point that they are making the local news.

The cost of personal security for him and his family is also raising eyebrows.

And now he's playing politics by calling for a repeal of Common Core without offering any plan to replace it.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123