Obamacare deemed illegal by Federal Appeals
 

Another blow, and they will keep coming.

http://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/10125254D91F8BAC85257D1D004E6176/$file/14-5018-1503850.pdf

Not going to read all of that...

..but if you guys lose Obamacare and can't replace it with something better because Boehner buddies want their way, it will be a really sad day for you guys.

Yet Romneycare is still alive and well.

Mark, we didn't have "Obamacare" before (and it still hasn't been fully implemented because the Pres. keeps unilaterally changing the law to suit the political climate).

Guess what? It wasn't a "sad day" for us.

The govt. and the media went on a full out blitz in 2009 to convince us that unless we got "Obamacare" that our prices would continue to rise and that it was hurting the economy unless prices went down.

So we got it.

Prices still went up. Even faster.

So let's see...for over 200 years we did just fine WITHOUT ObamaCare.
But now...with the tiny bit of it that has been implemented...you think it's a catastrophe if it goes away?

Let's take a quick look at the FACTS:
In 2008 14.6 % of the U.S. population was uninsured.
In 2009 that jumped to 16.1%
2010 it went up to 16.4%
By 2012 with ObamaCare it was all the way up to 17.5%
By mid-2013 it went up AGAIN to 18%
In the first quarter of this year 2014 it finally eased back to "only" 15.6%

So before ObamaCare it was 14.6% and prices were lower.
Now it's 15.6% and prices are higher.

Is there NOTHING that gets through to you that it's not a good plan?

http://content.gallup.com/origin/gal...pozvdid6gw.png

This will eventually end up at the Supreme Court, but I don't think they will rule any differently than the Federal Appeals. The law as written is very black and white.

2 things about this.

The ruling by the DC Court of Appeals was a 2-1 ruling with the 2 judges being republicans.

And also today the 4th Circuit of Appeals ruled unanimously in favor of the law. So apparently it is not black and white.

Yea this sucks. 87% of people get subsidies. So basically the law will still be in effect just everyone using a federal exchange will get screwed. Well except for the people who make too much.

Going to go from a great deal for a lot of people (except gfy republicans) to forced full price insurance

http://i.imgur.com/HWIDeTU.gif

cannot begin to tell you how nice it is to see this connection

Nothing changes for now. It will have to be decided by the Supreme Court.

What's your definition of "just fine"? Maybe you did just fine, but there's a lot of people who didn't. That's the problem with you conservatives....you look at everything through the prism of "whatever affects me".

Oh I realize this, just saying IF. I read three more cases with the same arguments are going through the courts now too

Yeah exactly

I'm not a "conservative"...unless conservatives are suddenly pro-choice, anti-'drug war', anti-war, and are all swingers. lol

As for "just fine"...yeah, up until the early 1990's most people could actually afford to go to the doctor and even have hospital stays and pay out of pocket (the way you are supposed to). No insurance needed.

That's the problem with you "guys who label others" people...you don't look at what happened.
The govt. got involved in "health care" with HMO's back in the 1980's. Once that happened...the gravy train was ON!
Now the hospitals charge people $20 for a tylenol and $50 for the paper dixie cup to drink water to swallow it with.

THAT is what needs to be addressed.

And AGAIN....the fucking facts speak for themselves.

How in the fuck can you see prices are higher and less people are insured and think that is "good"?

The sheer insanity of that is outrageous.

Did you not look at the facts and figures? What the fuck????

Even when reality slaps you guys in the face you STILL slavishly defend something that is not working.

Jesus quit drinking the I hate Obama koolaide, you aren't even rational..yes Obamacare had a ruff roll out, but it's working now and 99% of these changes you blame Obama for are because of things the right did.

no, it's not working. There is no "koolaid" in what I am saying.

There are now LESS people insured and insurance costs more. Fuck...what does it take to get you guys to open your eyes?

Talk about drinking kool-aid...

Wow. I don't know what to say. I show you stats that show less people insured. The costs are now higher (not less like the Pres. promised).

And you say I am not rational.

Wow.

Bullshit :2 cents:

Let's hope they get the Obamacare scam banned once and for all

a graph with no links to figure out how this poll was done isn't being 'slapped in the face with reality'

It's GALLUP in case you didn't look closely.

Why don't YOU google up "how many people uninsured in the U.S" and see for yourself since you are jumping on the "Crockett Science" bandwagon.

Or else stay out of the conversation if you are going to be foolish. Crockett and Mark Prince already have "foolish" covered here. lol

Yea let's go back to being uninsured, going bankrupt and dying instead. That plan worked much better

LOL, you're funny, make the conservatives pay more so the liberals can pay less, is that what you are trying to say?

You being a liberal, you're saying fuck the conservatives so I can get cheaper insurance, right? What a hypocrite!

End result, the numbers say it's not working as advertised or promised.

There needs to be a pot with all the money in, no insurance companies eating into that, this should not be about profit :2 cents:

Actually, as I understand it, those who currently qualify for subsidy's will not be required to purchase health insurance should this ruling stand. It's the same principle which already applies to those who qualify for medicaid under ACA, but live in states that have opted out of such.

Bottom line: millions more without health insurance and lots of new job openings for casket makers, morticians and gravediggers.

no, i didn't. i saw some image with no link information on how the study is done, while you were typing in capitals about reality.

tell me, robbie, is one gallup poll with no further information 'reality' for you

arock10, we have less people insured NOW than we did before ObamaCare. And insurance rates have risen even faster, not dropped as the Pres. promised in his pitch to try and "sell" it to the American people.

No Richard, the most prestigious polling company in the world is just total bullshit. You're right. What was I thinking? I'll just be like you and stick to "Crockett Science" :disgust

One thing is for sure...The Supreme Court has already ruled that ObamaCare is a "TAX". And that Congress has the constitutional right to levy taxes.

So I don't see how some other court can override that decision. ObamaCare is here to stay until a new Pres. and Congress nullify it.

who owns that most prestigious polling company in the world, may i ask?

democratic? republican? if this does get shifted to being entirely to the benefit of corporations in the states.. would Gallup, the "robbie proclaimed most prestigious polling company in the world', have any connections to the windfall that would occur?

now, sir, we're talking reality.

Richard, you're looking like a fool if you are questioning the Gallup Poll. It's THE poll that is accepted by all parties as the most reliable.
Instead of hijacking this thread with stupidity...just please use Google for yourself.

It's real easy. I know you can do it man! lol

ill take your word for it.

Come on! Google it for yourself. It's easy.

yea, i didn't

In July 2013, the United States Department of Justice announced that Gallup had agreed to pay $10.5 million to settle allegations that it violated the False Claims Act and the Procurement Integrity Act for conduct involving several of its federal government contracts and subcontracts

snort

Dude, if you really believe the Gallup Poll is fake...then I don't know what to say to you.

JUST GOOGLE UP HOW MANY PEOPLE IN THE US ARE UNINSURED FOR YOURSELF. Find as many stats as you want. They will all show you that more are uninsured now than before.

Jesus Fucking Christ.

i never said anything about it being fake. i stated that posting an image of a poll with out parameters and calling it reality.. isn't.

now, tell me how you managed to write out a full sentence in capital letters

im fucking impressed.

I don't know why you are being an asshole...but Gallup is known as THE polling company.

The fact you didn't even realize that says something to me about your knowledge of polling.

And again...google up that sentence that was in caps. it was in caps because if we were face to face I'd be screaming it at you in frustration. lol

i am not. i stated an opinion that the one poll image with no further information isn't being 'smacked in the face with' reality.

hope all is well with you.