Why do beaners hate Columbus Day so much?
 

Answer:

Spanish Mexicans are not flooding across the border. We are getting native american Mexicans and they are greatly offended by the American holiday of Columbus Day since "their ancestors were here first."

But do savage humanoids count? I don't think so. They were barely even human.

Says Neanderthal boy onehunglo/Matt26NaZi

It is plainly naive to hate on it. The history of human life on earth is of aggression and colonization.

he was not a good person. he did not discover america

Nitwit op doesn't even know Mexico also officially celebrates Columbus day as a national holiday.

Why does the Op hate america and love Russia and Nazis

It's really disgusting that anyone is OK with being racist. What am I even doing on this board? I came here for backlinks and business connections and got this garbage. Maybe time to stick to other GFY forum sections.

Russian troll farm troll in St. Petersburg Russia makes $778 USD a month working 60 hours a week in 12-16 hour rotating shifts.

Onwebcan aka matt26z aka OneHungLo

OP's sex doll

https://gfy.com/image.php?u=10396&dateline=1534403429

Then they win. :2 cents:

wasn't there another racist around here before that called hispanics beaners? and he was banned?

keep it up minority OP :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

Great video which Tyson tries to paint Columbus as a douche but I came away with the feeling that Columbus was pretty bad ass and just outsmarted some dumb savages.

You could always go back to posting on your other nick and drop this babe in the woods routine.

↑↑↑ matt26z aka Mineistaken aka Onwebcam aka OneHunglo aka ghjghj aka Drax aka tfto aka helix etc. etc.

Fake alt-right hate nic reply in 3.. 2.. 1..

Look at his posting history.

New nic ✔
Joined 2 months ago ✔
Posting in mainly Trump threads ✔
Possible Chinese bot ✔

This fits your fake nic criteria, correct?

I don't know what a "nic" is.

This forum is MOSTLY trump threads, and you mostly post in them also. By the same logic, couldn't anyone easily accuse you of being a foreign influencer? Also, if China is spending any resources posting on GFY, they're really wasting their money.

If you need confirmation that I'm actually an adult industry affiliate, you could send me an email via a contact link in one of the sites on my signature.

I think his name was ... wait for it...Beaner.

Yep, just a bunch of dumb savages that gave us our Republican form of government.

https://www.senate.gov/reference/res...hconres331.pdf

Yep, just a bunch of savages that were way ahead of Europeans in agriculture, both in products and methodology.

Food cultivated by Native Americans:
Corn, Popcorn, Wild rice, Bean (14 varieties), Squash, Pumpkins, Cranberries, Maple sugar and syrup, Potatoes (white and sweet), Pemmican, Tobacco, Tomatoes, Pineapples, Avocado, Tapioca (Manioc), Chocolate (Cacao), Peanuts, Vanilla

Do you know that there is no such thing as Wild Corn? Yep, those savages had developed Corn so long ago that there is no longer a truly known source of the original corn. There are educated guesses but no definitve source. The Incans in the BCs developed terraced farming, crop rotation and countour plowing - Stuff that White folks didn't get the idea of until after the dustbowl days of the 1930's.

They developed corn that could grow in almost any environment.

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/histo...ncas-70263217/
Inca Food | Discover Peru

Those "savage humanoids" developed products, many that are still in use today:

Canoe, Tobaggan, Snow shoes, Moccasins, Tipi, Kayak, Fringed buckskin jacket,, Coonskin caps, Mukluks, Lacrosse, Cradle boards (baby carriers), Tomahawk, Cigars, Pipe smoking, Cotton, Rubber, Quinine

https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/F...1p2_024206.pdf

Know why Pizarro could come in and conquer all those savage Incans so easily? Because he used their roads. He didn't have to cut through jungles and blaze trails, he just rode right up their roads. A system of roads that easily rivaled anything the Romans had done.

Same thing with Cortes' and those wildly savage Aztecs. He used their roads and causeways (yes, fucking causeways) to get to them. Again, he did not have to cut through jungles. He did not have to create an infrastructure. There was already one there for him to use.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inca_road_system

I am glad you did not say "dirty" savages because from most accounts those savages practiced better hygiene than most Europeans of the time.

https://www.encyclopediavirginia.org...al#start_entry


Yep, all those savages that were "barely human" and contributed absolutely nothing to the world.

Glad we got rid of them, aren't you?

:321GFY :321GFY :321GFY :321GFY :321GFY :321GFY :321GFY

(let's not talk about the cities that they built or their religions, we can save that for another time.)

Oh, I almost forgot, you piece of shit, fucking assholes that do not deserve to breath the same air as those "savages". Get your asses back over to stormfront or 4chan or whatever other piece of shit place you originated from.

:321GFY :321GFY :321GFY :321GFY :321GFY :321GFY :321GFY
:321GFY :321GFY :321GFY :321GFY :321GFY :321GFY :321GFY

.

:1orglaugh is that who I'm thinking of?

OMG what would we do without coonskin caps and...corn!!!!!

Dude don't act like indians were peaceful they were savages and did nothing but rape and pillage other indian tribes. Always trying to outdo each other. See the problem was they thought they could pull that shit with whitey and learned real quick whitey wasn't a pushover. Check the Pequot War for example. 700 indians slaughtered by whitey in one fell swoop.

This whole post gave me life. Anyone who claims the Native Americans encountered by the Europeans were savages has zero understanding of history. And is also a racist piece of garbage.

Are you denying the natives attacked the settlers? They did numerous times on record in New England and they did so until whitey taught them a valuable lesson.

Well corn is the largest U.S. crop today, accounting for 96 million acres of farmland, so we might have serious problems without corn.

There are plenty of massacres and atrocities committed by white people. Humans have a great capacity for violence - of course it's not racial.

you call it corn, we call it maize

Of course, you self hating whites never let us forget.

I am white, but I don't hate myself or white people in general just because SOME white people have done terrible things. I assume (if you are white) that you're in the same position.

So why would the same logic not apply to people of a different race? Why hate an entire group of people because some engaged in the same behavior?

I don't hate Native Americans. The settlers referred to many of them as savages. The Natives attacked them on numerous occasions. Their behavior earned that nickname.

What a beautiful woman

Surely you can see why its racist to refer to an entire ethnic group as "savages" like you did here? And to say incorrectly that they did nothing but "rape and pillage" each other?

I really don't have the time to explain the entirety of European atrocities committed against Native Americans, or the achievements of their cultures. If you actually want to educate yourself on this subject, check out this book - 1491. It's a collection of what the historical record and archeological evidence tells us about the indigenous cultures of the Americas. And that way you don't have to take my word for it - you can read the facts as experts in archeology and history know them.

While coonskin caps have gone out of style, they were an important clothing item on the frontier.

Corn is a staple of the World's food supply. Without the "savages" we would have neither corn or potatoes, 2 of the most important items in the world's food supply.


As if the Europeans were peaceful? What world do you live in that you equate civilized (nonsavage) with peaceful. The Europeans have spent quite a lot of time and effort trying to wipe each other out, but you expect all the Indians to be peaceful?

The Pequot war was essentially a trade war, it was not a random attack by Indians against Europeans and it was not started by the Indians.

Yeah, I am sooooooo fucking surprised that Europeans, using Muskets with gun powder and lead balls, along with steel swords, could manage to win a war against tomahawks and bows and arrows.

So in your version, whoever is mightier is more civilized.

Got ya. You have made your most excellent point. Now go back where you came from and quit polluting this place.

:321GFY :321GFY :321GFY :321GFY :321GFY

.

They originally welcomed Europeans from most accounts.

If some folk showed up at your door and decided to declare what is yours is now theirs you wouldn't fight? What are you, a fucking snowflake?

.

How it it self hating to be aware of the honest history instead of white washing it in your favor?

You practice self delusion when you ignore what your ancestors did and only remember what other people did. That is basically a mental illness you have there.

.

More self delusion and mis-representation of what actually happened.

You are just as much a fucking liar as the people you are so frequently admiring. I used to think that you (in particular) were just trolling and knew better on some of the stuff you spewed. I thought I had seen glimpses of actual intelligence from you every now and then.

I was wrong.

.

I don’t think you’re familiar with Indian history here in New England circa 1600s. Indians were constantly battling other tribes and while doing so committing awful atrocities always trying to outdo each other to send a message of dominance over rival tribes. The settlers inNew England did not attack any natives till after the natives attacked the settlers on NUMEROUS occasions. Imho they were called savages by the English for good reason.

I am quite familiar with New England Native American History. You exagerate the hell out of the "savagery" of the Native people. I grew up on Long Island and study of the Indians of New York and the New England area was part of our curriculum. So, I got the type of propaganda that you spew and also later studied the actual facts.

The wars between Indians and Settlers in New England were largely political wars such as the King Phillip war which by English and colonist views was started by King Phillips attack on Swansee. But if you examine the actual history it was precipitated by the English pressuring the Native American's to give up more land. Then the English tried and executed several Wampanoag and King Phillip said fuck you and attacked Swansee.

Almost all hostilities in the New England colonies were in response to trade conflict and the Europeans encroaching on the indian's lands.

Again, if someone showed up at your door and tried to take what is yours, would you fight them or are you just a fucking snowflake?

That does not make them savage, it makes them human.

The same things that you would applaud a white man for doing you will condemn another race for doing. Straight out bigotry and self delusion thinking that you are somehow better than someone else when you would do the same exact thing.

.

Here is how "savage" the people Columbus encountered were.

In Columbus's own words:

Yep, they sure sound like some nasty mother fuckers, don't they?

By the way, he returned their favors by kidnapping about 25 or 30 of them, of which only 8 survived.


.

According to onehunglo/Matt26naZi natives having a problem with foreigners invading their land are savages. So by his own definition and logic he's a savage losing his mind all the time about Mexicans.

:1orglaugh



https://i.imgflip.com/1u1r8n.jpg

and during this same period in europe, whitey did the exact same thing...slaughtering left and right...it is amusing to see how white man defends the obvious theft of other peoples land and tries to point fingers "but but but they did exactly as we did but we are pretending we are better"

but now white man gets a little foreign element in his stolen country and he is like "Keep them out" :1orglaugh:1orglaugh:1orglaugh

ah the white hypocrisy is always good for a laugh...