![]() |
Seen Acacia's stock price today?
|
I knew all my fake posts about taking them to court would do some damge....
|
Since I posted, it's now down 8.89% :Graucho
|
If you refresh the page they drop....
|
It's dropped about 40% in the past month, 15% in the past week alone :Graucho
|
Quote:
jDoG |
the word is getting out and the stock is falling.
i've heard they have 60 new licensees from a mailing of 10,000 letters. i suspect that they might have 300 licensees by December 1. acacia investors are beginning to UNDERSTAND that 97% of defendants will be FIGHTING these bogus patent claims. defendants like Stanford University and Harvard Law School. and something interesting about Judge Ware in California. for those of you that think acacia has an easy slam-dunk with this judge think again. "(Ware) also nixed Acacia's threatened motions for preliminary injunction," the message continued. "While Acacia has been threatening these motions for months as part of its effort to scare companies into paying up, it has not filed and has admitted that it does not have enough information to make such a motion. Reasoning that he would need to fully understand the case and the applicable defenses before he could even consider such extraordinary relief, (Ware) indicated that he would not even permit such a motion until after the conclusion of claim construction." Ware also reportedly asked Acacia attorneys if "all the parties it planned to sue were before the court," the message said. "The attorneys responded that they were not and that they had placed additional companies on notice. When Acacia told (Ware) that they had sent out thousands of cease and desist letters, (Ware) seemed very surprised." acacia's clumsy tactic of sending thousands of letters out to webmasters, many of whom do not even have video will backfire and be seen as what it is---an extortion attempt. IMO acacia will NOT receive preliminary injunctions against ANY website business before April 2004 regardless of the merit of the acacia case. which means IF you are sued RESPOND TO THE LAWSUIT. see them in court. |
Plummetting
|
not that I like them, but... you might wanna check out their 6m "value"
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=ACTG&t=6m |
nice trend - just goes to show that list spamming doesnt work.
Now if we could sort out this teleteria mess.. we'd all be happy campers |
Quote:
true, but the turnabout (down) really started happening when acacia made the insane move of noticing colleges and universities---who are now BANDING TOGETHER and refusing to license. in fact, the turndown started just about the time Stanford University got noticed. Stanford University is in Palo Alto, California, in the world-famous silicon valley. More engineers from Stanford built and designed the internet and information technology than any other place. word on the street is that Stanford and other large colleges and Universities WILL NOT BE SETTLING with acacia. there's a reason Stanford will not settle with acacia. there's a reason Harvard Law School will not settle with acacia. when the best and the brightest do not settle with acacia it means something. listen to Berman speak on the internet radio broadcast. he is not a techie, he is a lawyer salesman. he couldn't even explain adequately what the acacia patents cover, lots of double talk about double dipping, etc. these acacia guys are clumsy, and the geeks will eat them for lunch. watch it happen. |
I don't doubt this, not even for a second
|
It's now in the discovery stage, I wonder if we will find out who signed and about their search for Prior Art?
I think I found a guy that signed and does not have the ballst to say so. 12clicks Just says he let his lawyers make the decision. Like if he did not he would be saying that. Very interesting thread over on his board Tuna Fish Bitch. |
:1orglaugh
|
fuck them, I hope they burn in hell
|
Quote:
Well said. Fuck acacia & fuck berman...:ak47: |
It's a temp phase. It will go back up. Damn fuckers.
|
:glugglug bump
|
getting more & more interesting...
|
Sell quick!!
|
Quote:
no stupid fuck :321GFY i have bought the shares for 5.90 per share so GFY |
Quote:
:321GFY |
Quote:
damn, i should have sold them at 8.00 :321GFY |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
so you bought too?:( |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
down trend :Graucho
|
Quote:
I was also suprised that 12clicks kept dodging the question over whether he had signed with acacia or not. I know everyone has their reasons for signing/not signing but the least you can do is be upfront about whether you did or did not. |
Quote:
I am, however, happy to read the posts here by Latinasojourn. Here's hoping this is the beginning of a long down-turn for Acacia, hopefully it is soon to be the last we'll see of their extortion tactics. But I hazard a guess that they aren't going to go away without a long fight, there is still much to do. More webmasters need to donate! |
Quote:
|
That's something I like to hear when I wake up :)
|
I bought 10k shares at 1.58 way before the virus spread, and sold all 10k for 7 and change. Hate me all you want, but it's my cash for my defense fund should it arise. Also used some of the cash to buy a new Lincoln Towncar. Anyone buying now is fucked. Take that to the bank. I bought purely on speculation that it may hold up. I was right and wrong in the same sense. I was right in makin a ton of cash and wrong that it wil hold up, cause it wont:321GFY
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Paul Markham on the other hand, has reacted by basically accusing 12clicks of signing with Acacia.... something of which there is no basis in fact whatsoever I might add. It is certainly the right of anyone to ASK if a sponsor has signed with Acacia. However, no sponsor is compelled to answer that question, to you or anyone. If you don't get an answer, do you go off and assume the worst? Sorry, some people in ANY industry will tell you that what their company chooses to do or not do is, to put it bluntly.... none of your fucking business. Period. Having said all that, I will point out right here and now that for myself, I must admit that my level of respect will be greatly reduced towards those sponsors and companies that do cave in and sign. I don't like it, but if we're being honest here..... I haveto say that that is true in my case, especially those sponsors and companies that have disclosed private information regarding their affiliates. When it all comes out, and in the end it will.... there will be some companies no doubt that find their loyal webmasters leaving their sorry excuse for a company in droves. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Maybe you forgot to read the title of his thread... calling me a 'jackass'. And of course his other posts on GFY calling me an 'assclown', etc. and basically trying at every opportunity to discredit me. Public scrutiny is fine, i always respond with the truth. He deleted all my posts so I couldn't defend myself...real nice.. .,. in every thread that he has popped into make his comments, about my credibility, my intentions.. i have held my ground. His first posting against me was four months ago, calling me the "board hero of the month"...guess what....it's four months later, and i still pound away at the boards, helping webmasters and providing information....and i STILL have received no compe\nsation from anyone... it's my own money and time that I have spent. 12clicks doesn't support the IMPA..and has clearly made the business decision to sign.. which is his choice.. but he decided to try and "expose" me from the beginning....and so in usual typical hypocritical fashion for those that operate with arrogance, Paul Markam allowed him to expose himself. Looks great that he runs the IMPA banner on the site.. but that's because of people like you and Chowadog support IMPA. If you don't believe my approach is the way, that's fine.. but being libel and name calling completely reduces his own integrity.......... if you also don't think IMPA is the way either.... makes you wonder who side one is on. Notice how i don't run the pledge drive? Lots of webmasters supported my idea, but not enough.... so i took it down. When the next patent case comes through, people like 12clicks and hustler will just settle...leaving the rest of the webmasters to fend for themselves. I hope the webmasters rally behind IMPA...so far they haven't, because apathy doesn't protect you.... it doesn't care :Graucho Fight the Libel! |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:59 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123