GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Should Rich be banned? (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=317038)

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 03:26 AM

Should Rich be banned?
 
Do you think a webmaster like Rich should be banned for turning in webmasters to the Dept of Justice on the grounds of obscenity because he disagrees with their political views?

http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...pagen umber=2

StuartD 06-24-2004 03:27 AM

no

Internet God 06-24-2004 03:29 AM

No

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 03:29 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan
no
I disagree.

StuartD 06-24-2004 03:30 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
I disagree.
OH! in that case, I'll change my mind. http://www.sponsorslist.com/smilies/rolleyes.gif

Internet God 06-24-2004 03:31 AM

Maybe we should ban people like Colin who support Bush since the Bush administration is so against porn.

I vote to BAN COLIN!

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 03:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Internet God
Maybe we should ban people like Colin who support Bush since the Bush administration is so against porn.

I vote to BAN COLIN!

If you follow the threads I post in you'll see that I am voting for Kerry

Internet God 06-24-2004 03:35 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
If you follow the threads I post in you'll see that I am voting for Kerry
Ah, then I'll shut up now.

:1orglaugh

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 03:37 AM

There are many political discussions here.
People who make their living from porn should be free to post their views without feeling that someone is willing to threaten their livelihood. It's a form of forced censorship of the worst kind.

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Internet God
Ah, then I'll shut up now.

:1orglaugh

Nahh, don't. I am interested in why you think what you do. Maybe I am wrong.

StuartD 06-24-2004 03:39 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
There are many political discussions here.
People who make their living from porn should be free to post their views without feeling that someone is willing to threaten their livelihood. It's a form of forced censorship of the worst kind.

Uhm... yeah, but if we were sitting at a bar talking politics, and someone said somthing and he got up and called the Dept of Justice on the guy, I don't think the bar would kick him out and never let him back in again.

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 03:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan
Uhm... yeah, but if we were sitting at a bar talking politics, and someone said somthing and he got up and called the Dept of Justice on the guy, I don't think the bar would kick him out and never let him back in again.
That's because a bar is not a place for people in the adult industry to meet - business owners who expect their livelihood to be improved by their meeting here and not hurt by it.

StuartD 06-24-2004 03:46 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
That's because a bar is not a place for people in the adult industry to meet - business owners who expect their livelihood to be improved by their meeting here and not hurt by it.
I challenge you to find a business owner who expects to have their livelihood improved here and not hurt by it.

And if you've ever been to a convention, then you know that a bar is just as likely a place for adult webmasters to do business as GFY is. :winkwink:

Buff 06-24-2004 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
That's because a bar is not a place for people in the adult industry to meet - business owners who expect their livelihood to be improved by their meeting here and not hurt by it.
Colin, again, why are you trying to teach this special needs class? Obviously Rich is a hypocrite in addition to being a complete retard. He opposes the tyrrany of Bush-Hitler but then narcs on people to the Bush-Hitler regime.

If Rich were any stupider, he'd be "Internet God."

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 03:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan
I challenge you to find a business owner who expects to have their livelihood improved here and not hurt by it.

And if you've ever been to a convention, then you know that a bar is just as likely a place for adult webmasters to do business as GFY is. :winkwink:

Why would someone "hang out" here if they expected to make less money as a result?

As far as conventions, I've been in the business since 1996. I've been to nearly every major convention since the Orlando conference in 1997. I expect my livelihood to be improved by GFY and not hurt by it. It has been. Much business comes from this board.

StuartD 06-24-2004 03:53 AM

I will be fair, I do know what you mean by the whole bar to GFY comparison... and to a point I agree... however...

this is a public forum. Sure, it's contained within a given industry, but it's still very much public. Just as much as a public place is... conversations as such are in any public venue should be completely free, under the rule of freedom of speech.

However, just as what you could say can be used against you in a park or a restaurant or a bar.... it can be here as well.

Freedom of speech is also freedom of foot in mouth.... which is also freedom to do what ever to the person who just made the speech.

If you ban him from GFY for doing this, then every other public place of conversation would have to do the same.

It has nothing to do with my opinions of anyone here or anywhere, even if it was me that someone called the DOJ on... I'd definitely hate that person, but I wouldn't expect the board to ban him.

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 03:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan

If you ban him from GFY for doing this, then every other public place of conversation would have to do the same.

I respect your opinion. I don't care what he posts at the evolution vs. creation board. This is an adult webmaster board for people in the industry.

Buff 06-24-2004 03:59 AM

By the way, in answer to your query, I vote "no" because

1. I hate boards that ban people -- that's fucking gay. It's easy enough to textually sodomize gerbil stuffers like Rich.

2. It's good to have morons like Rich around to share their Bush-Hitler conspiracy theories like "Berg was beheaded by Americans not by Al Qaeda." This keeps all the moderates in check, because as soon as they start getting a left-leaning idea, they realize Rich probably has the same opinion as they do and it dawns on them that they ought to rethink their positions.

3. It's always good to know what the fringe nut position is not only for the entertainment value, but also because eventually it will pop up in a Michael Moore movie and we will already have our refutations handy.

4. The devil you know... if Rich gets banned, an even less mentally sound fucktard like perhaps "Internet God" might take over his position as dipshit-in-chief and as unlikely as you might think, he could be even less coherent than his dementor.

In summation, absolutely do not ban the retard.

evl4fun 06-24-2004 04:18 AM

Not that my opinion counts for two shits and a duck.......but I'm with Buff, very valid points. :thumbsup
should he be banned-no should he be punched in the eye-probably should he be verbally aasualted-definatly:2 cents:

arial 06-24-2004 04:24 AM

Let the man speak his mind, nothing wrong with that. If he wants to make an idiot of himself then so be it. He's not hurting anyone except himself. :2 cents:

I gotta crash nite all.

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 04:31 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by arial
Let the man speak his mind, nothing wrong with that. If he wants to make an idiot of himself then so be it. He's not hurting anyone except himself. :2 cents:

I gotta crash nite all.

How about we make him wear an Ashc roft armband since he is his stooge?

Joe Citizen 06-24-2004 04:32 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
Do you think a webmaster like Rich should be banned for turning in webmasters to the Dept of Justice on the grounds of obscenity because he disagrees with their political views?

http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...pagen umber=2

Banning doesn't achieve anything Colin.

I've been banned twice. The funny thing is it's never been because of my political views.

I'd say more but I'm packing my bags. I'm going to the airport in the morning.

Don't have the time.

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 04:40 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Citizen
Banning doesn't achieve anything Colin.

I've been banned twice. The funny thing is it's never been because of my political views.

You must not have read the thread.

Rich's political views are fine. I'm saying people who are stooges for Ashhahahahaha and threatening to turn people into the DOJ for disagreeing with their political views have no business on an adult webmaster board.

Rich has become what he most despises, a collaborator of Mr. John A. If he were to really follow through it would mean that anyone who holds a certain viewpoint would then have to consider not posting on certain topics because of his threats. Even as only an empty threat, it is far less than amusing.

Joe Citizen 06-24-2004 04:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
You must not have read the thread.

Rich's political views are fine. I'm saying people who are stooges for Ashhahahahaha and threatening to turn people into the DOJ for disagreeing with their political views have no business on an adult webmaster board.

Rich has become what he most despises, a collaborator of Mr. John A.

People who support Ashhahahahaha and work in this industry are hypocrites.

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Citizen
People who support Ashhahahahaha and work in this industry are hypocrites.
No one said they supported Ashhahahahaha. Someone posted an opinion that "Bush will win easily." Rich made his usual off the deep end assumptions, put 2 and 2 together got 5 and then decided that he will threaten to turn them into the DOJ. Because he lacks the wit to argue the point he instead decides to threaten people. Probably in another drunken stupor.

Joe Citizen 06-24-2004 04:51 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
No one said they supported Ashhahahahaha. Someone posted an opinion that "Bush will win easily." Rich made his usual off the deep end assumptions, put 2 and 2 together got 5 and then decided that he will threaten to turn them into the DOJ. Because he lacks the wit to argue the point he instead decides to threaten people. Probably in another drunken stupor.
Okay, well it was probably an overreaction on his part.

Rich should smoke a bong and chill out.

That's what I'm doing.

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Joe Citizen
Okay, well it was probably an overreaction on his part.

Rich should smoke a bong and chill out.

That's what I'm doing.

When I challenged him on it, he stood by it.

Joe Citizen 06-24-2004 05:00 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Colin
When I challenged him on it, he stood by it.
Yeah he's probably just pissed off.

Theo 06-24-2004 05:02 AM

Banned no. A board is nothing more than a mean of communication, but I agree on what you said. If he reported a site, this action is no different than what he despites. That's what Rich should realise.

ADL Colin 06-24-2004 05:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Soul_Rebel
Banned no. A board is nothing more than a mean of communication, but I agree on what you said. If he reported a site, this action is no different than what he despites. That's what Rich should realise.
I think you're right, Soul Rebel.

Buff 06-24-2004 05:50 AM

Now Joe on the other hand... he should be banned, because he smells like shit.

Joe Citizen 06-24-2004 05:57 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Buff
Now Joe on the other hand... he should be banned, because he smells like shit.
Buff likes Star Wars
Buff cries when people at porn conventions smoke near his booth.

Buff = Gay

12clicks 06-24-2004 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan
I will be fair, I do know what you mean by the whole bar to GFY comparison... and to a point I agree... however...

this is a public forum. Sure, it's contained within a given industry, but it's still very much public. Just as much as a public place is... conversations as such are in any public venue should be completely free, under the rule of freedom of speech.

However, just as what you could say can be used against you in a park or a restaurant or a bar.... it can be here as well.

Freedom of speech is also freedom of foot in mouth.... which is also freedom to do what ever to the person who just made the speech.

If you ban him from GFY for doing this, then every other public place of conversation would have to do the same.

It has nothing to do with my opinions of anyone here or anywhere, even if it was me that someone called the DOJ on... I'd definitely hate that person, but I wouldn't expect the board to ban him.

you couldn't be more wrong.
If a surfer came in here and started threatening to file complaints, he'd be banned.
Bich is nothing more than a surfer pretending to be in this industry. Threatening someone else's business on a business board, should be grounds for banning.
While I enjoy this stooge's posts and enjoy watching him drown in his own hate and stupidity, this board is still about business and making the childish threats Bich made, should cause his ouster.

chodadog 06-24-2004 06:45 AM

Rich is childish. That really is fucking pathetic.

Shok 06-24-2004 06:46 AM

Rich has proved time and time again that he has a dynamite suit in his closet and is waiting for his orders.

StuartD 06-24-2004 10:04 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 12clicks
you couldn't be more wrong.
If a surfer came in here and started threatening to file complaints, he'd be banned.
Bich is nothing more than a surfer pretending to be in this industry. Threatening someone else's business on a business board, should be grounds for banning.
While I enjoy this stooge's posts and enjoy watching him drown in his own hate and stupidity, this board is still about business and making the childish threats Bich made, should cause his ouster.

The surfer would then be banned for being a surfer, not for his actions against someone practicing free speech.

If Rich truly is nothing but a surfer, then sure... ban him. If he did call the DOJ on account of what someone said, then no, don't ban him.

You said I was wrong and then gave a totally different reason for the banning. Shame on you, making yourself sound right by changing the topic completely again :winkwink:

Sly_RJ 06-24-2004 10:15 AM

Doesn't Rich run casino sites? I don't think he has any adult sites, I could be wrong.

12clicks 06-24-2004 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MaskedMan
The surfer would then be banned for being a surfer, not for his actions against someone practicing free speech.

If Rich truly is nothing but a surfer, then sure... ban him. If he did call the DOJ on account of what someone said, then no, don't ban him.

You said I was wrong and then gave a totally different reason for the banning. Shame on you, making yourself sound right by changing the topic completely again :winkwink:

sorry asshat. if he called the DOJ to complain about someone here (or even threatened to) he should be gone. There is no changing the topic, I just tried to elemetary school it for you so you'd understand.
(if you owned a business, you would understand the problem better. it has nothing to do with free speach)

sexxxychat69 06-24-2004 10:30 AM

No, it seems to me that people like Rich won't learn a dam thing until it up and bites them in the ass.

Holly 06-24-2004 10:34 AM

I'd say this is pretty much a non-issue. "I'm turning your site in to the DOJ" is right up there with:

"I'm seeing my lawyer about this tomorrow. Expect to see the papers in the mail soon."

"That's it motherfucker, I've had enough of your shit. I'm kicking your ass at Internext/Webmaster Access/Mardi Gras/the Winn Dixie parking lot."

"I'm shutting you down. When I'm through with you, you will NEVER do business in the adult industry again."

"Okay, listen up! A group of us are getting together and filing a class action lawsuit against (insert cheating sponsor here)."


If we're gonna start banning people for message board threats, it's going to get awfully lonely around here. :1orglaugh


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:49 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123