GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum (https://gfy.com/index.php)
-   Fucking Around & Business Discussion (https://gfy.com/forumdisplay.php?f=26)
-   -   Iran's uranium enrichment (https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=642446)

NoComments 08-09-2006 09:40 AM

Iran's uranium enrichment
 
what is the purpose of Iranian uranium enrichment?

Michael O 08-09-2006 09:45 AM

I take option 3.
Iran needs nuclear reactors for peaceful purposes and to threaten Israel and the Western World.

Amnesic 08-09-2006 09:47 AM

???? .....

BoyAlley 08-09-2006 09:49 AM

I don't believe for a second Iran wants uranium enrichment for peaceful purposes.....

ADL Colin 08-09-2006 10:11 AM

To deter invasions and thus preserve their sovereign rights. You know, the soverign right to train and arm terrorists.

NoComments 08-09-2006 10:29 AM

I won't comment 'til I see more votes.

NoComments 08-09-2006 12:31 PM

bump................

NoComments 08-09-2006 01:57 PM

well, the results are in and as I suspected, the ratio of MORONS to smart ones on GFY is 1:2,
what a relief, could have been MUCH worse!

Morons:
directfiesta, Godsmack, iggysick, Linguist, milambur, TheRedZone

iggysick 08-09-2006 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winetalk
well, the results are in and as I suspected, the ratio of MORONS to smart ones on GFY is 1:2,
what a relief, could have been MUCH worse!

Morons:
directfiesta, Godsmack, iggysick, Linguist, milambur, TheRedZone

Phatetic idiot.

Mr. Soul 08-09-2006 02:59 PM

lmfao, you are pathetic. No third option? At least try to not make yourself sound stupid.

How about

3) they want nukes to insure that the United States and/or Israel will not attack their country, which they have repeatedly threatened to do.

It worked for North Korea. Giving them up didn't work so well for Iraq.

shahab6 08-09-2006 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Soul
lmfao, you are pathetic. No third option? At least try to not make yourself sound stupid.

How about

3) they want nukes to insure that the United States and/or Israel will not attack their country, which they have repeatedly threatened to do.

It worked for North Korea. Giving them up didn't work so well for Iraq.

Very good point,

ronbotx 08-09-2006 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winetalk
well, the results are in and as I suspected, the ratio of MORONS to smart ones on GFY is 1:2,
what a relief, could have been MUCH worse!

Morons:
directfiesta, Godsmack, iggysick, Linguist, milambur, TheRedZone

Actually the terrorist cheerleader list is much longer:

Directfiesta, xxxdesign-net, Paul Waters( the three Canadian stooges)

and Webby, dig420, EviLSuperstaR, Mr. Soul, GoodGuy, PostWhore,GatorB, AdultMovies.bz, anarchy....

and of course the guy who constantly screams " baby killers" when referring to the Israeli side only, Smokey the Bear


I'm missing a few, I'm sure. Sad that the most naive, deluded, and uninformed make the most noise on this board.

elron 08-09-2006 05:28 PM

Saddam kept these iranians busy for 10 years with his war against them (best example for those who said israel brought the wars to that region) , now when he's gone they feel they are the new arab empire , add the extreme islamic goverment that sits there and then ask yourself if these peasants really need nuclear power for "peace" , when half of their civillians go to work riding donkeys , or these fucktards wants to threaten israel and the entire world with that ?

i think the answer is clear .

elron 08-09-2006 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Soul
3) they want nukes to insure that the United States and/or Israel will not attack their country, which they have repeatedly threatened to do.

It worked for North Korea. Giving them up didn't work so well for Iraq.

their leader keep saying day and night that israel should be wiped of the planet , to make a genocide in its 7 million residents and fucktards you like keep saying it's to insure , what a pathetic piece of shit , keep supporting every dictator that is left on the planet , too bad hitler is gone or else you would say he's your role model

NoComments 08-09-2006 05:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iggysick
Phatetic idiot.

getting it from sick czech who was fathered by a drunk russian soldier is a compliment.

NoComments 08-09-2006 05:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Soul
lmfao, you are pathetic. No third option? At least try to not make yourself sound stupid.

How about

3) they want nukes to insure that the United States and/or Israel will not attack their country, which they have repeatedly threatened to do.

It worked for North Korea. Giving them up didn't work so well for Iraq.


hmmmm......USA and Israel DO beleive in pre-emptive strikes.
wait a second, are you a MORON picking fights with 12 clicks???

Fuck off, ameoba.

NoComments 08-09-2006 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ronbotx
Actually the terrorist cheerleader list is much longer:

Directfiesta, xxxdesign-net, Paul Waters( the three Canadian stooges)

and Webby, dig420, EviLSuperstaR, Mr. Soul, GoodGuy, PostWhore,GatorB, AdultMovies.bz, anarchy....

and of course the guy who constantly screams " baby killers" when referring to the Israeli side only, Smokey the Bear


I'm missing a few, I'm sure. Sad that the most naive, deluded, and uninformed make the most noise on this board.


my list is different:

69pornlinks, directfiesta, Godsmack, iggysick, Linguist, milambur, quiet, shahab6, TheRedZone
and my morons are moronier than yours
:)

NoComments 08-09-2006 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elron
Saddam kept these iranians busy for 10 years with his war against them (best example for those who said israel brought the wars to that region) , now when he's gone they feel they are the new arab empire , add the extreme islamic goverment that sits there and then ask yourself if these peasants really need nuclear power for "peace" , when half of their civillians go to work riding donkeys , or these fucktards wants to threaten israel and the entire world with that ?

i think the answer is clear .

Taking down Saddam was the BIGGEST mistake USA has made.

E$_manager 08-09-2006 05:46 PM

i thought the reason of getting uranium is evident. To scare countries, to seem more "seriouse", to be more safe.
If you think they are really gonna attack anybody - i doubt. But who knows?

NoComments 08-09-2006 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elron
their leader keep saying day and night that israel should be wiped of the planet , to make a genocide in its 7 million residents and fucktards you like keep saying it's to insure , what a pathetic piece of shit , keep supporting every dictator that is left on the planet , too bad hitler is gone or else you would say he's your role model

Elron, don't waste yourself on "soul", the bona fide MORON.

he-fox 08-09-2006 05:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keyser Soze
I take option 3.
Iran needs nuclear reactors for peaceful purposes and to threaten Israel and the Western World.

I was just about to say the same thing.:thumbsup

reynold 08-09-2006 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elron
their leader keep saying day and night that israel should be wiped of the planet , to make a genocide in its 7 million residents and fucktards you like keep saying it's to insure , what a pathetic piece of shit , keep supporting every dictator that is left on the planet , too bad hitler is gone or else you would say he's your role model


Can't you please write it on a bigger font next time?

BusterBunny 08-09-2006 06:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reynold
Can't you please write it on a bigger font next time?

i dunno it is easier to ignore at this size:2 cents:

notabook 08-09-2006 07:02 PM

Economically speaking it must be beneficial for them to use nuclear energy; if they can get the majority of their power requirements met by nuclear power then they can sell even more of their oil to the rest of the world, making even more money in the process. And it doesn?t hurt in the process to have a couple of nukes handy as a deterrent to keep the jewrats in their place.

NoComments 08-09-2006 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook
Economically speaking it must be beneficial for them to use nuclear energy; if they can get the majority of their power requirements met by nuclear power then they can sell even more of their oil to the rest of the world, making even more money in the process. And it doesn?t hurt in the process to have a couple of nukes handy as a deterrent to keep the jewrats in their place.

spoken like a true sigwhore...

the updated list of GFY morons:(far from full, partial)

69pornlinks, directfiesta, Godsmack, iggysick, Linguist, milambur, quiet, shahab6, TheRedZone, Webby

Storm_Tracker 08-09-2006 08:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook
Economically speaking it must be beneficial for them to use nuclear energy; if they can get the majority of their power requirements met by nuclear power then they can sell even more of their oil to the rest of the world, making even more money in the process. And it doesn?t hurt in the process to have a couple of nukes handy as a deterrent to keep the jewrats in their place.




:thumbsup

NoComments 08-09-2006 08:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Storm_Tracker
:thumbsup

Iranians found among dead Hezbollah. Halleluya! They are lucky, they gonna see Allah and 127 virgins from GFY.

CDSmith 08-09-2006 08:22 PM

My REAL vote would have been for C: all of the above

but since there was no third choice I voted #2. Sure they probably want nuclear capability for all the conventional "peaceful" benefits, but I'm quite sure they also want to use it to afford them more posturing leverage in the world, and put more teeth in their threats. And from what I've seen, heard and read in the news of Iran over the years, they do love to rattle the sabre.

notabook 08-09-2006 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winetalk
spoken like a true sigwhore...

the updated list of GFY morons:(far from full, partial)

69pornlinks, directfiesta, Godsmack, iggysick, Linguist, milambur, quiet, shahab6, TheRedZone, Webby

Are you retarded? Are you trying to say it would NOT be economically beneficial for them to be able to sell MORE OIL to the rest of the world? Are you some kind of fucking reject from the Special Olympics?

NoComments 08-09-2006 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook
Are you retarded? Are you trying to say it would NOT be economically beneficial for them to be able to sell MORE OIL to the rest of the world? Are you some kind of fucking reject from the Special Olympics?


sure, sure, and Hitler needed Cyclone B to sell it to the world and increase Germany economical might.....

nota, if I thought you were naive, I'd say so, but...you are just a MORON.

Storm_Tracker 08-09-2006 08:33 PM

WATCH THIS VIDEO ... FINALLY THE TRUTH!!!


https://youtube.com/watch?v=bPjjr_Pd2iY


Listen to this skynet news interview it will blow you away! :thumbsup


I love when truth comes out ... too bad we here in North America will
never hear it!!!

NoComments 08-09-2006 08:37 PM

who the fuck is George Galloway? Your version of George Carlin? Carlin is funier....

notabook 08-09-2006 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Winetalk
sure, sure, and Hitler needed Cyclone B to sell it to the world and increase Germany economical might.....

nota, if I thought you were naive, I'd say so, but...you are just a MORON.

You do realize how much money is in oil right? And the fact that the ENTIRE WORLD depends on it right? Iran has the third largest reserves of crude oil and is the SECOND largest oil producer, supplying roughly 10% of the oil that the ENTIRE WORLD USES. So friend, if they are further able to strengthen their markets (and standing globally) by being able to push out even more oil by cutting down their consumption by half or more? you seriously don?t think it?s worth them doing it? Well thank god the economy doesn?t reflect mental rejects such as yourself; Iran will continue their program and they will succeed in their economic goals. And as a delicious benefit, they?ll be able to keep the jewrats in their place.

As an even GREATER benefit, Iran will be able to supply even more weaponry (thanks to an economic boost) to the enemies of Israel, furthering their agenda. It?s quite just really; it?s what we call a storybook ending. Iran has their minions in the middle east doing their bidding, The United States has theirs?. both sides deliciously evil, both sides ridiculously wealthy and ultimately stupid in their decision making process. I can?t wait to see how it all plays out in the end. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

NoComments 08-09-2006 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook
I can?t wait to see how it all plays out in the end. :1orglaugh :1orglaugh :1orglaugh

at the end we all be dead.....some from natural causes, some from radiation poisoning, some from being idiots all their lives, but chances of that are remote.

CDSmith 08-09-2006 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Storm_Tracker
I love when truth comes out ...

I'm not sure why you're just accepting this man's opinion as "the truth", but I'll say this... he sure put her through her reporting paces in that interview. :D

But did he really say that if Israel gives up all the land they've occupied since 1967 that the fighting would stop? Now who's being naive? :1orglaugh

Storm_Tracker 08-09-2006 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CDSmith
I'm not sure why you're just accepting this man's opinion as "the truth", but I'll say this... he sure put her through her reporting paces in that interview. :D

But did he really say that if Israel gives up all the land they've occupied since 1967 that the fighting would stop? Now who's being naive? :1orglaugh


:thumbsup

SmokeyTheBear 08-09-2006 08:59 PM

does any nation use uranium enrichment solely for peacefull purposes ? no but that kind of logic is missed on many..

iran wants to make nukes , so does everyone , you dont get respect if you dont have them..

BradM 08-09-2006 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notabook
Are you retarded? Are you trying to say it would NOT be economically beneficial for them to be able to sell MORE OIL to the rest of the world? Are you some kind of fucking reject from the Special Olympics?

No, he is a communist.

I look at Iran and see their leader, a religious and hellbent-on-war douche bag. I have to wonder how peaceful someone who lives by the koran really is.

marketsmart 08-09-2006 09:27 PM

i will enrich that uranium and shove it up your cranium, light your ass on fire and send you straight to uranus in a bucket of cup o noodles lick my poodles ballsack....

free willy.....

he-fox 08-09-2006 09:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear
does any nation use uranium enrichment solely for peacefull purposes ? no but that kind of logic is missed on many..

iran wants to make nukes , so does everyone , you dont get respect if you dont have them..

Many countries use it for peaceful purposes only. Think Japan, Italy, Canada.
But a nutcase like Ahmadinejad who wants to be the leader of all muslims and bring all the non-believers on the right path you can bet that wants it for threatening purposes or even worse.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:04 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
©2000-, AI Media Network Inc123