We can all quit whinging about little lupe now...
 

little danni looks equally if not even more illegal... bah...

http://www.littledanni.com/

fuck that

if she is leg she IS legal.

hey, someones gotta corner the pedo market

she has a funny shaped head.

i prefer women

:thumbsup

I'd still hit her

She looks like a mozzerella pesto on sourdough, toasted and brushed with olive oil.

she doesn't look that young to me....she looks about 19-20 actually

Well she is 18...

Shit... Now that is fucked up...

In some of the pictures she looks underage but in most of them she looks 18+

hahahahaha

for the record i think she looks 18 or older....

In the pic above where it says "Enjoy Me!" she looks to be about 55 lbs. It appears that her head comprises about 40% of her body weight.

As for her appearance, she does look young...but I don't think the site would be so (intentionally or unintentionally) pedo-catering if a few lines of text were omitted...such as: "I feel really awkward about it, ‘cause all my friends have already tried you-know-what! I’m awfully curious about how they do it and what goes where, but I don’t think I’m ready yet…"

That looks like something Stone Phillips would recite as part of a chatroom convo.

later
c-lo

she is hot and does not look illegal to me, just youthful looking... beautiful actually. i think people will just see what they want to see..

...........

That´s why there is a legal age for performing. What are the requirements for "looking illegal".

HHmmnnn.........bubbles, and lolipops?

It even looks strange when you write it.

Hey come on, that's Michael Jacksons best pick-up line

lupe looks younger as does the background of lupe

Hope they got their 2257 shit tight lol

She's not even cute

People who think girls like this look young definitely haven't watched much Japanese porn...

Yea, it is pushing the envelope.

Nice body...what's her snizz look like?

"But it's an offshore corporation and we don't have to comply with US domestic laws..." :1orglaugh

Pity the beneficial owners are sitting in US Federal jurisdiction :pimp

PS Never seen a kid so interested in sucking so many lollipops :-)

this girl is not even cute

Lollipops are used to represent sexuality all the time in magazines and tv commercials...

Plus, haven't you ever heard of Kojak? Damn that old man sucking on a lollipop must appeal to the pedo crowd like a muthafucka:

http://wiki.phantis.com/images/7/77/Telly_21.jpg

Ah... that must be the reason :winkwink:

Sheech... Little Danni is awesome. Now wanna talk about young? How about Ariel Rebel? Oh wait..

Seriously: where will you draw the line?

If the legal age is 18 for performing in adult scenes, the age of the model has to be the borderline, not her appearance.

How will you base a legal judgment on the look of a model? The entire teenmania may be morally questionable, but legal age has to stay legal age and shouldn´t be debated with the appearance of the performer.

this is child porn...but why no one's reporting this to the authority?

Not my problem man - TeenRevenue know exactly what they are doing and would actually welcome legal action to kick their asses out of this business.

Basically they are a liability to the main stream adult entertainment biz and attract the wrong kind of attention by being in the "pedo entertainment industry". The result of that simply justifies more legislation - although it is already illegal in a number of countries.

If you want to know where I personally would draw the line - that's in pandering to pedo fantasies to earn a dime.

I can agree to that, but it´s hardly judicable.

Can't say for the US, some folks are looking at it now, but for a fair number of prime wired countries, this type of stuff is already illegal.

Better say... the legalities may vary from country to country, but the basic principle is that it is prohibited to dress talent up and present them as something they are not - eg underage kids - tho this also usually has to be in a sexual scenario. The laws also vary in name.. some are extensions to obscene publications acts or can fall under child protection legislation (tho, it hardly has much to do with actually protecting children since there are no "children", but mainly along the lines of pandering to pedos).

TeenRevenue will argue the models and 18 etc they have 2257 docs and proof of age etc. Fine... but draw the attention of the law and legislators to these sites and you can guess what will happen :-)

What TeenRevenue are doing is not new - it was done decades ago in other countries and they felt a need to terminate it and introduced legislation.

Ill just say its due to your language issues, but you just broke a clear cut board rule. Ill say you meant to put an IF before this, and change the but to then...

The LEGAL line is 18 and over. That means if they were born in May 22nd 1989 it is LEGAL to start shooting them today.

You will never know how idiotic you really are, will you? :1orglaugh

Get a friggin life idiot :pimp

haha... so true

Basically this level of trash most prob is acceptable under US law.

It's a matter of skinning the cat in the most appropriate way if a prosecutor elects to act - and best left to folks who know this area. They are already aware.

No you are the idiot. While you dont mind running around the board insinuating things like child porn, there are those that follow the rules and dont accuse people of lies.