View Single Post
Old 12-01-2006, 07:26 AM  
The Sultan Of Smut
Confirmed User
 
The Sultan Of Smut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jace View Post
LOL, you all are hilarious

128 is fine, 128kbps is cd quality

unless you have some amazing sound system in your house or car, you aren't going to notice the difference
No way dude 128 is only decent for electronic stuff and it sucks for pretty much everything else. I've noticed that when rock is encoded at 128kps it loses some of the low frequencies.

For most genres 160 is good enough and that's what I'd say is the minimum for CD quality. For each additional instrument that the track contains adds additional information so encoding an orchestra at 128kps just isn't going to work out too good.

When I ripped all my CDs I did it at 320 since storage even on portables isn't as big of an issue as it used to be. MP3 is a lossy codec so once you've encoded it a particular bitrate the other info is gone for good. I'd rather have a large block of stone with some extra to carve off later should I decide to re-encode the tracks using a different codec

If file size is a huge concern for ya then you should go with variable bitrate encoding (VBR) with an average of 192 would be best solution.
The Sultan Of Smut is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote