Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 12-01-2006, 04:27 AM   #1
samsam
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fla
Posts: 682
What Bitrate For MP3 Downloads?

What is the optimum download bitrate for MP3 tracks?

what gives the best quality without producing too large file sizes?
samsam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 04:41 AM   #2
samsam
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Fla
Posts: 682
Which is better... 128 Kbps or 192 Kbps ????
samsam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 04:49 AM   #3
salesman
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,534
I prefer VBR, better as 128 is 192 and better than 192 is 256, ...
__________________

Launched new sites in different niches with exclusive content:
salesman is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 04:51 AM   #4
LB-69
Confirmed User
 
LB-69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Land of Smiling Pussy
Posts: 1,322
Re

192 is good enough, the minimum should be 160. 128 is shitty quality.
LB-69 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 04:52 AM   #5
prezzz
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 959
No less than 192k IMO - at least if you're listening to the music on a decent stereo system.
prezzz is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 04:55 AM   #6
notabook
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Not a Library!
Posts: 9,748
128 minimum with cheap speakers, 192 for decent speakers. If space is a concern VBR 110-150kbps would be best option.
__________________
notabook is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 04:55 AM   #7
biftek
So Fucking Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,030
i encode all mine at 224 ,mainly because i use them for my radio show too ,
biftek is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 04:57 AM   #8
Jace
FBOP Class Of 2013
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: bumfuck, ky
Posts: 35,562
LOL, you all are hilarious

128 is fine, 128kbps is cd quality

unless you have some amazing sound system in your house or car, you aren't going to notice the difference
Jace is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 05:02 AM   #9
notabook
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Not a Library!
Posts: 9,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jace View Post
LOL, you all are hilarious

128 is fine, 128kbps is cd quality

unless you have some amazing sound system in your house or car, you aren't going to notice the difference
That's true for most people, definitely not all. I'm not even close to being an audiophile but I can tell a vast difference between 128 and 192 MP3's. I have a fairly shitty sound setup as well (cheap ass 5.1).
__________________
notabook is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 05:03 AM   #10
luvlyn
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: canada
Posts: 498
20 kbps makes about 500kb wma, good in computers but not in ipods
__________________
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
luvlyn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 05:05 AM   #11
Jace
FBOP Class Of 2013
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: bumfuck, ky
Posts: 35,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook View Post
That's true for most people, definitely not all. I'm not even close to being an audiophile but I can tell a vast difference between 128 and 192 MP3's. I have a fairly shitty sound setup as well (cheap ass 5.1).
well, I have been in the sound business since I was 18, and I can tell you one thing, it isn't 100% about the kbps, you have to also take into consideration the encoding tools used...if you use shitty software you can have a 192 sound like a 96

I have friends that are die hard 320kbps for anything they download....we all dj the same music at the same clubs on different nights, and no one (even them) can tell that I am using the 128 over their 320
Jace is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 05:14 AM   #12
notabook
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Not a Library!
Posts: 9,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jace View Post
well, I have been in the sound business since I was 18, and I can tell you one thing, it isn't 100% about the kbps, you have to also take into consideration the encoding tools used...if you use shitty software you can have a 192 sound like a 96

I have friends that are die hard 320kbps for anything they download....we all dj the same music at the same clubs on different nights, and no one (even them) can tell that I am using the 128 over their 320
True enough. I've always had a knack for picking up subtle differences in music though. Like those 'tonedeaf' tests, where they play a sound file then play another sound file that is slightly different, I would always get 100% correct. The really funny thing is I almost hate music, I don't own a single music CD. For the longest time I didn?t even have a radio in my car because I just simply wouldn?t use it LOL. The only music I've ever found to my liking is Europop (as gay as that may be).

I guess it?s sorta like how many people can?t see more than 32fps, and how most can?t see past 64fps? yet many fighter pilots have been observed in tests seeing way beyond 64fps. Weird chit.
__________________
notabook is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 05:16 AM   #13
Jace
FBOP Class Of 2013
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: bumfuck, ky
Posts: 35,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook View Post
True enough. I've always had a knack for picking up subtle differences in music though. Like those 'tonedeaf' tests, where they play a sound file then play another sound file that is slightly different, I would always get 100% correct. The really funny thing is I almost hate music, I don't own a single music CD. For the longest time I didn?t even have a radio in my car because I just simply wouldn?t use it LOL. The only music I've ever found to my liking is Europop (as gay as that may be).

I guess it?s sorta like how many people can?t see more than 32fps, and how most can?t see past 64fps? yet many fighter pilots have been observed in tests seeing way beyond 64fps. Weird chit.
europop haha

wish I had your hearing though, mine is all jacked up most of the time
Jace is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 05:30 AM   #14
notabook
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Not a Library!
Posts: 9,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jace View Post
europop haha

wish I had your hearing though, mine is all jacked up most of the time
Man when I was a kid my ears stayed fucked up, I had so many buttons put in there. When I hit my teens it all went away and I could hear awesome. Then my eyesight got horrible LMAO. It?s as if one sense got traded for the other one. Now I hear great and can?t see worth a shit, if I don?t wear these fucking 1lb coke-bottle glasses I can?t see anything but one big blur.

I'd trade better eyesight for my hearing any day of the week
__________________
notabook is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 05:33 AM   #15
Jace
FBOP Class Of 2013
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: bumfuck, ky
Posts: 35,562
Quote:
Originally Posted by notabook View Post
Man when I was a kid my ears stayed fucked up, I had so many buttons put in there. When I hit my teens it all went away and I could hear awesome. Then my eyesight got horrible LMAO. It?s as if one sense got traded for the other one. Now I hear great and can?t see worth a shit, if I don?t wear these fucking 1lb coke-bottle glasses I can?t see anything but one big blur.

I'd trade better eyesight for my hearing any day of the week
ha, you sound like me

I had tubes in my ears growing up and constant ear infections, and add the coke bottle glasses on top of that, well, I was a sick dork

I got the eyes fixed last year though, LASIK is wonderful....I was just on the edge of not being able to have it done though, if my eyes were much worse they wouldn't have been able to go through with it

now I just have to get my ears fixed up, it is mostly infectiions and constant wax that get me, if I went in every time I was supposed to to get them checked I would have so much better hearing
Jace is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 07:10 AM   #16
Manowar
jellyfish  
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 71,528
i use 224 or 192
Manowar is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 07:13 AM   #17
bl4h
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,282
gotta be at least 192...

There is a very noticable difference between 128 and 192

Last edited by bl4h; 12-01-2006 at 07:15 AM..
bl4h is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 07:21 AM   #18
4Man
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,830
192 the best
4Man is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 07:26 AM   #19
The Sultan Of Smut
Confirmed User
 
The Sultan Of Smut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 4,325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jace View Post
LOL, you all are hilarious

128 is fine, 128kbps is cd quality

unless you have some amazing sound system in your house or car, you aren't going to notice the difference
No way dude 128 is only decent for electronic stuff and it sucks for pretty much everything else. I've noticed that when rock is encoded at 128kps it loses some of the low frequencies.

For most genres 160 is good enough and that's what I'd say is the minimum for CD quality. For each additional instrument that the track contains adds additional information so encoding an orchestra at 128kps just isn't going to work out too good.

When I ripped all my CDs I did it at 320 since storage even on portables isn't as big of an issue as it used to be. MP3 is a lossy codec so once you've encoded it a particular bitrate the other info is gone for good. I'd rather have a large block of stone with some extra to carve off later should I decide to re-encode the tracks using a different codec

If file size is a huge concern for ya then you should go with variable bitrate encoding (VBR) with an average of 192 would be best solution.
The Sultan Of Smut is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 07:52 AM   #20
bl4h
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 1,282
Some programs call 128 cd quality, but its not true.

audio cds > 1411 kbps
bl4h is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.