Quote:
Originally Posted by Bossman
People are saying there is no reason to belive that slick sites were catering to CP, but almost everyone who has seen the sites agree that the girls are made to look younger than they are (I really hope they every one of them are of legal age), and when clicking on those thumbs people were either sent to a fhg OR a trade partner. If these trade partners are having CP, then I canīt think its legal (iīm not a lawyer), since he gets paid back with traffic from the same sites - just because there is no money involved doesnīt put it outside "who benefits from the crime". Of course he can say he knew nothing about those CP links, but with girls made to look younger than they are, and with many different links to CP sites, then that argument is vague 
Again Denmark has some of the most relaxed laws on this planet, when it come to nudity, sex and porn... its not the taliban blocking those CP sites, but the country which was the first to legalize porn on this planet. It has to be fucked up to get blocked. |
No, I honestly think more people are surprised because Slick was running free hosted galleries and people are going after HIM for it and forgetting the fact that these sites that were being promoted, and in come cases even the thumbs, are provided by THE SPONSORS. I still fail to see how that makes Slick a CP slinger? I know he's very well known in the TGP community and people there are pretty shocked about what's gone down. He has always had a solid reputation for good business (from what I have heard, I don't know him personally but I do trust the people who have told me this).