Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham
Sadly as far as online porn is concerned you're spot on for shooters.
After that you went the same route as Robbie, telling us how great you are. YOUR problem is pathetically low self-esteem coupled with a giant overcompensating ego. I suspect.  |
Paulie shush! The grown-ups are talking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery
and that is why i put "honest" in quotes
robbie brilliant arguement was because they get paid for the sale they should give every site posititve reviews and basically give glowing reviews to his treaming only site.
he completely ignored/didn't realize that a review site get upwards of 75-90% of their sales from people who come to their site to see if something they found it worth it
ie see a gallery -> go to the site -> go to the review site -> go back to the site -> buy
if the review site gave everyone great reviews or covered up hidden gotcha like streaming only
those surfers would goo to a different more "honest" review site in step3 and the revenue from that transaction would be gone forever.
|
True, that IS the review site theory, how it's supposed to work. But I also think people get to review sites from Google, from other review sites and so on. The problem really occurs, I think, when someone goes TO THAT PAYSITE, which has the recip link to the review. The surfer clicks the review and gets a so-so or even bad review, and it's like that paysite is advertising the fact that their site sucks. LOL
A smart review site peruser will note - and THIS is really the #1 issue with review sites - that 95% of the sites get "so-so" reviews while - SHOCK! - the review site's "Top Ten" are all Brograms who paid the review site to cook the books, so to speak. Therefore a review site reader reads review A, which is a 67 out of 100, then sees fucking Reality Kings (?) as #2 with a 98 out of 100.
Review sites are like see-saws, which never see (or saw). LOL Everything is slanted towards a handful of sites so good "honest" websites get exploited.