Originally Posted by SleazyDream

Oh my God, you're going into gun law????? Why not just post a sign that says gimme money, no refunds, no promises, no ability.

I know that's very complicated for you to understand, if I write it in crayon would it help?

to explain this again so you can HOPEFULLY (although doubtfully) understand it, cause you seem to not have a clue about what is being brought up here, is that the point was SOME firearms can and are restricted in the USA - Thus WHY are semi auto needed without huge regulations like full auto? Who cares if it's state or federally mandated. You have given NO reason as to WHY they are needed to be owned with minimal regulation by the general civilian population other than the typical NRA 'it's your right' bullshit which is full of holes.

if it's your right to own firearms, why are some highly regulated and some aren't then!?!?!?!??!?!. Apparently the gov't can and does take away your rights. You can't walk off the street in ANY state and just buy a full auto machine gun the same way you can buy a handgun most states.

my whole point was semi auto and handguns should be treated like full auto is in most places in the USA.

now IF you are an even slightly capable lawyer, show me a reason why this should not be so?

you avoided that, it was brought up MANY times in this thread, thus you were owned.
and still are.

sad, your answer says a LOT about your ability to practice law doesn't it.........



I highly doubt your highly trained legal response of "it's none of your business' would go very far with any police officer if they found a full auto uzi in your glove compartment and you didn't have ALL the highly restrictive licenses for it in ANY state.