Quote:
Originally Posted by _Richard_
that's a nice shiny opinion you have
Blue state, red face: Guess who benefits more from your taxes?
probably should give this a good read before yous tart blaming 'demtards' for social spending use
not that it matters, as historically most cities are liberal leaning, while rural areas are conservative leaning, and this is what social spending is for. |
Quote:
Originally Posted by crockett
Yes lets look at the Democrat mismanagement.. 6 out of the top 10 states which use the most food stamps are Republican run states. In other words shut your dumb pie hole because you know nothing of what you think you know. Stick to Canada's politics...
States with the most people on food stamps
Louisiana. ... Governor Republican
Tennessee. ... Governor Republican
Oregon. ... Governor Democrat
West Virginia. ... Governor Democrat
New Mexico. ... Governor Republican
Mississippi. ... Governor Republican
Florida .... Governor Republican
Georgia .... Governor Democrat
Alabama ... Governor Republican
Kentucky .... Governor Democrat
The simple fact is state by state Republican run states tend to use more food stamps and also require more state level subsidies. Why is that? Because Republican run states tend to keep wages down, which means people can't afford to live and in return the states collect less taxes and have to be bailed out by the federal govt. (ie leeches whom can't pay their own way)
Republicans are the biggest leeches in this country. Can't wait for all the denial posts..  |
Nice misdirection tactics
Lets me repeat my point which has nothing to do with states:
Democrats are happy that unemployment is down. Ok, that sounds good. But at the same time - food stamps more than doubled! Not so good?
To put what I am saying vividly with random numbers:
At first:
100.000 people, 7.000 unemployed, 15.000 on food stamps.
Decreasing unemployment range:
100.000 people, 5.200 unemployed, 32.000 on food stamps.
How is that a good thing? And how do you manage that?
Again, numbers are just random, to illustrate that it is very strange to have less unemployed, yet double the food stamps!
If you brag about one thing, brag about another
Of course you can twist it this way - democrats made all those jobs happen, but republicans in the states forced lower wages.
So yeah, democrats did good, but republicans ruined that. Typical GFY demoract fanboy rhetoric
But again - keep in mind that for that to happen not only ALL those extra jobs must be at food stamp level, but also many more "old" jobs should turn into food stamp jobs for food stamp numbers to increase more than double...
Could republicans destroy wages that much? YES THEY CAN! At least what crocket would say
