GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

eppoclappo · 10-30-2005, 06:49 AM

Over the past days I got a high number of refused galleries from Richards Realm. In general I understand when I get a denial, but over the past days it's not clear to me. Do they once again have a new reviewer that is much too anal about things?

Some examples:

"Poor quality full-size images." while there's nothing real fuzzy in the pics
(yeah, they are video screen caps and no mega sharp high quality glamour stills, but isn't that what at least half of the Internet porn is made of?):
http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030a/index.html
http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030b/index.html

Can someone please clear this up for me?

E.J.

10-30-2005, 06:49 AM
eppoclappo Confirmed User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Down south in liberal Holland where chicks are hot, eager and willing to expose. Posts: 259	Strange experiences with Richards Realm Over the past days I got a high number of refused galleries from Richards Realm. In general I understand when I get a denial, but over the past days it's not clear to me. Do they once again have a new reviewer that is much too anal about things? Some examples: "Poor quality full-size images." while there's nothing real fuzzy in the pics (yeah, they are video screen caps and no mega sharp high quality glamour stills, but isn't that what at least half of the Internet porn is made of?): http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030a/index.html http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030b/index.html Can someone please clear this up for me? E.J.