Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 10-30-2005, 06:49 AM   #1
eppoclappo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Down south in liberal Holland where chicks are hot, eager and willing to expose.
Posts: 259
Strange experiences with Richards Realm

Over the past days I got a high number of refused galleries from Richards Realm. In general I understand when I get a denial, but over the past days it's not clear to me. Do they once again have a new reviewer that is much too anal about things?

Some examples:

"Poor quality full-size images." while there's nothing real fuzzy in the pics
(yeah, they are video screen caps and no mega sharp high quality glamour stills, but isn't that what at least half of the Internet porn is made of?):
http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030a/index.html
http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030b/index.html

Can someone please clear this up for me?

E.J.
eppoclappo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2005, 07:09 AM   #2
bigdog
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,964
if i remember richard will also refuse galleries that don't have enough nudity, just go to play by his rules
bigdog is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2005, 07:23 AM   #3
E.Kant
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philosophy Center
Posts: 1,577
Qulity of the full sized image is not good as you said by yourself, because
It is screen caps which normally get denied.
__________________
FILL your TUBE SITE with thousands of videos within a few days!
Content delivery with Tags, Description, Pornstar Name, and niche!
For example: Start your Asian Porn Tube with 10,000 videos in only 10 days!

Contact me: ICQ 461 531 88
E.Kant is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2005, 07:25 AM   #4
grumpy
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
grumpy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Holland
Posts: 9,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by eppoclappo
Over the past days I got a high number of refused galleries from Richards Realm. In general I understand when I get a denial, but over the past days it's not clear to me. Do they once again have a new reviewer that is much too anal about things?

Some examples:

"Poor quality full-size images." while there's nothing real fuzzy in the pics
(yeah, they are video screen caps and no mega sharp high quality glamour stills, but isn't that what at least half of the Internet porn is made of?):
http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030a/index.html
http://www.pornpicz.com/tgps/051030b/index.html

Can someone please clear this up for me?

E.J.
the answer is in your remark
Quote:
Originally Posted by eppoclappo
yeah, they are video screen caps and no mega sharp high quality glamour stills
__________________
Don't let greediness blur your vision | You gotta let some shit slide
icq - 441-456-888
grumpy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2005, 08:46 AM   #5
eppoclappo
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Down south in liberal Holland where chicks are hot, eager and willing to expose.
Posts: 259
The strange thing is: sometimes they are accepted, sometimes not at all. And then I am talking about the same series of pics.

And if I ask David from RR to clear things up for me, he has no clue why the reviewer refused the pics and post them anyway...

There isn't real 100% uniformity.
I guess the reviewer didn't get laid this weekend that causes him to be very very strict on what is accepted these past 2 or 3 days...
eppoclappo is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2005, 08:57 AM   #6
johndoebob
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,405
Richards Realm is generally refusing a lot nowdays, beside you pay.

Quote:
yeah, they are video screen caps and no mega sharp high quality glamour stills, but isn't that what at least half of the Internet porn is made of?
If there isn't a real fresh gallery shortage it's very unlikely that a TGP owner will list screenshot galleries.
__________________
johndoebob is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.