Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 12-28-2010, 04:40 AM   #51
TheDoc
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
TheDoc's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Currently Incognito
Posts: 13,827
The idea of more gov regs, for sure if the fcc controls any part of it - just sucks. But the reason this law is happening is because the abuse is already happening!

The Internet is not an open free market - it's a multitude of markets that are HIGHLY regulated based on the regions they are located in. It's already packed with Regs (from local, state and fed), all around the world, unique to industries, even in America.

This could be a good or bad thing for our Industry - bad of the fcc douches it up - good if it happens as it should and ISP's can't charge the guy more / cut off him because one guy likes to download legal porn at all hours of the night.


P.S. The reason the phone companies are regulated is because they abused the powers they had, greatly - 20 years before any State/Fed stepped in. Every major phone company in America has already been classified as a monopoly, they abused powers they had like a teenage girl abuses text messaging - it never stops.
__________________
~TheDoc - ICQ7765825
It's all disambiguation

Last edited by TheDoc; 12-28-2010 at 04:41 AM..
TheDoc is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2010, 06:23 AM   #52
Barry-xlovecam
It's 42
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Global
Posts: 18,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agent 488 View Post
the telecoms are an oligopoly. ...
In the USA the cable carriers are even worse.

I pay $6.95 for a second IP from Comcast — I can get an IP for $1.00 to $2.00 in any data center.

I think that the FCC's version of net neutrality will just be another scam.

I have no choice of an alternate broadband carrier currently (the dslam switch for ATT Fiber is at 4,000 ft (too far)). So, there exists no "free market" currently for me and Comcast knows this — charging $10-$20 more per month in this market then others where they operate in a competitive market. Free market my ass ...

Last edited by Barry-xlovecam; 12-28-2010 at 06:25 AM..
Barry-xlovecam is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2010, 06:28 AM   #53
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by u-Bob View Post
Let's say someone gains a very big share of the market by keeping his prices low and delivering a product people are willing to pay for. That person gains a let's say 80% share of the online porn market. Should the State step in and divide up his sites so small webmasters have a better chance at gaining a bigger share of the market?
So are you saying we charge far too much for a product many consumers don't want to buy?

Quote:
Originally Posted by u-Bob View Post
I'm supporting laws? I only support the non-aggression principle. I support human cooperation an creativity, I support voluntary association, I support the free market.
What you support is irrelevant. Because if the person next to you doesn't support it you get squashed.

Quote:
It seems you should take a better look at history... State intervention is what enabled cartels and monopolies. Take a look at the first 15 minutes of the Rothbard video I posted, he explains things quit well.

Who lobbied for the first preservation laws? Who lobbied for the State to create big national parks? The railway companies. Why? Because by having the State create big parks in strategic places they were able to prevent the competition from building their own transcontinental railroads that would compete with their own.

Who lobbied for banking regulations? The big banks. Why? because that way they were able to harass their small competitors. Rockefeller went even so far as calling "competition a sin".

Big corporations don't like the free market, they don't like competition. They like State intervention because they know they can control the decision making process. They fund both sides in the elections. They don't care who wins or looses an election. In the end politicians always do what is good for the big corporations.

If you really believe that the fact that the state organizes elections every 4 years gives you one bit of power, then you are very far down the road Hayek talked about.
So you can see clearly the intentions of these big companies and yet you want the only thing stopping them removed. The system will always be manipulated by the strongest. Give all the power to the strongest without limits and you're in trouble.

You have 3 options. Let Government make the rules that you get small chance to change every year.

Let big companies make the rules that you get no chance to change ever.

Go live on a desert island and pray no one finds you.

Last edited by Paul Markham; 12-28-2010 at 06:35 AM..
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2010, 07:28 AM   #54
u-Bob
there's no $$$ in porn
 
u-Bob's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: icq: 195./568.-230 (btw: not getting offline msgs)
Posts: 33,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
So are you saying we charge far too much for a product many consumers don't want to buy?
Ferrari still sells cars even though they are very expensive. Would Ferrari sell more cars if they lowered their prices? Probably. Does that mean Ferrari should lower their prices? No, that's up to Ferrari to decide. They decide what profit margin they are happy with. They decide if they are happy with the volume they are currently selling and if they want to lower their margins to increase their sales.

The law of supply and demand at a certain price.
...Economics 101

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
What you support is irrelevant. Because if the person next to you doesn't support it you get squashed.
So, what you support is the law of the jungle? where the strong are allowed to crush the weak...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
So you can see clearly the intentions of these big companies and yet you want the only thing stopping them removed. The system will always be manipulated by the strongest. Give all the power to the strongest without limits and you're in trouble.

You have 3 options. Let Government make the rules that you get small chance to change every year.

Let big companies make the rules that you get no chance to change ever.

Go live on a desert island and pray no one finds you.
Like I said, It's naive to think that state intervention stops big corporations from doing bad things. State intervention is what enables big corporations to do bad things. state intervention creates and maintains monopolies. State intervention creates cartels.

Let's take a look at patents for example. Many people seem to think that patents protect your ideas and encourage innovation. However, patents don't protect idea's. What a patent does is give you the right to use the State to stop another person or company from using a technique that you patented.

Let's say Paul A owns a small company and has been selling a certain product for many many years. Paul A developed a special technique to produce his products and to keep his competitive edge he kept that special technique a secret. Years later, Paul B invents a technique that is very similar to the one Paul A has been using for many years. Paul B pays the state to patent 'his invention'. Paul B now has the power to stop Paul A from using the technique he has been using for many years, a technique Paul A invented himself.

Now let's say Paul C invented another technique and kept it a secret. Corporation D invents a similar technique and patents it. Corporation D now has the power to put Paul C out of business.

Corporation E comes a long and wants to use the technique Corporation D patented. No problem, Corporation E will just use that technique and if Corporation D sues Corporation E then Corporation E will just sue Corporation D for using some other technique that E patented and D is using. In the end D and E will just crosslicense and continue doing business.

The end result: Big Corporation that spend millions of dollars on large patent arsenals are able to prevent small companies that don't have large patent arsenals from entering the market.

And still patents are being promoted as a way to encourage innovation and to help small companies.

There usually is a big difference between what laws and regulations are really intended for and what politicians claim they are intended for.

Last edited by u-Bob; 12-28-2010 at 07:31 AM..
u-Bob is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2010, 08:10 AM   #55
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by u-Bob View Post
Ferrari still sells cars even though they are very expensive. Would Ferrari sell more cars if they lowered their prices? Probably. Does that mean Ferrari should lower their prices? No, that's up to Ferrari to decide. They decide what profit margin they are happy with. They decide if they are happy with the volume they are currently selling and if they want to lower their margins to increase their sales.

The law of supply and demand at a certain price.
...Economics 101
I guess you didn't learn that in an economics University. The reason Ferrari cost more to buy is, they cost a lot more to make and better than the cheaper alternatives. Status symbol comes into it partly. Equating a Ferrri with porn is stupid. When was the last time you saw someone browsing a Playboy movie in public and thought he was a cool dude?


Quote:
So, what you support is the law of the jungle? where the strong are allowed to crush the weak...
No I know without laws to protect us it would be the law of the jungle. Your beliefs would result in laws of the jungle. Because in the real world it takes one person to not sign up to make it so.

Quote:
Like I said, It's naive to think that state intervention stops big corporations from doing bad things. State intervention is what enables big corporations to do bad things. state intervention creates and maintains monopolies. State intervention creates cartels.

Let's take a look at patents for example. Many people seem to think that patents protect your ideas and encourage innovation. However, patents don't protect idea's. What a patent does is give you the right to use the State to stop another person or company from using a technique that you patented.

Let's say Paul A owns a small company and has been selling a certain product for many many years. Paul A developed a special technique to produce his products and to keep his competitive edge he kept that special technique a secret. Years later, Paul B invents a technique that is very similar to the one Paul A has been using for many years. Paul B pays the state to patent 'his invention'. Paul B now has the power to stop Paul A from using the technique he has been using for many years, a technique Paul A invented himself.

Now let's say Paul C invented another technique and kept it a secret. Corporation D invents a similar technique and patents it. Corporation D now has the power to put Paul C out of business.

Corporation E comes a long and wants to use the technique Corporation D patented. No problem, Corporation E will just use that technique and if Corporation D sues Corporation E then Corporation E will just sue Corporation D for using some other technique that E patented and D is using. In the end D and E will just crosslicense and continue doing business.

The end result: Big Corporation that spend millions of dollars on large patent arsenals are able to prevent small companies that don't have large patent arsenals from entering the market.

And still patents are being promoted as a way to encourage innovation and to help small companies.

There usually is a big difference between what laws and regulations are really intended for and what politicians claim they are intended for.
So your solution is to remove all protection????

Go find your desert island because you're clearly not suited for the real world. You believe because the system doesn't work perfectly to your liking you think it should all be changed. So there is no workable system.

Of course if I invent patent A someone can invent patent B and take it further or change it in some way. That's been the way of science through the ages. Most inventions today come from people taking one mans ideas and developing them into another use.

You see what big corporations will do and think it's wrong. So come up with a workable logical solution. We can all point to the problems. Point is to the solutions that work.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2010, 08:27 AM   #56
u-Bob
there's no $$$ in porn
 
u-Bob's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: icq: 195./568.-230 (btw: not getting offline msgs)
Posts: 33,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
I guess you didn't learn that in an economics University. The reason Ferrari cost more to buy is, they cost a lot more to make and better than the cheaper alternatives. Status symbol comes into it partly. Equating a Ferrri with porn is stupid. When was the last time you saw someone browsing a Playboy movie in public and thought he was a cool dude?
*sigh* The basic concepts that apply to Ferrari, also apply to playboy and to the shoemakers and to the bakers and to the butchers and to prostitutes and to designers and to blacksmiths and to those making microprocessors and to....

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
No I know without laws to protect us it would be the law of the jungle. Your beliefs would result in laws of the jungle. Because in the real world it takes one person to not sign up to make it so.
A big gang of thugs forcing their rules onto people = law of the jungle.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Markham View Post
So your solution is to remove all protection????

Go find your desert island because you're clearly not suited for the real world. You believe because the system doesn't work perfectly to your liking you think it should all be changed. So there is no workable system.

Of course if I invent patent A someone can invent patent B and take it further or change it in some way. That's been the way of science through the ages. Most inventions today come from people taking one mans ideas and developing them into another use.

You see what big corporations will do and think it's wrong. So come up with a workable logical solution. We can all point to the problems. Point is to the solutions that work.
Your solution to problems caused by large gangs of thugs is to give power to an even bigger gang of thugs.

Btw: It seems you have no idea what patents are and how they work and where they came from and how the concept evolved.
u-Bob is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2010, 03:03 PM   #57
$5 submissions
I help you SUCCEED
 
$5 submissions's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The Pearl of the Orient Seas
Posts: 32,195
$5 submissions is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2010, 03:40 PM   #58
Paul Markham
Too old to care
 
Paul Markham's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws.
Posts: 52,943
U-Bob give me solutions. We know the problems. We need solutions. So give them to us.
Paul Markham is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.