Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 05-22-2011, 09:03 AM   #1
2MuchMark
Videochat Solutions
 
2MuchMark's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 48,553
Ultra High Definition TV

http://www.japanprobe.com/2011/05/22...definition-tv/





This 85″ LCD display has a resolution of 7,680 x 4,320 pixels, which is equivalent to 16 times the resolution of HDTV, allowing for the display of incredibly detailed, high-quality images.

In the past the only way to show the Ultra High Definition broadcast at full resolution was using a projector, but due to Sharp?s UV2A LCD technology, which allows for an unprecedented level of precision when controlling the alignment of liquid crystal molecules in an LCD structure, Sharp have been able to create a flawless 33megapixel display.
__________________

VideoChat Solutions | Custom Software | IT Support
https://www.2much.net | https://www.lcntech.com
2MuchMark is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 09:21 AM   #2
bronco67
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
bronco67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,035
Isn't anything above 2k just diminishing returns where visual perception is concerned? Looks like it would be overkill.
__________________
bronco67 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 09:38 AM   #3
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
That will never be mainsteam.
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 10:02 AM   #4
Internet User
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2011
Location: New York
Posts: 544
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorB View Post
That will never be mainsteam.
3-4 years tops
Internet User is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 10:40 AM   #5
ArsewithClass
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 7,957
That picture is incredible! It looks like a window through to real life... I think its fantastic, but I wouldnt like to purchase the camera to film true 7000*5000

Nice bit of equipment
ArsewithClass is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 10:41 AM   #6
camperjohn64
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,531
Quote:
Originally Posted by bronco67 View Post
Isn't anything above 2k just diminishing returns where visual perception is concerned? Looks like it would be overkill.
I was thinking the same thing. If you compress images (JPG vs RAW) you lose quality. At some point the video compression will cancel out the quality of pixel display.

Prediction: 25 years from now, compression will be almost lossless (99.8% RAW), and pixels in displays will be imperceptible to the human eye (26,000x16000 pixels). It's just a matter of time.
__________________
www.gimmiegirlproductions.com
camperjohn64 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 10:45 AM   #7
Si
Such Fun!
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 13,900
Sharp is doing some very good and interesting things lately, I'm still an LG man though.
Si is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 11:15 AM   #8
scarlettcontent
www.scarlettcontent.net
 
scarlettcontent's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pleiades
Posts: 6,031
nice bit of kit
__________________


Scarlett Content - Adult Content Provider - High Quality Adult Stock Content for your Websites, Mobile Media and Print.

Over 3 Million Images (14,000 photo sets) over 5000 Videos - Many Niches, US-2257, Awesome Prices.
Over 40 years in the adult industry.

[email protected] Follow us on twitter.
scarlettcontent is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 11:44 AM   #9
Jack Sparrow
Almost goners..
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 11,420
What resolutiin is real life anyway?
Jack Sparrow is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 12:02 PM   #10
Scott McD
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Scott McD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Glasgow, Scotland
Posts: 67,795
Anything is better than 3D shit!
__________________


I Buy My High Quality Traffic Here, You Should Too!

Scott McD is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 01:59 PM   #11
ArsewithClass
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 7,957
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott McD View Post
Anything is better than 3D shit!
I was going to purchase a 3d camera to check out the material when watching it.. do you think it wont take off?
ArsewithClass is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 02:00 PM   #12
biskoppen
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Very small penis
Posts: 5,809
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorB View Post
That will never be mainsteam.
Ofcourse it will
__________________
Submit my videos to make bank, tons of 5 minute videos offered right here
biskoppen is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 02:27 PM   #13
SDA CASH - Banned for Life AGAIN
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Scottsdale Arizona
Posts: 1,100
I must get one asap!
SDA CASH - Banned for Life AGAIN is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 04:55 PM   #14
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by Internet User View Post
3-4 years tops
Nope. No ultra HD content. Networks and cable channels have spent tens of millions upgrading to HD. They're not going to spend millions more in just a few years to upgrade to ultra HD. Not to mention broadcast network can't even handle 1080p so they certainly can't handle ultra HD. Cable and satellite companies have limited bandwidth so unless they only want to offer 1/8 the channels they have now they can't do ultra HD either. No ultra HD online steaming either. Most people don't have connections fast enough to handle it and won't for the foreseeable future. At least not in the US. Even if they did, bandwidth caps that ISPs are now enforcing will make ultra HD useless. All those companies that spent BILLIONS developing blu-ray are not in a hurry to go to ultra HD format. They are still trying to make money on blu-ray. So if there is no content then no one will buy these things.
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 04:57 PM   #15
Seth Manson
Please dont fuck animals
 
Seth Manson's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 3,988
I'm pretty damn happy with regular HD now that most networks and channels have finaly upgraded to it and prices have dropped to be affordable to most people.
__________________
Seth Manson is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 05:03 PM   #16
bronco67
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
bronco67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by GatorB View Post
Nope. No ultra HD content. Networks and cable channels have spent tens of millions upgrading to HD. They're not going to spend millions more in just a few years to upgrade to ultra HD. Not to mention broadcast network can't even handle 1080p so they certainly can't handle ultra HD. Cable and satellite companies have limited bandwidth so unless they only want to offer 1/8 the channels they have now they can't do ultra HD either. No ultra HD online steaming either. Most people don't have connections fast enough to handle it and won't for the foreseeable future. At least not in the US. Even if they did, bandwidth caps that ISPs are now enforcing will make ultra HD useless. All those companies that spent BILLIONS developing blu-ray are not in a hurry to go to ultra HD format. They are still trying to make money on blu-ray. So if there is no content then no one will buy these things.
Also, look at the production end of UltraHD. It's already a pain in the ass to post-produce effects and edit for 1080p. Just imagine going 8 times bigger. The amount of hard drive space and computing power needed would be incredible.

As a digital animator, I'm still just getting into rendering in HD, which takes up so much more time. Now 3D is getting popular, which means rendering double frames(one for each eye) -- and they eventually want to spring this UltraHD shit, which will be crazy to render and display during After Effects processing.

We're just moving way too fast.
__________________

Last edited by bronco67; 05-22-2011 at 05:04 PM..
bronco67 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 05:05 PM   #17
Socks
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 8,478
We'll be going back to pluggable VCR sized tapes called "hard drives"
Socks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 05:20 PM   #18
GatorB
The Demon & 12clicks
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: SallyRand is a FAGGOT
Posts: 18,208
Quote:
Originally Posted by bronco67 View Post
Also, look at the production end of UltraHD. It's already a pain in the ass to post-produce effects and edit for 1080p. Just imagine going 8 times bigger. The amount of hard drive space and computing power needed would be incredible.

As a digital animator, I'm still just getting into rendering in HD, which takes up so much more time. Now 3D is getting popular, which means rendering double frames(one for each eye) -- and they eventually want to spring this UltraHD shit, which will be crazy to render and display during After Effects processing.

We're just moving way too fast.
3-D is a fad and will be done in 5 years. Sales of 3-D TVs are a joke. What all these posters saying it's inevitable don't get is there is only so much bandwidth. Boprcaster use 6 MHZ wide channels and have amax bitrate of 19 MBps. Which is barely suitable for 1080i. Espeically since broadcasters still use mpeg2 compression. Now if they switch to mpeg4( which no broadcasters I know have any desire to do ) you can do 1080p. But that's it. No way you could do 2k let alone 4k. DirecTv uses Mpeg4 they barely have enough bandwidth for what they currently have. Now way you're getting 4k TVs. In 2025 TVs will still be 1080p.
GatorB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2011, 03:08 PM   #19
Cherry7
Confirmed User
 
Cherry7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: UK
Posts: 3,564
Porn site will be claiming their videos are in Ultra HD in a matter of months...
Cherry7 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2011, 03:17 PM   #20
96ukssob
So Fucking Banananananas
 
96ukssob's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: If I was in your ass you'd know it
Posts: 12,991
would be useless for years until TV and movie industry buys cameras that support it
__________________
Email: Clicky on Me
96ukssob is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.