is this the end of YOUTUBE ?!!! - GoFuckYourself.com

SmokeyTheBear · 06-30-2011, 09:17 AM

http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s978/show

"Makes unauthorized web streaming of copyrighted content a felony with a possible penalty of up to 5 years in prison. Illegal streaming of copyrighted content is defined in the bill as an offense that "consists of 10 or more public performances by electronic means, during any 180-day period, of 1 or more copyrighted works" and has a total economic value, either to the copyright holder or the infringer, of at least $2,500."

it hasn't passed yet , but wouldn't youtube be guilty of this right now ?

How would/could youtube alter its model to abide by this law ?

porno jew · 06-30-2011, 09:18 AM

Top recipients for ALL supporting interest groups

Name Amount Received Vote On Passage
Sen. Harry Reid [D, NV] $2,335,183
Sen. Charles Schumer [D, NY] $2,016,955
Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand [D, NY] $1,650,251
Sen. Barbara Boxer [D, CA] $1,163,223
Sen. Michael Bennet [D, CO] $767,772
Sen. Patrick Leahy [D, VT] $737,110
Sen. Robert Portman [R, OH] $714,176
Sen. Mark Kirk [R, IL] $471,721
Sen. Ron Wyden [D, OR] $423,313
Sen. Patty Murray [D, WA] $413,000

Rep. Howard Berman [D, CA-28] $454,598
Rep. Bruce Braley [D, IA-1] $360,989
Rep. Michael Capuano [D, MA-8] $320,580
Rep. Patrick Meehan [R, PA-7] $249,800
Rep. Allyson Schwartz [D, PA-13] $243,319
Rep. Eric Cantor [R, VA-7] $239,300
Rep. John Barrow [D, GA-12] $218,080
Rep. Gary Peters [D, MI-9] $216,748
Rep. Nancy Pelosi [D, CA-8] $213,550
Rep. Carolyn Maloney [D, NY-14] $209,610
Specific Organizations Supporting S.978

American Federation of Television and Radio Artists
Directors Guild of America
International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States
Screen Actors Guild
Motion Picture Association of America
Recording Industry Association of America
Independent Film and Television Alliance
National Association of Theatre Owners
Ultimate Fighting Championship
American Federation of Musicians
American Intellectual Property Law Association
NBC Universal
Viacom
Sony Pictures Entertainment
American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers
Association of American Publishers
Association of Independent Music Publishers
American Photographic Artists
AT&T
Broadcast Music, Inc.
Business Software Alliance
CBS Corporation
Church Music Publishers Association
Entertainment Software Association
Graphic Artists Guild
National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing
National Association of Broadcasters
National Collegiate Athletic Association
National Music Publishers' Association
National Basketball Association
News America Holdings
Newspaper Association of America
Picture Archive Council of America
Professional Photographers of America
Professional School Photographers Association
Reed Elsevier
PPL & VPL
SESAC
Software & Information Industry Association
Time Warner
Universal Music Group
Magazine Publishers of America
The Walt Disney Company
Writers Guild of America, West
U. S. Chamber of Commerce
International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Entertainment Merchants Association
Global Intellectual Property Center

drmadcat · 06-30-2011, 09:20 AM

copyright is a load of crap youtube.com is great

bronco67 · 06-30-2011, 09:42 AM

Wouldn't this shut down most tube sites? Who the fuck really believes that a 40 minute clip from the latest Elegant Angel movie is there legally?

L-Pink · 06-30-2011, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drmadcat

copyright is a load of crap youtube.com is great

Without the content uploaded by non copyright owners there isn't shit worth watching on youtube. Who cares if youtube makes it or not.

.

96ukssob · 06-30-2011, 09:49 AM

this will be a disaster to manage

L-Pink · 06-30-2011, 09:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bossku69

this will be a disaster to manage

It will manage itself once people start getting in deep shit for their behavior. I mean really, fuck people that mess with the property of others. Just because someone can afford a computer and internet service doesn't give them the right to use the property of others without permission.

.

brassmonkey · 06-30-2011, 10:03 AM

soon the government will control everything you do.

L-Pink · 06-30-2011, 10:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

soon the government will control everything you do.

"soon" where you been hiding Willis?

.

Love Sex · 06-30-2011, 10:17 AM

its only bad for american uploaders the rest of the world is saying ..|..

retards · 06-30-2011, 10:21 AM

OUCH! I can't believe it's taken this long.

seeandsee · 06-30-2011, 10:23 AM

we all expected this, but this opens all new problems about who, when, what, how

Captain Kawaii · 06-30-2011, 10:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

It will manage itself once people start getting in deep shit for their behavior. I mean really, fuck people that mess with the property of others. Just because someone can afford a computer and internet service doesn't give them the right to use the property of others without permission.

.

RIGHT ON! Tubes can choke on it! Only THIEVES have complaints about this one.

BFT3K · 06-30-2011, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

"soon" where you been hiding Willis?.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=v17lMr0j2D8

Captain Kawaii · 06-30-2011, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brassmonkey

soon the government will control everything you do.

You're a bit late on that...

iSpyCams · 06-30-2011, 10:35 AM

This would make the majority of the internet either illegal or or useless.

lazycash · 06-30-2011, 10:35 AM

I'm sure Gideongallery can find a loophole.

dan@noof · 06-30-2011, 10:38 AM

Google is compiling a file of incriminating evidence, of various wrongdoings committed by these politicians, that its spiders found while crawling the web. Each one will be contacted with copies of those files. This will subsequently die.

(my grammar seems fucked, but you get what I'm saying)

porno jew · 06-30-2011, 10:40 AM

people would rather destroy the internet and go back to the dark ages in order to protect their garbage content.

Nathan · 06-30-2011, 10:45 AM

sorry guys, I know you hate me saying this... but USC 17 §512 (DMCA Safe Harbor) limits the other paragraphs, including §506 that this extends to make it a criminal act.

So no, this is not the end of youtube.

Adwank Pro · 06-30-2011, 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BFT3K

https://youtube.com/watch?v=v17lMr0j2D8

hilarious

brassmonkey · 06-30-2011, 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

"soon" where you been hiding Willis?

.

bullshit wait till they have the id that carries all your info so the government can scan it without confronting you. their already testing a technology that can view items in your car remotely

. internet access that has your id # maybe 5 years out?

http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2010/09...-snooping.html

cooldude7 · 06-30-2011, 11:33 AM

never gonna happen.

CurrentlySober · 06-30-2011, 11:35 AM

i bought a pair of levis 501s today...

SmokeyTheBear · 06-30-2011, 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nathan

sorry guys, I know you hate me saying this... but USC 17 §512 (DMCA Safe Harbor) limits the other paragraphs, including §506 that this extends to make it a criminal act.

So no, this is not the end of youtube.

i don't pretend to understand the law very well but can you explain/elaborate a bit ?

In a nutshell are you saying as long as someone abides by dmca then this doesn't apply ? i.e. this only applies to people who ignore dmca ?

i can prove youtube has ignored dmca requests that would fit the criteria of the above law. i.e. safe harbor would not apply for youtube in my case because they did not abide by the rules, thus as it stands they would be guilty .

In my case i noticed someone had copied an original video of mine and reposted it under a different account, they did this with several videos. Upon recieving the dmca request they banned my account for copyright violations ( my own original videos ) and left the infringers account open with all my videos.

seems to me an open and shut case.

Wizzo · 06-30-2011, 11:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CurrentlySober

i bought a pair of levis 501s today...

Try not to poo in them this time.

gideongallery · 06-30-2011, 11:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear

i don't pretend to understand the law very well but can you explain/elaborate a bit ?

In a nutshell are you saying as long as someone abides by dmca then this doesn't apply ? i.e. this only applies to people who ignore dmca ?

i can prove youtube has ignored dmca requests that would fit the criteria of the above law. i.e. safe harbor would not apply for youtube in my case because they did not abide by the rules, thus as it stands they would be guilty .

In my case i noticed someone had copied an original video of mine and reposted it under a different account, they did this with several videos. Upon recieving the dmca request they banned my account for copyright violations ( my own original videos ) and left the infringers account open with all my videos.

seems to me an open and shut case.

i call bullshit

you made a DMCA take down request which specifically identified the EXACT video to take down, and they ignored that info and took down your account instead

i am betting you made a generic "you need to police every account because i am not going to " BS arguement and they reviewed your account and took your shit down because of another TOS violation.

cooldude7 · 06-30-2011, 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wizzo

Try not to poo in them this time.

lmao....

halfpint · 06-30-2011, 12:08 PM

I wish Google along with everything it owns would just curl up and die, They are one of the worst copyright infringers on the whole of the interwebs, and they are very happy making $$$$$$$ from it with thier bullshit ads everywhere

DWB · 06-30-2011, 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lazycash

I'm sure Gideongallery can find a loophole.

Last I heard he was expected at Google to provide legal council, then he was headed off to speak at TED.

Tom_PM · 06-30-2011, 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

i call bullshit

you made a DMCA take down request which specifically identified the EXACT video to take down, and they ignored that info and took down your account instead

i am betting you made a generic "you need to police every account because i am not going to " BS arguement and they reviewed your account and took your shit down because of another TOS violation.

You think he had a video copied and reposted and then turned into a 4 year old and whined via email? Then you think youtube decided to punish the whiner so deleted their account?

Which is worse, a youtube who doesnt remove copyrighted materials or a youtube who deletes complainers accounts?

SmokeyTheBear · 06-30-2011, 01:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

you made a DMCA take down request which specifically identified the EXACT video to take down, and they ignored that info and took down your account instead

yes , thank you for repeating what was already made clear to most people.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

i am betting you made a generic "you need to police every account because i am not going to

perhaps you have a problem reading or don't understand how the dmca process works..

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

they reviewed your account and took your shit down because of another TOS violation.

next time read the thread before making foolish shots in the dark. they send users notice if you violate tos, they sent me 2 copyright violations on my original videos then shutdown the account because of "multiple" copyright violations

They sent me copyright violations on the original videos of the ones i complained about after i sent them a dmca notice.

Basically they got it backwards..

I can only assume 1 of 2 things happened.
1) the person reviewing the notice actually did make a mistake and did it backwards.
2) the person who stole the videos sent a dmca request on my videos once he recieved the violations from youtube ?

either way i have sent multiple dmca requests since then and the videos are still up.

The account in question is made up of copied videos and is quite obvious they are just reuploading existing videos with alternate descriptions.

NetHorse · 06-30-2011, 01:15 PM

Interesting, but definitely not the end of youtube.

GatorB · 06-30-2011, 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drmadcat

copyright is a load of crap youtube.com is great

you're in this business right?

kane · 06-30-2011, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear

yes , thank you for repeating what was already made clear to most people.

perhaps you have a problem reading or don't understand how the dmca process works..

next time read the thread before making foolish shots in the dark. they send users notice if you violate tos, they sent me 2 copyright violations on my original videos then shutdown the account because of "multiple" copyright violations

They sent me copyright violations on the original videos of the ones i complained about after i sent them a dmca notice.

Basically they got it backwards..

I can only assume 1 of 2 things happened.
1) the person reviewing the notice actually did make a mistake and did it backwards.
2) the person who stole the videos sent a dmca request on my videos once he recieved the violations from youtube ?

either way i have sent multiple dmca requests since then and the videos are still up.

The account in question is made up of copied videos and is quite obvious they are just reuploading existing videos with alternate descriptions.

I listen to Howard Stern pretty regularly and one of their guys on the show had a similar situation on Twitter. He set up a twitter account and quickly there were several other people that set up fakes pretending to be him. Most of them were funny and he didn't care but one was saying some really offensive stuff so he contacts Twitter to complain about it and they ended up shutting his account down, but the fake stayed up. He had to jump through a lot of hoops to get his account back online.

Barefootsies · 06-30-2011, 01:40 PM

Do you have any idea the number of bills proposed that never pass?

This one doesn't stand a chance.

u-Bob · 06-30-2011, 02:30 PM

*insert hitler is not amused parody youtube video*

marlboroack · 06-30-2011, 04:29 PM

No because they don't own the content and they have very strict teams going at it 24.7 to limit all the videos that go viral. Good luck taking Youtube to court anyway.

gideongallery · 06-30-2011, 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear

next time read the thread before making foolish shots in the dark. they send users notice if you violate tos, they sent me 2 copyright violations on my original videos then shutdown the account because of "multiple" copyright violations

They sent me copyright violations on the original videos of the ones i complained about after i sent them a dmca notice.

Basically they got it backwards..

I can only assume 1 of 2 things happened.
1) the person reviewing the notice actually did make a mistake and did it backwards.
2) the person who stole the videos sent a dmca request on my videos once he recieved the violations from youtube ?

seriously man if you filed a proper counter notice you would know exactly which one of these it was

and you would have the evidence to press charges for fraud if it was the second.

Quote:

either way i have sent multiple dmca requests since then and the videos are still up.

The account in question is made up of copied videos and is quite obvious they are just reuploading existing videos with alternate descriptions.

leaving a video up after a valid takedown is completely different then having the video be re uploaded with a different description

especially when the "supposed" copyright holder doesn't file a counter notice when the work is DMCA ed.

SmokeyTheBear · 06-30-2011, 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

leaving a video up after a valid takedown is completely different then having the video be re uploaded with a different description

you obviously can't read very well gideon

I had an original video , i made myself, everything in it owned by me and created by me

Someone copied my videos and had them on their channel.

I noticed these copied videos and filed a valid dmca notice to youtube

their videos stayed up and i recieved 2 copyright violations on MY account and then a notice that my account was being turned off.

The law above says youtube committed a felony, they are not protected by dmca safe harbour as they did not remove the video after a valid dmca was filed ,they continue to stream the video.

gideongallery · 06-30-2011, 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear

you obviously can't read very well gideon

I had an original video , i made myself, everything in it owned by me and created by me

Someone copied my videos and had them on their channel.

I noticed these copied videos and filed a valid dmca notice to youtube

their videos stayed up and i recieved 2 copyright violations on MY account and then a notice that my account was being turned off.

The law above says youtube committed a felony, they are not protected by dmca safe harbour as they did not remove the video after a valid dmca was filed ,they continue to stream the video.

so sue youtube for 25k per view if they don't have safe harbor protection

i suspect you did something wrong in your filling because you didn't even fille a counter notice your 2 complaints.

and what about this statement do you not understand

Quote:

seriously man if you filed a proper counter notice you would know exactly which one of these it was

and you would have the evidence to press charges for fraud if it was the second.

your account got banned for multiple copyright violations and you never filed a counter notice.

Diomed · 06-30-2011, 09:09 PM

Youtube,

love it or hate it.. serves an incredibly necessary purpose. I'm sure politicians would love to see it go, and have it targeted for the near future.

Zorgman · 06-30-2011, 09:47 PM

Tubes will end up showing 1-2 minutes then say "click to download" to your computer. Then it's not streaming.

SmokeyTheBear · 07-01-2011, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

so sue youtube for 25k per view if they don't have safe harbor protection

would rather see them do a 5yr prison stint

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

i suspect you did something wrong in your filling

you suspected wrong, twice.. after it being clearly explained to you..

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

because you didn't even fille a counter notice your 2 complaints.

has nothing to do with the law quoted nor would it invalidate a dmca. Thanks for playing irrelevant comments by gideon

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

your account got banned for multiple copyright violations and you never filed a counter notice.

i was not served with the dmca , youtube was. I never got to see it as my account was banned, all i got was an account notice. I replied to the account notice explaining the situation.

You have to find some other reason for it to be ok to steal gideon.

DWB · 07-01-2011, 09:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diomed

Youtube,

love it or hate it.. serves an incredibly necessary purpose.

what purpose is that?

there was life before youtube, there will be life after.

pornguy · 07-01-2011, 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Love Sex

its only bad for american uploaders the rest of the world is saying ..|..

American people came up with a little quote and lots have found the actual truth of this.

The quote. " The Long Arm of the Law"

Trust me they can and will use it against ANYONE they please.

gideongallery · 07-01-2011, 10:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokeyTheBear

would rather see them do a 5yr prison stint

you suspected wrong, twice.. after it being clearly explained to you..

has nothing to do with the law quoted nor would it invalidate a dmca. Thanks for playing irrelevant comments by gideon

i was not served with the dmca , youtube was. I never got to see it as my account was banned, all i got was an account notice. I replied to the account notice explaining the situation.

You have to find some other reason for it to be ok to steal gideon.

there is a huge difference between claiming something and proving something

you claim a billion dollar company is doing something so wrong that it would open them up to an open and shut case for copyright infringement

you haven't proven that at all

i find it hard to believe your statement

especially when you could get paid 25k per hit to the video in question and you choose not to sue for that money.

Robbie · 07-01-2011, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pompousjohn

This would make the majority of the internet either illegal or or useless.

No...it would mean that the majority of the internet wouldn't be stolen.

Everything on the internet would still be there...but it would be on the OWNERS websites where it belongs.

JamesGw · 07-01-2011, 02:25 PM

This could set a dangerous precedent, but we'll see where it goes.

SmokeyTheBear · 07-01-2011, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

there is a huge difference between claiming something and proving something

thanks for that fucking brilliant observation dumbass

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

a billion dollar company is doing something so wrong that it would open them up to an open and shut case for copyright infringement

umm glad it only took explaining it 3 times to you before you understand.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

you haven't proven that at all

this isn't a court, and youtube doesn't post here, it would be beyond stupid to give them a jump on the gun.

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

i find it hard to believe your statement

you find it hard to follow simple english so it doesn't suprise me..

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

especially when you could get paid 25k per hit to the video in question and you choose not to sue for that money.

when did i say i decided not to sue ?

this is where reading really helps gideon.. read the thread.. respond to what is written.

You have a problem with not reading what is written , asking questions that have already been answered and making shit up out of thin air.

06-30-2011, 09:17 AM	#1
SmokeyTheBear ►SouthOfHeaven Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer Posts: 28,609	is this the end of YOUTUBE ?!!! http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-s978/show "Makes unauthorized web streaming of copyrighted content a felony with a possible penalty of up to 5 years in prison. Illegal streaming of copyrighted content is defined in the bill as an offense that "consists of 10 or more public performances by electronic means, during any 180-day period, of 1 or more copyrighted works" and has a total economic value, either to the copyright holder or the infringer, of at least $2,500." it hasn't passed yet , but wouldn't youtube be guilty of this right now ? How would/could youtube alter its model to abide by this law ? __________________ hatisblack at yahoo.com

06-30-2011, 09:20 AM	#3
drmadcat Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2011 Location: in the back room wanking Posts: 2,024	copyright is a load of crap youtube.com is great __________________ asiamoviepass.com

06-30-2011, 09:42 AM	#4
bronco67 Too lazy to set a custom title Join Date: Dec 2006 Posts: 29,035	Wouldn't this shut down most tube sites? Who the fuck really believes that a 40 minute clip from the latest Elegant Angel movie is there legally? __________________

06-30-2011, 09:49 AM	#6
96ukssob So Fucking Banananananas Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: If I was in your ass you'd know it Posts: 12,991	this will be a disaster to manage __________________ Email: Clicky on Me

06-30-2011, 10:03 AM	#8
brassmonkey Pay It Forward Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Yo Mama House Posts: 76,934	soon the government will control everything you do. __________________ TRUMP 2025 KEKAW!!! - Support The Laken Riley Act!!! END DACA - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com

06-30-2011, 09:18 AM	#2
porno jew Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 10,166	Top recipients for ALL supporting interest groups Name Amount Received Vote On Passage Sen. Harry Reid [D, NV] $2,335,183 Sen. Charles Schumer [D, NY] $2,016,955 Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand [D, NY] $1,650,251 Sen. Barbara Boxer [D, CA] $1,163,223 Sen. Michael Bennet [D, CO] $767,772 Sen. Patrick Leahy [D, VT] $737,110 Sen. Robert Portman [R, OH] $714,176 Sen. Mark Kirk [R, IL] $471,721 Sen. Ron Wyden [D, OR] $423,313 Sen. Patty Murray [D, WA] $413,000 Rep. Howard Berman [D, CA-28] $454,598 Rep. Bruce Braley [D, IA-1] $360,989 Rep. Michael Capuano [D, MA-8] $320,580 Rep. Patrick Meehan [R, PA-7] $249,800 Rep. Allyson Schwartz [D, PA-13] $243,319 Rep. Eric Cantor [R, VA-7] $239,300 Rep. John Barrow [D, GA-12] $218,080 Rep. Gary Peters [D, MI-9] $216,748 Rep. Nancy Pelosi [D, CA-8] $213,550 Rep. Carolyn Maloney [D, NY-14] $209,610 Specific Organizations Supporting S.978 American Federation of Television and Radio Artists Directors Guild of America International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees, Moving Picture Technicians, Artists and Allied Crafts of the United States Screen Actors Guild Motion Picture Association of America Recording Industry Association of America Independent Film and Television Alliance National Association of Theatre Owners Ultimate Fighting Championship American Federation of Musicians American Intellectual Property Law Association NBC Universal Viacom Sony Pictures Entertainment American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers Association of American Publishers Association of Independent Music Publishers American Photographic Artists AT&T Broadcast Music, Inc. Business Software Alliance CBS Corporation Church Music Publishers Association Entertainment Software Association Graphic Artists Guild National Association for Stock Car Auto Racing National Association of Broadcasters National Collegiate Athletic Association National Music Publishers' Association National Basketball Association News America Holdings Newspaper Association of America Picture Archive Council of America Professional Photographers of America Professional School Photographers Association Reed Elsevier PPL & VPL SESAC Software & Information Industry Association Time Warner Universal Music Group Magazine Publishers of America The Walt Disney Company Writers Guild of America, West U. S. Chamber of Commerce International Brotherhood of Teamsters Entertainment Merchants Association Global Intellectual Property Center

06-30-2011, 10:17 AM	#10
Love Sex Confirmed User Join Date: Nov 2004 Posts: 1,905	its only bad for american uploaders the rest of the world is saying ..\|..

06-30-2011, 10:21 AM	#11
retards Registered User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 55	OUCH! I can't believe it's taken this long. __________________ Always looking for non adult sponsors !

06-30-2011, 10:23 AM	#12
seeandsee Check SIG! Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Europe (Skype: gojkoas) Posts: 50,945	we all expected this, but this opens all new problems about who, when, what, how __________________ BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year Contact here

06-30-2011, 10:35 AM	#16
iSpyCams Amateur Gynecologist Industry Role: Join Date: May 2009 Location: Medellin Posts: 4,436	This would make the majority of the internet either illegal or or useless.

06-30-2011, 10:35 AM	#17
lazycash Troll Patrol Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Local Socal Posts: 15,214	I'm sure Gideongallery can find a loophole. __________________ "WTF, on google you can find the answer to every question in human history, EXCEPT how to convert cams.. Its crazy..." VenusBlogger

06-30-2011, 10:38 AM	#18
dan@noof Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2008 Location: Boulder Posts: 278	Google is compiling a file of incriminating evidence, of various wrongdoings committed by these politicians, that its spiders found while crawling the web. Each one will be contacted with copies of those files. This will subsequently die. (my grammar seems fucked, but you get what I'm saying) __________________

06-30-2011, 10:40 AM	#19
porno jew Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 10,166	people would rather destroy the internet and go back to the dark ages in order to protect their garbage content.

06-30-2011, 10:45 AM	#20
Nathan Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2003 Posts: 3,108	sorry guys, I know you hate me saying this... but USC 17 §512 (DMCA Safe Harbor) limits the other paragraphs, including §506 that this extends to make it a criminal act. So no, this is not the end of youtube. __________________ "Think about it a little more and you'll agree with me, because you're smart and I'm right." - Charlie Munger

06-30-2011, 11:33 AM	#23
cooldude7 Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Heaven Posts: 4,306	never gonna happen.

06-30-2011, 11:35 AM	#24
CurrentlySober Too lazy to wipe my ass Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: A Public Bathroom Posts: 38,495	i bought a pair of levis 501s today... __________________ My AI Handywork... My Dream Gal... XXX 👁️ 👍️ 💩

06-30-2011, 12:08 PM	#29
halfpint GFY's Halfpint Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: UK Posts: 15,223	I wish Google along with everything it owns would just curl up and die, They are one of the worst copyright infringers on the whole of the interwebs, and they are very happy making $$$$$$$ from it with thier bullshit ads everywhere __________________ Get FREE website listings on Cryptocoinshops.net

06-30-2011, 01:15 PM	#33
NetHorse Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Chicago Posts: 3,526	Interesting, but definitely not the end of youtube. __________________ ┌∩┐(◣_◢)┌∩┐ ICQ # 427013273

06-30-2011, 01:40 PM	#36
Barefootsies Choice is an Illusion Industry Role: Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Land of Obama Posts: 42,635	Do you have any idea the number of bills proposed that never pass? This one doesn't stand a chance. __________________ Should You Email Your Members? Link1 \| Link2 \| Link3 Enough Said. "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

06-30-2011, 02:30 PM	#37
u-Bob there's no $$$ in porn Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: icq: 195./568.-230 (btw: not getting offline msgs) Posts: 33,063	insert hitler is not amused parody youtube video

06-30-2011, 04:29 PM	#38
marlboroack So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: ☣ Posts: 9,327	No because they don't own the content and they have very strict teams going at it 24.7 to limit all the videos that go viral. Good luck taking Youtube to court anyway.

06-30-2011, 09:09 PM	#42
Diomed Converting like it's 1999 Industry Role: Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: The South Posts: 6,165	Youtube, love it or hate it.. serves an incredibly necessary purpose. I'm sure politicians would love to see it go, and have it targeted for the near future. __________________ 10 years of experience in: CHAT SALES - PAID TRAFFIC - CONVERSION - CREATIVES - CONSULTATION

06-30-2011, 09:47 PM	#43
Zorgman Confirmed User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Sydney, Australia Posts: 6,103	Tubes will end up showing 1-2 minutes then say "click to download" to your computer. Then it's not streaming. __________________ ---

07-01-2011, 02:25 PM	#49
JamesGw Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 1,237	This could set a dangerous precedent, but we'll see where it goes. __________________ Giggles.com has a huge selection of sex toys. Need backlinks? Ask to guest post on our adult blog.