How much dangerous could it be promoting tubes - GoFuckYourself.com

KLAN · 09-20-2011, 05:01 PM

in this article http://www.xbiz.com/news/138678 this sentence "...as well as 100 John Does and 100 John Doe companies, presumably its advertising clients...." made me ponder and worry not a little......Does this mean that even who promote the tubes who acted spuriously are subjects to charges?

wehateporn · 09-20-2011, 05:05 PM

No danger, all is safe

blackmonsters · 09-20-2011, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marino sumo

in this article http://www.xbiz.com/news/138678 this sentence "...as well as 100 John Does and 100 John Doe companies, presumably its advertising clients...." made me ponder and worry not a little......Does this mean that even who promote the tubes who acted spuriously are subjects to charges?

You will be judged by the "company" that you keep...........in business!

KLAN · 09-20-2011, 05:21 PM

still not very clear......cryptic answers

porno jew · 09-20-2011, 05:36 PM

yes is very dangerous.

L-Pink · 09-20-2011, 05:42 PM

Did you drive traffic (victims) to sites with fraudulent billing? Did you make money off of stolen content? ..... Think about it.

.

KLAN · 09-22-2011, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Did you drive traffic (victims) to sites with fraudulent billing? Did you make money off of stolen content? ..... Think about it.

.

yes that's a clear answer! thx.
But how can ppl know if a tube stole content ?
That would be impossible.....none could just keep watching all the tube's content.....
what could be the worst scenario if someone got caught promoting a tubesite who stolen content from a regular producer ? just paying, as penalty, an amount of money more or less based on how much it could made you gain?

gideongallery · 09-22-2011, 05:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Did you drive traffic (victims) to sites with fraudulent billing? Did you make money off of stolen content? ..... Think about it.

.

did you guys send traffic to a gallery featuring a girl who turned out to be under age

oh wait a second....

L-Pink · 09-22-2011, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gideongallery

did you guys send traffic to a gallery featuring a girl who turned out to be under age

Yes, I'd worry about that too.

.

gideongallery · 09-22-2011, 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L-Pink

Yes, I'd worry about that too.

.

so you never send a single hit to nasty dollars nore trade traffic with a single site that used their galleries

https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=9879...light=underage

and you do a perfect job of screening every single trade partner, as well as every sponsor BEFORE you ever send a single hit of traffic.

http://digg.com/news/offbeat/bieyank..._old_porn_star

KLAN · 09-23-2011, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marino sumo

yes that's a clear answer! thx.
But how can ppl know if a tube stole content ?
That would be impossible.....none could just keep watching all the tube's content.....
what could be the worst scenario if someone got caught promoting a tubesite who stolen content from a regular producer ? just paying, as penalty, an amount of money more or less based on how much it could made you gain?

bump for me!

_Richard_ · 09-23-2011, 01:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marino sumo

in this article http://www.xbiz.com/news/138678 this sentence "...as well as 100 John Does and 100 John Doe companies, presumably its advertising clients...." made me ponder and worry not a little......Does this mean that even who promote the tubes who acted spuriously are subjects to charges?

you probably need a bit more official legal advice, but if there is videos longer than 5 mins on the lander i think it would be hard claiming ignorance

KLAN · 09-24-2011, 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_

you probably need a bit more official legal advice

I guess so as well. thx

09-20-2011, 05:01 PM	#1
KLAN Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Always behind you Posts: 300	How much dangerous could it be promoting tubes in this article http://www.xbiz.com/news/138678 this sentence "...as well as 100 John Does and 100 John Doe companies, presumably its advertising clients...." made me ponder and worry not a little......Does this mean that even who promote the tubes who acted spuriously are subjects to charges?

09-20-2011, 05:05 PM	#2
wehateporn Promoting Debate on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 27,173	No danger, all is safe __________________ Sexy Girls Teasing

09-20-2011, 05:21 PM	#4
KLAN Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2010 Location: Always behind you Posts: 300	still not very clear......cryptic answers

09-20-2011, 05:36 PM	#5
porno jew Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 10,166	yes is very dangerous.

09-20-2011, 05:42 PM	#6
L-Pink working on my tan Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Florida/Kentucky Posts: 39,152	Did you drive traffic (victims) to sites with fraudulent billing? Did you make money off of stolen content? ..... Think about it. .