![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the South.
Posts: 797
|
A good article on hardlinks for seo
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/10-illust...ation-of-links
Although it's from last year, this is a pretty good article on the value of different types of back links. At one point it says: "Papers like Microsoft's VIPS (Vision Based Page Segmentation), Google's Document Ranking Based on Semantic Distance, and the recent Reasonable Surfer stuff all suggest that valuing links from content more highly than those in sidebars or footers can have net positive impacts on avoiding spam and manipulation. As webmasters and SEOs, we can certainly attest to the fact that a lot of paid links exist in these sections of sites and that getting non-natural links from inside content is much more difficult." It appears that Search Engines don't value links in footers and sidebars as much as they used to. In another part of that article it talks about links from multiple pages on a domain and says that they do not help you any more than just one link. Hence, links on blogs in their blogroll where the link appears on every page on the blog will not help you any more than just one link. IMHO having a link on every page on a site, using the exact same anchor text, can actually hurt both sites...the one that the link is on and the site that the link points to.
__________________
Email me at jeff at rouge dot net |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Too lazy to set a custom title
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 10,166
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the South.
Posts: 797
|
I think so too, porno jew
__________________
Email me at jeff at rouge dot net |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the South.
Posts: 797
|
Matter of fact, back around October of 2010 Google introduced an algorithmic filter that will penalize a site with multiple links where there are too many links on the same domains.
__________________
Email me at jeff at rouge dot net |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
aliasx
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 19,010
|
Thanks for the info.
__________________
https://porncorporation.com |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Confirmed User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the South.
Posts: 797
|
Quote:
__________________
Email me at jeff at rouge dot net |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |