Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 01-21-2012, 07:01 PM   #1
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
For all you idiots who keep arguing that copyright infringement is theft

Quote:
The phonorecords in question were not "stolen, converted or taken by fraud" for purposes of [section] 2314. The section's language clearly contemplates a physical identity between the items unlawfully obtained and those eventually transported, and hence some prior physical taking of the subject goods. Since the statutorily defined property rights of a copyright holder have a character distinct from the possessory interest of the owner of simple "goods, wares, [or] merchandise," interference with copyright does not easily equate with theft, conversion, or fraud. The infringer of a copyright does not assume physical control over the copyright nor wholly deprive its owner of its use. Infringement implicates a more complex set of property interests than does run-of-the-mill theft, conversion, or fraud."
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/script...s/473/207.html

the supreme court disagrees with you
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 07:03 PM   #2
MaDalton
I am Amazing Content!
 
MaDalton's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 39,826
and i disagree with the supreme court

and with you anyways
MaDalton is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 07:06 PM   #3
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaDalton View Post
and i disagree with the supreme court

and with you anyways


The supreme court (and therefore the law) defines copyright infringement as not being theft, no amount of wishing is going to change that fact.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 07:13 PM   #4
bronco67
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
bronco67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,035
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/script...s/473/207.html

the supreme court disagrees with you
So posting a blurb of legalese makes you look smart? This bullshit probably makes lots of sense to a double-talker like you.
__________________
bronco67 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 07:13 PM   #5
blackmonsters
Making PHP work
 
blackmonsters's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 🌎🌅🌈🌇
Posts: 20,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
The supreme court (and therefore the law) defines copyright infringement as not being theft, no amount of wishing is going to change that fact.
Not exactly bro.

They define copyright infringement as being more than theft!


Quote:
Infringement implicates a more complex set of property interests than does run-of-the-mill theft, conversion, or fraud."
In other words copyright infringement could involve conversion, fraud AND THEFT!

__________________
Make Money with Porn
blackmonsters is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 07:36 PM   #6
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackmonsters View Post
In other words copyright infringement could involve conversion, fraud AND THEFT!

want to bet.


I will bet you 25k I can produce a case where a person convicted of one count of conspiracy to transport stolen property in interstate commerce, eight counts of interstate transportation of stolen property, and three counts of mail fraud appealed and reversed of all those charges.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 07:45 PM   #7
Dirty Dane
Sick Fuck
 
Dirty Dane's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: www
Posts: 9,491
Neither is copying money. Go ahead Gideon. Do it.
Dirty Dane is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 07:47 PM   #8
Jim_Gunn
Confirmed User
 
Jim_Gunn's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Where The Teens Are
Posts: 5,702
The culture of entitlement from amoral people like yourself with no understanding of macroeconomics or fairness for that matter has now reached its zenith. Theft has a range of meanings. If one purposefully accesses a pay service like HBO for example without paying for it one is not actually removing a physical object nor is one depriving others from that service. Yet the law commonly defines that as a "theft of services". And rightly so. Even if the criminal who does so dubiously claims that they "weren't going to pay for it anyway". As if that is an excuse.
Jim_Gunn is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 07:53 PM   #9
SmokeyTheBear
►SouthOfHeaven
 
SmokeyTheBear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: PlanetEarth MyBoardRank: GerbilMaster My-Penis-Size: extralarge MyWeapon: Computer
Posts: 28,609
who cares if it is theft ? it is illegal and you are a douchebag.

end of story.
__________________
hatisblack at yahoo.com
SmokeyTheBear is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 07:58 PM   #10
blackmonsters
Making PHP work
 
blackmonsters's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 🌎🌅🌈🌇
Posts: 20,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
want to bet.


I will bet you 25k I can produce a case where a person convicted of one count of conspiracy to transport stolen property in interstate commerce, eight counts of interstate transportation of stolen property, and three counts of mail fraud appealed and reversed of all those charges.
I will bet you $25k that the following URL doesn't have any video content :

http://megaupload.com



__________________
Make Money with Porn
blackmonsters is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 07:58 PM   #11
Radical Bucks
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: On the Beach
Posts: 673
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
want to bet.


I will bet you 25k I can produce a case where a person convicted of one count of conspiracy to transport stolen property in interstate commerce, eight counts of interstate transportation of stolen property, and three counts of mail fraud appealed and reversed of all those charges.
Sounds to me like you condone content theft defending the definitions.
Radical Bucks is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 08:07 PM   #12
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by Radical Bucks View Post
Sounds to me like you condone content theft defending the definitions.
1. copyright infringement is not content thef

2. If i said murder was not theft would you say so stupid as argue that means i believe murder is ok.

I only object to morons who are copyright infringement is theft, mainly because such a misrepresentation ignores fair use as authorization.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 08:09 PM   #13
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackmonsters View Post
I will bet you $25k that the following URL doesn't have any video content :

http://megaupload.com



you take my bet first, then i will take your bet once the supreme court rules on that trial.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 08:10 PM   #14
blackmonsters
Making PHP work
 
blackmonsters's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 🌎🌅🌈🌇
Posts: 20,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim_Gunn View Post
The culture of entitlement from amoral people like yourself with no understanding of macroeconomics or fairness for that matter has now reached its zenith. Theft has a range of meanings. If one purposefully accesses a pay service like HBO for example without paying for it one is not actually removing a physical object nor is one depriving others from that service. Yet the law commonly defines that as a "theft of services". And rightly so. Even if the criminal who does so dubiously claims that they "weren't going to pay for it anyway". As if that is an excuse.

Gideongallery helped OJ set up his cable TV.




http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8719276/


Quote:
In a raid on Simpson?s Miami home in 2001, federal agents seized illegal devices known as ?bootloaders? that authorities said were used to steal television programming.
__________________
Make Money with Porn
blackmonsters is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 08:15 PM   #15
blackmonsters
Making PHP work
 
blackmonsters's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 🌎🌅🌈🌇
Posts: 20,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
you take my bet first, then i will take your bet once the supreme court rules on that trial.
You might have a point about the supreme court.
I mean, it's made up of old motherfuckers who can't use a laptop.
__________________
Make Money with Porn
blackmonsters is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 08:43 PM   #16
PornoMonster
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
want to bet.


I will bet you 25k I can produce a case where a person convicted of one count of conspiracy to transport stolen property in interstate commerce, eight counts of interstate transportation of stolen property, and three counts of mail fraud appealed and reversed of all those charges.
BUT, why was it appealed and reversed? Just because these 2 things happen, does NOT mean it didn't happen. It could mean the evidence was gathered wrong, not enought and so on.

OJ
casey anthony

LOL

Do I know what the court said the reason for the reversal was, NO, but you also did not post it.
PornoMonster is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 08:46 PM   #17
PornoMonster
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,257
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim_Gunn View Post
The culture of entitlement from amoral people like yourself with no understanding of macroeconomics or fairness for that matter has now reached its zenith. Theft has a range of meanings. If one purposefully accesses a pay service like HBO for example without paying for it one is not actually removing a physical object nor is one depriving others from that service. Yet the law commonly defines that as a "theft of services". And rightly so. Even if the criminal who does so dubiously claims that they "weren't going to pay for it anyway". As if that is an excuse.
This is Fair Use, he watched it on a 30% smaller TV, LOL
PornoMonster is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 08:54 PM   #18
Splum
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 6,195
But yet you post an illegal copyrighted video on GFY?

Quote:
Originally Posted by blackmonsters View Post
I will bet you $25k that the following URL doesn't have any video content :

http://megaupload.com



Splum is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 08:55 PM   #19
ArsewithClass
So Fucking Banned
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 7,957
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
1. copyright infringement is not content thef

2. If i said murder was not theft would you say so stupid as argue that means i believe murder is ok.

I only object to morons who are copyright infringement is theft, mainly because such a misrepresentation ignores fair use as authorization.
Do you not know GFY yet? Just saying


I can't believe a handful of people try to irrationally put words in peoples mouths or twist what has been said

I agree copyright infringement is not theft, but I think with a car, TWOCK is the usual acceptable law broken... (taking without the owners consent)

Copyright infringement should come under the same law... Miss use of property belonging to others
ArsewithClass is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 09:00 PM   #20
Due
Confirmed User
 
Due's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Murrieta, CA
Posts: 3,620
where did you see copyright infridgement is not theft? I saw only does not EASYLY equal theft.....

Would you mind timewarping that episode of law and the idiot to show some authority to that statement ?
__________________
I buy plugs
Skype: Due_Global
/Due
Due is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 09:04 PM   #21
TheSquealer
BANNED
 
TheSquealer's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: In Your Head
Posts: 25,083
This guy is such a bizarre fucking retard. Copyright infringement is against the law... period. That's not a disputable fact. Calling it "theft" or not, is semantics and irrelevant to the fact that its illegal.
__________________
.
Yes, fewer illegal immigrants working equates to more job opportunities for American citizens.

Rochard
TheSquealer is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 09:05 PM   #22
FlexxAeon
Confirmed User
 
FlexxAeon's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,765
murder is not manslaughter
__________________
flexx [dot] aeon [at] gmail
FlexxAeon is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 09:06 PM   #23
blackmonsters
Making PHP work
 
blackmonsters's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 🌎🌅🌈🌇
Posts: 20,227
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splum View Post
But yet you post an illegal copyrighted video on GFY?
That video is authorized.

Try clicking the link under the video :

https://youtube.com/cthru?c2b=ama...=Nx64_N4AA 04


Nice try though.




BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
__________________
Make Money with Porn
blackmonsters is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 09:06 PM   #24
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by Due View Post
where did you see copyright infridgement is not theft? I saw only does not EASYLY equal theft.....

Would you mind timewarping that episode of law and the idiot to show some authority to that statement ?
read the ruling

the link is in the very first post

nuff said.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2012, 11:45 PM   #25
Due
Confirmed User
 
Due's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Murrieta, CA
Posts: 3,620
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
read the ruling

the link is in the very first post

nuff said.
Try and check the entire ruling, the following legal amendments / notes and guidelines

Reproduction is fine, add distribution/time morphing / whatever you wish to call it and it's conspiracy charges. Teach others how to do it and it's conspiracy to commit racketeering.

Have you ever been in a court before ? It sounds like you think it's 1 way communications.

You would also know it's not sufficient to just quote a case you have to quote the similarity / reference point used, unlike on TV all judges are not "very well familiar with case x"

Also you should read more about 18 U.S.C. § 2318, looks like it should be useful too. The funny part about that one is actually that you wouldn't need to be found guilty in copyright infringement but instead it's counterfeit labels, packaging and / or documentation. IE: you produced a copy of your legally obtained software, music to bypass 18 U.S.C. § 2314, now you are instead trafficking counterfeit/illicit labels and packaging. It's easy to build on the charges here (file names, digital signatures, COPYRIGHT NOTICE, CREDITS TO).

That's actually interested as it appears to cover a lot of the "safe harbors"
__________________
I buy plugs
Skype: Due_Global
/Due
Due is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 06:13 AM   #26
MaDalton
I am Amazing Content!
 
MaDalton's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 39,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
The supreme court (and therefore the law) defines copyright infringement as not being theft, no amount of wishing is going to change that fact.
the supreme court doesn't rule the world - and since i am not american i am allowed to disagree
MaDalton is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 06:25 AM   #27
Splum
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 6,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackmonsters View Post
That video is authorized.
No its not authorized you idiot, its uploaded by a normal user, any authorized music from any major label is always stored on VEVO. Nice try pirate.
Splum is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 06:34 AM   #28
sixsax
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denmark
Posts: 213
Of course copyright infringement is not theft, it's copyright infringement. Doesn't make you less of an asshole for doing it, though.
sixsax is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 06:40 AM   #29
newB
Confirmed User
 
newB's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere between reality and total ape-shit bonkers.
Posts: 2,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlexxAeon View Post
murder is not manslaughter
Best answer, that seems to have gone unnoticed.

The law protects individuals from double jeopardy - being tried for the same offense twice. For that reason there are distinctions in the type and degree of offense committed, such as murder/manslaughter and petite/grand larceny.
__________________

The best Adult Affiliate Programs reviewed and indexed by niche and feature.
Easily find the sponsors that suit your needs.


newB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 06:41 AM   #30
Nautilus
Confirmed User
 
Nautilus's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,631
Supreme court may call piracy whatever they want, as long as they still agree piracy is illegal, I don't care. And I'll keep calling bloodsuckers stealing our content thieves just because it sounds spot on to me.
__________________
.
.

FerroCash - 50+ quality niche paysites to promote | 100K+ FHGs | Check recently added galleries

New sites | Pantyhose | Nylon | Shemale | Strapon | Lesbian | Mature/MILF | Anal | Old&Young | Gay | Feet

Morphing RSS feeds - check them at the Official blog| Page Peels (Sample 1 : Sample 2)

Wish to review or evaluate our sites before promoting them? Contact me for free password.

ICQ: 38.89.22.76 e-mail: support AT ferrocash.com
Nautilus is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 06:42 AM   #31
stocktrader23
Let's do some business.
 
stocktrader23's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The dirty south.
Posts: 18,781
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackmonsters View Post
Not exactly bro.

They define copyright infringement as being more than theft!

In other words copyright infringement could involve conversion, fraud AND THEFT!

No, it's quite obvious that they mean copyright infringement is not theft.

"Copyright holders frequently refer to copyright infringement as "theft." In copyright law, infringement does not refer to actual theft, but an instance where a person exercises one of the exclusive rights of the copyright holder without authorization.[5] Courts have distinguished between copyright infringement and theft, holding, for instance, in the United States Supreme Court case Dowling v. United States (1985) that bootleg phonorecords did not constitute stolen property and that "interference with copyright does not easily equate with theft, conversion, or fraud. The Copyright Act even employs a separate term of art to define one who misappropriates a copyright... 'an infringer of the copyright.'" In the case of copyright infringement the province guaranteed to the copyright holder by copyright law is invaded, i.e. exclusive rights, but no control, physical or otherwise, is taken over the copyright, nor is the copyright holder wholly deprived of using the copyrighted work or exercising the exclusive rights held."

And Gideon,

I know the courts define infringement as something else but I still call it theft.

1) Because you are steal stealing shit, by my definition of the word.

2) To piss off people that like playing semantics when we are talking about a serious issue.

I've told you before, you are right about a lot of things that you catch shit for here but there are no legitimate excuses for blatant theft / infringement like we see in the case of Mega Upload. I 100% agree that they shouldn't be punished for what their users do and they have not been. Their punishment is over things that they did, like making it look like content was removed after a DMCA when in fact they just played some linking games.

I also don't agree with how they handle cases like this. At no point should you have all of your websites completely taken offline *before you are found guilty of anything. They should have appointed someone to run the business (like they do in other Federal cases) and handled things correctly until the court case was decided. They've already been wrong once and ruined someones business over their own stupidity. I'm 100% sure that won't be the case with MU but we have due process for a reason and this is bullshit.
__________________


Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life

"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."
stocktrader23 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 06:47 AM   #32
Fletch XXX
GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
 
Fletch XXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: that 504
Posts: 60,840
Meanwhile gfyers watching a stolen movie scene on YouTube....
__________________

Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me
Fletch XXX is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 06:52 AM   #33
stocktrader23
Let's do some business.
 
stocktrader23's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The dirty south.
Posts: 18,781
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch XXX View Post
Meanwhile gfyers watching a stolen movie scene on YouTube....
And posting copyrighted goatse images.
__________________


Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life

"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."
stocktrader23 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 06:53 AM   #34
stocktrader23
Let's do some business.
 
stocktrader23's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The dirty south.
Posts: 18,781
Poor tub girl, her rights were infringed upon thousands of times on GFY alone. We should all send her a few bucks to compensate her.
__________________


Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life

"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."
stocktrader23 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 06:57 AM   #35
Nautilus
Confirmed User
 
Nautilus's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,631
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletch XXX View Post
Meanwhile gfyers watching a stolen movie scene on YouTube....
Youtube is nothing like megaupload.

They have digital fingerprinting which is free to copyright holders - if you want your content blocked from youtube, you can do it fast and stop all new uploads cold.

They ban repeat infringers and remove all files from their accounts.

They make it clear and explicit they're dead serious about copyright issues.

They have revenue splitting option and many copyright holders choose it to monetize their videos when they're posted at YT.

That means if some copyrighted content is posted there, that's only because copyright holders either want it there or simply do not care.
__________________
.
.

FerroCash - 50+ quality niche paysites to promote | 100K+ FHGs | Check recently added galleries

New sites | Pantyhose | Nylon | Shemale | Strapon | Lesbian | Mature/MILF | Anal | Old&Young | Gay | Feet

Morphing RSS feeds - check them at the Official blog| Page Peels (Sample 1 : Sample 2)

Wish to review or evaluate our sites before promoting them? Contact me for free password.

ICQ: 38.89.22.76 e-mail: support AT ferrocash.com
Nautilus is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 07:00 AM   #36
CaptainHowdy
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
CaptainHowdy's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Happy in the dark.
Posts: 92,999
Late signature spot ...
__________________
FLASH SALE INSANITY! deal with a 100% Trusted Seller
Buy Traffic Spots on a High-Quality Network

1 Year or Lifetime — That’s Right, Until the Internet Explodes!
CaptainHowdy is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 07:05 AM   #37
cess
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,921
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/script...s/473/207.html

the supreme court disagrees with you
You're right it's not theft, it's much worse than theft. If you walk into best buy and steal a movie you basically took away 10 bucks or whatever from them. If you download a movie and share it with thousands or millions of other people you cost whoever owns the copyright to that movie thousands if not millions.

That's why lawsuits are for thousands of dollars or more when someone is sued for copyright infringement. When someone steals a DVD no one really cares.

I'm sure some fuckturd will come in and say "but everyone they shared with wouldn't have bought it!" The truth is though if only 10% would have bought it that's still a shitload of money in most cases.
__________________
cess is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 07:35 AM   #38
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackmonsters View Post
You might have a point about the supreme court.
I mean, it's made up of old motherfuckers who can't use a laptop.
cool the double bet is accepted

here is the proof that your wrong

it actually the original case i posted in the begining

Quote:
The federal government brought its initial case against Dowling in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, arguing his guilt on the basis that he had no legal authority to distribute the records. Dowling was convicted of one count of conspiracy to transport stolen property in interstate commerce, eight counts of interstate transportation of stolen property, nine counts of copyright infringement, and three counts of mail fraud. The charges of mail fraud arose out of his use of the United States Postal Service to distribute the records.
Dowling appealed all convictions besides those of copyright infringement and the case moved to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, where he argued that the goods he was distributing were not "stolen, converted or taken by fraud", according to the language of 18 U.S.C. 2314 - the interstate transportation statute under which he was convicted. The court disagreed, affirming the original decision and upholding the conviction. Dowling then took the case to the Supreme Court, which sided with his argument and reversed the convictions. From the Reporter of Decision's syllabus:
The phonorecords in question were not "stolen, converted or taken by fraud" for purposes of [section] 2314. The section's language clearly contemplates a physical identity between the items unlawfully obtained and those eventually transported, and hence some prior physical taking of the subject goods. Since the statutorily defined property rights of a copyright holder have a character distinct from the possessory interest of the owner of simple "goods, wares, [or] merchandise," interference with copyright does not easily equate with theft, conversion, or fraud. The infringer of a copyright does not assume physical control over the copyright nor wholly deprive its owner of its use. Infringement implicates a more complex set of property interests than does run-of-the-mill theft, conversion, or fraud.
so you owe me 25k

if after the supreme court rules on the mega upload case, we will check the site

if videos exist you owe me 50k

if they don't your 25k debt is cancelled

good luck.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 07:45 AM   #39
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixsax View Post
Of course copyright infringement is not theft, it's copyright infringement. Doesn't make you less of an asshole for doing it, though.
but i don't infringe or defend infringement in any way at all

I defend fair use uses of technology that can be used to infringe

just like the original vcr which can be daisy chained together to make bootleg copies, doesn't invalidate my right to use it to timeshift tv shows that i paid for.

the fact that torrents are used to pirate shit shouldn't invalidate my right to use it to timeshift tv shows.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 08:04 AM   #40
MaDalton
I am Amazing Content!
 
MaDalton's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 39,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
but i don't infringe or defend infringement in any way at all

I defend fair use uses of technology that can be used to infringe

just like the original vcr which can be daisy chained together to make bootleg copies, doesn't invalidate my right to use it to timeshift tv shows that i paid for.

the fact that torrents are used to pirate shit shouldn't invalidate my right to use it to timeshift tv shows.
so what's your problem?

Megaupload was in violation of DMCA and as their internal email communication shows, they knew it and they didnt care. therefore they got shut down.

you can still "timeshift" your TV shows somewhere else
MaDalton is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 08:25 AM   #41
stocktrader23
Let's do some business.
 
stocktrader23's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The dirty south.
Posts: 18,781
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaDalton View Post
so what's your problem?

Megaupload was in violation of DMCA and as their internal email communication shows, they knew it and they didnt care. therefore they got shut down.

you can still "timeshift" your TV shows somewhere else
He's playing semantics and arguing about related but irrelevant points. One of the main reasons he is so hated here.

MegaUpload obviously breaking the law (from what we've seen).

He's arguing about calling it theft and people assume he's pro MU.
__________________


Hands Free Adult - Join Once, Earn For Life

"I try to make a habit of bouncing my eyes up to the face of a beautiful woman, and often repeat “not mine” in my head or even verbally. She’s not mine. God has her set aside. She’s not mine. She’s His little girl, and she needs me to fight for her by keeping my eyes where they should be."
stocktrader23 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 08:27 AM   #42
newB
Confirmed User
 
newB's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Somewhere between reality and total ape-shit bonkers.
Posts: 2,870
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
but i don't infringe or defend infringement in any way at all

I defend fair use uses of technology that can be used to infringe

just like the original vcr which can be daisy chained together to make bootleg copies, doesn't invalidate my right to use it to timeshift tv shows that i paid for.

the fact that torrents are used to pirate shit shouldn't invalidate my right to use it to timeshift tv shows.
I don't think anybody is saying the technology is unlawful. Just as you can use VCRs to record TV shows and movies for your own use, you can likewise make digital copies for your own use.

As with the VCR, the problem arises when you share those copies with others, especially for some type of financial gain.
__________________

The best Adult Affiliate Programs reviewed and indexed by niche and feature.
Easily find the sponsors that suit your needs.


newB is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 08:44 AM   #43
raymor
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 3,745
The law defines many different kinds of theft. The court ruled that in that particular case, the specific type of copyright infringement that defendant commited didn't fall under "simple theft" as defined by that particular statute.

A dictionary definition of theft:
1. To take wrongfully.

If you take some work you don't have permission to take, you're taking wrongfully. Therefore that's theft under the dictionary definition.
__________________
For historical display only. This information is not current:
support@bettercgi.com ICQ 7208627
Strongbox - The next generation in site security
Throttlebox - The next generation in bandwidth control
Clonebox - Backup and disaster recovery on steroids
raymor is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 10:07 AM   #44
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaDalton View Post
so what's your problem?

Megaupload was in violation of DMCA and as their internal email communication shows, they knew it and they didnt care. therefore they got shut down.

you can still "timeshift" your TV shows somewhere else
did you read the complaint

most of the smoking guns in that complaint are about as bogus as the smoking gun paul "found" against youtube.

Remember that thread, paul predicted that youtube would go down because of that evidence.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 10:10 AM   #45
gideongallery
Confirmed User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 7,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by newB View Post
I don't think anybody is saying the technology is unlawful. Just as you can use VCRs to record TV shows and movies for your own use, you can likewise make digital copies for your own use.

As with the VCR, the problem arises when you share those copies with others, especially for some type of financial gain.
you don't prevent sony/walmart etc from selling vcr (providing the service) that can be used for both infringing and non infringing purposes you go after the actual people infringing.

You do however take down sites like thepiratebay, megaupload that can be used for both legit and infringing activity

That the fucking point

Go after the individual leachers who don't have a fair use right to the content, go after the individual uploaders who don't have a fair use right.

Treat the torrents like you treat a vcr.
__________________

“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak
gideongallery is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 10:20 AM   #46
brassmonkey
Pay It Forward
 
brassmonkey's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Yo Mama House
Posts: 76,944
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlexxAeon View Post
murder is not manslaughter
in legal terms it isn't, but you still kill someone.
__________________
TRUMP 2025 KEKAW!!! - Support The Laken Riley Act!!!
END DACA - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com
brassmonkey is online now   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 10:38 AM   #47
Slappin Fish
Confirmed User
 
Slappin Fish's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Thailand
Posts: 2,512
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
but i don't infringe or defend infringement in any way at all

I defend fair use uses of technology that can be used to infringe

just like the original vcr which can be daisy chained together to make bootleg copies, doesn't invalidate my right to use it to timeshift tv shows that i paid for.

the fact that torrents are used to pirate shit shouldn't invalidate my right to use it to timeshift tv shows.
you shouldn't complain then. nobody banned the technology.
Slappin Fish is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 10:52 AM   #48
MaDalton
I am Amazing Content!
 
MaDalton's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 39,826
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
did you read the complaint

most of the smoking guns in that complaint are about as bogus as the smoking gun paul "found" against youtube.

Remember that thread, paul predicted that youtube would go down because of that evidence.
yes, i did, unlike you probably

once again - no one took your precious timeshifting away - just a website went down that profited from copyright infringement - run by a already twice convicted self acclaimed "Hacker".

so - what's your problem?
MaDalton is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 10:54 AM   #49
PornMD
Mainstream Businessman
 
PornMD's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 9,291
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackmonsters
You might have a point about the supreme court.
I mean, it's made up of old motherfuckers who can't use a laptop.
Quote:
Originally Posted by gideongallery View Post
cool the double bet is accepted

here is the proof that your wrong
Funny, you have all this comprehension about law and court cases to try and justify your "time shifting" but you have no comprehension of how bets are accepted or proper use of the word "your".
__________________
Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.
PornMD is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2012, 11:03 AM   #50
slapass
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Earth
Posts: 14,627
It is theft.
slapass is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.