Tube Uploads

[dgraves]

i've been finding a lot of my gloryhole videos on various tube sites with the watermark removed.

would a so called "user" really take the time to re-encode the video just to cut out the watermark?

[CurrentlySober]

Originally Posted by dgraves

i've been finding a lot of my gloryhole videos on various tube sites with the watermark removed.

would a so called "user" really take the time to re-encode the video just to cut out the watermark?

No, the tube itself, would take the time to use 'Built in' tech software, to do it on behalf of the 'user'...

[V_RocKs]

Some users will because they know it won't get accepted with one.

[dgraves]

the scum just keep getting scummier! it's bad enough to steal you shit and post it on a tube but to make sure you don't get any credit or traffic from it really spools me up.

[seeandsee]

he is one good user , in terms of tube site owners )

[The Ghost]

You mean cropped? Some tubes mask part of the video to "hide" the watermark. Fight this by watermarking in each corner of the vid for a 1/4th of the vid

[Fletch XXX]

Nah never happen tubes are our friends

[BIGTYMER]

I like when they put their URL over your watermark.

[DWB]

dgraves, check your ICQ.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by dgraves

the scum just keep getting scummier! it's bad enough to steal you shit and post it on a tube but to make sure you don't get any credit or traffic from it really spools me up.

maybe you should have made the argument that the exist of the watermark proves that the content is infringing then.

You created a situation where tube sites decided to not accept videos with watermarks

which in turn caused users to remove them so that they could upload them.

[porno jew]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

maybe you should have made the argument that the exist of the watermark proves that the content is infringing then.

You created a situation where tube sites decided to not accept videos with watermarks

which in turn caused users to remove them so that they could upload them.

fuck are you delusional. that's is not even remotely why they remove watermarks.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by porno jew

fuck are you delusional. that's is not even remotely why they remove watermarks.

so explain it then

why do the end users remove the watermark.

[Sly]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

maybe you should have made the argument that the exist of the watermark proves that the content is infringing then.

You created a situation where tube sites decided to not accept videos with watermarks

which in turn caused users to remove them so that they could upload them.

I lock my doors every night in hopes of a break-in. I can't wait for someone to steal my TV.

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by Sly

I lock my doors every night in hopes of a break-in. I can't wait for someone to steal my TV.

difference is that since fair use existed, a watermark is NOT proof of infringement.

It was as valid as saying your guilty of theft because the sky is blue.

[dgraves]

moving the watermark around from corner to corner sounds like a good idea.

i've found a few uploads that put a black box over my watermark and put theirs in it's place. i contacted the owner of the site about it and he said he didn't do it. of course he didn't, why would he ever want to do something like that?

maybe i need to put the watermark right around the gloryhole itself!

[gideongallery]

Originally Posted by dgraves

moving the watermark around from corner to corner sounds like a good idea.

i've found a few uploads that put a black box over my watermark and put theirs in it's place. i contacted the owner of the site about it and he said he didn't do it. of course he didn't, why would he ever want to do something like that?

maybe i need to put the watermark right around the gloryhole itself!

seriously take a course on product placement

specifically on signage placement

if your understanding of that is so limited that this is the best you can think off you really need training.

[The Porn Nerd]

Here's why they remove the watermark:
Videos WITHOUT watermarks get more views. More views = more $$$ for the tubes. Yes people, tubes make WAY more from selling their ad space than they do from any Content Partner Program. The CCP is just there for if/when their surfer leaves the tube site (they might as well try and get some $ out of it).
Deal with it and prosper.
Carry on.

[dgraves]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

seriously take a course on product placement

specifically on signage placement

if your understanding of that is so limited that this is the best you can think off you really need training.

i know the thought of any kind of signage probably pisses someone like you off because it's making theft harder for you but out of curiosity, what would you recommend?

putting the watermark on the shaft of their cocks is pretty creative!

[dgraves]

Originally Posted by MisterPeabody

Here's why they remove the watermark:
Videos WITHOUT watermarks get more views. More views = more $$$ for the tubes. Yes people, tubes make WAY more from selling their ad space than they do from any Content Partner Program. The CCP is just there for if/when their surfer leaves the tube site (they might as well try and get some $ out of it).
Deal with it and prosper.
Carry on.

where did you get this data from?

[DWB]

Originally Posted by dgraves

moving the watermark around from corner to corner sounds like a good idea.

Yep. You can outsmart them. Bottom feeders always take the easy road. Make it more work than it's worth and they'll find another video to remove the watermarks on. And the Filipinos that many tube sites are paying to do this, are generally lazy, so they will skip you without question if you make them actually have to work for something. They just want to batch process everything, and if you foil that, you're 10 steps ahead.

[porno jew]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

so explain it then

why do the end users remove the watermark.

explained in this thread, kook.

[papill0n]

Originally Posted by gideongallery

difference is that since fair use existed, a watermark is NOT proof of infringement.

It was as valid as saying your guilty of theft because the sky is blue.

no you stupid piece of dog shit

the sky doesnt have your name on it

see the difference there idiot ?

[dgraves]

Originally Posted by DWB

Yep. You can outsmart them. Bottom feeders always take the easy road. Make it more work than it's worth and they'll find another video to remove the watermarks on. And the Filipinos that many tube sites are paying to do this, are generally lazy, so they will skip you without question if you make them actually have to work for something. They just want to batch process everything, and if you foil that, you're 10 steps ahead.

thanks for the tips earlier man.