2257..... let me get this straight.... - GoFuckYourself.com

Tat2Jr · 06-01-2012, 09:13 PM

After the rulings on 2257 a few years ago (that made us all secondary producers) let me ask some questions...

Being in the USA I've been operating under the assumption that I can never have a TGP, review site, or tube site (that has preview pics or screen grabs) because I can't ever post another picture of someone's content on any of my sites because my 2257 officer doesn't have their 2257 info on that posted content (including non-2257 softcore thumbs that comes from a 2257 needed scene). Right?

That's how my lawyer read it to me at the time.... is that the jist of it or am I wrong?

Rochard · 06-01-2012, 09:32 PM

You signed up in 2001 and your asking this question NOW?

You can debate this one until your blue in the face. According to the letter of the law, by putting a picture or video on line you are in fact a "producer" and thus required to have 2257 information on all or any models used.

However, they've never gone after an affiliate, and just follow the trail back to the program and hit them up - which is rare.

2MuchMark · 06-01-2012, 09:34 PM

...if only they would go after tube sites.

StickyGreen · 06-01-2012, 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

You signed up in 2001 and your asking this question NOW?

His signup date is completely irrelevant you douche.....

And the word you were looking for in that sentence is "you're."

Tat2Jr · 06-01-2012, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rochard

You signed up in 2001 and your asking this question NOW?...

I have a 3rd party 2257 officer/lawyer. For the last few years (since 2257 was overhauled) I've just been on a self-imposed ban (actually a Federal imposed ban) on any picture posting of any kind that I didn't shoot myself or bought the content myself. I will continue that, but just wanted to hear what the word on the 'street' was on the issue.

xenigo · 06-01-2012, 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tat2Jr

I have a 3rd party 2257 officer/lawyer. For the last few years (since 2257 was overhauled) I've just been on a self-imposed ban (actually a Federal imposed ban) on any picture posting of any kind that I didn't shoot myself or bought the content myself. I will continue that, but just wanted to hear what the word on the 'street' was on the issue.

This is still technically correct, but in reality I believe people are going by court cases in which people are actually prosecuted. That establishes the prescient for existing laws. I think what you're seeing now is people pushing the boundaries beyond what the laws technically specify, and watching and waiting to see how the Obama administration responds.

Paul Markham · 06-02-2012, 12:32 AM

Contact this guy http://www.xxxlaw.com/articles/begin.html

Rochard · 06-02-2012, 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by StickyGreen

His signup date is completely irrelevant you douche.....

Sorry. I just ASSumed that being as he had signed up nearly ten fucking years ago he would know a little bit more than Paul Markham.

Rochard · 06-02-2012, 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tat2Jr

....self-imposed ban (actually a Federal imposed ban) ....

If you have ever had a "federal ban" or restriction on anything... You might want to reconsider being in this line of work.

Just saying.

Tat2Jr · 06-02-2012, 12:59 AM

How did a question about how other USA based webmasters were handling things for the last few years get so misconstrued so quickly? Oh yeah....forgot where i was, I've missed ya GFY!

onwebcam · 06-02-2012, 01:13 AM

If they have bigger guns than you do... You're kinda fucked. You can apply that to any scenario.

06-01-2012, 09:13 PM	#1
Tat2Jr Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Sunny California Posts: 4,882	2257..... let me get this straight.... After the rulings on 2257 a few years ago (that made us all secondary producers) let me ask some questions... Being in the USA I've been operating under the assumption that I can never have a TGP, review site, or tube site (that has preview pics or screen grabs) because I can't ever post another picture of someone's content on any of my sites because my 2257 officer doesn't have their 2257 info on that posted content (including non-2257 softcore thumbs that comes from a 2257 needed scene). Right? That's how my lawyer read it to me at the time.... is that the jist of it or am I wrong? __________________ NICHE MONEY >> Ass Worship • Panties • Solo Teen • Pantyhose Serving up exclusive fetish sites since 1997!

06-01-2012, 09:32 PM	#2
Rochard Jägermeister Test Pilot Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2001 Location: NORCAL Posts: 72,884	You signed up in 2001 and your asking this question NOW? You can debate this one until your blue in the face. According to the letter of the law, by putting a picture or video on line you are in fact a "producer" and thus required to have 2257 information on all or any models used. However, they've never gone after an affiliate, and just follow the trail back to the program and hit them up - which is rare. __________________ “The choice is no longer between right or left. The choice is between normal and crazy.” - Sarah Huckabee Sanders YNOT MAIL \| THE BEST ADULT MAILING SOLUTION

06-01-2012, 09:34 PM	#3
2MuchMark Videochat Solutions Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Canada Posts: 48,551	...if only they would go after tube sites. __________________ VideoChat Solutions \| Custom Software \| IT Support https://www.2much.net \| https://www.lcntech.com

06-02-2012, 12:32 AM	#7
Paul Markham Too old to care Industry Role: Join Date: Jun 2001 Location: On the sofa, watching TV or doing my jigsaws. Posts: 52,943	Contact this guy http://www.xxxlaw.com/articles/begin.html __________________ Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500. PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

06-02-2012, 12:59 AM	#10
Tat2Jr Confirmed User Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Sunny California Posts: 4,882	How did a question about how other USA based webmasters were handling things for the last few years get so misconstrued so quickly? Oh yeah....forgot where i was, I've missed ya GFY! __________________ NICHE MONEY >> Ass Worship • Panties • Solo Teen • Pantyhose Serving up exclusive fetish sites since 1997!

06-02-2012, 01:13 AM	#11
onwebcam Fake Nick 1.0 Industry Role: Join Date: Oct 2005 Location: Rent free, your head Posts: 27,652	If they have bigger guns than you do... You're kinda fucked. You can apply that to any scenario. __________________ PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF..... ██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.