If the government has no knowledge of aliens.....

[DVTimes]

If the government has no knowledge of aliens, then why does Title 14,Section
1211 of the Code of Federal Regulations, implemented on July 16 1969, make
it illegal for U.S. citizens to have any contact with extraterrestrials or
their vehicles?

[crockett]

Because ET is bad ok?

[seeandsee]

because they want their technology locked deep in the some military base

[tical]

http://www.snopes.com/legal/et.asp

[AdultPornMasta]

Originally Posted by DVTimes

If the government has no knowledge of aliens, then why does Title 14,Section
1211 of the Code of Federal Regulations, implemented on July 16 1969, make
it illegal for U.S. citizens to have any contact with extraterrestrials or
their vehicles?

Fail.

Total bullshit:

http://www.snopes.com/legal/et.asp

http://67.19.222.106/legal/graphics/et.jpg

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread60038/pg1

http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/a/aliens.htm

"Summary of eRumor:

This message says that a law already passed by Congress makes it illegal to have contact with a space alien and establishes penalties for anybody who does. It specifies Title 14, Section 1211 of the Code of Federal Regulations."

"First, the section of the Code of Federal Regulations that it is referring to is Title 14, Chapter V, Section 1211. Title 14 is the part of the code dealing with aviation and space and sections 1211 through 1299 specifically regulate the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).

Section 1211 was added in 1969 when the U.S. would be bringing a space vehicle and astronauts back to earth from a mission to the moon. The section was designed to protect the earth from any contamination that may have been picked up during the trip and did not specifically describe contact with alien beings or UFO's. The wording from Section 1211 part 100 says, " NASA policy, responsibility and authority to guard the Earth against any
harmful contamination or adverse changes in its environment resulting from personnel, spacecraft and other property returning to the [earth] after landing on or coming within the atmospheric envelope of a celestial body..." There is no mention of alien beings or vehicles.

Section 1211 was taken out of the Code of Federal Regulations in 1991. An announcement in the 1991 code says that the section was removed "...since it has served its purpose and is no longer in keeping with current policy."

A complete reading of the regulation makes it clear that it applied to any manned or unmanned space mission that lands or comes within the "atmospheric envelope of a celestial body." That would apply to anyone who has been into space, not all American citizens. It didn't prohibit contact with extraterrestrials. It merely specified what regulations would affect a mission's return to earth to protect us from space contamination."

For the treatment that you desperately need, DVTimes, go here:

http://zapatopi.net/afdb/

[Phoenix]

damn it!!!!

[JFK]

Originally Posted by Phoenix

damn it!!!!

yeah, wanted to take their vehicle for a spin around the block

[Best-In-BC]

Originally Posted by seeandsee

because they want their technology locked deep in the some military base

Bingo

[DWB]

Originally Posted by tical

http://www.snopes.com/legal/et.asp

I don't think Snopes is wrong, but I find it absolutely hilarious that people will use one website to prove another one wrong. For all we know, Snopes could be the biggest lying website on the entire internet, but they claim they root out the facts so everyone believes them.

[Tom_PM]

Originally Posted by DWB

I don't think Snopes is wrong, but I find it absolutely hilarious that people will use one website to prove another one wrong. For all we know, Snopes could be the biggest lying website on the entire internet, but they claim they root out the facts so everyone believes them.

No way, gfy.com does that.

[baddog]

Originally Posted by JohnnyClips

Anyone who can't see the extra-terrestrial effect on our society is either blind or 100% propagandized. The proof and evidence is BEYOND overwhelming.

He has a point; it does not seem feasible that Johnny could have turned out this way on his own.

I am a believer.