![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||||
Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. |
![]() ![]() |
|
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed. |
|
Thread Tools |
![]() |
#1 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: tits
Posts: 2,751
|
what nats programs do not pay on initial revshare sign ups
i want to know of all the nats programs who do not pay out on initial rev shave sign ups those who only pay out on the re bills and not the first rev share sign up
i know of 1 program who does this Caribbean Flavor Cash nats.caribbeanflaver.com |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: tits
Posts: 2,751
|
bump***********
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,539
|
@babeterminal... that's a certainly a serious accusation. I could be wrong, but I think if CFC are doing that, it might even be a violation of NATS' own terms of use, and they could possibly lose their license. In any case, that's a pretty low tactic for anyone to be doing.
I'm curious as well to see who else is not paying out on initial sales and initial revshare payouts.
__________________
NSFW |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Confirmed Chicago Pimp
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,100
|
Quote:
https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1081...+Flavo r+Cash then they said they are now paying for joins after the spotlight was on them... https://gfy.com/showthread.php?t=1082...+Flavo r+Cash |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,539
|
ErectMedia... interesting. I would have placed that in the "shaving" category. I always thought it was against NATS' policy to allow their software to be used in such a fashion. I would certainly consider hiding joins as deceptive. Interesting, thanks for the link.
(Shows you how much I pay attention here... this is the first I had heard of it) ETA: after reading the referenced thread, I better understand. While not shaving, it can certainly create confusion around the program's integrity.
__________________
NSFW |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#6 | |
Confirmed Chicago Pimp
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,100
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Confirmed User
Industry Role:
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: tits
Posts: 2,751
|
i dont think may people know this can happen and am not sure it is easy to spot even in tos
i have one program showing 95,000 uniques in 2012 and not a single sign up i can not believe that and others with 200k plus with very little sign ups |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Confirmed Chicago Pimp
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 7,100
|
Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |