Welcome to the GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Post New Thread Reply

Register GFY Rules Calendar Mark Forums Read
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >
Discuss what's fucking going on, and which programs are best and worst. One-time "program" announcements from "established" webmasters are allowed.

 
Thread Tools
Old 05-03-2013, 06:39 PM   #1
kadudu
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 220
SD video - better to be 4:3 or 16:9 ?

I know HD video is usually in 16:9 but what about SD video? I read that nowadays most SD footage is being shown in 16:9 on televisions rather than 4:3, but for optimal viewing on a computer monitor is it better for SD vids to be in 4:3 or 16:9?

Thanks.
kadudu is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2013, 06:47 PM   #2
bronco67
Too lazy to set a custom title
 
bronco67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 29,035
SD resolution video by its nature is 4:3.

The only way to make it fit a windescreen viewing device would be to letterbox it (chop the top and bottom) then upscale it...which looks like ass.
__________________

Last edited by bronco67; 05-03-2013 at 06:49 PM..
bronco67 is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2013, 06:59 PM   #3
kadudu
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 220
Quote:
Originally Posted by bronco67 View Post
SD resolution video by its nature is 4:3.

The only way to make it fit a windescreen viewing device would be to letterbox it (chop the top and bottom) then upscale it...which looks like ass.
Ah. I've got some 4:3 native footage that I'm editing right now, and if I choose the fullscreen (16:9) option it makes the image wide to where there's no black bars on top and bottom but black bars on the sides. So I should leave it in 4:3 and not attempt to make it widescreen? I was told that 4:3 looks like crap on devices like ipad.
kadudu is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2013, 10:13 PM   #4
2MuchMark
Videochat Solutions
 
2MuchMark's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 48,573
Quote:
Originally Posted by kadudu View Post
I know HD video is usually in 16:9 but what about SD video? I read that nowadays most SD footage is being shown in 16:9 on televisions rather than 4:3, but for optimal viewing on a computer monitor is it better for SD vids to be in 4:3 or 16:9?

Thanks.
They are unrelated.

4:3 and 16:9 are aspect ratios (width:height). SD and HD refers to the resolution, lines or pixels. You can still have High Definition video in 4:3, though its not popular.

Saying "most SD footage is being shown in 16:9 on televisions rather than 4:3" is not accurate because you're kind of mixing apples and oranges.

Different TV shows for example are presented in different ways. For example: 4:3 content can be "stretched" to 16:9 but it looks awful, making people look short and fat.

Some news channels have a cool trick. They show 4:3 video of a news report, and add a kind of stretched background to fill up the remaining space, made up of a blurred version of the original content. Kind of a smart trick.

The best are TV shows such as Seinfeld and Star Trek TOS. Both TV shows were originally shot on film, in 16:9, but "framed" for 4:3. Today they are shown in spectacular HD and 16:9 format because they took the original film, re-framed it without having to zoom in to fill the space except for a few rare occasions.
__________________

VideoChat Solutions | Custom Software | IT Support
https://www.2much.net | https://www.lcntech.com
2MuchMark is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2013, 10:48 PM   #5
kadudu
Confirmed User
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 220
Quote:
Originally Posted by ********** View Post
They are unrelated.

4:3 and 16:9 are aspect ratios (width:height). SD and HD refers to the resolution, lines or pixels. You can still have High Definition video in 4:3, though its not popular.

Saying "most SD footage is being shown in 16:9 on televisions rather than 4:3" is not accurate because you're kind of mixing apples and oranges.

Different TV shows for example are presented in different ways. For example: 4:3 content can be "stretched" to 16:9 but it looks awful, making people look short and fat.

Some news channels have a cool trick. They show 4:3 video of a news report, and add a kind of stretched background to fill up the remaining space, made up of a blurred version of the original content. Kind of a smart trick.

The best are TV shows such as Seinfeld and Star Trek TOS. Both TV shows were originally shot on film, in 16:9, but "framed" for 4:3. Today they are shown in spectacular HD and 16:9 format because they took the original film, re-framed it without having to zoom in to fill the space except for a few rare occasions.

I understand now, thanks for your thorough explanation.
kadudu is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote
Post New Thread Reply
Go Back   GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum > >

Bookmarks
Thread Tools



Advertising inquiries - marketing at gfy dot com

Contact Admin - Advertise - GFY Rules - Top

©2000-, AI Media Network Inc



Powered by vBulletin
Copyright © 2000- Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.