Stanley Kubrick, The Shining and the Moon Landing Hoax - Page 2 - GoFuckYourself.com

dyna mo · 05-14-2013, 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

Huh? The Soviets have moon rocks too, genius. Even your own image says so. I guess you think that means they put men on the moon too but chose to keep quiet about it.

Seriously, you "man on the moon" loons are so far gone it's not true. You will grasp at anything, however tenuous, to try and 'prove' your crazy beliefs, even Youtube weirdos in funny hats. Get help.

But please, do carry on with the one about how NASA could get men on the moon multiple times, 40+ years ago (but never since), film those men on the moon, and return those men back to Earth safely... but they were completely stumped at how to simulate slow motion video/film.

Because that one is totally fucking hilarious.

huh what? it states right on the graphic the soviets gathered moon rocks.

think more for yourself. regurgitate less.

dyna mo · 05-14-2013, 12:12 PM

it's so funny how your sort tries to troll, you completely fail to realize google is a click away, check it out once or twice for yourself,

you might find you will learn something about moon rocks.

_Richard_ · 05-14-2013, 12:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

well, that certainly proves they faked apollo 11 but what about the other 5 lunar landings? were the scenes with the apollo 12, 13, 14 ,15, 16 sweaters and corresponding room #s cut from the shining or maybe they are in the director's cut?

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

i believe that connection is cleverly revealed in "eyes wide shut". it's super cool how they also included these reveals in mainstream movies, just to fuck with us.

it's also pretty impressive that they faked 11+ hours of televised coverage of the first landing with film tech that wasn't even available then.

nothing our government can't accomplish! well, except for going to the moon, of course, duh!

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

i was more focused on counting.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

it seems the clip is from this documentary:::::::

After the box office failure of Barry Lyndon, Stanley Kubrick decided to embark on a project that might have more commercial appeal. The Shining, Stephen King's biggest critical and commercial success yet, seemed like a perfect vehicle. After an arduous production, Kubrick's film received a wide release in the summer of 1980; the reviews were mixed, but the box office, after a slow start, eventually picked up. End of story? Hardly. In the 30 years since the film's release, a considerable cult of Shining devotees has emerged, fans who claim to have decoded the film's secret messages addressing everything from the genocide of Native Americans to a range of government conspiracies. Rodney Ascher's wry and provocative Room 237 fuses fact and fiction through interviews with cultists and scholars, creating a kaleidoscopic deconstruction of Kubrick's still-controversial classic.

it appears the clip is taken out of context as the documentary is an exploration into how people see the same thing differently, using the movie as a platform.

i might have to check itout!

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

it took an entire nation focused for years to get to the moon, themoon budget took 5% of the entire budget national budget. it was all combined with the race against our nuclear enemy. it was THE goal the government focused the nation on. it was the entire basis around "ask not what your country can do for you but you can do for your country".

spend that mount of resources and government speeches on film tech and they could shoot 11 hours of ~7 second delayed fake moon television shit in 1969.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

mission speech:

astronauts, you have been chosen to go on a dangerous mission, your years of training will not be needed. please report on time to the film studio tomorrow morning, 0500, for your first meeting with the movie director and script read-throughs.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

where'd you come up with this?

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

he's confused, the tech to video record the lunar landings was nothing special. broacasting it to various links around the globe that rebroadcast it on tele was also nothing special.

what would have been special are slow motion cams, amongst other tech.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_TV_camera

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

the ct's can't account for moon rocks either

moon rocks + lack of video tech

you cter's got some splainin to do!

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

smoking gun!

would kubrick ever shoot handheld? i don't think so, he's a 35mm guy!

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

huh what? it states right on the graphic the soviets gathered moon rocks.

think more for yourself. regurgitate less.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

it's so funny how your sort tries to troll, you completely fail to realize google is a click away, check it out once or twice for yourself,

you might find you will learn something about moon rocks.

troll what now?

dyna mo · 05-14-2013, 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_

troll what now?

learn to read, richard, i said

Quote:

how your sort tries to troll

helterskelter808 · 05-14-2013, 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

huh what? it states right on the graphic the soviets gathered moon rocks.

That's what I said in my post, you pothead. Learn to read a post before replying to it. The very fact that your own fucking image states that the Russians collected moon rocks destroys your argument that moon rocks somehow prove men landed on the moon. And if that's not the point you were trying to make, God knows what you were dribbling about.

_Richard_ · 05-14-2013, 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

learn to read, richard, i said

which, is hilarious, after 13 responses in just this one thread..

dyna mo · 05-14-2013, 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

That's what I said in my post, you pothead. Learn to read a post before replying to it. The very fact that your own fucking image states that the Russians collected moon rocks destroys your argument that moon rocks somehow prove men landed on the moon. And if that's not the point you were trying to make, God knows what you were dribbling about.

i see. perhaps one day you will understand how many pounds of moon rocks we brought back and do the math on your own.

dyna mo · 05-14-2013, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by _Richard_

which, is hilarious, after 13 responses in just this one thread..

you still can't figure it out. that's precious!

dyna mo · 05-14-2013, 12:36 PM

the entire moon rock part of the mission is a good read, fun facts, etc. all of the studying.

dyna mo · 05-14-2013, 12:37 PM

several of the rocks are too big to have fit on the soviet luna.

helterskelter808 · 05-14-2013, 12:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

i see. perhaps one day you will understand how many pounds of moon rocks we brought back and do the math on your own.

Who is denying that our robots brought back more samples than the Russian robots?

dyna mo · 05-14-2013, 12:42 PM

since the ussr GAVE us all their moon rocks, during the fucking space race/cold war, several 100 pounds of their moon rocks can be found at http://curator.jsc.nasa.gov/lunar/lun-fac.cfm

i guess we're holding them for them

dyna mo · 05-14-2013, 12:46 PM

i like this part best-

During the six Apollo surface excursions, 2,415 samples weighing 382 kg (842 lb) were collected, the majority by Apollo 15, 16, and 17. The three Luna spacecraft returned with an additional 0.32 kg (0.7 lb) of samples.

yeah, those ussr rocks account for 1100x their weight huh

MiLo · 05-14-2013, 12:52 PM

helterskelter808 · 05-14-2013, 01:03 PM

Dyna mo I admit I haven't just spent the past hour Googling moon rocks, like you have. What point are you trying to make here, if any?

dyna mo · 05-14-2013, 01:08 PM

i'm a nasa buff, my pops was one of those guys with a slide rule that got us there, he got me hooked on it all,

like 500 million others, i watched walter cronkite and the apollo 11 live.

i've got original photos, models, some other bits of nasa nostalgia passed down to me from my pops too.

it's a fun subject to dialogue about for me, regardless of who the dialogue is with.

_Richard_ · 05-14-2013, 01:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MiLo

helterskelter808 · 05-14-2013, 02:34 PM

Bottom line:

There has never been a valid explanation why we could land men on the moon every few months over 40 years ago, and have every single astronaut return safely, something NASA is incapable of even in the 21st century, yet we have not even attempted to do it since.

Lack of interest in the moon? So that's why NASA sent up the LRO? Lack of money? NASA's budget 40 years ago was pretty much what it is today. No reason to go back? Yet there's reason to send a robot to a dead, uninhabitable planet 30+ million miles away?

The reason no country has ever even attempted to land men on the moon in the last 40 years, including the one country that claims to already have the technology to do it, is that it is not possible. Not today, and certainly not in 1969.

CaptainHowdy · 05-14-2013, 02:36 PM

dyna mo · 05-14-2013, 02:41 PM

we didn't go the first time because we didn't go a 2nd time, yeah that makes sense.

Sly · 05-14-2013, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

we didn't go the first time because we didn't go a 2nd time, yeah that makes sense.

You love these threads, are you bored at home all day? LOL.

dyna mo · 05-14-2013, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

You love these threads, are you bored at home all day? LOL.

what level of participation is ok with you?

_Richard_ · 05-14-2013, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

what level of participation is ok with you?

see how mobs work?

Sly · 05-14-2013, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

what level of participation is ok with you?

Don't shoot, I'm a friendly.

PornoStar69 · 05-14-2013, 02:47 PM

40 min doc on Youtube by RobAger he BREAKS DOWN Clockwork Orange - posted several weeks ago.

Its something you have to see

watch carefully

dyna mo · 05-14-2013, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sly

Don't shoot, I'm a friendly.

perhaps i misunderstood your bored comment then, but i am splitting time between editing & processing then uploading a photoset and shooting the shit here at gfy since i'm sitting at my computer. i can't look at porn all day. used to, can't anymore.

these sorts of topics have been a hobby for me, i like the subject and learning more about it all. i like to have dialogue about that as well. sometimes that dialogue is with peeps that don't see things the way i see them, no biggie. i can talk about that too.

96ukssob · 05-14-2013, 03:10 PM

I just called Stanely Kubrick. He said he did this intentionally to fuck with you mental midgets

dyna mo · 05-14-2013, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bossku69

I just called Stanely Kubrick. He said he did this intentionally to fuck with you mental midgets

someone should make a movie about this, the angle would be from absolute seriousness, stanley kubrick hired by nasa to direct neil armstrong and astronauts in a lunar landing spoof.

fuck, i would camp out to see that shit the first weekend!

helterskelter808 · 05-14-2013, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dyna mo

we didn't go the first time because we didn't go a 2nd time, yeah that makes sense.

We did go a second time (if you believe we went the first time). And a 3rd and a 4th and a 5th and a 6th.

We did it every few months under Nixon, no problem, with relatively backward technology (so backward we apparently couldn't even do slow motion effects).

And yet zero times under any other President, with far more advanced technology at their disposal. More advanced technology that just ten years ago couldn't even lift astronauts a few hundred miles above Earth and back safely, let alone the moon.

Yeah, that makes sense.

dyna mo · 05-14-2013, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

We did go a second time (if you believe we went the first time). And a 3rd and a 4th and a 5th and a 6th.

We did it every few months under Nixon, no problem, with relatively backward technology (so backward we apparently couldn't even do slow motion effects).

And yet zero times under any other President, with far more advanced technology at their disposal. More advanced technology that couldn't even even always lift astronauts a few hundred miles above Earth and back safely, let alone the moon.

Yeah, that makes sense.

2nd time = 2nd effort.

helterskelter808 · 05-14-2013, 03:23 PM

I've given my reason why we haven't gone back -> because it's impossible. What's yours?

dyna mo · 05-14-2013, 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by helterskelter808

We did it every few months under Nixon, no problem, with relatively backward technology (so backward we apparently couldn't even do slow motion effects).

And yet zero times under any other President, with far more advanced technology at their disposal. More advanced technology that just ten years ago couldn't even lift astronauts a few hundred miles above Earth and back safely, let alone the moon.

Yeah, that makes sense.

things changed, you know that. we made the goal. hoorah. mission ACCOMPLISHED.

in the meantime, while we were landing on the moon, we were also bombing cambodia. there was a gas shortage, etc........hello new world. priorities changed, spending 5% of the budget on going to the moon just to take pictures of going to the moon was no longer a priority.

wehateporn · 05-14-2013, 05:03 PM

wehateporn · 05-14-2013, 05:34 PM

I wonder what this hacker found that makes him such a wanted man, some of what he says is surreal

lucas131 · 05-14-2013, 05:52 PM

here is johny!

05-14-2013, 12:52 PM	#64
MiLo Confirmed User Industry Role: Join Date: May 2002 Location: city of the living dead Posts: 2,970	__________________ ICQ: 9203112

05-14-2013, 02:36 PM	#69
CaptainHowdy Too lazy to set a custom title Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Happy in the dark. Posts: 92,995	__________________ FLASH SALE INSANITY! deal with a 100% Trusted Seller Buy Traffic Spots on a High-Quality Network 1 Year or Lifetime — That’s Right, Until the Internet Explodes!

05-14-2013, 02:47 PM	#75
PornoStar69 Confirmed User Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: xxweekxx mothers bed. Posts: 2,017	40 min doc on Youtube by RobAger he BREAKS DOWN Clockwork Orange - posted several weeks ago. Its something you have to see watch carefully __________________ GFY King?

05-14-2013, 03:10 PM	#77
96ukssob So Fucking Banananananas Industry Role: Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: If I was in your ass you'd know it Posts: 12,991	I just called Stanely Kubrick. He said he did this intentionally to fuck with you mental midgets __________________ Email: Clicky on Me

05-14-2013, 05:03 PM	#83
wehateporn Promoting Debate on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 27,173	__________________ Sexy Girls Teasing

05-14-2013, 12:12 PM	#52
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 63,905	it's so funny how your sort tries to troll, you completely fail to realize google is a click away, check it out once or twice for yourself, you might find you will learn something about moon rocks.

05-14-2013, 12:36 PM	#59
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 63,905	the entire moon rock part of the mission is a good read, fun facts, etc. all of the studying.

05-14-2013, 12:37 PM	#60
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 63,905	several of the rocks are too big to have fit on the soviet luna.

05-14-2013, 12:42 PM	#62
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 63,905	since the ussr GAVE us all their moon rocks, during the fucking space race/cold war, several 100 pounds of their moon rocks can be found at http://curator.jsc.nasa.gov/lunar/lun-fac.cfm i guess we're holding them for them

05-14-2013, 12:46 PM	#63
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 63,905	i like this part best- During the six Apollo surface excursions, 2,415 samples weighing 382 kg (842 lb) were collected, the majority by Apollo 15, 16, and 17. The three Luna spacecraft returned with an additional 0.32 kg (0.7 lb) of samples. yeah, those ussr rocks account for 1100x their weight huh

05-14-2013, 01:03 PM	#65
helterskelter808 So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 3,405	Dyna mo I admit I haven't just spent the past hour Googling moon rocks, like you have. What point are you trying to make here, if any?

05-14-2013, 01:08 PM	#66
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 63,905	i'm a nasa buff, my pops was one of those guys with a slide rule that got us there, he got me hooked on it all, like 500 million others, i watched walter cronkite and the apollo 11 live. i've got original photos, models, some other bits of nasa nostalgia passed down to me from my pops too. it's a fun subject to dialogue about for me, regardless of who the dialogue is with.

05-14-2013, 02:34 PM	#68
helterskelter808 So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 3,405	Bottom line: There has never been a valid explanation why we could land men on the moon every few months over 40 years ago, and have every single astronaut return safely, something NASA is incapable of even in the 21st century, yet we have not even attempted to do it since. Lack of interest in the moon? So that's why NASA sent up the LRO? Lack of money? NASA's budget 40 years ago was pretty much what it is today. No reason to go back? Yet there's reason to send a robot to a dead, uninhabitable planet 30+ million miles away? The reason no country has ever even attempted to land men on the moon in the last 40 years, including the one country that claims to already have the technology to do it, is that it is not possible. Not today, and certainly not in 1969.

05-14-2013, 02:41 PM	#70
dyna mo The People's Post Industry Role: Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: invisible 7-11 Posts: 63,905	we didn't go the first time because we didn't go a 2nd time, yeah that makes sense.

05-14-2013, 03:23 PM	#81
helterskelter808 So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 3,405	I've given my reason why we haven't gone back -> because it's impossible. What's yours?

05-14-2013, 05:34 PM	#84
wehateporn Promoting Debate on GFY Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 27,173	I wonder what this hacker found that makes him such a wanted man, some of what he says is surreal __________________ Sexy Girls Teasing

05-14-2013, 05:52 PM	#85
lucas131 ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Industry Role: Join Date: Aug 2004 Posts: 11,475	here is johny!